国审品种‘苏植1号’杂交结缕草抗旱性初步评价与分析

doi:10.11686/cyxb2015356

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以‘苏植1号’杂交结缕草为研究对象,‘兰引3号’结缕草为对照品种,采用沙培试验控水处理,根据叶片萎蔫度、叶片相对含水量、根系电解质外渗率和土壤含水量4个指标对‘苏植1号’的抗旱性进行了初步评价,同时分析了两个品种的根系生长特性(根系干重、比根长)和干旱胁迫下最大光化学量子产量(F_v/F_m)的变化特点。结果表明,干旱胁迫过程中,两个品种的叶片萎蔫度逐渐增大,土壤含水量逐渐下降,不同品种的变化趋势相似,胁迫结束时,两个品种的叶片萎蔫度、叶片相对含水量、根系电解质外渗率和土壤含水量均无显著差异,说明‘苏植1号’整体抗旱表现与‘兰引3号’近似。同时,相对于‘兰引3号’而言,虽然‘苏植1号’的根系干重显著较小,但是较大的比根长和干旱胁迫中期较高的F_v/F_m值很可能使‘苏植1号’在一定程度上抵消了较小的根系生物量所带来的不利影响,是其重要的抗旱机制。总体来看,‘苏植1号’与‘兰引3号’抗旱性相当,但两者具有不同的抗旱途径。

Abstract: An experiment was carried out to evaluate the drought resistance of hybrid zoysiagrass ‘Suzhi No.1’, compared with Zoysia japonica ‘Lanyin No.3’ as the control. Plant materials were cultured in sand in PVC tubes in a greenhouse and drought treatments were implemented by withholding water. Leaf wilting (LW), leaf relative water content (RWC), root electrolyte leakage (REL), soil water content (SWC), root growth characteristics including root dry weight (RDW) and specific root length (SRL), as well as maximum quantum yield of PSⅡ (F_v/F_m) were measured under drought stress. The drought resistance of ‘Suzhi No.1’ was initially evaluated based on LW, RWC, REL and SWC. Both cultivars showed gradual increases in LW, exhibiting slight wilting on the 12th day of drought stress, moderate wilting on the 29th day and severe wilting after 40 days. SWC values decreased gradually with both cultivars displaying similar trends during the stress period. Drought stress also caused significant declines in RWC and rises in REL. By the end of the treatment (40th day), no differences in LW, RWC, REL and SWC were found indicating that the performance of ‘Suzhi No.1’ was similar to ‘Lanyin No.3’ under drought stress. Although ‘Suzhi No.1’ had smaller RDW to ‘Lanyin No.3’, it also had larger SRL and could keep higher F_v/F_m values in the middle of the stress period, potentially an important drought resistance mechanism. With relatively denser roots and higher photochemical efficiency, it is probable that ‘Suzhi No.1’ was able to offset the adverse effects of smaller root biomass. In summary, ‘Suzhi No.1’ and ‘Lanyin No.3’ had similar drought resistance but with different resistant mechanisms.

汪毅, 郭海林, 陈静波, 宗俊勤, 李丹丹, 姜亦巍, 刘建秀. 国审品种‘苏植1号’杂交结缕草抗旱性初步评价与分析[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(5): 30-39.

WANG Yi, GUO Hai-Lin, CHEN Jing-Bo, ZONG Jun-Qin, LI Dan-Dan, JIANG Yi-Wei, LIU Jian-Xiu. Preliminary evaluation of drought resistance for the hybrid zoysiagrass ‘Suzhi No.1’[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(5): 30-39.

参考文献

[1] Zhang Z B, Xu P. Water and food security in China. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2008, 16(5): 1305-1310.
[2] Marcum K B, Engelke M C, Morton S J, et al . Rooting characteristics and associated drought resistance of zoysiagrasses. Agronomy Journal, 1995, 87: 534-538.
[3] Carrow R N. Drought resistance aspects of turfgrasses in the Southeast: root-shoot responses. Crop Science, 1996, 36(3): 687-694.
[4] Qian Y L, Fry J D. Irrigation frequency affects zoysiagrass rooting and plant water status. HortScience, 1996, 31(2): 234-237.
[5] Qian Y L, Fry J D. Water relations and drought tolerance of four turfgrasses. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 1997, 122(1): 129-133.
[6] White R H, Engelke M C, Anderson S J, et al . Zoysiagrass water relations. Crop Science, 2001, 41(1): 133-138.
[7] Li Y, Ling P P, Liu J X, et al . Morphology and distribution diversity of rhizome and adventitious root of Zoysia spp. in China. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2002, 11(2): 39-44.
[8] Lu S Y, Chen S P, Chen S M, et al . Responses of proline content and activity of antioxidant enzymes in warm-season turfgrasses to soil drought stress. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2003, 30(3): 303-306.
[9] Liu Z X, Zheng Q Y, Wang X. The form and conductance of leaves stoma for six turfgrasses. Pratacultural Science, 2005, 22(8): 71-75.
[10] Hu H G, Liu J X, Ma K Q, et al . Assessment of evapotranspiration on Zoysia spp. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2006, 14(3): 206-209, 222.
[11] Hu H G, Liu J X, Xuan J P, et al . Assessment of drought resistance of Zoysia . Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2007, 16(1): 47-51.
[12] Hu H G, Liu J X. Morphological mechanisms of drought resistance of Zoysia Willd. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2008, 16(1): 94-96.
[13] Li Z D, Li K H, He H R, et al . Preliminary study on drought resistance and water saving irrigation of 7 warm season turfgrasses in south China. Pratacultural Science, 2008, 25(11): 120-124.
[14] Yu X H, Zhang J M, Wang M Z, et al . Response and resistance of four turfgrasses of Zoysia Willd. to drought stress. Northern Horticulture, 2008, (5): 121-124.
[15] Zhao Y, Sun J X, Wang Z L. Evaluation on drought resistance of warm-season turfgrass varieties. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Agricultural Science), 2008, 26(3): 183-187.
[16] Wang Q, Sun J X, An Y. The effect of the population properties and stress-tolerance physiological characteristics of Zoysia grass under water stresses. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2009, 18(2): 33-38.
[17] Lv J, Liu W D, Wang L, et al . Study on drought resistance of four warm-season turfgrasses. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2010, 30(3): 100-104.
[18] Yu L, Liu Y H, Zhou L P, et al . A study on the changes of ascorbic acid and related physiological indexes in different cultivars of Zoysia under drought stress. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(4): 106-115.
[19] Hu H G, Zhang Z M, Ji F F, et al . Effects of rewatering on turf quality and physiological recovery of Zoysiagrass. Pratacultural Science, 2014, 31(6): 1058-1062.
[20] Hu H G, Zhang Z M, Ji F F, et al . Variation analysis of drought resistance of germplasm resources of Zoysia Willd. in Chinese main region. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(2): 224-228.
[21] Xie X C, Xie Y F, Zhang J M, et al . Study on drought resistance of three Zoysiagrasses under drought stress. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2014, (17): 38-41, 46.
[22] Hu H G, Zhang Z M, Ji F F, et al . Variation analysis of water use efficiency in Chinese germplasm of Zoysia Willd. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2015, 37(1): 45-50.
[23] Song H W, Liu Y, Cao R X, et al . A comparison of drought resistance of three zoysiagrasses and their new strains induced by 60 Co-γ radiation. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2015, 36(6): 55-61.
[24] Huang B R, Duncan R R, Carrow R N. Drought-resistance mechanisms of seven warm-season turfgrasses under surface soil drying: Ⅰ. Shoot response. Crop Science, 1997, 37(6): 1858-1863.
[25] Huang B R, Duncan R R, Carrow R N. Drought-resistance mechanisms of seven warm-season turfgrasses under surface soil drying: Ⅱ. root aspects. Crop Science, 1997, 37(6): 1863-1869.
[26] Abraham E M, Huang B R, Bonos S A, et al . Evaluation of drought resistance for Texas bluegrass, Kentucky bluegrass, and their hybrids. Crop Science, 2004, 44(5): 1746-1753.
[27] Zhou Y, Lambrides C J, Fukai S. Drought resistance of C 4 grasses under field conditions: genetic variation among a large number of bermudagrass ( Cynodon spp.) ecotypes collected from different climatic zones. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2013, 199(4): 253-263.
[28] Pirnajmedin F, Majidi M M, Gheysari M. Root and physiological characteristics associated with drought tolerance in Iranian tall fescue. Euphytica, 2015, 202(1): 141-155.
[29] Zhu H S, Wang B P, Dong X Y, et al . Effects of drought stress and rewatering on the growth and physiological characteristics of Shanxi wild Poa pratensis seedlings. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(7): 79-88.
[30] Zhang J M, Zhao M. A comparative study between turf-type Zoysia japonica cv. Lanyin 3 and Zoysia japonica . Pratacultural Science, 1996, 13(2): 47-50.
[31] Zhang X Z, Ervin E H, Evanylo G K, et al . Impact of biosolids on hormone metabolism in drought-stressed tall fescue. Crop Science, 2009, 49(5): 1893-1901.
[32] Luo N, Liu J X, Yu X Q, et al . Natural variation of drought response in Brachypodium distachyon . Physiologia Plantarum, 2011, 141(1): 19-29.
[33] Chai Q, Jin F, Merewitz E, et al . Growth and physiological traits associated with drought survival and post-drought recovery in perennial turfgrass species. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 2010, 135(2): 125-133.
[34] Sun J M, Meyer W, Cross J, et al . Growth and physiological traits of canopy and root systems associated with drought resistance in tall fescue. Crop Science, 2013, 53(2): 575-584.
[35] Huang B R, Fry J D. Root anatomical, physiological, and morphological responses to drought stress for tall fescue cultivars. Crop Science, 1998, 38(4): 1017-1022.
[36] Huang B R, DaCosta M, Jiang Y W. Research advances in mechanisms of turfgrass tolerance to abiotic stresses: from physiology to molecular biology. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 2014, 33(2-3): 141-189.
[37] Hays K L, Barber J F, Kenna M P, et al . Drought avoidance mechanisms of selected bermudagrass genotypes. HortScience, 1991, 26(2): 180-182.
[38] Huang B R, Fry J D. Turfgrass evapotranspiration. Journal of Crop Production, 1999, 2(2): 317-333.
[39] Huang B R, Gao H W. Root physiological characteristics associated with drought resistance in tall fescue cultivars. Crop Science, 2000, 40(1): 196-203.
[40] Wang Z L, Huang B R. Genotypic variation in abscisic acid accumulation, water relations, and gas exchange for Kentucky bluegrass exposed to drought stress. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 2003, 128(3): 349-355.
[41] Cathey S E, Kruse J K, Sinclair T R, et al . Transpiration and visual appearance of warm season turfgrasses during soil drying. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2013, 89: 36-43.
[42] Bian S M, Jiang Y W. Reactive oxygen species, antioxidant enzyme activities and gene expression patterns in leaves and roots of Kentucky bluegrass in response to drought stress and recovery. Scientia Horticulturae, 2009, 120(2): 264-270.
[43] Zhang X Y, He J G, Sun X H, et al . Transformation of Lolium perenne with a fructan: fructan 1-fructosyltransferase gene from Agropyron cristatum and enhancement of drought tolerance in transgenic plants. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(1): 111-118.
[44] Zhao Y, Du H M, Wang Z L, et al . Identification of proteins associated with water deficit in C 4 perennial grass species, Cynodon dactylon × Cynodon transvaalensis and Cynodon dactylon . Physiologia Plantarum, 2011, 140(1): 41-55.
[45] Merewitz E B, Du H M, Yu W J, et al . Elevated cytokinin content in ipt transgenic creeping bentgrass promotes drought tolerance through regulating metabolite accumulation. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2012, 63(3): 1315-1328.
[46] Yang Z M, Xu L X, Yu J J, et al . Changes in carbohydrate metabolism in two Kentucky bluegrass cultivars during drought stress and recovery. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 2013, 138(1): 24-30.
[47] Krause G H, Weis E. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 1991, 142: 313-349.
[48] cielniak J, Filek W, Biesaga-cielniak J. The effect of drought stress on chlorophyll fluorescence in Lolium-Festuca hybrids. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2006, 28(2): 149-158.
[49] Carmo-Silva A E, Soares A S, Marques da Silva J, et al . Photosynthetic responses of three C 4 grasses of different metabolic subtypes to water deficit. Functional Plant Biology, 2007, 34(3): 204-213.
[50] Xu C B, Li X M, Zhang L H. The effect of calcium chloride on growth, photosynthesis, and antioxidant responses of Zoysia japonica under drought conditions. Plos One, 2013, 8(7): e68214.
[1] 张正斌, 徐萍. 中国水资源和粮食安全问题探讨. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(5): 1305-1310.
[7] 李亚, 凌萍萍, 刘建秀, 等. 中国结缕草属植物( Zoysia spp.)地下部分分布和形态类型的多样性. 植物资源与环境学报, 2002, 11(2): 39-44.
[8] 卢少云, 陈斯平, 陈斯曼, 等. 三种暖季型草坪草在干旱条件下脯氨酸含量和抗氧化酶活性的变化. 园艺学报, 2003, 30(3): 303-306.
[9] 刘自学, 郑群英, 汪玺. 6种草坪草叶片的气孔特征与气孔传导力. 草业科学, 2005, 22(8): 71-75.
[10] 胡化广, 刘建秀, 马克群, 等. 结缕草属植物蒸散量评价. 草地学报, 2006, 14(3): 206-209, 222.
[11] 胡化广, 刘建秀, 宣继萍, 等. 结缕草属植物的抗旱性初步评价. 草业学报, 2007, 16(1): 47-51.
[12] 胡化广, 刘建秀. 结缕草属植物抗旱形态机理. 草地学报, 2008, 16(1): 94-96.
[13] 李志东, 黎可华, 何会蓉, 等. 华南地区7个暖季型草坪草种的抗旱性与灌溉节水的初步研究. 草业科学, 2008, 25(11): 120-124.
[14] 余晓华, 张巨明, 王明祖, 等. 四种结缕草属草坪草对土壤干旱胁迫的响应及抗旱性研究. 北方园艺, 2008, (5): 121-124.
[15] 赵艳, 孙吉雄, 王兆龙. 狗牙根和结缕草部分品种的抗旱性能评价. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2008, 26(3): 183-187.
[16] 王齐, 孙吉雄, 安渊. 水分胁迫对结缕草种群特征和生理特性的影响. 草业学报, 2009, 18(2): 33-38.
[17] 吕静, 刘卫东, 王丽, 等. 4种暖季型草坪草的抗旱性分析. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2010, 30(3): 100-104.
[18] 俞乐, 刘拥海, 周丽萍, 等. 干旱胁迫下结缕草叶片抗坏血酸与相关生理指标变化的品种差异研究. 草业学报, 2013, 22(4): 106-115.
[19] 胡化广, 张振铭, 季芳芳, 等. 复水处理对结缕草草坪质量和生理恢复的影响. 草业科学, 2014, 31(6): 1058-1062.
[20] 胡化广, 张振铭, 季芳芳, 等. 中国主要地区结缕草属植物种质资源抗旱性变异分析. 草地学报, 2014, 22(2): 224-228.
[21] 谢新春, 解彦峰, 张巨明, 等. 干旱胁迫下3种结缕草的抗旱性分析. 广东农业科学, 2014, (17): 38-41, 46.
[22] 胡化广, 张振铭, 季芳芳, 等. 中国结缕草属植物种质资源水分利用效率变异分析. 中国草地学报, 2015, 37(1): 45-50.
[23] 宋华伟, 刘颖, 曹荣祥, 等. 3种结缕草及其 60 Co-γ辐射诱变新品系抗旱性比较. 华南农业大学学报, 2015, 36(6): 55-61.
[29] 朱慧森, 王保平, 董晓燕, 等. 干旱及复水对山西野生草地早熟幼苗生长与生理特性的影响. 草业学报, 2015, 24(7): 79-88.
[30] 张巨明, 赵鸣. 兰引3号草坪型结缕草与日本结缕草的比较研究. 草业科学, 1996, 13(2): 47-50.
[43] 张小芸, 何近刚, 孙学辉, 等. 转果聚糖合成关键酶基因多年生黑麦草的获得及抗旱性的提高. 草业学报, 2011, 20(1): 111-118.