轮作对土壤养分、微生物活性及细菌群落结构的影响

doi:10.11686/cyxb2015002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 试验选择云南省具有代表性的烤烟-休闲-玉米(T-F-M)、烤烟-油菜-玉米(T-C-M)、烤烟-油菜-水稻(T-C-R)和烤烟-苕子-水稻(T-V-R)等4种轮作模式,通过测定土壤养分、酶活性及16S rDNA序列分析,研究了轮作对土壤养分、微生物活性及细菌群落结构的影响。结果表明,经过16年的不同轮作种植后,土壤pH值变化于6.2~7.1之间,有机质和有效氮、磷、钾提高或无显著变化,说明在高强度轮作种植条件下,辅以秸秆还田或冬季休闲均可保持或提高土壤肥力和生产力。土壤微生物量碳氮、蔗糖酶、脱氢酶、脲酶、磷酸酶和过氧化氢酶活性均以T-V-R最高,说明土壤生态环境改善,促进微生物繁衍,数量增加,活性增强。土壤细菌的16S rDNA读数依次为5395(T-F-M)、5864(T-C-M)、5528(T-C-R)和6614(T-V-R),分别代表885,973,969和987种(属)类的细菌,归属于变形菌、绿弯菌、放线菌、酸杆菌、拟杆菌等31个门,其中变形菌门的数量最多,占总量的24.69%~32.49%。此外,在4种轮作处理土壤中,前5种门类的细菌相同,15种优势菌株有6种(属)一样,均有较高的丰富度,但也因种植模式不同而变化,说明土壤是决定细菌组成的基本要素,种植模式可不同程度地改变它们的种群结构。从土壤有机质、有效养分、酶活性、微生物量碳氮、细菌种群结构和多样性等方面看,T-V-R 最佳,该种植模式具有潜在的推广应用价值。

Abstract: A 16-year field experiment has been carried out to investigate the influence of crop rotations on soil nutrients, microbial activities and bacterial community structures. The study includes 454 pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial 16S rDNA. The experiment investigated four crop rotation treatments: 1) flue-cured tobacco in summer, followed by winter fallowing and maize in summer (T-F-M); 2) flue-cured tobacco in summer, canola in winter and maize in summer (T-C-M); 3) flue-cured tobacco in summer, canola in winter and rice in summer (T-C-R); and 4) tobacco in summer, Vicia villosa in winter and rice in summer (T-V-R). After 16-years of crop rotation, soil pH had changed from 6.2 to 7.1. Compared with original soil levels, organic matter and available nutrients (such as nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium) either varied very little or significantly increased, suggesting the retention or growth of fertility under intensive rotations that return straw into soil and fallow during winter. There were higher microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen and enzyme activity (for example, sucrase, phosphatase, dehydrogenase, catalase and urease) in soils under the T-V-R treatment than in any of the other treatments. The readings of bacterial 16S rDNA sequences were 5395 for T-F-M soils, 5864 for T-C-M, 5528 for T-C-R and 6614 for T-V-R, representing 885, 973, 969 and 987 bacterial genera or species respectively, attributed to 31 phyla including Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria and Bacteroidetes. Proteobacteria were the largest group, accounting for 24.69%-32.49% of soil bacteria. 5 of the 31 bacterial phyla and 6 of the 15 predominant bacteria were found in all the treatments’ soils. It seems reasonable to suggest that crop rotation was a fundamental determinant of the abundance of soil bacterial components and community structures. Taking into account variations in organic matter, available nutrients, enzyme activities, microbial biomass, bacterial community structures and biodiversity, our experiment suggests that T-V-R could be the best rotation model to promote in the flue-tobacco cultivation areas of Yunnan province.

陈丹梅，陈晓明，梁永江，霍新建，张长华，段玉琪，杨宇虹，袁玲. 轮作对土壤养分、微生物活性及细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(12): 56-65.

CHEN Dan-Mei, CHEN Xiao-Ming, LIANG Yong-Jiang, HUO Xin-Jian, ZHANG Chang-Hua, DUAN Yu-Qi, YANG Yu-Hong, YUAN Ling. Influence of crop rotation on soil nutrients, microbial activities and bacterial community structures[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(12): 56-65.

参考文献

[1] Wang F, Li S G, Xu F H, et al . The research progress on mechanism of continuous cropping obstacle. Chinese Soil and Fertilizer, 2013, 5: 6-12.
[2] Yang J, Xie Y Z, Wu X D, et al . Stoichiometry characteristics of plant and soil in alfalfa grassland with different growing years. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(2): 340-345.
[3] Xin H Q, Xiao Z W, Yan J Z, et al . Effect of continuous cropping of maize on soil microbes and main soil nutrients. Pratacultural Science, 2011, 28(10): 1777-1780.
[4] Zhang X H, Zhao Y J. Research progress on watermelon allelopathy. China Vegetables, 2013, 24: 10-15.
[5] Jin Y, Yang Y H, Duan Y Q, et al . Effect of rotational cropping and continuous cropping on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Science, 2004, 17: 267-271.
[6] Wang Y Q. Study on rotation. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2010, 2: 108.
[7] Wang X H. Effect of different rotation systems on rice soil fertility. Tillage and Cultivation, 2003, 6: 9-10.
[8] Yang X T, Zhou C, Li J H, et al . Effect of cropping system on yield of strawberry and soil biological property under plastic greenhouse condition. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2010, 18(2): 312-315.
[9] Yu G B, Wu F Z, Zhou X G. Effects of rotations of cucumber with wheat and hairy vetch on soil micro-ecological environment. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2011, 48(1): 175-184.
[10] Kennedy A C, Smith K L. Soil microbial diversity and the sustainability of agricultural soils. Plant and Soil, 1995, 170: 75-86.
[11] Yan S P, Yang R H, Leng S J, et al . High-fluxed DNA sequencing technology and its application in agricultural science research. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(30): 171-176.
[12] Li T F, Wang S H, Wang B, et al . Current situation and suggestion to Yunnan tobacco rotation system. Tobacco Agricultural Science, 2006, 2: 211-217.
[13] Yu F Y, Li Y J. Effect of rotation on soil fertility. Science and Technology Communication, 2011, 16: 60.
[14] Yang J H. Soil Agrochemical Analysis and Environmental Monitoring[M]. Beijing: China Press, 2008.
[15] Guan S Y. Soil Enzyme and Its Research Method[M]. Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1986.
[16] Frostegard A, Tunlid A, Baat I E. Phospholipid fatty acid composition, biomass, and activity of microbial communities from two soil types experimentally exposed to different heavy metals. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1993, 59: 3605-3617.
[17] Herlemann Danie P R, Lundin D, Labrenz M. Metagenomic assembly of an aquatic representative of the verrucomicrobial class spartobacteria. MBIO, 2013, 4: 1157-1169.
[18] Krebs C J. Ecological Methodology[M]. New York: Harper Collins Publish, 1989.
[19] Patrick D S, Dirk G, Sarah L W. Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16S rDNA-based studies. PLoS ONE(e27310), 2011, 6(12): 1-14.
[20] Roesch L F W, Fulthorpe R R, Riva A, et al . Pyrosequencing enumerates and contrasts soil microbial diversity. The ISME Journal, 2007, (4): 283-290.
[21] Lim Y M, Kim B K, Kim C, et al . Assessment of soil fungal communities using pyrosequencing. The Journal of Microbiology, 2010, 48(3): 284-289.
[22] Amato K R, Yeoman C J, Kent A, et al . Habitat degradation impacts black howler monkey ( Alouatta pigra ) gastrointestinal microbiomes. The ISME Journal, 2013, 7: 1344-1353.
[23] Katarina H. Soil microbial community structure in relation to vegetation management on former agricultural land. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2002, 34(9): 1299-1307.
[24] Shan G L, Chu X H, Luo F C, et al . Influence of exclosure period on soil microorganism and its enzyme activity in typical steppe. Grassland and Turf, 2012, 32(1): 1-6.
[25] Nishino S F, Spain J C. Biodegradation of 3-nitrotyrosine by Burkholderia sp. strain JS165 and Variovorax paradoxus JS171. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2006, 72(2): 1040-1044.
[26] Hunter P R, Gaston M A. Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems-An application of Simpsons index of diversity. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 1988, 26(11): 2465-2466.
[27] Wise M G, Mcarthur J V, Shimkets L J. Bacterial diversity of a carolina bay as determined by 16S rRNA gene analysis: confirmation of novel taxa. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1997, 63(4): 1505-1514.
[28] Barns S M, Takala S L, Kuske C R. Wide distribution and diversity of members of the bacterial kingdom Acidobacterium in the environment. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1999, 65(4): 1731-1737.
[29] Zhu Z X. Screening and Identification of Actinomyces from Soil and Study of Their Metabolites with Bioactivity[D]. Haerbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2011.
[30] Roller C, Wagner M, Amann R, et al . In situ probing of gram-positive bacteria with high DNA G+C content using 235-ribosomal-RNA-targeted oligonucleotides. Microbiology-UK, 1994, 140(10): 2849-2858.
[31] Guo J K, Tang S R, Ju X H, et al . Effects of inoculation of a plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Burkholderia sp. D54 on plant growth and metal uptake by a hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii Hance grown on multiple metal contaminated soil. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2011, 27(1): 2835-2844.
[32] Liao S Q, Guo J K, Wang F L, et al . The physiological and biochemical response og P. Americana Linn. And A. Crenentus L. to inoculation with Burkholderia sp. and its effect to Cs accumulation. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2012, 32(1): 213-223.
[33] Futamata H, Nagano Y, Watanabe K, et al . Uniquekinetic properties of phenol-degrading Variovorax strains responsible for efficient trichloroethylene degradation in a chemostat enrichment culture. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2005, 71(2): 904-911.
[34] SØrensen S R, Albers C N, Aamand J. Rapid mineralization of the phenyl urea herbicide diuron by Variovorax sp. strain SRS16 in pure culture and within a two-member consortium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2008, 74(8): 2332-2340.
[1] 王飞, 李世贵, 徐凤花, 等. 连作障碍发生机制研究进展. 中国土壤与肥料, 2013, 5: 6-12.
[2] 杨菁, 谢应忠, 吴旭东, 等. 不同种植年限人工苜蓿草地植物和土壤化学计量特征. 草业学报, 2014, 23(2): 340-345.
[3] 邢会琴, 肖占文, 闫吉智, 等. 玉米连作对土壤微生物和土壤主要养分的影响. 草业科学, 2011, 28(10): 1777-1780.
[4] 张小红, 赵依杰. 西瓜化感作用研究进展. 中国蔬菜, 2013, 24: 10-15.
[5] 晋艳, 杨宇虹, 段玉琪, 等. 烤烟轮作、连作对烟叶产量质量的影响. 西南农业学报, 2004, 17: 267-271.
[6] 王玉琴. 关于轮作的探讨. 现代农业科技, 2010, 2: 108.
[7] 王先华. 稻田不同轮作方式对培肥地力的作用. 耕作与栽培, 2003, 6: 9-10.
[8] 杨祥田, 周翠, 李建辉, 等. 不同轮作方式下大棚草莓产量及土壤生物学特性. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18(2): 312-315.
[9] 于高波, 吴凤芝, 周新刚. 小麦、毛苕子与黄瓜轮作对土壤微生态环境及产量的影响. 土壤学报, 2011, 48(1): 175-184.
[11] 闫绍鹏, 杨瑞华, 冷淑娇, 等. 高通量测序技术及其在农业科学研究中的应用. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(30): 171-176.
[12] 李天福, 王树会, 王彪, 等. 云南烤烟轮作现状与对策分析. 烟草农业科学, 2006, 2: 211-217.
[13] 郁飞燕, 李友军. 轮作对土壤肥力的影响. 科技传播, 2011, 16: 60.
[14] 杨剑虹. 土壤农化分析与环境监测[M]. 北京: 中国大地出版社, 2008.
[15] 关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1986.
[24] 单贵莲, 初晓辉, 罗富成, 等. 围封年限对典型草原土壤微生物及酶活性的影响. 草原与草坪, 2012, 32(1): 1-6.
[29] 朱兆香. 土壤放线菌的筛选、鉴定及其活性代谢产物的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2011.
[32] 廖上强, 郭军康, 王芳丽, 等. 美洲商陆和籽粒苋对接种伯克氏菌的生理生化响应及其对富集铯的影响. 环境科学学报, 2012, 32(1): 213-223.