7种能源草在酸性红壤中的性状比较及适应性评价

doi:10.11686/cyxb2015005

草业学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (12): 237-244.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2015005

7种能源草在酸性红壤中的性状比较及适应性评价

侯维¹，肖亮^2，3，易自力^1，*，覃静萍¹，杨塞¹，郑铖¹，陈智勇¹

1.湖南农业大学生物科学技术学院,湖南长沙 410128；
2.湖南农业大学芒属植物研究所,湖南长沙 410128；
3.湖南农业大学生物质醇类燃料湖南省工程实验室,湖南长沙 410128

收稿日期:2015-01-05 出版日期:2015-12-20 发布日期:2015-12-20
通讯作者: yizili889@163.com
作者简介:侯维(1987-),男,湖南安仁人,在读硕士。E-mail:houweichangsha@163.com
基金资助:
“十二五”农村领域国家科技计划课题(2013BAD22B02)资助

Evaluation of the adaptability of bioenergy grasses in acidic red soil

HOU Wei¹, XIAO Liang^{2, 3}, YI Zi-Li^{1, *}, QIN Jing-Ping¹, YANG Sai¹, ZHENG Cheng¹, CHEN Zhi-Yong¹

1.College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China;
2.Miscanthus Institute, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China;
3.Biomass Alcohol Fuel in Hunan Engineering Laboratory, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China

Received:2015-01-05 Online:2015-12-20 Published:2015-12-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究比较了7种能源草在酸性红壤中物候期、越冬率、农艺性状和化学成分等20个性状,并利用其中与适应性相关的12个性状来综合评价不同能源草在酸性红壤中的适应性。结果表明,1)7种能源草中除狼尾草以外其余各品种均能完成生育期,且都能在酸性红壤上生长良好;2)7种能源草的7个主要农艺性状和5个化学成分均有显著差异(P<0.05)。其中五节芒、湘杂芒、柳枝稷的干物质产量较高,单株分别达到5385.24,4846.09和4566.83 g,而斑茅、奇岗和湘杂芒的纤维素含量较高,分别达46.13%,45.38%和45.16%;3)对12个数量性状进行主成分分析,得到累计贡献率为92.626%的4个主成分因子,说明前4个主成分代表了主要的遗传信息;4)利用主成分线性模型综合评价7种能源草的适应性,排序结果如下:湘杂芒>五节芒>狼尾草>斑茅>柳枝稷>奇岗>荻。本研究结果可为我国南方酸性红壤边际性土地的开发与利用提供理论依据。

Abstract: Seven grass species grown as bioenergy crops were compared using 20 traits including phenological period, winter survival rate, agronomic traits and chemical composition. The results showed that, with the exception of Pennisetum purpureum, all grasses could complete their growth period and grow well in acidic red soil. There were significant differences among the grasses for seven agronomic characters and five chemical composition traits. Miscanthus floridulus, M. lutarioriparia×sinensis and Panicum virgatum had higher dry matter yield than other species; 5385.24, 4846.09 and 4566.83 g respectively. Cellulose contents of Saccharum arundinaceu, Miscanthus×giganteus and M. lutarioriparia×sinensis were 46.13%, 45.38% and 45.16% respectively, significantly higher than other species. Principal component analysis of twelve quantitative traits revealed that the cumulative contribution rate of four principal component factors accounted for was 92.626% of variation. This indicated that M. lutarioriparia×sinensis was the most adaptable species followed by M. floridulus, P. purpureum, S. arundinaceum, P. virgatum, Miscanthus×giganteus and M. sacchariflora. The results of this study will provide a theoretical basis for the development and utilization of acidic red soil in southern China.

侯维，肖亮，易自力，覃静萍，杨塞，郑铖，陈智勇. 7种能源草在酸性红壤中的性状比较及适应性评价[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(12): 237-244.

HOU Wei, XIAO Liang, YI Zi-Li, QIN Jing-Ping, YANG Sai, ZHENG Cheng, CHEN Zhi-Yong. Evaluation of the adaptability of bioenergy grasses in acidic red soil[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(12): 237-244.

参考文献

[1] Xie G H, Guo X Q, Wang X, et al . An overview and perspectives of energy crop resources. Resources Science, 2007, 29(5): 74-80.
[2] Fan X F, Hou X C, Wu J Y, et al . Research progress and development potential analysis of bioenergy grass in the north of China. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2012, 17(6): 150-158.
[3] China Renewable Energy Development Project Strategic Research Group. China Renewable Energy Development Strategy Research Series(Biomass volume)[M]. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2008: 40-48.
[4] Zhuang D, Jiang D, Liu L, et al . Assessment of bioenergy potential on marginal land in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(2): 1050-1056.
[5] Xie G H. Progress and direction of non-food biomass feedstock supply research and development in China. Journal of Agricultural University, 2012, 17(6): 1-19.
[6] Xie G H. An overview on classification and utilizations of energy plants. Journal of Agricultural University, 2011, 16(2): 1-7.
[7] Yi Z L. Exploitation and utilization of Miscanthus as energy plant. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2012, 38(5): 455-463.
[8] Nishiwaki A, Mizuguti A, Kuwabara S, et al . Discovery of natural Miscanthus (Poaceae) triploid plants in sympatric populations of Miscanthus sacchariflorus and Miscanthus sinensis in southern Japan. American Journal of Botany, 2011, 98(1): 154-159.
[9] Fan X F, Zuo H T, Hou X C, et al . Potential of Miscanthus spp. and Triarrhena spp. as herbaceous energy plants. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(14): 381-387.
[10] Fan X F, Hou X C, Zuo H T, et al . Biomass yield and quality of three kinds of bioenergy grasses in Beijing of China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(16): 3316-3322.
[11] Yan J, Chen W L, Luo P, et al . Variability and adaptability of Miscanthus species evaluated for energy crop domestication. GCB Bioenergy, 2012, 4(1): 49-60.
[12] Ai X, Zhu Y Y, Jiang J X, et al . Flowering phenology and reproductive features of artificial F 1 hybrids between Miscanthus floridulus and M. sacchariflorus . Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(3): 118-126.
[13] Fan X F, Hou X C, Zhu Y, et al . Biomass yield and quality of hybrid Pennisetum . Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2012, 34(1): 48-52.
[14] Pan Y C, Li Y, Wang Y. Preliminary selection of energy grasses. Journal of Shenyang Normal University (Natural Science), 2011, 29(4): 571-573.
[15] Yan J J, Bai S Q, Liang X Z, et al . Investigation on germplasm resources of energy plant- Saccharum arundinaceum Ratz.in Sichuan Province. Prataculturae and Animal Husbandry, 2009, (3): 29-31.
[16] McLaughlin S B, Kszos L A. Development of switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum ) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States Biomass and Bioenergy, 2005, 28(6): 515-535.
[17] Sanderson M A, Reed R L, Ocumpaugh W R, et al . Switchgrass cultivars and germplasm for biomass feedstock production in Texas. Bioresource Technology, 1999, 67(3): 209-219.
[18] Liu J H , Zuo Y M, Huang B Z, et al . Comparison experiment of four Setaria sphacelata varieties in rainy southern subtropical areas of Yunnan. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 24(2): 429-432.
[19] Yang S. Feed Analysis and Feed Quality Detection Technology (first edition)[M]. Beijing: Beijing Agricultural Press, 1993: 58-63.
[20] Van Soest P J, Robertson J B, Lewis B A. Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber,and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal production. Journal of Dairy Science, 1991, 74: 3583-3597.
[21] Zheng X, Wei Z W, Wu Z N, et al . Adaptability evaluation of different Avena sativa varrieties in Yangzhou Area. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2013, 21(2): 272-279.
[22] Schmer M R, Vogel K P, Mitchell R B, et al . Net energy of cellulosic from switchgrass. PNAS, 2008, 105(2): 464-469.
[23] Chen S L, Yu R, Cheng Z S, et al . Principal component analysis and cluster analysis on biological characters of the peanut cultivars. Journal of Peanut Science, 2007, 36(2): 29-34.
[24] Lewandowski I, Scurlockb J M O, Lindvall E, et al . The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2003, 25(4): 335-361.
[25] Frank M, Chmielewski, Thomas R. Response of tree phonological to climate change across Europe. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2001, 108(2): 101-112.
[26] Zhang X B, Ren J R, Zhang D E. Phonological observations on Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr in primary seed orchard. Journal of Forestry Research, 2001, 12(3): 201-204.
[27] Yuan Z H, Sun X Y, Yan Y J, et al . An orthogonal experiment on technical needs for Chinese silver grass hydrolysis process with dilute sulphuric acid. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2006, 27(6): 631-634.
[28] Xi Q G, Liu Y X. An overview and processing technology of tall grasses. Pratacultural Science, 2005, 22(1): 32-33.
[29] Li G Y, Li J L, Wang Y, et al . Study on the selection and evaluation on fine energy plants. Renewable Energy Resources, 2007, 25(6): 84-89.
[30] Cheng B J, Lu X Y, Jiang L K, et al . Biomass Energy Science[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2008: 83-84.
[1] 谢光辉, 郭兴强, 王鑫, 等. 能源作物资源现状与发展前景. 资源科学, 2007, 29(5): 74-80.
[2] 范希峰, 侯新村, 武菊英, 等. 我国北方能源草研究进展及发展潜力. 中国农业大学学报, 2012, 17(6): 150-158.
[3] 中国可再生能源发展战略研究项目组. 中国可再生能源发展战略研究丛书(生物质能卷)[M]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2008: 40-48.
[5] 谢光辉. 非粮生物质原料体系研究发展及方向. 中国农业大学学报, 2012, 17(6): 1-19.
[6] 谢光辉. 能源植物分类及其转化利用. 中国农业大学学报, 2011, 16(2): 1-7.
[7] 易自力. 芒属能源植物资源的开发与利用. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 38(5): 455-463.
[9] 范希峰, 左海涛, 侯新村, 等. 芒和荻作为草本能源植物的潜力分析. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(14): 381-387.
[10] 范希峰, 侯新村, 左海涛, 等. 三种草本能源植物在北京地区的产量和品质特性. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(16): 3316-3322.
[12] 艾辛, 朱玉叶, 蒋建雄, 等. 五节芒与荻人工杂交F 1 群体开花物候期与生殖特性研究. 草业学报. 2014, 23(3): 118-126.
[13] 范希峰, 侯新村, 朱毅, 等. 杂交狼尾草作为能源植物的产量和品质特性. 中国草地学报, 2012, 34(1): 48-52.
[14] 潘一晨, 李阳, 王艳. 能源禾草的初步筛选. 沈阳师范大学学报(自然科学), 2011, 29(4): 571-573.
[15] 鄢家俊, 白史且, 梁绪振, 等. 生物质能源潜力植物-斑茅种质资源考察与收集. 草业与畜牧, 2009, (3): 29-31.
[18] 刘金海, 左应梅, 黄必志, 等. 非洲狗尾草4品种在滇南的品比试验. 草地学报, 2014, 24(2): 429-432.
[19] 杨胜. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术(第一版)[M]. 北京: 北京农业出版社, 1993: 58-63.
[21] 郑曦, 魏臻武, 武自念, 等. 不同燕麦品种(系)在扬州地区的适应性评价. 草地学报, 2013, 21(2): 272-279.
[23] 陈四龙, 玉荣, 程增书, 等. 花生品种(系)生物学性状的主成分分析和聚类分析. 花生学报, 2007, 36(2): 29-34.
[27] 袁振宏, 孙晓英, 颜涌捷, 等. 芒草稀硫酸水解工艺条件的正交实验. 太阳能学报, 2006, 27(6): 631-634.
[28] 席庆国, 刘玉新. 高大禾草加工技术概况. 草业科学, 2005, 22(1): 32-33.
[29] 李高扬, 李建龙, 王艳, 等. 优良能源植物筛选及评价指标探讨. 可再生能源, 2007, 25(6): 84-89.
[30] 程备久, 卢向阳, 蒋立科, 等. 生物质能学[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2008: 83-84.

7种能源草在酸性红壤中的性状比较及适应性评价

Evaluation of the adaptability of bioenergy grasses in acidic red soil

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics