甘蓝型与白菜型冬油菜杂交F1代植物学性状及自交亲和性分析

doi:10.11686/cyxb2015103

草业学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (3): 108-119.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2015103

甘蓝型与白菜型冬油菜杂交F₁代植物学性状及自交亲和性分析

赵艳宁¹, 米超¹, 孙万仓^{1, *}, 刘自刚¹, 武军艳¹, 方彦¹, 李学才¹, 刘海卿¹, 董云²

1.甘肃省作物遗传改良与种质创新重点实验室,甘肃省干旱生境作物学重点实验室,甘肃省油菜工程中心,甘肃兰州 730070;
2.甘肃省农业科学院作物研究所,甘肃兰州 730070

收稿日期:2015-02-25 出版日期:2016-03-20 发布日期:2016-03-20
通讯作者: E-mail:1134137111@qq.com
作者简介:赵艳宁(1988-),女,甘肃会宁人,硕士.E-mail:zjnn228@163.com
基金资助:
国家"863"高技术研究发展计划(2011AA10A104),国家自然基金"白菜型油菜抗寒评价指标体系及数学模型构建"(31460356),国家自然基金"油菜miR1140靶基因鉴定及其调控油菜分枝的生理功能"(31260334),"973"计划"油菜高产油量形成的分子生物学机制"(2015CB150206)和国家农业科技成果转化项目(2014G10000317)资助

Analysis of botanical traits and self-compatibility in winter rapeseed Brassica napus and Brassica rapa and F₁ hybrid populations

ZHAO Yan-Ning¹, MI Chao¹, SUN Wan-Cang^{1, *}, LIU Zi-Gang¹, WU Jun-Yan¹, FANG Yan¹, LI Xue-Cai¹, LIU Hai-Qing¹, Dong Yun²

1.Improvement and Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Gansu Province Key Laboratory of Arid Land Crop Sciences, Rapeseed Engineering Research Center of Gansu Province, Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730070, China;
2.Crop Institute of Gansu Academy of Agriculture Science, Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730070, China

Received:2015-02-25 Online:2016-03-20 Published:2016-03-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过甘蓝型冬油菜与北方白菜型冬油菜及其正反交杂种F₁植物学形态,生长习性,自交亲和性的比较,分析杂种抗寒性,植物学形态,生长习性,自交亲和性的变化.选择白菜型冬油菜陇油9号与甘蓝型冬油菜Vision组配的(陇油9号×Vision),(Vision×陇油9号)甘白杂交正反交组合,通过亲本与杂种形态比较,越冬率统计,套袋自交以及花粉-柱头互作等,对杂种抗寒性,植物学形态,生长习性,自交亲和性作出评价.陇油9号与Vision杂交,杂种F₁植物学形态,干物质积累特性为中间型,生长习性和生长点下凹程度均偏白菜型.F₁正,反交越冬率分别为68.75%和65.00%,根长为14.83和14.30 cm,根颈直径为6.08 和5.67 mm.自交亲和性为:Vision>F₁ (Vision×陇油9号)>F₁ (陇油9号×Vision)>陇油9号,其相应的自交亲和指数为20.83,1.09,1.06,0.87;杂种及其亲本的自交亲和性的大小与其花粉在柱头上的萌发数量与萌发速度相一致.陇油9号与Vision杂交,杂种F₁抗寒性强于甘蓝型冬油菜,但较白菜型冬油菜弱.同时,白菜型冬油菜与甘蓝型冬油菜杂交,杂种F₁代自交亲和,但杂种的自交亲和程度远远低于甘蓝型冬油菜,而且F₁杂种的自交亲和性因杂交组合方式而有差异.

Abstract: Changes in cold tolerance, botanical morphology (BM), growth habit (GH) and self-compatibility (SC) of Brassica napus, Brassica rapa and their hybrids were compared. Vision (B. napus), Longyou 9 (B. rapa) and their reciprocal crosses progenies were used in the study. The cold tolerance, BM, GH and SC of the hybrids were evaluated by comparing BM, winter performance, bagging selfing and pollen-stigma interactions with that of the parent lines. The BM and dry matter accumulation of F₁ hybrids (Vision×Longyou 9) was intermediate while GH was similar to B. rapa. Winter survival of F₁ plants in reciprocal crosses were 68.75% and 65.00%. Root length of reciprocal crosses in F₁ plants were 14.83 and 14.30 cm. Crown diameter of F₁ hybrids from reciprocal crosses were 6.08 and 5.67 mm. The SC was highest in Vision and declined in order; F₁ (Vision×Longyou 9), F₁ (Longyou 9×Vision), Longyou 9 with SC indices being 20.83, 1.09, 1.06 and 0.87, respectively. The self-compatibility of parents and F₁ plants was consistent with the level of pollen germination. The cold tolerance of hybrids was stronger than B. napus but weaker than B. rapa. The F₁ hybrids were self-compatible, but the degree of the SC was much less than that of B. napus.

赵艳宁, 米超, 孙万仓, 刘自刚, 武军艳, 方彦, 李学才, 刘海卿, 董云. 甘蓝型与白菜型冬油菜杂交F₁代植物学性状及自交亲和性分析[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(3): 108-119.

ZHAO Yan-Ning, MI Chao, SUN Wan-Cang, LIU Zi-Gang, WU Jun-Yan, FANG Yan, LI Xue-Cai, LIU Hai-Qing, Dong Yun. Analysis of botanical traits and self-compatibility in winter rapeseed Brassica napus and Brassica rapa and F₁ hybrid populations[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(3): 108-119.

参考文献

[1] Sun W C, Ma W G, Lei J M, et al . Study on adaptation and introduction possibility of winter rapeseed to dry and cold areas in Northwest China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(12): 2716-2726.
[2] Liu H D. The inheritance, variation and selection of characters in the hybrid progeny of rape. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2000, 12(1): 48-51.
[3] Liu Z S. Crossabilities and the F 1 hybrids between Brassica napus and B. juncea . Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 1994, 16(3): 1-5, 10.
[4] Zhao F Y, Lu J X, Huang J. Genetic analysis on interspecific hybrids of Brassica napus and wild Brassica juncea . Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science, 2011, 39(2): 718-720, 794.
[5] Liu Z S, Guan C Y, Chen S Y, et al . RAPD analysis of the hybrid progenies from the interspecific cross Brassica juncea × Brassica napus . Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2002, 35(8): 1010-1015.
[6] Niu Y, Zhao Z G, Yu Q L, et al . Genetic analysis on interspecific hybrids progeny between Brassica juncea and Brassica rapa . Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2013, 14(4): 715-722.
[7] Fu S H, Li Y, Yang J, et al . Study on obtaining of hybrids ( B. napus×B. campestris ) by chromosome doubling method. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 25(4): 1164-1170.
[8] Liu H B, Liu Z S. Advance in studies on compatibility of distant hybridization in rapeseed. Crop Research, 2006, (5): 456-458.
[9] Wang C, Lei J J, Jiang C, et al . Study on cross-compatibility of interspecific hybridization and selfing in Clivia lindl . Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(18): 3822-3829.
[10] Xie W J, Bai T, Li S F, et al . Observation on the pollinated styles of Rhododendron siderophyllum by fluorescence microscopy and analysis of its self-compatibility. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2013, 35(4): 698-702.
[11] Yu X Y, Zhao L Y, Feng Z, et al . Self-compatibility of 22 Rosa rugosa thunb. resources in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(9): 3236-3242.
[12] Liu H M, Wang Q G, Zhang H, et al . Self-compatibility in six new Rosa hybrida cultivars. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2011, 37(4): 391-395.
[13] Xue Z X, Zhao Z Y, Dang Z G, et al . Observation on the cross pollinated styles of Red Fuji apple by fluorescence microscopy and the compatibility analysis. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 2011, 39(9): 118-122.
[14] Wang H, Liu G C, Lv D G, et al . Observation on the pollinated styles of Hanfu apple by fluorescence microscopy and its self-compatibility analysis. Journal of Fruit Science, 2008, 25(2): 162-165.
[15] Sui W, Ding X D, Huo J W, et al . Preliminary studies on distant cross-incompatibility between Cerasus fruticosa Pall. and C. avium L. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 1999, 30(2): 148-153.
[16] Wu X M, Chen B Y, Lu G Y, et al . Descriptors and Data Standard for Rae Seed ( Brassica spp.)[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2007: 12-16.
[17] Fan H L, Sun W C, Wu J Y, et al . The self-compatibility of Sinapis alba (L.) Boiss. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinca, 2007, 27(5): 859-863.
[18] Williams E G, Rouse J L, Palser B F, et al . Reproductive biology of rhododendron. Horticultural Reviews, 1990, 12: 13.
[19] Kong D J, Wang Y, Sun W C, et al . Analysis of variation physio-biochemical characteristics and cold resistance in winter rapeseed F 2 populations. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(4): 79-86.
[20] Guo H L, Gao Y D, Xue D D, et al . Genetic analysis of cold tolerance of zoysia grass. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2009, 18(3): 53-58.
[21] Liu L L, Yang X, Gao T P, et al . A study on the attractive function of different floral structures in Trollius ranunculoides (Ranunculaceae). Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(3): 190-195.
[22] Lei J J, Dai H P, Ge H B, et al . Studies on the hexaploid interspecific hybrid and its backcross with cultivars in strawberry. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2004, 31(4): 496-498.
[23] Wang W H, Wang S D, Zhao X Y, et al . Process of pollen sprouting and pollen tube growth on the lily distant hybridization. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinca, 2007, 27(9): 1790-1794.
[24] Mayer E, Gottsberger G. Pollen viability in the genus Silene (Caryophyllaceae) and its evaluation by means of different test procedures. Flora, 2000, 195: 349-353.
[25] Meng J L, Liu D F, Cai D T, et al . Plant Reproductive Genetics[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1997: 300-305.
[26] Gong Z H, He Y K, Wang M, et al . Studies on pollen-stigma interaction between Chinese cabbage and white mustard. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2006, 15(5): 61-64.
[27] Wang Y P, Luo P, Jia Y J, et al . Fertilization and embryo development in generic crosses between Brassica species and C. abyssinica . Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1997, 10(23): 538-544.
[28] Sun W C, Guan C Y, Meng Y X, et al . Intergeneric crosses between Eruca sativa Mill. and Brassica species. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2005, 31(1): 36-42.
[29] Meng J L, Wu J S, Han J X, et al . Interspecific crossability affected by parental genotypes. Crop Research, 1992, 6(2): 28-32.
[30] Wu J Y, Sun W C. Observation on interaction of pollen-pistil on Cruciferae rapeseeds. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2006, 15(5): 61-64.
[31] Liu P, Ma L C, Wang Y, et al . Observation of pollen morphology of 16 Vicia accessions using scanning electron microscopy. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(1): 107-114.
[32] Chen D X. Characteristics of Pollen Germination, Tube Growth and the Expression of Style S Gene in Pyrus pyrifolia [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2005.
[33] Li S L, Shi L, Zhang J Z. Pollen tube behavior following pollination between Cardiocrinum giganteum and Lilium . Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2006, 33(6): 1259-1262.
[34] 孙万仓, 马卫国, 雷建民,等. 冬油菜在西北旱寒区的适应性和北移的可行性研究. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(12): 2716-2726.
[35] 刘汉东. 油菜杂交后代性状的遗传,变异与选择. 江西农业学报, 2000, 12(1): 48-51.
[36] 刘忠松. 甘蓝型油菜与芥菜型油菜杂交的亲和性及其杂种一代. 中国油料作物学报, 1994, 16(3): 1-5,10.
[37] 赵福永, 鲁军雄, 黄杰. 甘蓝型油菜与野生芥菜型油菜杂交子代的遗传分析. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39( 2): 718-720, 794.
[38] 刘忠松, 官春云, 陈社员, 等. 芥菜型油菜与甘蓝型油菜种间杂种后代的RAPD分析. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(8): 1010-1015.
[39] 牛妍, 赵志刚, 余青兰, 等. 芥菜型油菜和白菜型油菜种间杂种遗传分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2013, 14(4): 715-722.
[40] 付少红, 李云, 杨进, 等. 染色体加倍获得甘白(甘蓝型×白菜型油菜)杂交后代研究. 西南农业学报, 2012, 25(4): 1164-1170.
[41] 王冲, 雷家军, 姜闯, 等. 君子兰种间杂交及自交亲和性. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(18): 3822-3829.
[42] 解玮佳, 白天, 李世峰, 等. 锈叶杜鹃授粉花柱的显微观察与自交亲和性分析. 江西农业大学学报, 2013, 35(4): 698-702.
[43] 于晓艳, 赵兰勇, 丰震, 等. 22 份国产玫瑰资源的自交亲和性. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(9): 3236-3242.
[44] 刘红明, 王其刚, 张颢, 等. 6 个月季品种的自交亲和性. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 37(4): 391-395.
[45] 薛志霞, 赵政阳, 党志国, 等. 红富士苹果异花授粉花柱的荧光显微观察与亲和性分析. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版, 2011, 39(9): 118-122.
[46] 王浩, 刘国成, 吕德国, 等. 寒富苹果授粉花柱的荧光显微观察与自交亲和性分析. 果树学报, 2008, 25(2): 162-165.
[47] 雎薇, 丁晓东, 霍俊伟, 等. 草原樱桃与欧洲甜樱桃远缘杂交不亲和原因初探. 东北农业大学学报, 1999, 30(2): 148-153.
[48] 伍晓明, 陈碧云, 陆光远, 等. 油菜种质资源描述规范及数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007: 12-16.
[49] 范惠玲, 孙万仓, 武军艳, 等. 白芥自交亲和性分析研究. 西北植物学报, 2007, 27(5): 859-863.
[50] 孔德晶, 王月, 孙万仓, 等. 北方白菜型冬油菜F 2 主要生理生化特性的变异与抗寒性相关性分析. 草业学报, 2014, 23(4): 79-86.
[51] 郭海林, 高亚丹, 薛丹丹, 等. 结缕草属植物抗寒性的遗传分析. 草业学报, 2009, 18(3): 53-58.
[52] 刘乐乐, 杨晓, 高天鹏, 等. 毛茛状金莲花花部结构的吸引功能. 草业学报, 2013, 22(3): 190-195.
[53] 雷家军, 代汉萍, 葛会波, 等. 草莓六倍体种间杂种及其回交研究. 园艺学报, 2004, 31(4): 496-498.
[54] 王文和, 王树栋, 赵祥云, 等. 百合远缘杂交花粉萌发及花粉管生长过程观察. 西北植物学报, 2007, 27(9): 1790-1794.
[55] 孟金陵, 刘定富, 蔡得田, 等. 植物生殖遗传学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1997: 300-305.
[56] 巩振辉, 何玉科, 王鸣, 等. 白菜与白芥属间花粉-柱头相互作用的研究. 西北农业学报, 1994, 3(1): 35-38.
[57] 王幼平, 罗鹏, 贾勇炯, 等. 海甘蓝与芸茎属间杂交的受精和胚胎发育. 作物学报, 1997, 10(23): 538-544.
[58] 孙万仓, 官春云, 孟亚雄, 等. 芸芥与芸薹属3个油用种的远缘杂交. 作物学报, 2005, 31(1): 36-42.
[59] 孟金陵, 吴江生, 韩继祥, 等. 母本基因型对油菜种间可交配性的影响. 作物研究, 1992, 6(2): 28-32.
[60] 武军艳, 孙万仓. 利用花粉-柱头的相互作用鉴定5个十字花科油用植物的自交亲和性. 西北农业学报, 2006, 15(5): 61-64.
[61] 刘鹏, 马利超, 王宇, 等. 16种野豌豆属植物花粉形态的扫描电镜观察. 草业学报, 2015, 24(1): 107-114.
[62] 陈迪新. 梨花粉萌发,生长及花柱S基因表达特性[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2005.
[63] 李守丽, 石雷, 张金政. 大百合与百合属间授粉后花粉管生长发育的观察. 园艺学报, 2006, 33(6): 1259-1262.

甘蓝型与白菜型冬油菜杂交F₁代植物学性状及自交亲和性分析

Analysis of botanical traits and self-compatibility in winter rapeseed Brassica napus and Brassica rapa and F₁ hybrid populations

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics