混贮模式对高丹草青贮发酵品质及体外产气动力学特性的影响

doi:10.11686/cyxb2015271

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了解决高丹草因水分高造成青贮发酵品质不佳的问题,通过添加不同种类干草(玉米秸秆、小麦秸秆和苜蓿干草)及干草添加量(12.5,25.0,37.5和50.0 kg/t)对混贮高丹草营养价值、青贮发酵品质及体外产气动力学特性进行了研究。结果表明,单独青贮高丹草的丁酸含量较高,弗氏评分等级仅为“可”, 添加干草混贮可显著提高青贮高丹草的发酵品质,从添加干草的种类来看,添加小麦秸秆组青贮发酵品质最高,添加苜蓿干草组营养价值最高,苜蓿干草组的体外72 h干物质消失率(IVDMD)、产气速率(c)和达到最大产气量1/2时的产气速率(AGPR)均为最高,3种干草在72 h累积产气量、理论最大产气量以及产气延滞时期方面差异不显著(P>0.05);从干草的添加量来看,添加25.0 kg/t干草的青贮发酵品质最优,达到产气量1/2所需要时间也最长,添加50.0 kg/t干草的营养价值和IVDMD最高,添加37.5 kg/t干草的产气速率和AGPR最大,添加不同重量干草对混贮高丹草的72 h累积产气量、理论最大产气量以及产气延滞时期无显著影响(P>0.05)。综合考虑青贮发酵品质和饲料营养价值,得出最佳的混贮模式为在高丹草中添加37.5 kg/t小麦秸秆,添加50.0 kg/t苜蓿干草混贮高丹草的体外干物质消失率最高,添加37.5 kg/t苜蓿干草组产气速率最快,添加50.0 kg/t小麦秸秆组的72 h累积产气量和理论最大产气量最高。

Abstract: The fermentation quality of sorghum-sudangrass hybrids (Sorghum bicolor×Sorghum sudanense) is poor because of their high moisture contents. In this study, we analyzed the effects of different storage modes on the fermentation quality of a sorghum-sudangrass hybrid. A sorghum-sudangrass hybrid was mixed different types of hay (corn stalk, wheat straw, and alfalfa hay) at different proportions (12.5, 25.0, 37.5 and 50.0 kg/t). Then, the nutritive value, fermentation quality, 72 h dry matter digestibility, and gas dynamics were measured using an in vitro system that simulated rumen fermentation. The results showed that the silage produced from the sorghum-sudangrass hybrid had a high butyric acid content, and a poor Flieg evaluation ranking. The addition of all types of hay significantly improved the fermentation quality of stored silage. The addition of wheat straw resulted in the best fermentation quality, while the addition of alfalfa hay resulted in the best nutritive value. The addition of alfalfa hay resulted in the highest values for IVDMD (in vitro dry matter digestibility), c (gas production speed), and AGPR (speed when gas production was one-half of the maximum). There was no significant difference in GP_72h (accumulated gas production in 72 h), A (ideal maximum gas production), and lag (lag time of gas production) among silages produced with the three types of hay. In terms of the amount of hay added, the addition of 25.0 kg/t resulted in the best fermentation quality and the highest half-time content, and the addition of 50.0 kg/t resulted in the best nutritive value and the highest IVDMD. The addition of 37.5 kg/t hay resulted in the highest c and AGPR values. The amount of hay added did not significantly affect GP_72h, A, or lag. Considering the nutritive value and fermentation quality, the best mixed silage was produced by adding 37.5 kg/t wheat straw. The addition of 50.0 kg/t alfalfa hay gave the highest IVDMD content, the addition of 37.5 kg/t alfalfa hay gave the highest gas production rate, and the addition of 50.0 kg/t wheat straw resulted in the highest GP_72h and A.

梁欢, 刘贵波, 吴佳海, 曾兵, 李源, 游永亮, 赵海明. 混贮模式对高丹草青贮发酵品质及体外产气动力学特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(4): 188-196.

LIANG Huan, LIU Gui-Bo, WU Jia-Hai, ZENG Bing, LI Yuan, YOU Yong-Liang, ZHAO Hai-Ming. Effects of mixed silage modes on the fermentation quality and in vitro gas dynamics of a sorghum-sudangrass hybrid (Sorghum bicolor×Sorghum sudanense)[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(4): 188-196.

参考文献

[1] Li Y, Xie N, Zhao H M, et al . Analysis on change pattern of the vegetative growth and forage quality of Sorghum bicolor × S. sudanense . Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2011, 19(5): 813-819.
[2] Beck P A, Hutchison S, Gunter S A, et al . Chemical composition and in situ dry matter and fiber disappearance of sorghum×sudangrass hybrids. Journal of Animal Science, 2007, 85: 545-555.
[3] Han J. Effect of Nitrogen Application Rate on Forage Productivity and Utilization of Soil Mineral Nitrogen in Sorghum Hybrid Sudangrass[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2010: 12.
[4] Pang L Y, Zhang J H. Biological characteristics of Sudangrass and sorghum-sudan hybrid. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2004, 17(2): 160-163.
[5] Valenzuela H, Smith J. Sorghum-sudangrass hybrids. Sustainable Agriculture Green Manure Crops, 2002, 8(10): 1-3.
[6] Akdeniz H, Karsli M A, Yilmaz I. Effects of harvesting different sorghum-sudan grass varieties as hay or silage on chemical composition and digestible dry matter yield. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 2005, 4(6): 610-614.
[7] Wedig C L, Jaster E H, Moore K J, et al . Rumen turnover and digestion of normal and brown midrib sorghum×sudangrass hybrid silages in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 1987, 70(6): 1220-1227.
[8] Gul I, Demirel R, Kilicalp N, et al . Effect of crop maturity stages on yield, silage chemical composition and in vivo digestibilities of the maize, sorghum and sorghum×sudangrass hybrids grown in semi arid conditions. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 2008, 7: 1021-1028.
[9] Jiang Y B, Wang C Z, Li Z T. Effect of several cutting heights on the yield, quality and silage effect of Gaodancao (a hybrid grass between sorghum and Sorghum sudenense ). Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2005, (3): 78-79.
[10] Deng W D, Xi D M, Liu Y, et al . Effect on nutrition value of silage sugareane top adding acids. Heilongjiang Animal Science And Veterinary Medicine, 2001, (12): 17-18.
[11] Doležal P, Skládanka J, Zeman L, et al . Quality of silage from brown midrib sorghum×sudangrass forage. Animal Welfare, Ethology and Housing Systems, 2009, 5(4): 98-102.
[12] Zhang S P, Chen Z, Liu D L. Effect of different additives on the perfermance and in vitro degradation characteristics of sorghum×sudangrass hybrids. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2010, (11): 65-69.
[13] Zhu A M, Shi Y M. Effect of different treatments on the in vitro degradation characteristics of sorghum sudangrass hybrids. Jilin Agriculture, 2010, (3): 54-55.
[14] Ji X, Yu Z, Bai C S, et al . Effect of additives on quality of sorghum-sudangrass hybrids silage. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2012, 20(3): 571-575.
[15] General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China(AQSIQ). GB/T6435-2006. Determination of Moisture and Other Volatile Mater Content In Feeds[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2007.
[16] CSBTS. GB/T6432-1994. Method for the Determination of Crude Protein in Feedstuffs[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 1995.
[17] AQSIQ. GB 20806-2006-T. Determination of Neutral Detergent Fiber in Feedstuffs[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2007.
[18] Ministry of Agriculture (PRC). NY 1459-2007-T. Determination of Acid Detergent Fiber in Feedstuff (ADF)[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2007.
[19] Owens V N, Albrecht K A, Muck RE, et al . Protein degradation and fermentation characteristics of red clover and alfalfa silage haverested with varying levels of total nonstrutural carbohydrates. Crop Science, 1999, (39): 1873-1880.
[20] Broderiea G A, Kang J H. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and amino acids in rumihal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Science, 1980, 63(1): 64-75.
[21] Yu Z, Sun Q Z. Silage Technology of Forage Grass[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2011: 156.
[22] Yang H J, Song Z H, Zhu S P, et al . A Fermented Trace Gases Quantity Data Automatic Collection and Storage Device and Method[P]. China, ZL200610011301.X, 2007-12-19.
[23] Ørskov E R, McDonald I. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, 1979, 92(2): 499-503.
[24] Wei C Q, Wang M J. The silage making and nutritive variation of Trifolium ambiguum . Pratacultural Science, 2010, 27(2): 134-138.
[25] Borba L F P, Ferreira M A, Guim A, et al . Nutritive value of differents silage sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) cultivares. Acta Scientiarum, 2012, 34(2): 123-129.
[26] Xue Z L, Luo F C, Kuang C Y, et al . Analysis to mixed silage effect of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid and alfalfa. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University, 2013, 28(3): 340-345.
[27] Selmer-Olsen I. Enzymes as silage additives for grass-clover mixtures. Grass and Forage Science, 1994, 49(3): 305-315.
[28] Wang L, Sun Q Z, Zhang H J. A study on quality of mixed silage of alfalfa and corn. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(4): 202-209.
[29] Fairbairn R, Alli I, Baker B E. Proteolysis associated with the ensiling of chopped alfalfa. Journal of Dairy Science, 1988, 71(1): 152-158.
[30] Zhang X Z, Lu L, Meng Q X, et al . Effects of calcium propionate on in vitro ruminal gas production, fermentation parameters and dry matter degradation rate of substrate with high concentrate. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2013, 25(12): 2906-2912.
[31] Yang F L, Ding X Z, Shi H S, et al . Study on in vitro fermentation characteristics of alfalfa hay mixed with straw and their combined utilization. Pratacultural Science, 2008, 25(3): 61-67.
[32] Prasad C S, Wood C D, Sampath KT. Use of in vitro gas production to evaluate rumen fermentation of untreated and urea-treated finger millet straw ( Eleusine coracana ) supplemented with different levels of concentrate. Journal of Food Science and Agriculture, 1994, 65: 457-464.
[33] Cui Z H, Hao L Z, Liu S J, et al . Evaluation of the fermentation characteristics of mixed oat green hay and native pastures in the Qinhai plateau using an in vitro gas production technique. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(3): 250-257.
[34] Cone J W, Gelder van A H. Influence of protein fermentation on gas production profiles. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1999, 76: 251-264.
[35] Tang S X, Jiang H L, Zhou C S, et al . Effects of different forage species on in vitro gas production characteristics. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2005, 14(3): 72-77.
[36] Sun G Q, Lv Y Y, Zhang J J. A study on the associative effect of whole corn silage-peanut vine and Leymus chinensis by rumen fermentation in vitro . Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(3): 224-231.
[1] 李源, 谢楠, 赵海明, 等. 高丹草营养生长与饲用品质变化规律分析. 草地学报, 2011, 19(5): 813-819.
[3] 韩娟. 施氮水平对高丹草生产性能及土壤无机氮利用的影响[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2010:12.
[4] 庞良玉, 张建华. 苏丹草、高丹草生物性状研究. 西南农业学报, 2004, 17(2): 160-163.
[9] 姜义宝, 王成章, 李振田. 高丹草不同刈割高度对产量、品质及青贮效果的影响. 河南农业科学, 2005, (3): 78-79.
[10] 邓卫东, 席冬梅, 刘勇, 等. 添加甲酸和丙酸对甘蔗梢青贮品质的影响. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2001,(12): 17-18.
[12] 张树攀, 陈铮, 刘大林. 不同添加剂对高丹草青贮性能及体外降解特性的影响. 中国畜牧杂志, 2010,(11): 65-69.
[13] 朱爱民, 时玉梅. 不同处理的高丹草在体外的降解特点. 吉林农业: 下半月, 2010, (3): 54-55.
[14] 冀旋, 玉柱, 白春生, 等. 添加剂对高丹草青贮效果的影响. 草地学报, 2012, 20(3): 571-575.
[15] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. GB/T6435-2006. 饲料中水分和其他挥发性物质含量的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
[16] 国家技术监督局. GB/T6432-1994. 饲料中粗蛋白质的测定方法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1995.
[17] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. GB 20806-2006-T. 饲料中中性洗涤纤维含量的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
[18] 中华人民共和国农业部. NY 1459-2007-T. 饲料中酸性洗涤纤维含量的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
[21] 玉柱, 孙启忠. 饲草青贮技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011: 156.
[22] 杨红建, 宋正河, 祝仕平, 等. 一种发酵微量气体产生量数据自动采集存储装置及方法[P].中国, ZL200610011301.X, 2007-12-19.
[24] 魏春秋, 王明玖. 高加索三叶草青贮饲料的制作及质量变化. 草业科学, 2010, 27(2): 134-138.
[26] 薛祝林, 罗富成, 匡崇义, 等. 高丹草与紫花苜蓿的混合青贮效果分析. 云南农业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2013, 28(3): 340-345.
[28] 王林, 孙启忠, 张慧杰. 苜蓿与玉米混贮质量研究. 草业学报, 2011, 20(4): 202-209.
[30] 张心壮, 鲁琳, 孟庆翔, 等. 丙酸钙对高精料底物瘤胃体外发酵产气量, 发酵参数和干物质降解率的影响. 动物营养学报, 2013, 25(12): 2906-2912.
[31] 阳伏林, 丁学智, 史海山, 等. 苜蓿干草和秸秆组合体外发酵营养特性及其利用研究. 草业科学, 2008, 25(3): 61-67.
[33] 崔占鸿, 郝力壮, 刘书杰, 等. 体外产气法评价青海高原燕麦青干草与天然牧草组合效应. 草业学报, 2012, 21(3): 250-257.
[35] 汤少勋, 姜海林, 周传社, 等. 不同牧草品种对体外发酵产气特性的影响. 草业学报, 2005, 14(3): 72-77.
[36] 孙国强, 吕永艳, 张杰杰. 利用体外瘤胃发酵法研究全株玉米青贮与花生蔓和羊草间的组合效应. 草业学报, 2014, 23(3): 224-231.