温度和水分对中华羊茅幼苗生长的影响

doi:10.11686/cyxb2015492

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本试验采用室内盆栽法对不同温度和水分互作条件下中华羊茅幼苗生长的形态特性进行了研究,通过设定4个土壤水分梯度(80%,65%,50%和35%FWC,FWC为田间最大持水量)和3个生长温度(15,20和25 ℃)来模拟自然生长条件来探究适宜中华羊茅幼苗生长的温度和土壤水分条件。结果表明,中华羊茅在25 ℃、65%水分条件下的出苗率最高,且显著高于其他温度和水分处理(P<0.05),而对照和其他水分处理的幼苗株高在20 ℃条件下均显著高于15和25 ℃处理(P<0.05);3种温度下中华羊茅幼苗的茎粗在65%水分条件下均达到最大,在35%水分条件下最小,且与其他水分处理差异显著(P<0.05);在15和20 ℃条件下,中华羊茅幼苗的叶宽、组织含水量、株高胁迫指数和干物质胁迫指数均在65%水分条件下最大,在35%水分条件下最小,而在25 ℃条件下,其随着土壤水分含量的降低而逐渐减小,且在80%水分条件下达到最大;3种温度下中华羊茅幼苗的根冠比随着土壤水分含量的降低而逐渐增大,其在35%水分条件下最大,且显著大于对照和其他水分处理(P<0.05);20 ℃条件下,中华羊茅幼苗的根长在35%水分条件下最大,而在15和25 ℃条件下,其根长在50%水分条件下最大,且均与对照和其他水分处理差异显著(P<0.05)。因此,由结果得出20 ℃温度和65%水分条件最适于中华羊茅幼苗的生长。

Abstract:

Morphological characteristics of Festuca sinensis seedling growth were studied using the inner potted method under different temperature and moisture conditions. In order to explore the appropriate conditions for seedling growth, natural growth conditions were simulated by setting four soil moisture contents (80%, 65%, 50% and 35% field maximum water capacity, FWC) and three temperature levels (15, 20 and 25 ℃). The results showed that the emergence rate of F. sinensis was highest under the condition of 25 ℃ and 65% moisture content (P<0.05). The plant height of the control and other moisture treatments were significantly higher at 20 ℃ than the 15 and 25 ℃ treatments (P<0.05). Seedling stem diameter under the three temperature treatments all reached their highest scores under the 65% moisture content condition, while the lowest scores were recorded at 35% moisture content (P<0.05). At 15 and 20 ℃, blade width, plant tissue water content, plant height stress index and dry matter stress index were the largest at the 65% moisture condition and lowest at the 35% moisture condition. However, at 25 ℃ these factors decreased with the loss of soil moisture content, with the highest scores recorded at the 80% moisture condition. The root-shoot ratios of F. sinensis under the three temperature treatments increased with the loss of the soil moisture content, reaching maximum levels at 35%, significantly greater than the control and other moisture treatments (P<0.5). Under the 20 ℃ treatment, seedling root length was the largest at 35% moisture content, while under the 15 and 25 ℃ treatments it was largest at 50% moisture content and significantly greater than the control and other moisture treatments (P<0.05). Therefore, it is concluded that 20 ℃ temperature and 65% soil moisture content is the most suitable condition for the growth of F. sinensis seedlings.

汪建军, 汪治刚, 麻安卫, 蔺伟虎, 旷宇, 田沛. 温度和水分对中华羊茅幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(8): 65-73.

WANG Jian-Jun, WANG Zhi-Gang, MA An-Wei, LIN Wei-Hu, KUANG Yu, TIAN Pei. Effect of different temperature and moisture conditions on seedling growth of Festuca sinensis[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(8): 65-73.

参考文献

[1] Wang B, Li C D, Ma Z Z, et al . Study on drought resistance at seeding stage of 4 varieties of tall fescue. Journal of Agricultura Sciences, 2011, 32(3): 22-26.
[2] Wang J P, Bughrara S S. Evaluation of drought tolerance for Atlas fescue, perennial ryegrass, and their progeny. Euphytica, 2008, 164(1): 113-122.
[3] Zheng Y, Rimmington G M, Xie Z, et al . Responses to air temperature and soil moisture of growth of four dominant species on sand dunes of central Inner Mongolia. Journal of Plant Research, 2008, 121(5): 473-482.
[4] Ge Z M, Zhou X, Kellomäki S, et al . Measured and modeled biomass growth in relation to photosynthesis acclimation of a bioenergy crop (Reed canary grass) under elevated temperature, CO 2 enrichment and different water regimes. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2012, 46: 251-262.
[5] A’Bear A D, Jones T H, Kandeler E, et al . Interactive effects of temperature and soil moisture on fungal-mediated wood decomposition and extracellular enzyme activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2014, 70: 151-158.
[6] Luo H J, Zhang Y Q, Shi Y H, et al . Effect of drought stress on the physiological characteristics of different adzuki bean varieties at the seedling stage. Plant Science Journal, 2014, 32(5): 493-501.
[7] Liu Y, Wang Y R. Effect of temperature and soil moisture on seedling growth of Vicia sativa . Pratacultural Science, 2014, 31(7): 1302-1309.
[8] Li X Z, Chi Y Q. The introduction test report of Festuca sinensis . China Pratacultural Science, 1987, 4(1): 58-59.
[9] Li S J, Wang X C, Li C H. Effect of plant growth agents application through leaf spraying on the yield of Poa crymophila cv. Qinghai and Festuca sinensis cv. Qinghai. Pratacultural Science, 2010, 27(7): 68-71.
[10] Mo Y H. Effect yield of Qinghai Festuca sinensis keng in different sowing seeds and sowing seeds measures in alpine area. Qinghai Prataculture, 2009, 18(1): 8-10.
[11] Tian P, Kuang Y, Nan Z B. The characteristics of Festuca sinensis and its breeding potential. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 32(7): 1079-1087.
[12] Chen C, Zhao L L, Wang P C, et al . Growth physiological ecology responses of Lotus corniculatus materials to drought stress and evaluation of drought resistance. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 28(3): 300-306.
[13] Cui H W. The Effects of Cilling and Drought Stress on Germination and Seedling Growth and the Research on Improving Chilling and Drought Tolerance in Tobacco[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2012.
[14] Liu F F. Effects of Paclobutrazol on the Drought Tolerance of Lolium perenne [D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2011.
[15] Yang X L, Wang D M, Wang X F. Impact of water retaining agent on germination and seedling growth of Astragalus adsurgens pelleted seed under drought conditions. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 34(6): 89-93.
[16] Jin B H. Research on Drought Stress Affect Morphological and Physiological Characteristic of Different Cultivars of Bluegrass[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2009.
[17] Zhang S Z. Effect of drought stress on growing development and physiological characteristics of Pennisetum setaceum . Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 29(8): 752-756.
[18] Zhao X Y, Yuan Q H, He S J. Comprehensive appraisal of drought resistance of Festuca elata at seedling stage. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 36(5): 118-120.
[19] Liu A R, Zhang Y B, Tan Z J, et al . Effect of drought stress using PEG-6000 on the growth and osmotica of Sedum lineare . Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(3): 156-162.
[20] Chen M, Hou X C, Fan X F, et al . Drought tolerance analysis of Miscanthus sinensis ‘Gracillimu’ seedlings. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(3): 184-189.
[21] Tian S J, Yang S M, Kong F L, et al . Screening in Southwest China of drought-resistant varieties of maize at the seedling stage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(1): 50-57.
[22] Zhang J Z, Zhang Q Y, Sun G F, et al . Effects of drought stress and re-watering on growth and photosynthesis of Hosta . Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(1): 167-176.
[23] Hornetz B, Shisanya C A, Gitonga N M. Crop water relationships and thermal adaptation of Kathika beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris ) and green grams ( Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) with special reference to temporal patterns of potential growth in the drylands of SE-Kenya. Journal of Arid Environments, 2001, 48(4): 591-601.
[24] Nijs I, Teughels H, Blum H, et al . Simulation of climate change with infrared heaters reduces the productivity of Lolium perenne L. in summer. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 1996, 36(3): 271-280.
[25] Xu Z Z, Zhou G S. Effects of soil moisture on growth characteristics of Leymus chinensis seedlings under different temperature conditions. Journal of Ecology, 2005, 24(3): 256-260.
[26] Zhang L, Jiang H D, Tian N, et al . Effects of temperature and substrate water content on the establishment of Sedum sarmentosum . Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2008, 17(3): 59-64.
[27] Wang X J. Effects of Different Temperatures on Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Two Kinds of Turfgrass[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2008.
[28] Liu Y Y, Li Zh L, Han J Y, et al . Influences of precipitation regimes and elevated CO 2 on photosynthesis and biomass accumulation in Leymus chinensis . Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(11): 128-136.
[29] Wang Y D, Quan B W, Piao J Z, et al . Comparison about drought resistance of 4 forages at seedling stage under water stress. Journal of Agricultural Science Yanbian University, 2007, 29(2): 101-106.
[30] Xu K J, Wang Y F, Tang Y, et al . Effects of persistent and re-watering on the seedling growth and development of switchgrass during tillering stage. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(1): 126-133.
[31] Xu M Y, Hu Z Z, Liu Z X, et al . Effects of moisture on the growth and evapotranspiration of three cold-season turfgrass—the aboveground biomass and turfgrass quality of three cold-season turfgrass responded to diverse soil water gradients. Pratacultural Sciences, 2006, 22(10): 87-91.
[32] Yang X G, Fu H, Zhang H R, et al . Effect of soil water stress on leaf water potential and biomass of Zygophyllum xanthoxylum during seedling stage. Acta Pratacultural Sinica, 2006, 15(2): 37-41.
[33] Song Y. Effect of Increased Temperature and Water Stress on Pinus koraiensis Seed Germination and Seedling Growth[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2013.
[34] Ge Z M, Zhou X, Kellomäki S, et al . Acclimation of photosynthesis in a boreal grass ( Phalaris arundinace a L.) under different temperature, CO 2 , and soil water regimes. Photosynthetica, 2012, 50(1): 141-151.
[35] Zhou J Y, Wang C Y, Xu W L. Comparison between transgenic soybean and non-transgenic soybean in resistance to temperature, water and salt stress. Journal of Ecology and Rura Environment, 2006, 22(2): 26-30.
[36] Wang J, Zhang Y, Yan X, et al . Influence of illumination, temperature, soil moisture and sowing depths on the seed germination and seedling growth of Thermopsis lanceolate . Pratacultural Science, 2011, 28(9): 1640-1644.
[1] 王彬, 李长鼎, 马仲泽, 等. 4个高羊茅品种幼苗期抗旱性比较研究. 农业科学研究, 2011, 32(3): 22-26.
[6] 罗海婧, 张永清, 石艳华, 等. 不同红小豆品种幼苗对干旱胁迫的生理响应. 植物科学学报, 2014, 32(5): 493-501.
[7] 刘勇, 王彦荣. 温度和水分对箭筈豌豆幼苗生长的影响. 草业科学, 2014, 31(7): 1302-1309.
[8] 李先植, 池玉勤. 中华羊茅引种试验报告. 中国草业科学, 1987, 4(1): 58-59.
[9] 李淑娟, 汪新川, 李长慧. 叶面喷施植物生长剂对青海冷地早熟禾和青海中华羊茅产量的影响. 草业科学, 2010, 27(7): 68-71.
[10] 莫玉花. 高寒地区不同行距与播种量对青海中华羊茅产量的影响. 青海草业, 2009, 18(1): 8-10.
[11] 田沛, 旷宇, 南志标. 中华羊茅的优良特性以及利用内生真菌进行育种潜力浅析. 草业科学, 2015, 32(7): 1079-1087.
[12] 陈超, 赵丽丽, 王普昶, 等. 百脉根对干旱胁迫的生长, 生理生态响应及其抗旱性评价. 水土保持学报, 2014, 28(3): 300-306.
[13] 崔华威. 低温干旱胁迫对烟草种子发芽和幼苗生长的影响及提高其抗寒抗旱性的研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2012.
[14] 刘芳芳. 多效唑对多年生黑麦草抗旱性影响的研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2011.
[15] 杨新乐, 王冬梅, 汪晓峰. 干旱条件下保水剂对丸化沙打旺种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响. 水土保持通报, 2014, 34(6): 89-93.
[16] 金不换. 干旱胁迫对不同品种早熟禾形态和生理特性影响的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2009.
[17] 张苏州. 干旱胁迫对‘紫叶’狼尾草生长发育及生理特性的影响. 福建农业学报, 2014, 29(8): 752-756.
[18] 赵相勇, 袁庆华, 何胜江. 高羊茅苗期抗旱性综合评价. 贵州农业科学, 2008, 36(5): 118-120.
[19] 刘爱荣, 张远兵, 谭志静, 等. 模拟干旱对佛甲草生长和渗透调节物质积累的影响. 草业学报, 2012, 21(3): 156-162.
[20] 陈敏, 侯新村, 范希峰, 等. 细叶芒苗期耐旱性分析. 草业学报, 2013, 22(3): 184-189.
[21] 田山君, 杨世民, 孔凡磊, 等. 西南地区玉米苗期抗旱品种筛选. 草业学报, 2014, 23(1): 50-57.
[22] 张金政, 张起源, 孙国峰, 等. 干旱胁迫及复水对玉簪生长和光合作用的影响. 草业学报, 2014, 23(1): 167-176.
[25] 许振柱, 周广胜. 不同温度条件下土壤水分对羊草幼苗生长特性的影响. 生态学杂志, 2005, 24(3): 256-260.
[26] 张蕾, 江海东, 田娜, 等. 不同温度和基质含水量对垂盆草建植初期生长的影响. 草业学报, 2008, 17(3): 59-64.
[27] 王晓洁. 温度对两种类型草坪草生理生化的影响[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2008.
[28] 刘玉英, 李卓琳, 韩佳育, 等. 模拟降雨量变化与CO 2 浓度升高对羊草光合特性和生物量的影响. 草业学报, 2015, 24(11): 128-136.
[29] 王怡丹, 全炳武, 朴京珠, 等. 水分胁迫对4种牧草苗期的抗旱性比较. 延边大学农学学报, 2007, 29(2): 101-106.
[30] 徐开杰, 王勇锋, 汤益, 等. 持续干旱及复水对柳枝稷幼苗分蘖期生长发育的影响. 草地学报, 2014, 22(1): 126-133.
[31] 徐敏云, 胡自治, 刘自学, 等. 水分对3种冷季型草坪草生长的影响及蒸散需水研究—3种冷季型草坪草地上部分对不同水分梯度的响应. 草业科学, 2006, 22(10): 87-91.
[32] 杨鑫光, 傅华, 张洪荣, 等. 水分胁迫对霸王苗期叶水势和生物量的影响. 草业学报, 2006, 15(2): 37-41.
[33] 宋媛. 温度升高和干旱处理对红松种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2013.
[35] 周军英, 王长永, 续卫利. 温度, 水分和盐度对转基因耐草甘膦大豆种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响. 生态与农村环境学报, 2006, 22(2): 26-30.
[36] 王进, 张勇, 颜霞, 等. 光照, 温度, 土壤水分和播种深度对披针叶黄华种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响. 草业科学, 2011, 28(9): 1640-1644.||