微生态制剂对玉米秸秆青贮发酵品质、营养成分及瘤胃降解率的影响

doi:10.11686/cyxb2015511

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究以玉米秸秆为研究对象,探讨酶制剂、菌制剂以及酶制剂与菌制剂混合处理对玉米秸秆青贮料发酵品质、营养成分以及瘤胃降解率的影响。玉米秸秆(干物质含量为42%~44%)用青贮切碎机切短至2 cm,将各处理青贮剂溶于蒸馏水,与原料混合均匀后,装入聚乙烯袋(24 cm×40 cm)中,每袋1 kg,然后用真空包装机抽真空封口,室温贮藏45 d后开封取样。采用实验室化学分析法及半体内试验测定发酵品质、营养成分和瘤胃降解率。结果表明,1)与对照组相比,菌制剂(LAB₁ 和LAB₂)处理组pH值和NH₃-N含量均显著降低(P<0.05),乳酸(LA)含量、有机物(OM)及可溶性碳水化合物(WSC)保存量、干物质(DM)、OM、粗蛋白(CP)的瘤胃降解率显著增加(P<0.05);菌制剂处理组的WSC含量显著高于对照组和酶制剂处理(P<0.05)。2)与对照组相比,酶制剂(CE₁和CE₂)处理组pH值、NH₃-N含量、中性洗涤纤维(NDF)、酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)、纤维素均显著降低(P<0.05),乳酸(LA)含量、有机物(OM)及可溶性碳水化合物(WSC)保存量、干物质(DM)、OM、粗蛋白(CP)的瘤胃降解率显著增加(P<0.05);有降低酸性洗涤木质素(ADL)含量的趋势,但是差异不显著(P>0.05)。3)酶菌复合处理组(MCL₁和MCL₂)pH值最低(P<0.05),NDF、纤维素在瘤胃中降解能力显著高于其他处理组(P<0.05),ADL降解率在数值上高于其他组,但差异不显著(P>0.05);与对照组相比,酶菌混合处理组能够降低NDF、ADF、纤维素含量(P<0.05)。综上,酶菌复合添加剂喷洒到秸秆中进行青贮发酵后,能够有效破除玉米秸秆青贮饲料的特殊的木质素-纤维素-半纤维素复合体结构,改善秸秆青贮饲料的发酵品质,提高营养物质的保存量及反刍动物瘤胃对秸秆营养物质的降解率,从而提高秸秆的可利用率,其中MCL₂处理组效果最佳。

Abstract: A study has been undertaken to investigate the effects of probiotics on the fermentation quality, nutrition composition and in situ ruminal degradability of corn stalk silage. Green corn stalk without ears (dry matter=42%-44%) was chopped to 2 cm lengths and then 1 kg of chopped corn stalk was packed with additives (zymin, fungus-preparation, and a mixture of the zymin and fungus-preparation) in polyethylene bags (24 cm×40 cm) using a vacuum packager. After 45 days of fermentation at room temperature, the corn stalk silage’s fermentation quality, nutrition composition and in situ ruminal degradability were analyzed using laboratory chemical methods and in situ technology. The results showed that, compared to the control, the pH value and ammonia nitrogen (NH₃-N) content of the two lactobacillus (LAB₁ and LAB₂) treatments decreased (P<0.05), whereas contents of lactate acid (LA), organic matter (OM), water soluble carbohydrates (WSC), and the in situ ruminal degradability of DM, OM and crude protein (CP) increased significantly (P<0.05). The addition of lactobacillus increased WSC content (P<0.05) compared with the control and cellulase treatments. Compared with the control, the pH value, NH₃-N content, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and cellulose content of the cellulase treatments (CE₁ and CE₂) significantly decreased (P<0.05). Furthermore, the acid detergent lignin (ADL) content had a decreasing trend (P>0.05). The mixture of cellulase and lactobacillus treatments (MCL₁ and MCL₂) had the lowest pH value and the highest in situ degradation of NDF and cellulose compared with other treatments (P<0.05). In addition, in situ degradation of ADL increased but did not reach significance (P>0.05). Compared with the control, the NDF, ADF and cellulose contents of the cellulase and lactobacillus mixture treatments significantly decreased (P<0.05). In conclusion, the application of cellulase and lactobacillus mixtures to the fermentation of corn stalk contributed to the breakdown of lignin-cellulose-hemicellulose composite structures and the improvement of fermentation quality, which consequently resulted into high nutrient digestibility and utilization efficiency. The MCL₂ treatment had the best effect in this regard.

陶莲, 冯文晓, 王玉荣, 刁其玉. 微生态制剂对玉米秸秆青贮发酵品质、营养成分及瘤胃降解率的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(9): 152-160.

TAO Lian, FENG Wen-Xiao, WANG Yu-Rong, DIAO Qi-Yu. Effects of microecological agents on the fermentation quality, nutrition composition and in situ ruminal degradability of corn stalk silage[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(9): 152-160.

参考文献

[1] Ren S F. Effect of Plant Hemicellulose Monosaccharide Composition on Biomass Degradation Transposition[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2011.
[2] Xue F, Zhou Z, Ren L, et al . Influence of rumen-protected lysine supplementation on growth performance and plasma amino acid concentrations in growing cattle offered the maize stalk silage/maize grain-based diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2011, 169(1/2): 61-67.
[3] Wang R, Sun Y, Zhang S, et al . Two-step pretreatment of corn stalk silage for increasing sugars production and decreasing the amount of catalyst. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 120: 290-294.
[4] Cheng Y H, Lei X Q, Xu T S, et al . Microbe composition and nutrient content analysis for straws of micro-storage and traditional silage. Acta Ecologae Animalis Domastici, 2013, 34(4): 41-44.
[5] Li X J, Yu Z. Filtering of excellent lactic acid bacteria strains from alfalfa silage. China Dairy Cattle, 2014, (11): 37-40.
[6] Yang W Q, Long X Q, Cui W D. Bacteria diversity analysis in corn silage. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 50(8): 1424-1433.
[7] Schmid T R T, Kung Jr L.The effects of Lactobacillus buchneri with or without a homolactic bacterium on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silages made at different locations. Journal of Dairy Science, 2010, 93: 1616-1624.
[8] Wang J, Wang J Q, Zhou H, et al . Effects of addition of previously fermented juice prepared from alfalfa on fermentation quality and protein degradation of alfalfa silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2009, 151: 280-290.
[9] Guo X S, Undersander D J, Combs D K. Effect of Lactobacillus inoculants and forage dry matter on the fermentation and aerobic stability of ensiled mixed-crop tall fescue and meadow fescue. Journal of Dairy Science, 2013, 96(3): 1735-1744.
[10] Guo P, Wang X, Zhu W, et al . Degradation of corn stalk by the composite microbial system of MC1. Journal of Enbironmental Sciences-China, 2008, 20: 109-114.
[11] Wang C, Sun H, Li J, et al . Enzyme activities during degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by white rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium in soils. Chemosphere, 2009, 77: 733-738.
[12] Zhang L X, Li Y L, Diao Q Y. Effects of different microorganisms and their combinations on the nutritional value of corn stover. Animal Nutrition, 2014, (1): 32-35.
[13] Zhang X Q, Jin Y M, Li F D, et al . Effect of corn flour on the quality of Urtica cannabina silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(1): 190-195.
[14] Broderick G A, Kang J H. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Science, 1980, 63(1): 64-75.
[15] Zhang L Y. Feed Analysis and Feed Quality Testing Technology[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2002: 53-56, 70-74.
[16] Ribeiro S S, Vasconcelos J T, Morais M G, et al . Effects of ruminal infusion of a slow-release polymer-coated urea or conventional urea on apparent nutrient digestibility, in situ degradability, and rumen parameters in cattle fed low-quality hay. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2011, 164: 53-61.
[17] Zhang L X, Diao Q Y, Li Y L. Research progress in using biological agents to degrade anti-nutritional factor of straw. Feed Industry, 2013, (5): 21-25.
[18] Peng H L. Effect of Different Silage Additives on Alfalfa Silage Quality[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2003.
[19] Selmer-Olsen I. Enzymes as silage additives for grass-clove mixtures. Grass and Forage Science, 1994, 49(3): 305-315.
[20] Jacobs J L, Mcallan A B. Enzymes as silage additives for silage quality, digestion, digestibility and performance in growing cattle. Grass and Forage Science, 1991, 46(1): 63-68.
[21] Wang A, Zhang S F, Zhong Y M, et al . A study on effect of exogenous enzymes on silage. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 1997, 28(4): 358-365.
[22] Ma H, Miao S J, Liu J. Effect of cellulase on nutrient content of corn straw silage and rumen degradability of dairy cows. Grazing Livestock, 2006, 133(4): 43-46.
[23] Li H H, Guo Y N, Tong Z. Study on the biological degradation effect of corn straw. Journal of Polytechnic University, 2010, (3): 294-297.
[24] Båth K, Roos S, Wall T, et al . The cell surface of Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55730 high lighted by identification of 126 extracellular proteins from the genome sequence. Fems Microbiology Letters, 2005, 253: 75-82.
[25] Sheperd A C, Kung L. Effect of an enzyme additive on composition of corn silage ensiled at various stages of maturity. Journal of Dairy Science, 1996, 79: 1767-1773.
[26] Zhang L X, Li Y L, Diao Q Y. The optimization of solid-state fermentation culture medium for combined cellulose degradation bacteria. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2014, 50(13): 77-81.
[27] He C F, Wang J T, Xin Z X. Study of finishing sheep feeding with two approaches of wheat straw. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2010, 5: 82-83.
[28] Cai Y M, Suyanandana P, Saman P, et al . Classification and characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the intestines of common carp and freshwater prawns. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, 1999, 45(4): 177-184.
[29] Lv W L, Diao Q Y, Yan G L. Effect of Lactobacillus buchneri on the quality and aerobic stability of green corn-stalk silages. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(3): 143-148.
[30] Salawu M B, Waxen E H, Adesogan A T. Fermentation characteristics, aerobic stability and ruminal degradation of ensiled peal/wheat bi-crop forages treated with two microbial inoculants, formic acid or quebracho tannins. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture, 2001, 81: 1263-1268.
[31] Fu T. Effect of Microbial Inoculants on Fermentation Process and Quality of Corn Silage[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2005.
[32] Hong M, Diao Q Y, Yan G L, et al . Review for effect of Lactobacillus buchneri on the silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(5): 266-271.
[33] Chen H, Zhang Q. Technology for co-degradation of corn stalk by microorganism and enzyme. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008, 24(3): 270-273.
[34] Liu R L, Su X M. Application study on complex enzyme-straw decomposition agent. Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2012, 31(1): 12-15.
[1] 任双丰. 植物半纤维素单糖组成对生物质降解转化的影响[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2011.
[4] 程银华, 雷雪芹, 徐廷生, 等. 揉丝微贮与传统青贮秸秆的微生物组成与营养成分分析. 家畜生态学报, 2013, 34(4): 41-44.
[5] 李旭娇, 玉柱. 苜蓿青贮饲料中优良乳酸菌菌株的筛选. 中国奶牛, 2014(11): 37-40.
[6] 杨文琦, 龙宣杞, 崔卫东. 玉米青贮中细菌多样性分析. 新疆农业科学, 2013, 50(8): 1424-1433.
[12] 张立霞, 李艳玲, 刁其玉. 不同微生物及组合对玉米秸秆营养价值的影响. 动物营养学报, 2014, (1): 32-35.
[13] 张晓庆, 金艳梅, 李发弟, 等. 麻叶荨麻与玉米粉混贮对青贮品质的影响. 草业学报, 2015, 24(1): 190-195.
[15] 张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2002: 53-56, 70-74.
[17] 张立霞, 刁其玉, 李艳玲. 利用生物制剂破解秸秆抗营养因子的研究进展. 饲料工业, 2013, (5): 21-25.
[18] 彭海兰. 不同青贮添加剂对苜蓿青贮品质的影响[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2003.
[21] 王安, 张淑芳, 钟一民, 等. 纤维素复合酶作为青贮饲料添加剂的研究. 东北农业大学学报, 1997, 28(4): 358-365.
[22] 马慧, 苗树君, 刘君. 纤维素酶对玉米秸青贮营养成分及其奶牛毅力降解率的影响. 草食家畜, 2006, 133(4): 43-46.
[23] 李海红, 郭雅妮, 同帜. 玉米秸秆的生物降解效果研究. 西安工程大学学报, 2010, (3): 294-297.
[26] 张立霞, 李艳玲, 刁其玉. 复合纤维素降解菌固体发酵培养基的筛选及优化. 中国畜牧杂志, 2014, 50(13): 77-81.
[27] 何长芳, 王建涛, 辛总秀. 两种处理小麦秸秆饲喂育肥羊效果试验. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2010, 5: 82-83.
[29] 吕文龙, 刁其玉, 闫贵龙. 布氏乳杆菌对青玉米秸青贮发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响. 草业学报, 2011, 20(3): 143-148.
[31] 傅彤. 微生物接种剂对玉米青贮饲料发酵进程及品质的影响[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2005.
[32] 洪梅, 刁其玉, 闫贵龙, 等. 布氏乳杆菌对青贮发酵及其效果的研究进展. 草业学报, 2011, 20(5): 266-271.
[33] 陈合, 张强. 酶菌共降解玉米秸秆的工艺研究. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(3): 270-273.
[34] 刘瑞玲, 苏希孟. 复合酶制剂-秸秆分解剂的应用研究. 畜牧兽医杂志, 2012, 31(1): 12-15.