刈割对羊草草原土壤酶活性和养分含量的影响

doi:10.11686/cyxb2015549

草业学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 55-62.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2015549

刈割对羊草草原土壤酶活性和养分含量的影响

秦燕^{1, 2}, 何峰¹, 仝宗永¹, 陈宝瑞³, 李向林^{1*, *}

1.中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所,北京 100193;
2.齐齐哈尔大学, 黑龙江齐齐哈尔 161006;
3.呼伦贝尔国家野外站,中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所,北京 100081

收稿日期:2015-12-04 出版日期:2016-04-20 发布日期:2016-04-20
作者简介:秦燕(1981-),女,黑龙江齐齐哈尔人,在读博士。E-mail:mule119@163.com
基金资助:
国家牧草产业技术体系课题(CARS-35),公益性行业(农业)科研专项经费(201303060)和草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室开放课题(SKLGAE201506)资助

Influence of cutting interval on soil enzyme activity and nutrients in Leymus chinensis meadow

QIN Yan^{1, 2}, HE Feng¹, TONG Zong-Yong¹, CHEN Bao-Rui³, LI Xiang-Lin^{1, *}

1.Institute of Animal Science of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing 100193, China;
2.Qiqihar University, Qiqihar 161006, China;
3.Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2015-12-04 Online:2016-04-20 Published:2016-04-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 土壤酶是土壤生态系统中最活跃的组分之一,是土壤中重要的生物活性物质,草地土壤酶活性与草地土壤养分含量关系密切。本文研究了刈割制度对呼伦贝尔羊草草原土壤酶活性和养分的影响,主要结果为:土壤脲酶、碱性磷酸酶对刈割制度的响应较为敏感,与逐年刈割相比,刈割间隔2年到6年草地0~30 cm土壤的脲酶活性提高了0.34~0.64倍,碱性磷酸酶活性降低了28.9%~44.2%。刈割对草地30~60 cm土壤养分含量影响更大,表现为土壤全氮、速效氮、全磷、速效钾和速效磷含量在各处理间0~30 cm土壤中没有显著的变化,仅6年1割样地较逐年刈割样地土壤有机质含量增加了10.5%;随刈割间隔年限的增加,30~60 cm土壤全氮和有机质含量变化范围分别为0.36~0.66 g/kg和12.26~17.73 g/kg,并且速效钾和速效磷含量都有降低的趋势。不同刈割制度下草地土壤养分含量与土壤酶活性的关系不尽相同,正负兼有。研究结果表明逐年刈割对土壤养分的影响有限,逐年刈割适用于该研究区的草地管理。

Abstract: Soil enzymes are essential bioactive substances and among the most active components of soil ecosystems closely relation with the nutrient status of soils.This paper focused on the influence of cutting interval on soil enzyme activities and nutrients and their relationships in Leymus chinensis meadow in Hulunber. Soil urease and alkaline phosphorus activity were most sensitive to forage cutting intervals. Compared with the annual cutting, soil urease activity was enhanced 0.4-1.0 times in the top 30 cm compared with forage cutting intervals between 2 and 6 years whereas soil alkaline phosphatase activity decreased by 28.9%-44.2%. Soil nutrients were influenced greatly by cutting. Longer cutting intervals did not result in significant differences in soil total nitrogen, available nitrogen, total phosphorus, available phosphorus and available potassium, but soil organic matter was increased 10.5% in the 0-30 cm soil layer when grassland was cut every 6 years. With increasing cutting interval, variation in soil total nitrogen and organic matter content in the 30-60 cm soil layer were 0.36-0.66 g/kg and 12.26-17.73 g/kg respectively, but available phosphorus and potassium content were reduced. Correlations between soil nutrients and enzyme activities differ with forage cutting interval.It is concluded that annual cutting does not adversely affect soil meaning that cutting L. chinensis meadow annually is a useful strategy for its management.

秦燕, 何峰, 仝宗永, 陈宝瑞, 李向林. 刈割对羊草草原土壤酶活性和养分含量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(4): 55-62.

QIN Yan, HE Feng, TONG Zong-Yong, CHEN Bao-Rui, LI Xiang-Lin. Influence of cutting interval on soil enzyme activity and nutrients in Leymus chinensis meadow[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(4): 55-62.

参考文献

[1] Wang Q L, Wang C T, Liu W, et al . Changes in plant communities and soil enzyme activities of artificial grasslands in headwater areas of the Yangtze and Yellow Rivers. Chinese Journal of Applied Environment Biology, 2010, 16(5): 662-666.
[2] Zhao S, Zhang J N, Lai X, et al . Effects of grazing and fencing on soil enzyme activity and soil physicochemical properties in Stipa steppe in Hulunbeier, Inner Mongolia. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2011, 33(1): 71-76.
[3] Guan S Y. Soil Enzyme and Its Research Methods[M]. Beijing: Agricultural Press, 1986.
[4] Wendu R L, Li G, Zhang J N, et al . The study of soil microbial biomass and soil enzyme activity on different grassland in Hulunbeier, Inner Mongolia. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(5): 94-102.
[5] Li Z J, Zhu T H, Liu Z X. Evaluation on effect of grain-for-green models on soil biological properties. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 33(6): 129-135.
[6] Liu S J, Xia X, Chen G M, et al . Study progress on functions and affecting factors of soil enzymes. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(21): 1-7.
[7] Ndour N, Chotte J, Pate E. Use of soil enzyme activities to monitor soil quality in natural and improved fallows in semi-arid tropical regions. Applied Soil Ecology, 2001, 18(3): 229-238.
[8] Sardans J, Penuelas J. Soil enzyme activity in a Mediterranean forest after six years of drought. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2010, 74(3): 838-851.
[9] Rasool N, Reshi Z, Shah M. Effect of butachlor (G) on soil enzyme activity. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2014, 61(5): 94-100.
[10] Gomah A, Alnahidh S, Amer H. Amidase and urease activity in soil as affected by sludge, salinity and wetting and drying cycles. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 1990, 153(4): 215-218.
[11] Gao R, Lv J L. Study on the enzyme activities and fertility change of soils by a long term located utilization of different fertilizers. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2005, 13(1): 143-145.
[12] Yan R R, Yan Y C, Xin X P, et al . Changes in microorganisms and enzyme activities in soil under different grazing intensities in meadow steppe, Inner Mongolia. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2011, 20(2): 259-265.
[13] Wang Q, Bao Y, Liu X. Spatio-temporal dynamics of Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with glomalin-related soil protein and soil enzymes in different managed semiarid steppes. Mycorrhiza, 2014, 24(7): 525-538.
[14] Tan Y R, Du G Z, Chen D D, et al . Impact of grazing on the activities of soil enzymes and soil nutrient factors in an alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 2012, 48(1): 86-91.
[15] Zhou X, Zhang Y M. Season and nitrogen effects on activities of three hydrolytic enzymes in soils of the Gurbantunggut Desert, Northwest China. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2014, 45(12): 1699-1713.
[16] Bremner J. Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biology Biochemistry, 1969, 1(4): 301-307.
[17] Bao S D. Agrochemical Soil Analysis[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2005: 23-107.
[18] Henry H A, Juarez J D, Field C B, et al . Interactive effects of elevated CO 2 , N deposition and climate change on extracellular enzyme activity and soil density fractionation in a California annual grassland. Global Change Biology, 2005, 11: 1808-1815.
[19] Keeler B L, Hobbie S E, Kellogg L E. Effects of long-term nitrogen addition on microbial enzyme activity in eight forested and grassland sites: implications for litter and soil organic matter decomposition. Ecosystems, 2009, 12(1): 1-15.
[20] Cao H, Sun H, Yang H, et al . A review of soil enzyme activity and its indication for soil quality. Chinese Journal of Applied Environmental Biology, 2003, 9(1): 105-109.
[21] Zhang X Y, Dong W Y, Dai X Q, et al . Responses of absolute and specific soil enzyme activities to long term additions of organic and mineral fertilizer. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 536: 59-67.
[22] Zhu J, Zhang B, Tan Z L, et al . Research progress of clipping effect on quality and biomass of grazing. Pratacultural Science, 2009, 26(2): 80-85.
[23] Zhang J E, Liu W G, Chen J Q, et al . Effects of different cutting intensities of Stylosanthes guianensis (Aubl.) SW. on soil nutrients and soil enzyme activities in rhizosphere. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2005, 14(3): 387-391.
[24] Dinesh R, Dubey R, Prasad G. Soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities as influenced by organic manure incorporation into soils of a rice-rice system. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 1998, 181(3): 173-178.
[25] Qin Y, Niu D C, Kang J, et al . Effect of livestock exclusion on soil physical and biochemical properties of a desert rangeland in Inner Mongolia. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2015, 24(6): 2587-2595.
[26] Lu P, Guo J X, Zhu L. Soil catalase activity of main plant communities in Leymus chinensis grassland in northern China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(6): 675-679.
[27] Nahidan S, Nourbakhsh F, Mosaddeghi M. Variation of soil microbial biomass C and hydrolytic enzyme activities in a rangeland ecosystem: are slope aspect and position effective. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2014, 61(6): 1-15.
[28] Kandeler E, Mosier A, Morgan J. Response of soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities to the transient elevation of carbon dioxide in a semi-arid grassland. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2006, 38(8): 2448-2460.
[29] Zhou X, Chen C, Wang Y. Warming and increased precipitation have differential effects on soil extracellular enzyme activities in a temperate grassland. The Science of the Total Environment, 2013, 444: 552-558.
[30] An S, Cheng Y, Huang Y. Effects of revegetation on soil microbial biomass, enzyme activities, and nutrient cycling on the Loess Plateau in China. Restoration Ecology, 2013, 21(5): 600-607.
[31] Li H, Xiang D, Wang C. Effects of epigeic earthworm ( Eisenia fetida ) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus ( Glomus intraradices ) on enzyme activities of a sterilized soil-sand mixture and nutrient uptake by maize. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2012, 48(8): 879-887.
[32] Tscherko D, Kandeler E, Bardossy A. Fuzzy classification of microbial biomass and enzyme activities in grassland soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2007, 39(7): 1799-1808.
[33] Wei S W, Wang S M, Zhang Y, et al . Effects of different soil management methods on the soil nutrients, enzyme activity and fruit quality of pear orchards. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(12): 46-55.
[1] 王启兰, 王长庭, 刘伟, 等. 江河源区人工草地植物群落和土壤酶活性变化. 应用与环境生物学报, 2010, 16(5): 662-666.
[2] 赵帅, 张静妮, 赖欣, 等. 放牧与围封对呼伦贝尔针茅草原土壤酶活性及理化性质的影响. 中国草地学报, 2011, 33(1): 71-76.
[3] 关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1986.
[4] 文都日乐, 李刚, 张静妮, 等. 呼伦贝尔不同草地类型土壤微生物量及土壤酶活性研究. 草业学报, 2010, 19(5): 94-102.
[5] 李姝江, 朱天辉, 刘子雄. 不同退耕还林模式对土壤生物学性质的影响效果评价. 水土保持通报, 2013, 33(6): 129-135.
[6] 刘善江, 夏雪, 陈桂梅, 等. 土壤酶的研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(21): 1-7.
[11] 高瑞, 吕家珑. 长期定位施肥土壤酶活性及其肥力变化研究. 中国农业生态学报, 2005, 13(1): 143-145.
[12] 闫瑞瑞, 闫玉春, 辛晓平, 等. 不同放牧梯度下草甸草原土壤微生物和酶活性研究. 生态环境学报, 2011, 20(2): 259-265.
[14] 谈嫣蓉, 杜国祯, 陈懂懂, 等. 放牧对青藏高原东缘高寒草甸土壤酶活性及土壤养分的影响. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 48(1): 86-91.
[17] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005: 23-107.
[20] 曹慧, 孙辉, 杨浩, 等. 土壤酶活性及其对土壤质量的指示研究进展. 应用与环境生物学报, 2003, 9(1): 105-109.
[22] 朱珏, 张彬, 谭支良, 等. 刈割对牧草生物量和品质影响的研究进展. 草业科学, 2009, 26(2): 80-85.
[23] 章家恩, 刘文高, 陈景青, 等. 刈割对牧草地下部根区土壤养分及土壤酶活性的影响. 生态环境, 2005, 14(3): 387-391.
[26] 鲁萍, 郭继勋, 朱丽. 东北羊草草原主要植物群落土壤过氧化氢酶活性的研究. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(6): 675-679.
[33] 魏树伟, 王少敏, 张勇, 等. 不同土壤管理方式对梨园土壤养分、酶活性及果实风味品质的影响. 草业学报, 2015, 24(12): 46-55.

刈割对羊草草原土壤酶活性和养分含量的影响

Influence of cutting interval on soil enzyme activity and nutrients in Leymus chinensis meadow

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics