种群密度对沙米异速生长的影响

doi:10.11686/cyxb2016147

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 植物各器官之间的异速生长关系决定了植物的生活史对策,进而影响种群内个体之间的共存和生物多样性的维持。传统方法无法区分植物性状对其的响应是环境造成的,还是由于个体大小差异造成的,而异速生长分析能够解决这一问题。为此,本研究利用异速生长分析方法,通过模拟沙米在退化草地恢复过程中不同的种群密度(16, 44.4, 100和400株/m²),研究其各器官之间的异速生长关系。结果表明,沙米各器官之间都具有显著的异速生长关系:其中根和地上、根和主茎、叶和根、主茎和地上等器官生物量之间的变化不随种群密度的变化而变化,属于表观可塑性;根和茎、茎和地上、叶和茎等器官生物量之间的异速生长及生物量比值均受种群密度的显著影响,属于真正可塑性,这表明种群密度变化的确影响了沙米的生长变化。研究同时发现,沙米叶和地上生物量之间的异速指数仅在44.4株/m²种群密度下接近于0.75,即叶生物量与个体大小呈3/4次幂关系,符合生态代谢理论,而在其他密度时异速指数与0.75有显著差异(P<0.001),表明环境变化可能会导致沙米生长策略发生改变。种群密度对沙米繁殖和其他器官之间的异速生长关系影响不显著,表明在不同种群密度下,沙米仍保持相同的繁殖策略;然而种群密度在沙米生育期对繁殖和其他器官之间的异速常数和个体大小均产生了极显著的影响。因此,在探讨繁殖器官与个体大小的关系时,还需要关注植物生育期的变化,只有生育期相同的时候,才能比较不同研究之间的差异。

Abstract: The allometric relationships between plant organs determine the strategies of life history, affecting the coexistence and biodiversity of species. Traditional methods are not able to distinguish the responses of plant traits to environmental or genetic differences but allometric analysis can help solve this problem. Allometric analysis was used to study the relationships between different organs of Agriophyllum squarrosum by simulating different population densities of A. squarrosum (16, 44.4, 100 and 400 plants/m²) during the restoration of degraded grassland. The results showed that there are significant allometric relationships between organ pairs. Changes in root vs. aboveground biomass, root vs. main stem biomass, leaf vs. root biomass and main stem vs. aboveground biomass were not influenced by population density, indicating ‘apparent plasticity’. The allometric relationships of root vs. stem, stem vs. aboveground, leaf vs. stem biomass and their respective biomass ratio were significantly affected by population density, reflecting ‘real plasticity’. The allometric index of leaf vs. aboveground biomass at 44.4 plants/m² was approximately 0.75, while the allometric indices at other plant densities were significantly different from 0.75 (P<0.001), suggesting that environmental changes resulted in changes in growth strategy of A. squarrosum. The influence of population density on the allometric relationships between reproductive and other organs is not significant, indicating that A. squarrosum will adopt the same strategy under different densities, but that density differences will result in different allometric scaling and size of individual reproductive organ during different periods of reproductive development. It is important to consider changes in plant growth stages when investigating the relationships between reproductive organs and individual plants.

范高华, 黄迎新, 赵学勇, 神祥金. 种群密度对沙米异速生长的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(3): 53-64.

FAN Gao-Hua, HUANG Ying-Xin, ZHAO Xue-Yong, SHEN Xiang-Jin. Effect of population density on the allometric growth of Agriophyllum squarrosum[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(3): 53-64.

参考文献

[1] Mandak B, Py ek P. How does density and nutrient stress affect allometry and fruit production in the heterocarpic species Atriplex sagittata (Chenopodiaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany, 1999, 77(8): 1106-1119.
[2] Wang T H, Zhou D W, Wang P, et al . Size-dependent reproductive effort in Amaranthus retroflexus : the influence of planting density and sowing date. Botany, 2006, 84(3): 485-492.
[3] Zhang H X, Zhou D W, Huang Y X, et al . Plasticity and allometry of meristem allocation in response to density in three annual plants with different architectures. Botany, 2008, 86(11): 1291-1298.
[4] Huang Y X, Zhao X Y, Zhang H X, et al . Allometry of Corispermum macrocarpum in response to soil nutrient, water, and population density. Botany, 2010, 88(1): 13-19.
[5] Weiner J. Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2004, 6(4): 207-215.
[6] Allen A P, Pockman W T, Restrepo C, et al . Allometry, growth and population regulation of the desert shrub Larrea tridentata . Functional Ecology, 2008, 22(2): 197-204.
[7] Huang Y X, Zhao X Y, Zhang H X, et al . Response of Agriophyllum squarrosum phenotypic plasticity to the changes of soil nutrient and moisture contents and population density. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 29(12): 2593-2598.
黄迎新, 赵学勇, 张洪轩, 等. 沙米表型可塑性对土壤养分, 水分和种群密度变化的响应. 应用生态学报, 2008, 29(12): 2593-2598.
[8] Calder W A. Size, Function, and Life History[M]. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1984.
[9] Peters R H. The Ecological Implications of Body Size[M]. England: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
[10] Han W X, Fang J Y. Review on the mechanism models of allometric scaling laws: 3/4 vs. 2/3 power. Journal of Plant Ecology: Chinese Version, 2008, 32(4): 951-960.
韩文轩, 方精云. 幂指数异速生长机制模型综述. 植物生态学报: 中文版, 2008, 32(4): 951-960.
[11] Han W X, Fang J Y. Self-thinning law in plant populations: -3/2 vs -4/3. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis: Natural Science Edition, 2008, 44(4): 661-668.
韩文轩, 方精云. 植物种群的自然稀疏规律——-3/2还是-4/3. 北京大学学报: 自然科学版, 2008, 44(4): 661-668.
[12] White J. The allometric interpretation of the self-thinning rule. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1981, 89(3): 475-500.
[13] Menges E S. Biomass allocation and geometry of the clonal forest herb Laportea canadensis : adaptive responses to the environment or allometric constraints. American Journal of Botany, 1987, 74(4): 551-563.
[14] Huang Y X, Zhao X Y, Zhang H X, et al . Allometric effects of Agriophyllum squarrosum in response to soil nutrients, water, and population density in the Horqin sandy land of China. Journal of Plant Biology, 2009, 52(3): 210-219.
[15] Wu Z Y. Flora of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1999.
吴征镒. 中国植物志[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999.
[16] Liu Y X. The Chinese Desert Flora[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1985.
刘媖心. 中国沙漠植物志[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1985.
[17] Li H Y, Li H Q, Li Q H, et al . Multi-species and multi-scale patterns and species associations of sand-fixing plantations. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(4): 741-746.
李慧勇, 李慧卿, 李清河, 等. 几种人工固沙林多种群多尺度格局及种间关联. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(4): 741-746.
[18] Chang X L, Wu J G. Species diversity during desertification on Kerqin Sandy Land. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1997, 8(2): 151-156.
常学礼, 邬建国. 科尔沁沙地沙漠化过程中的物种多样性. 应用生态学报, 1997, 8(2): 151-156.
[19] Zhang J G, Zhou H Y, Wang X P, et al . Physio-ecological characteristics of annual plants in Shapotou Region. Journal of Desert Research, 2002, 22(4): 350-353.
张景光, 周海燕, 王新平, 等. 沙坡头地区一年生植物的生理生态特性研究. 中国沙漠, 2002, 22(4): 350-353.
[20] Niklas K J. Plant Allometry: the Scaling of Form and Process[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
[21] Falster D S, Warton D I, Wright I J. User’s guide to SMATR: standardized major axis tests and routines version 2.0, copyright 2006[DB/OL]. (2006-03-11)[2016-03-11]. http://www. bio. mq. edu. au/ecology/SMATR/.
[22] Yang Y W, Wang G X, Li X L, et al . Research advances in plant density-dependent regulation and its response to environmental change. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2011, 30(8): 1813-1821.
杨元武, 王根轩, 李希来, 等. 植物密度调控及其对环境变化响应的研究进展. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(8): 1813-1821.
[23] Li L, Zhou D W, Sheng L X. Allometric relationship between mean component biomass and density during the course of self-thinning for Fagopyrum esculentum populations. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(13): 3987-3997.
黎磊, 周道玮, 盛连喜. 植物种群自疏过程中构件生物量与密度的关系. 生态学报, 2012, 32(13): 3987-3997.
[24] Deng J M, Li T, Wang G X, et al . Trade-offs between the metabolic rate and population density of plants. PloS One, 2008, 3(3): e1799.
[25] Zhang L, Tang J J, Ye B X, et al . Advance in relationship between biomass and density of plant communities. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(2): 455-461.
张璐, 唐建军, 叶宝兴, 等. 植物群落密度调控研究进展. 生态学报, 2010, 30(2): 455-461.
[26] Chen J, Zhao Q L, Wang J H, et al . Research on density of biomass and model of allometric growth in Catalpa ovata seedlings. Practical Forestry Technology, 2012, 5: 8-11.
陈静, 赵秋玲, 王俊辉, 等. 梓树幼苗生物量和异速生长模式的密度效应研究. 林业实用技术, 2012, 5: 8-11.
[27] Cheng D L, Zhong Q L, Lin M Z, et al . The advance of allometric studies on plant metabolic rates and biomass. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(8): 2312-2320.
程栋梁, 钟全林, 林茂兹, 等. 植物代谢速率与个体生物量关系研究进展. 生态学报, 2011, 31(8): 2312-2320.
[28] Long J N, Smith F W. Relation between size and density in developing stands: a description and possible mechanisms. Forest Ecology and Management, 1984, 7(3): 191-206.
[29] Osawa A, Allen R B. Allometric theory explains self-thinning relationships of mountain beech and red pine. Ecology, 1993, 74(4): 1020-1032.
[30] Niklas K J, Midgley J J, Enquist B J. A general model for mass-growth-density relations across tree-dominated communities. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 2003, 5(3): 459-468.
[31] Olesen B, Sand-Jensen K. Biomass-density patterns in the temperate seagrass Zostera marina . Marine Ecology-Progress Series, 1994, 109: 283-291.
[32] Li L, Zhou D W, Sheng L X. Density dependence-determined plant biomass allocation pattern. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2011, 30(8): 1579-1589.
黎磊, 周道玮, 盛连喜. 密度制约决定的植物生物量分配格局. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(8): 1579-1589.
[33] Niklas K J, Enquist B J. Invariant scaling relationships for interspecific plant biomass production rates and body size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001, 98(5): 2922-2927.
[34] Enquist B J, Niklas K J. Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants. Science, 2002, 295: 1517-1520.
[35] Cheng D L. Plant Allometric Study of Biomass Allocation Pattern and Biomass Production Rates[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2007.
程栋梁. 植物生物量分配模式与生长速率的相关规律研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2007.
[36] Niklas K J. Plant allometry: is there a grand unifying theory. Biological Reviews, 2004, 79(4): 871-889.
[37] Niklas K J. Modelling below-and above-ground biomass for non-woody and woody plants. Annals of Botany, 2005, 95(2): 315-321.
[38] Xie R, Tao Y, Chang S L. Allometric relationship between modular morphology and biomass of four annuals in the Gurbantunggut Desert, China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(3): 648-655.
谢然, 陶冶, 常顺利. 四种一年生荒漠植物构件形态与生物量间的异速生长关系. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(3): 648-655.
[39] Peng F R, Wang L G. Growth and biomass productivity of Chestnut stands with varying planting densities. Economic Forest Researches, 1998, 16(3): 12-16.
彭方仁, 王良桂. 板栗不同密度林分的生长发育与生物生产力. 经济林研究, 1998, 16(3): 12-16.
[40] Fang H, Kong F B. Study on biomass and its allocation of different density Loblolly pine . Journal of Fujian College of Forestry, 2003, 23(2): 182-185.
方华, 孔凡斌. 不同密度火炬松林生物量及其分配. 福建林学院学报, 2003, 23(2): 182-185.
[41] Bazzaz F A, Chiariello N R, Coley P D, et al . Allocating resources to reproduction and defense. BioScience, 1987, 37(1): 58-67.
[42] Bazzaz F, Ackerly D. Reproductive allocation and reproductive effort in plants. Seeds: the Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities, 1992, 1: 26.
[43] Du G Z, Liu Z H, Wang X Z, et al . The relationship between size-dependent reproduction and population density of Elymus nutans . Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 1999, 8(2): 26-33.
杜国祯, 刘振恒, 王兮之, 等. 垂穗披碱草个体大小依赖的繁殖分配与种群密度的关系. 草业学报, 1999, 8(2): 26-33.
[44] Weiner J, Thomas S C. Size variability and competition in plant monocultures. Oikos, 1986, 47(2): 211-222.
[45] Zhu Z, Wang G. Studies on the phenotypic plasticity and reproductive allocation in Avena sativa . Journal of Lanzhou University, 2002, 38(1): 76-83.