草业学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 112-122.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2025400
• 研究论文 • 上一篇
李博华1(
), 云岚1,2(
), 穆乙鑫1, 周成美1, 艾芊1, 李珍1, 何雨航1
收稿日期:2025-09-30
修回日期:2025-11-03
出版日期:2026-08-20
发布日期:2026-06-22
通讯作者:
云岚
作者简介:Corresponding author. E-mail: yunlan@imau.edu.cn基金资助:
Bo-hua LI1(
), Lan YUN1,2(
), Yi-xin MU1, Cheng-mei ZHOU1, Qian AI1, Zhen LI1, Yu-hang HE1
Received:2025-09-30
Revised:2025-11-03
Online:2026-08-20
Published:2026-06-22
Contact:
Lan YUN
摘要:
以高粗蛋白(CP)与低CP新麦草种质为材料,测定叶片中18种氨基酸含量,通过氨基酸组成分析与营养价值评价,旨在系统阐明新麦草种质的蛋白质营养特性,为其作为优质饲草资源的开发利用提供依据。采用盐酸水解法,使用氨基酸全自动分析仪测定17种氨基酸含量并用分光光度法单独测定色氨酸含量。计算必需氨基酸比值(RAA)、比值系数分(SRC)、必需氨基酸指数(EAAI)等参数,并与联合国粮食及农业组织/世界卫生组织(FAO/WHO)氨基酸模式谱及理想蛋白质标准进行比较,综合评价新麦草蛋白质的营养价值。结果表明:高CP与低CP新麦草种质在氨基酸总量和必需氨基酸含量上均存在显著差异。新麦草叶片中含有10种药效氨基酸,总含量超过65%,具备潜在的药用价值。两类种质的必需氨基酸含量大多接近或超过FAO/WHO模式标准,仅赖氨酸(Lys)和蛋氨酸+半胱氨酸(Met+Cys)含量低于标准。高CP种质的必需氨基酸占氨基酸总量的比值(E/T)介于40.55%~42.04%,必需氨基酸与非必需氨基酸的比值(E/N)介于68.21%~72.52%;低CP种质的E/T值介于42.20%~43.22%,E/N值介于73.01%~76.11%,均高于FAO/WHO推荐值。高CP种质的SRC值(47.17~57.37)明显高于低CP种质(35.31~43.47)。两类种质的EAAI平均值均接近1,表明新麦草蛋白质质量较高。总体而言,高CP种质在蛋白质营养供给方面优于低CP种质,而低CP种质在必需氨基酸比例方面略占优势。Met+Cys是两类新麦草共同的第一限制性氨基酸。高CP种质在SRC和EAAI方面整体表现更优,其中种质“578854-8”和“531828-17”在氨基酸组成和营养平衡性方面表现突出,可作为未来品质改良的重要候选材料。本研究说明新麦草叶片氨基酸种类齐全、比例合理、营养价值高,是一种值得深度开发的优质蛋白饲草资源,研究结果为其在动物日粮中的科学利用及遗传育种提供了理论依据。
李博华, 云岚, 穆乙鑫, 周成美, 艾芊, 李珍, 何雨航. 不同新麦草种质叶片氨基酸组分分析与营养价值评价[J]. 草业学报, 2026, 35(8): 112-122.
Bo-hua LI, Lan YUN, Yi-xin MU, Cheng-mei ZHOU, Qian AI, Zhen LI, Yu-hang HE. Amino acid composition analysis and nutritional value evaluation of leaves of contrasting Psathyrostachys juncea germplasm lines[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(8): 112-122.
| H | 品种Variety | 来源Source | L | 品种Variety | 来源Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 502572-1 | AR-142 | 苏联Soviet Union | 531828-1 | 野生Wild | 美国America |
| 502573-1 | AR-163 | 苏联Soviet Union | 531828-7 | 野生Wild | 美国America |
| 502576-11 | K37772 | 俄罗斯Russia | 531828-9 | 野生Wild | 美国America |
| 565060-7 | AJC-534 | 俄罗斯Russia | 531828-17 | 野生Wild | 美国America |
| 565051-6 | DJ-4154 | 俄罗斯Russia | 619483-7 | 96N331 | 蒙古Mongolia |
| 578854-8 | SWIFT | 加拿大Canada | 619483-19 | 96N331 | 蒙古Mongolia |
| 578854-12 | SWIFT | 加拿大Canada | 565052-20 | DJ-4155 | 俄罗斯Russia |
| 578854-19 | SWIFT | 加拿大Canada | 565052-28 | DJ-4155 | 俄罗斯Russia |
表1 新麦草种质材料及其来源
Table 1 Germplasm materials and their sources of P. juncea
| H | 品种Variety | 来源Source | L | 品种Variety | 来源Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 502572-1 | AR-142 | 苏联Soviet Union | 531828-1 | 野生Wild | 美国America |
| 502573-1 | AR-163 | 苏联Soviet Union | 531828-7 | 野生Wild | 美国America |
| 502576-11 | K37772 | 俄罗斯Russia | 531828-9 | 野生Wild | 美国America |
| 565060-7 | AJC-534 | 俄罗斯Russia | 531828-17 | 野生Wild | 美国America |
| 565051-6 | DJ-4154 | 俄罗斯Russia | 619483-7 | 96N331 | 蒙古Mongolia |
| 578854-8 | SWIFT | 加拿大Canada | 619483-19 | 96N331 | 蒙古Mongolia |
| 578854-12 | SWIFT | 加拿大Canada | 565052-20 | DJ-4155 | 俄罗斯Russia |
| 578854-19 | SWIFT | 加拿大Canada | 565052-28 | DJ-4155 | 俄罗斯Russia |
| 指标Index | H (%) | L (%) | M (%) | SD (%) | CV | 指标Index | H(%) | L(%) | M(%) | SD (%) | CV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 天冬氨酸Asp# | 2.78 | 1.41 | 2.09 | 0.69 | 0.33 | 赖氨酸Lys*# | 1.21 | 0.73 | 0.97 | 0.24 | 0.25 |
| 苏氨酸Thr* | 1.36 | 0.69 | 1.03 | 0.33 | 0.32 | 精氨酸Arg# | 1.70 | 0.76 | 1.23 | 0.47 | 0.38 |
| 丝氨酸Ser | 1.34 | 0.69 | 1.02 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 色氨酸Trp*# | 0.71 | 0.47 | 0.59 | 0.12 | 0.20 |
| 谷氨酸Glu# | 3.28 | 1.56 | 2.42 | 0.86 | 0.36 | 氨基酸总量TAA | 25.24 | 13.29 | 19.26 | 5.97 | 0.31 |
| 脯氨酸Pro | 0.79 | 0.36 | 0.58 | 0.22 | 0.37 | 必需氨基酸EAA | 10.42 | 5.67 | 8.05 | 2.38 | 0.30 |
| 甘氨酸Gly# | 1.59 | 0.86 | 1.23 | 0.36 | 0.30 | 非必需氨基酸NEAA | 14.81 | 7.62 | 11.22 | 3.60 | 0.32 |
| 丙氨酸Ala | 1.91 | 1.06 | 1.48 | 0.42 | 0.28 | 药效氨基酸MAA | 16.80 | 8.72 | 12.76 | 4.04 | 0.32 |
| 半胱氨酸Cys | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1.00 | 甜味氨基酸SAA | 8.19 | 4.40 | 6.30 | 1.90 | 0.30 |
| 缬氨酸Val* | 1.62 | 0.85 | 1.23 | 0.38 | 0.31 | 鲜味氨基酸UAA | 6.06 | 2.96 | 4.51 | 1.55 | 0.34 |
| 蛋氨酸Met*# | 0.30 | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.08 | 0.33 | 苦味氨基酸BAA | 9.33 | 4.96 | 7.15 | 2.18 | 0.31 |
| 异亮氨酸Ile*# | 1.26 | 0.69 | 0.98 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 芳香族氨基酸AAA | 3.10 | 1.80 | 2.45 | 0.65 | 0.27 |
| 亮氨酸Leu*# | 2.48 | 1.26 | 1.87 | 0.61 | 0.33 | 支链氨基酸BCAA | 5.36 | 2.79 | 4.08 | 1.28 | 0.31 |
| 酪氨酸Tyr | 0.91 | 0.49 | 0.70 | 0.21 | 0.29 | 风味平衡(UAA+SAA)/BAA | 1.53 | 1.49 | 1.51 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| 苯丙氨酸Phe*# | 1.49 | 0.84 | 1.16 | 0.33 | 0.28 | 粗蛋白Crude protein | 29.63 | 13.81 | 21.72 | 7.91 | 0.36 |
| 组氨酸His | 0.49 | 0.42 | 0.45 | 0.03 | 0.08 |
表2 新麦草种质氨基酸组分含量及粗蛋白含量
Table 2 The amino acid and crude protein content of different P.juncea germplasms
| 指标Index | H (%) | L (%) | M (%) | SD (%) | CV | 指标Index | H(%) | L(%) | M(%) | SD (%) | CV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 天冬氨酸Asp# | 2.78 | 1.41 | 2.09 | 0.69 | 0.33 | 赖氨酸Lys*# | 1.21 | 0.73 | 0.97 | 0.24 | 0.25 |
| 苏氨酸Thr* | 1.36 | 0.69 | 1.03 | 0.33 | 0.32 | 精氨酸Arg# | 1.70 | 0.76 | 1.23 | 0.47 | 0.38 |
| 丝氨酸Ser | 1.34 | 0.69 | 1.02 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 色氨酸Trp*# | 0.71 | 0.47 | 0.59 | 0.12 | 0.20 |
| 谷氨酸Glu# | 3.28 | 1.56 | 2.42 | 0.86 | 0.36 | 氨基酸总量TAA | 25.24 | 13.29 | 19.26 | 5.97 | 0.31 |
| 脯氨酸Pro | 0.79 | 0.36 | 0.58 | 0.22 | 0.37 | 必需氨基酸EAA | 10.42 | 5.67 | 8.05 | 2.38 | 0.30 |
| 甘氨酸Gly# | 1.59 | 0.86 | 1.23 | 0.36 | 0.30 | 非必需氨基酸NEAA | 14.81 | 7.62 | 11.22 | 3.60 | 0.32 |
| 丙氨酸Ala | 1.91 | 1.06 | 1.48 | 0.42 | 0.28 | 药效氨基酸MAA | 16.80 | 8.72 | 12.76 | 4.04 | 0.32 |
| 半胱氨酸Cys | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1.00 | 甜味氨基酸SAA | 8.19 | 4.40 | 6.30 | 1.90 | 0.30 |
| 缬氨酸Val* | 1.62 | 0.85 | 1.23 | 0.38 | 0.31 | 鲜味氨基酸UAA | 6.06 | 2.96 | 4.51 | 1.55 | 0.34 |
| 蛋氨酸Met*# | 0.30 | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.08 | 0.33 | 苦味氨基酸BAA | 9.33 | 4.96 | 7.15 | 2.18 | 0.31 |
| 异亮氨酸Ile*# | 1.26 | 0.69 | 0.98 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 芳香族氨基酸AAA | 3.10 | 1.80 | 2.45 | 0.65 | 0.27 |
| 亮氨酸Leu*# | 2.48 | 1.26 | 1.87 | 0.61 | 0.33 | 支链氨基酸BCAA | 5.36 | 2.79 | 4.08 | 1.28 | 0.31 |
| 酪氨酸Tyr | 0.91 | 0.49 | 0.70 | 0.21 | 0.29 | 风味平衡(UAA+SAA)/BAA | 1.53 | 1.49 | 1.51 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| 苯丙氨酸Phe*# | 1.49 | 0.84 | 1.16 | 0.33 | 0.28 | 粗蛋白Crude protein | 29.63 | 13.81 | 21.72 | 7.91 | 0.36 |
| 组氨酸His | 0.49 | 0.42 | 0.45 | 0.03 | 0.08 |
图2 不同新麦草种质功能氨基酸的占比不同小写字母表示不同种质间同一指标占比存在显著差异(P<0.05)Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in the proportion of the same index among different germplasms (P<0.05).
Fig.2 The functional amino acid proportion of different P. juncea germplasms
类型 Item | 株系 Strain | 异亮氨酸 Ile (4.0) | 亮氨酸 Leu (7.0) | 赖氨酸 Lys (5.5) | 蛋氨酸+半胱氨酸 Met+Cys (3.5) | 苯丙氨酸+酪氨酸 Phe+Tyr (6.0) | 苏氨酸 Thr (4.0) | 缬氨酸 Val (5.0) | 色氨酸 Trp (1.0) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H | 502572-1 | +0.25 | +0.84 | -1.58 | -2.52 | +1.35 | +0.25 | -0.10 | +1.32 |
| 502573-1 | -0.03 | +0.94 | -1.53 | -2.67 | +1.44 | +0.30 | +0.29 | +0.93 | |
| 502576-11 | -0.07 | +0.56 | -1.88 | -2.35 | +1.40 | +0.27 | -0.07 | +1.45 | |
| 565060-7 | +0.38 | +1.59 | -1.63 | -2.66 | +2.25 | +0.55 | +0.73 | +1.11 | |
| 565051-6 | +0.45 | +1.72 | -1.23 | -2.65 | +2.38 | +0.79 | +0.81 | +1.65 | |
| 578854-8 | +0.62 | +2.25 | -0.88 | -1.45 | +3.25 | +1.14 | +1.16 | +2.20 | |
| 578854-12 | +0.06 | +1.11 | -1.44 | -2.25 | +3.11 | +0.52 | +0.30 | +1.17 | |
| 578854-19 | -0.05 | +0.91 | -1.55 | -2.64 | +1.56 | +0.30 | -0.02 | +1.11 | |
| L | 619483-7 | +0.85 | +1.96 | -0.65 | -2.38 | +2.59 | +0.85 | +0.60 | +2.32 |
| 531828-17 | +0.72 | +1.71 | +1.03 | -2.41 | +3.43 | +1.08 | +1.17 | +2.34 | |
| 565052-20 | +0.90 | +1.67 | -0.60 | -2.75 | +3.04 | +0.90 | +1.03 | +2.54 | |
| 565052-28 | +0.99 | +2.27 | -0.15 | -2.07 | +3.98 | +0.99 | +1.41 | +2.74 | |
| 531828-1 | +1.17 | +2.30 | -0.33 | -2.47 | +4.34 | +1.17 | +1.55 | +2.38 | |
| 619483-19 | +0.94 | +2.17 | -0.56 | -2.44 | +3.88 | +0.94 | +1.35 | +2.28 | |
| 531828-7 | +1.20 | +2.37 | -0.30 | -2.11 | +4.41 | +1.20 | +1.25 | +2.44 | |
| 531828-9 | +1.04 | +2.31 | -0.46 | -2.72 | +3.31 | +1.04 | +0.82 | +2.26 |
表3 不同新麦草种质各种必需氨基酸与联合国粮食及农业组织与世界卫生组织推荐氨基酸的模式谱比较
Table 3 Comparison of the pattern spectra of essential amino acids in different P. juncea germplasms with the amino acids recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization and the World Health Organization
类型 Item | 株系 Strain | 异亮氨酸 Ile (4.0) | 亮氨酸 Leu (7.0) | 赖氨酸 Lys (5.5) | 蛋氨酸+半胱氨酸 Met+Cys (3.5) | 苯丙氨酸+酪氨酸 Phe+Tyr (6.0) | 苏氨酸 Thr (4.0) | 缬氨酸 Val (5.0) | 色氨酸 Trp (1.0) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H | 502572-1 | +0.25 | +0.84 | -1.58 | -2.52 | +1.35 | +0.25 | -0.10 | +1.32 |
| 502573-1 | -0.03 | +0.94 | -1.53 | -2.67 | +1.44 | +0.30 | +0.29 | +0.93 | |
| 502576-11 | -0.07 | +0.56 | -1.88 | -2.35 | +1.40 | +0.27 | -0.07 | +1.45 | |
| 565060-7 | +0.38 | +1.59 | -1.63 | -2.66 | +2.25 | +0.55 | +0.73 | +1.11 | |
| 565051-6 | +0.45 | +1.72 | -1.23 | -2.65 | +2.38 | +0.79 | +0.81 | +1.65 | |
| 578854-8 | +0.62 | +2.25 | -0.88 | -1.45 | +3.25 | +1.14 | +1.16 | +2.20 | |
| 578854-12 | +0.06 | +1.11 | -1.44 | -2.25 | +3.11 | +0.52 | +0.30 | +1.17 | |
| 578854-19 | -0.05 | +0.91 | -1.55 | -2.64 | +1.56 | +0.30 | -0.02 | +1.11 | |
| L | 619483-7 | +0.85 | +1.96 | -0.65 | -2.38 | +2.59 | +0.85 | +0.60 | +2.32 |
| 531828-17 | +0.72 | +1.71 | +1.03 | -2.41 | +3.43 | +1.08 | +1.17 | +2.34 | |
| 565052-20 | +0.90 | +1.67 | -0.60 | -2.75 | +3.04 | +0.90 | +1.03 | +2.54 | |
| 565052-28 | +0.99 | +2.27 | -0.15 | -2.07 | +3.98 | +0.99 | +1.41 | +2.74 | |
| 531828-1 | +1.17 | +2.30 | -0.33 | -2.47 | +4.34 | +1.17 | +1.55 | +2.38 | |
| 619483-19 | +0.94 | +2.17 | -0.56 | -2.44 | +3.88 | +0.94 | +1.35 | +2.28 | |
| 531828-7 | +1.20 | +2.37 | -0.30 | -2.11 | +4.41 | +1.20 | +1.25 | +2.44 | |
| 531828-9 | +1.04 | +2.31 | -0.46 | -2.72 | +3.31 | +1.04 | +0.82 | +2.26 |
| H | E/T (40) | E/N (60) | L | E/T (40) | E/N (60) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 502572-1 | +1.50 | +10.95 | 619483-7 | +3.01 | +15.47 |
| 502573-1 | +0.91 | +9.23 | 531828-17 | +2.90 | +15.13 |
| 502576-11 | +1.29 | +10.32 | 565052-20 | +2.20 | +13.01 |
| 565060-7 | +1.12 | +9.83 | 565052-28 | +3.22 | +16.11 |
| 565051-6 | +1.97 | +12.32 | 531828-1 | +2.52 | +13.98 |
| 578854-8 | +2.04 | +12.52 | 619483-19 | +2.55 | +14.08 |
| 578854-12 | +0.70 | +8.62 | 531828-7 | +2.49 | +13.88 |
| 578854-19 | +0.55 | +8.21 | 531828-9 | +2.48 | +13.86 |
| 平均Mean | +1.26 | +10.25 | 平均Mean | +2.67 | +14.44 |
表4 必需氨基酸比例与理想蛋白质标准比较
Table 4 The proportion of essential amino acids and the ideal protein standards comparison
| H | E/T (40) | E/N (60) | L | E/T (40) | E/N (60) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 502572-1 | +1.50 | +10.95 | 619483-7 | +3.01 | +15.47 |
| 502573-1 | +0.91 | +9.23 | 531828-17 | +2.90 | +15.13 |
| 502576-11 | +1.29 | +10.32 | 565052-20 | +2.20 | +13.01 |
| 565060-7 | +1.12 | +9.83 | 565052-28 | +3.22 | +16.11 |
| 565051-6 | +1.97 | +12.32 | 531828-1 | +2.52 | +13.98 |
| 578854-8 | +2.04 | +12.52 | 619483-19 | +2.55 | +14.08 |
| 578854-12 | +0.70 | +8.62 | 531828-7 | +2.49 | +13.88 |
| 578854-19 | +0.55 | +8.21 | 531828-9 | +2.48 | +13.86 |
| 平均Mean | +1.26 | +10.25 | 平均Mean | +2.67 | +14.44 |
| 类型Type | 株系Strain | 指标Item | Ile | Leu | Lys | Met+Cys | Phe+Tyr | Thr | Val | Trp | SRC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H | 502572-1 | RAA | 1.06 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 0.28 | 1.22 | 1.06 | 0.98 | 2.32 | 50.59 |
| RC | 0.97 | 1.02 | 0.65 | 0.26 | 1.12 | 0.97 | 0.89 | 2.12 | |||
| 502573-1 | RAA | 0.99 | 1.13 | 0.72 | 0.24 | 1.24 | 1.07 | 1.06 | 1.93 | 57.37 | |
| RC | 0.95 | 1.08 | 0.69 | 0.23 | 1.18 | 1.02 | 1.01 | 1.84 | |||
| 502576-11 | RAA | 0.99 | 1.08 | 0.66 | 0.33 | 1.23 | 1.07 | 0.99 | 2.45 | 47.56 | |
| RC | 0.90 | 0.98 | 0.60 | 0.30 | 1.12 | 0.97 | 0.90 | 2.23 | |||
| 565060-7 | RAA | 1.09 | 1.23 | 0.70 | 0.24 | 1.38 | 1.14 | 1.15 | 2.11 | 55.76 | |
| RC | 0.97 | 1.09 | 0.62 | 0.21 | 1.22 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.87 | |||
| 565051-6 | RAA | 1.11 | 1.25 | 0.78 | 0.24 | 1.40 | 1.20 | 1.16 | 2.65 | 47.96 | |
| RC | 0.91 | 1.02 | 0.64 | 0.20 | 1.14 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 2.17 | |||
| 578854-8 | RAA | 1.16 | 1.32 | 0.84 | 0.59 | 1.54 | 1.28 | 1.23 | 3.20 | 47.17 | |
| RC | 0.83 | 0.95 | 0.60 | 0.42 | 1.10 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 2.29 | |||
| 578854-12 | RAA | 1.01 | 1.16 | 0.74 | 0.36 | 1.35 | 1.13 | 1.06 | 2.17 | 56.60 | |
| RC | 0.90 | 1.03 | 0.66 | 0.32 | 1.20 | 1.01 | 0.95 | 1.93 | |||
| 578854-19 | RAA | 0.99 | 1.13 | 0.72 | 0.25 | 1.26 | 1.07 | 1.00 | 2.11 | 53.74 | |
| RC | 0.93 | 1.06 | 0.67 | 0.23 | 1.18 | 1.01 | 0.94 | 1.98 | |||
| L | 619483-7 | RAA | 1.21 | 1.28 | 0.88 | 0.32 | 1.43 | 1.21 | 1.12 | 3.32 | 39.77 |
| RC | 0.90 | 0.95 | 0.65 | 0.24 | 1.06 | 0.90 | 0.83 | 2.47 | |||
| 531828-17 | RAA | 1.18 | 1.24 | 1.19 | 0.31 | 1.57 | 1.27 | 1.23 | 3.34 | 43.47 | |
| RC | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.22 | 1.11 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 2.36 | |||
| 565052-20 | RAA | 1.22 | 1.24 | 0.89 | 0.22 | 1.51 | 1.22 | 1.21 | 3.54 | 35.31 | |
| RC | 0.89 | 0.90 | 0.64 | 0.16 | 1.09 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 2.56 | |||
| 565052-28 | RAA | 1.25 | 1.32 | 0.97 | 0.41 | 1.66 | 1.25 | 1.28 | 3.74 | 38.26 | |
| RC | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.65 | 0.27 | 1.12 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 2.52 | |||
| 531828-1 | RAA | 1.29 | 1.33 | 0.94 | 0.30 | 1.72 | 1.29 | 1.31 | 3.38 | 42.79 | |
| RC | 0.89 | 0.92 | 0.65 | 0.20 | 1.19 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 2.34 | |||
| 619483-19 | RAA | 1.24 | 1.31 | 0.90 | 0.30 | 1.65 | 1.24 | 1.27 | 3.28 | 42.66 | |
| RC | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.64 | 0.22 | 1.18 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 2.35 | |||
| 531828-7 | RAA | 1.30 | 1.34 | 0.95 | 0.40 | 1.73 | 1.30 | 1.25 | 3.44 | 43.42 | |
| RC | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.65 | 0.27 | 1.19 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 2.35 | |||
| 531828-9 | RAA | 1.26 | 1.33 | 0.92 | 0.22 | 1.55 | 1.26 | 1.16 | 3.26 | 41.22 | |
| RC | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.67 | 0.16 | 1.13 | 0.92 | 0.85 | 2.38 |
表5 不同新麦草种质各种必需氨基酸的必需氨基酸比值、氨基酸比值系数及比值系数分比较
Table 5 Comparison of ratio of essential amino acid, ratio coefficient of amino acid and score of ratio coefficient in different P. juncea germplasms
| 类型Type | 株系Strain | 指标Item | Ile | Leu | Lys | Met+Cys | Phe+Tyr | Thr | Val | Trp | SRC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H | 502572-1 | RAA | 1.06 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 0.28 | 1.22 | 1.06 | 0.98 | 2.32 | 50.59 |
| RC | 0.97 | 1.02 | 0.65 | 0.26 | 1.12 | 0.97 | 0.89 | 2.12 | |||
| 502573-1 | RAA | 0.99 | 1.13 | 0.72 | 0.24 | 1.24 | 1.07 | 1.06 | 1.93 | 57.37 | |
| RC | 0.95 | 1.08 | 0.69 | 0.23 | 1.18 | 1.02 | 1.01 | 1.84 | |||
| 502576-11 | RAA | 0.99 | 1.08 | 0.66 | 0.33 | 1.23 | 1.07 | 0.99 | 2.45 | 47.56 | |
| RC | 0.90 | 0.98 | 0.60 | 0.30 | 1.12 | 0.97 | 0.90 | 2.23 | |||
| 565060-7 | RAA | 1.09 | 1.23 | 0.70 | 0.24 | 1.38 | 1.14 | 1.15 | 2.11 | 55.76 | |
| RC | 0.97 | 1.09 | 0.62 | 0.21 | 1.22 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.87 | |||
| 565051-6 | RAA | 1.11 | 1.25 | 0.78 | 0.24 | 1.40 | 1.20 | 1.16 | 2.65 | 47.96 | |
| RC | 0.91 | 1.02 | 0.64 | 0.20 | 1.14 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 2.17 | |||
| 578854-8 | RAA | 1.16 | 1.32 | 0.84 | 0.59 | 1.54 | 1.28 | 1.23 | 3.20 | 47.17 | |
| RC | 0.83 | 0.95 | 0.60 | 0.42 | 1.10 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 2.29 | |||
| 578854-12 | RAA | 1.01 | 1.16 | 0.74 | 0.36 | 1.35 | 1.13 | 1.06 | 2.17 | 56.60 | |
| RC | 0.90 | 1.03 | 0.66 | 0.32 | 1.20 | 1.01 | 0.95 | 1.93 | |||
| 578854-19 | RAA | 0.99 | 1.13 | 0.72 | 0.25 | 1.26 | 1.07 | 1.00 | 2.11 | 53.74 | |
| RC | 0.93 | 1.06 | 0.67 | 0.23 | 1.18 | 1.01 | 0.94 | 1.98 | |||
| L | 619483-7 | RAA | 1.21 | 1.28 | 0.88 | 0.32 | 1.43 | 1.21 | 1.12 | 3.32 | 39.77 |
| RC | 0.90 | 0.95 | 0.65 | 0.24 | 1.06 | 0.90 | 0.83 | 2.47 | |||
| 531828-17 | RAA | 1.18 | 1.24 | 1.19 | 0.31 | 1.57 | 1.27 | 1.23 | 3.34 | 43.47 | |
| RC | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.22 | 1.11 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 2.36 | |||
| 565052-20 | RAA | 1.22 | 1.24 | 0.89 | 0.22 | 1.51 | 1.22 | 1.21 | 3.54 | 35.31 | |
| RC | 0.89 | 0.90 | 0.64 | 0.16 | 1.09 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 2.56 | |||
| 565052-28 | RAA | 1.25 | 1.32 | 0.97 | 0.41 | 1.66 | 1.25 | 1.28 | 3.74 | 38.26 | |
| RC | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.65 | 0.27 | 1.12 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 2.52 | |||
| 531828-1 | RAA | 1.29 | 1.33 | 0.94 | 0.30 | 1.72 | 1.29 | 1.31 | 3.38 | 42.79 | |
| RC | 0.89 | 0.92 | 0.65 | 0.20 | 1.19 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 2.34 | |||
| 619483-19 | RAA | 1.24 | 1.31 | 0.90 | 0.30 | 1.65 | 1.24 | 1.27 | 3.28 | 42.66 | |
| RC | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.64 | 0.22 | 1.18 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 2.35 | |||
| 531828-7 | RAA | 1.30 | 1.34 | 0.95 | 0.40 | 1.73 | 1.30 | 1.25 | 3.44 | 43.42 | |
| RC | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.65 | 0.27 | 1.19 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 2.35 | |||
| 531828-9 | RAA | 1.26 | 1.33 | 0.92 | 0.22 | 1.55 | 1.26 | 1.16 | 3.26 | 41.22 | |
| RC | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.67 | 0.16 | 1.13 | 0.92 | 0.85 | 2.38 |
| H | EAAI | L | EAAI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 502572-1 | 0.95 | 619483-7 | 1.14 |
| 502573-1 | 0.92 | 531828-17 | 1.21 |
| 502576-11 | 0.97 | 565052-20 | 1.11 |
| 565060-7 | 0.97 | 565052-28 | 1.26 |
| 565051-6 | 1.05 | 531828-1 | 1.21 |
| 578854-8 | 1.25 | 619483-19 | 1.18 |
| 578854-12 | 1.01 | 531828-7 | 1.26 |
| 578854-19 | 0.94 | 531828-9 | 1.12 |
表6 不同新麦草种质必需氨基酸指数比较
Table 6 Comparison of essential amino acid index of different P. juncea germplasms
| H | EAAI | L | EAAI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 502572-1 | 0.95 | 619483-7 | 1.14 |
| 502573-1 | 0.92 | 531828-17 | 1.21 |
| 502576-11 | 0.97 | 565052-20 | 1.11 |
| 565060-7 | 0.97 | 565052-28 | 1.26 |
| 565051-6 | 1.05 | 531828-1 | 1.21 |
| 578854-8 | 1.25 | 619483-19 | 1.18 |
| 578854-12 | 1.01 | 531828-7 | 1.26 |
| 578854-19 | 0.94 | 531828-9 | 1.12 |
| [1] | Yang X H, Chen M J, Wu X R. Essential amino acids of several leguminous forages. Aminoacid Journal, 1993(4): 11-12. |
| 杨晓贺, 陈默君, 吴显荣. 几种豆科牧草的必需氨基酸.氨基酸杂志, 1993(4): 11-12. | |
| [2] | Qiu Y L. Amino acids are essential nutrients for animals such as livestock and poultry. Cereal & Feed Industry, 1990(5): 29. |
| 裘永良. 氨基酸是畜禽等动物必需的营养物质. 粮食与饲料工业, 1990(5): 29. | |
| [3] | Chen X, Liang K H, Zhu H, et al. Analysis method and application of free amino acids. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2021, 12(18): 7298-7304. |
| 陈雪, 梁克红, 朱宏, 等. 游离氨基酸检测方法及其应用. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2021, 12(18): 7298-7304. | |
| [4] | Penkov D, Pavlov D, Mihovsky T. Comparative study of the amino acid’s true digestibility of different clover (Trifolium) varieties in experiments with ganders. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 2003, 4(2): 191-198. |
| [5] | Liu Y H, Chen J L, Zhang H R, et al. Study on the characteristics of amino acid composition and nutritional value of forage grass in Alashan desert grassland. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2008, 17(6): 25-33. |
| 刘永红, 陈菊兰, 张洪荣, 等. 阿拉善荒漠草地牧草氨基酸组成特点与营养价值研究. 草业学报, 2008, 17(6): 25-33. | |
| [6] | Naya, Wang Z L, Sun Q Z, et al. A study on amino acid characteristics and nutritive value of forages in the desert grasslands of Alxa. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2014, 36(3): 84-89. |
| 那亚, 王宗礼, 孙启忠, 等. 草甸草原牧草青贮料氨基酸组成特点与营养价值研究. 中国草地学报, 2014, 36(3): 84-89. | |
| [7] | Mayland H F, Martin S A, Lee J, et al. Malate, citrate, and amino acids in tall fescue cultivars. Agronomy Journal, 2000, 92(2):206-210. |
| [8] | Tian H, Zhang H S, Xiong J B, et al. Evaluation of amino acid composition and nutritional value of Lespedeza formosa in different phenological periods. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2022, 44(6): 98-105. |
| 田宏, 张鹤山, 熊军波, 等. 不同物候期美丽胡枝子氨基酸组成和营养价值评价. 中国草地学报, 2022, 44(6): 98-105. | |
| [9] | Huo L, Chen P, Peng S, et al. Analysis of protein and amino acid contents in different parts of Ixeris chinensis. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2013, 34(19): 341-343, 348. |
| 霍莉, 陈萍, 彭松, 等. 苦菜不同部位蛋白质和氨基酸含量分析. 食品工业科技, 2013, 34(19): 341-343, 348. | |
| [10] | Gao Z Q, Yun L, He R X, et al. Evaluation of reproductive traits of Psathyrostachys juncea hybrid population. Grassland and Prataculture, 2022, 34(3): 33-37. |
| 高志琦, 云岚, 何茹雪, 等. 新麦草杂交后代群体繁殖性状评价. 草原与草业, 2022, 34(3): 33-37. | |
| [11] | Li Z, Yun L, Wang T, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of fertility yield and stability of Psathyrostachys juncea germplasm in different environments. Journal of Northwest A & F University(Natural Science Edition), 2025, 53(2): 19-31. |
| 李珍, 云岚, 王恬, 等. 不同环境下新麦草种质丰产性及稳产性的综合评价. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 53(2): 19-31. | |
| [12] | Yu X D, Zhang Y W. Research progress of Psathyrostachys juncea. Prataculture & Animal Husbandry, 2010(1): 5-8, 13. |
| 于晓丹, 张蕴薇. 新麦草研究进展. 草业与畜牧, 2010(1): 5-8, 13. | |
| [13] | Zhen M Y, Zi Y Y. Understanding different regulatory mechanisms of proteinaceous and non-proteinaceous amino acid formation in tea (Camellia sinensis) provides new insights into the safe and effective alteration of tea flavor and function. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2020, 60(5): 844-858. |
| [14] | Sun J J, Alamusi, Zhao J M, et al. Analysis of amino acid composition and six native alfalfa cultivars. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(13): 2359-2367. |
| 孙娟娟, 阿拉木斯, 赵金梅, 等. 6个紫花苜蓿品种氨基酸组成分析及营养价值评价. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(13): 2359-2367. | |
| [15] | FAO/WHO(1973)Energy and Protein Requirements. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Adhoc Expert Committee. FAO Nutritional Meeting Report Series No. 52, Technical Report Series No. 522 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation, Rome. |
| [16] | Zhu S T, Wu K. Nutritional evaluation of protein-ratio coefficient of amino acid. Acta Nutrimenta Sinica, 1998(2): 187-190. |
| 朱圣陶, 吴坤. 蛋白质营养价值评价——氨基酸比值系数法. 营养学报, 1998(2): 187-190. | |
| [17] | Oser B L. Method for integrating essential amino acid content in the nutritional evaluation of protein. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 1951, 27(5): 396-402. |
| [18] | Balde A T, Vandersall J H, Erdman R A, et al. Effect of stage of maturity of alfalfa and orchardgrass on in situ dry matter and crude protein degradability and amino acid composition. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1993, 44(1/2): 29-43. |
| [19] | Li Z Z, Ma Q Z. Studies on the characteristics of amino acid content in alfalfa varieties. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 1996(3): 110-112. |
| 李造哲, 马青枝. 紫花苜蓿品种氨基酸含量的特征性研究. 内蒙古农牧学院学报, 1996(3): 110-112. | |
| [20] | Yan D, Yang X Y. Analysis of amino acid composition and evaluation of nutritional quality in Cordyceps sinensis from different regions of Tibet. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(3): 281-284. |
| 严冬, 杨鑫嵎. 西藏不同产地冬虫夏草中氨基酸成分分析及其营养价值评价. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(3): 281-284. | |
| [21] | Tian Y H, Zhang L W, Tian Y, et al. Amino acid composition and principal component analysis of 11 kinds of jujube. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2018, 16(4): 1300-1306. |
| 田艳花, 张立伟, 田叶, 等. 11种红枣氨基酸组成及主成分分析. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(4): 1300-1306. | |
| [22] | Hao B H, Hao J F, Jia Y S, et al. Effect of amino acids on quality evaluation of alfalfa hay. Feed Research, 2022, 45(2): 97-101. |
| 郝百贺, 郝俊峰, 贾玉山, 等. 氨基酸在紫花苜蓿干草品质评定中的作用. 饲料研究, 2022, 45(2): 97-101. | |
| [23] | Chen R, Wu Q N, Shen B. Amino acid composition and nutritional evaluation of Semen euryales from different regions. Food Science, 2011, 32(15): 239-244. |
| 陈蓉, 吴启南, 沈蓓. 不同产地芡实氨基酸组成分析与营养价值评价.食品科学, 2011, 32(15): 239-244. | |
| [24] | Liu Y, Wu X F, Chen X Z, et al. Nutrition value of leaves of forage grasses as feedstuffs. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(17): 135-139. |
| 刘远, 吴贤锋, 陈鑫珠, 等. 牧草叶作为饲料原料的营养价值分析. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(17): 135-139. | |
| [25] | Wu G. Dietary requirements of synthesizable amino acids by animals: a paradigm shift in protein nutrition. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2015, 6(1): 1-12. |
| [26] | Adeola O, Xue P C, Cowieson A J, et al. Basal endogenous losses of amino acids in protein nutrition research for swine and poultry. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2016, 221(Part B): 274-283. |
| [27] | Peng H M, Zhang J Q, Zhang P, et al. Effects of rumen amino acids on growth performance, serum indexes, and rumen fermentation parameters of Hu sheep. Feed Research, 2024, 47(22): 1-6. |
| 彭洪妹, 张建强, 张鹏, 等. 饲粮中添加过瘤胃氨基酸对湖羊生长性能、血清指标和瘤胃发酵参数的影响. 饲料研究, 2024, 47(22): 1-6. | |
| [28] | Adeola O, Cowieson A J. Board-invited review: Opportunities and challenges in using exogenous enzymes to improve nonruminant animal production. Journal of Animal Science, 2011, 89(10): 3189-3218. |
| [29] | Hou L L, Qiu H L, Dong J H, et al. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ameliorated the negative effects of a low-protein diet on growth performance, antioxidant capacity, immune status, and gut microbiota of laying chicks. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2025, 16: 1507752. |
| [30] | Chen Q L, Li Z H, Chen S Q. Analysis of amino acid composition and nutritional evaluation in five local edible fungus. Food & Machinery, 2014, 30(6): 43-46. |
| 陈巧玲, 李忠海, 陈素琼. 5种地产食用菌氨基酸组成比较及营养评价. 食品与机械, 2014, 30(6): 43-46. | |
| [31] | Zhang C, Yun L, Li Z, et al. Genetic diversity and structure analysis in Psathyrostachys population using SSR markers. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2019, 20(1): 48-59. |
| 张晨, 云岚, 李珍, 等. 新麦草种质的SSR遗传多样性及群体结构分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(1): 48-59. | |
| [32] | Jiang X H, Wang X B, Li H, et al. Effects of dietary tryptophan and methionine on growth performance, digestive ability, immune function and antioxidant capacity of Chinese mitten Crab (Eriocheir sinensis). Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2025, 37(3): 1929-1939. |
| 蒋湘辉, 王兴兵, 李赫, 等. 饲料中添加色氨酸和蛋氨酸对中华绒螯蟹生长性能、消化能力、免疫功能及抗氧化能力的影响.动物营养学报, 2025, 37(3): 1929-1939. | |
| [33] | Hu L G, Hu J J, Wei Y M, et al. The physiological functions and applications of taurine. Feed Industry, 2024, 45(18): 49-54. |
| 胡立国, 胡俊杰, 魏玉明, 等. 牛磺酸的生理功能及其应用. 饲料工业, 2024, 45(18): 49-54. | |
| [34] | Kang J. Effects of cysteine and methionine on the growth and development of secondary hair follicle and hair dermal papilla cell and related gene expression in cashmere goat. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2024. |
| 康佳. 半胱氨酸、蛋氨酸对绒山羊次级毛囊和毛乳头细胞生长发育及相关基因表达的影响. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2024. |
| [1] | 李珍, 云岚, 石子英, 王俊, 张晨, 郭宏宇, 盛誉. 盐胁迫对新麦草种子萌发及幼苗期生理特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(8): 119-129. |
| [2] | 张文涛,杜久元,陈新宏,武军,赵继新,杜万里,张礼军. 华山新麦草在小麦遗传改良中的应用研究进展[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(5): 330-337. |
| [3] | 田春丽,介晓磊,刘巘,刘芳,郭孝,胡华锋,刘世亮. 硒锌与富啡酸配施对紫花苜蓿产量、营养成分及氨基酸组成的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(2): 66-75. |
| [4] | 李孟良, 郑琳. 五河野生大豆种子营养成分及饲用价值研究[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(4): 137-142. |
| [5] | 陈仕勇,马啸,张新全,武小龙. 野生新麦草种质醇溶蛋白遗传变异分析[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(4): 311-315. |
| [6] | 云岚,云锦凤,李俊琴,郑丽娜,赵韦,齐丽娜. 新麦草愈伤组织多倍体诱导与倍性鉴定[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(6): 126-131. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||