苗期施用钠复合肥增强梭梭抗逆性的初步研究

草业学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2): 127-133.

苗期施用钠复合肥增强梭梭抗逆性的初步研究

康建军¹,王锁民^1*,赵明²,杨自辉³

1.兰州大学草地农业科技学院,甘肃兰州 730020;
2.甘肃省林业科学研究院,甘肃兰州 730020;
3.甘肃省治沙研究所民勤荒漠草地生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站,甘肃民勤 733300

收稿日期:2009-12-22 出版日期:2011-02-25 发布日期:2011-04-20
通讯作者: E-mail:smwang@lzu.edu.cn
作者简介:康建军(1982-),男,甘肃张掖人,在读硕士。E-mail:kangjj07@lzu.cn
基金资助:
国家农业科技成果转化资金项目(2009GB23600512),863计划(2006AA10Z126)和国家自然科学基金(30770347)资助。

Tentative research of Na compound fertilizer at seedling stage on enhancing drought resistance of Haloxylon ammodendron

KANG Jian-jun¹, WANG Suo-min¹, ZHAO Ming², YANG Zi-hui³

1.College of Pastoral Agricultural Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China;
2.Gansu Research Academy of Forestry Science and Technology, Lanzhou 730020, China;
3.Minqin National Studies Station for Desert Steppe Ecosystem, Gansu Desert Control Research Institute, Wuwei 733000, Gansu, China

Received:2009-12-22 Online:2011-02-25 Published:2011-04-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用盆栽育苗的方法,施用钠复合肥后培育梭梭植株,使其正常生长70 d后干旱20 d进行沙地移栽试验,3个月后生长期结束测定其形态指标、生物量以及Na⁺和K⁺含量,初步探讨了钠复合肥在培育强抗旱梭梭植株方面所起的作用。与对照(不施任何肥料)和施用(NH₄)₂HPO₄(与钠复合肥含等量的N、P)的处理相比,施用钠复合肥的梭梭株高分别增加了26%和12%;分枝数增加了22%和14%;主茎直径分别增加了48%和23%、主根直径分别增加了37%和24%;冠幅分别增加了57%和28%;根冠比均增加了18%;鲜重分别增加了130%和74%、干重分别增加了154%和74%;地上部的Na⁺含量分别增加了45%和38%,根中的Na⁺含量分别增加了15%和12%;地上部中的K⁺含量差异不显著,根中K⁺含量分别降低了28%和31%。以上结果表明,钠复合肥的施用能有效地促进梭梭的生长并提高其抗旱能力。

Abstract: We mainly investigated morphological indexes, biomass, Na⁺ and K⁺ contents using potted Haloxylon ammodendro seedlings transplanted into a sandlot at the end of the three months growing season. There is a preliminary discussion on the effects of Na compound fertilizer application on induction of strong drought resistance in H. ammodendro seedlings. Comparing Na compound fertilizer with the control and with Diammonium phosphate, plant height increased by 42% and 18%,the branching number by 22% and 14%, the main stem diameter by 48% and 23%, the main root diameter by 37% and 24%,the crown diameter by 57% and 28%,the root/shoot ratio by 18% and 18%, the total fresh biomass by 130% and 74%,the total dry biomass by 154% and 74%, and the Na⁺ contents of shoots by 60% and 49%,but the K⁺ contents of roots decreased by 28% and 31% respectively (P<0.05). It is suggested that Na compound fertilizer application not only promotes the growth, but also improves drought-tolerance of H. ammodendro seedlings.

中图分类号:

S332
Q945.7

康建军,王锁民,赵明,杨自辉. 苗期施用钠复合肥增强梭梭抗逆性的初步研究[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(2): 127-133.

KANG Jian-jun, WANG Suo-min, ZHAO Ming, YANG Zi-hui. Tentative research of Na compound fertilizer at seedling stage on enhancing drought resistance of Haloxylon ammodendron[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(2): 127-133.

参考文献

[1] 张永锋, 梁正伟, 隋丽, 等. 盐碱胁迫对苗期紫花苜蓿生理特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(4): 230-235.
[2] Spickeff C M, Smirnoff N, Ratcliffe R G. An in vivo nuclear magneta resonance investigation of ion transport in maize and Spartina anglica roots during exposed to high salt concentration[J]. Plant Physiology, 1993, 102: 629-638.
[3] Surekha K A, Paul V, Zhu J K. Mechanisms of tolerance in plants[A]. Plant Nutrition for Food Security, Human Health and Environmental Protection[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2005: 44-45.
[4] Vander Moezel P G, Watson L E, Bell D T. Gas exchange responses of two Eucalyptus species to salinity and water logging[J]. Tree Physiology, 1989, (5): 251-257.
[5] 张永峰, 殷波. 混合盐碱胁迫对苗期紫花苜蓿抗氧化酶活性及丙二醛含量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(1): 46-50.
[6] 王丽燕. 盐生植物耐盐机理的研究进展[C]. 海峡两岸植物生理与分子生物学教学研讨会论文集, 2005: 3-6.
[7] Wang B S, Lüttge U, Ratajczak R. Effects of salt treatment and osmotic stress on V-ATPase and V-PPase in leaves of the halophyte Suaeda salsa[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2001, 365: 2355-2365.
[8] 李三相, 周向睿, 王锁民. Na⁺在植物中的有益作用[J]. 中国沙漠, 2008, 28(3): 485-490.
[9] Galeev R R. Application of sodium humate to potatoes[J]. Kartofel’I Ovoshchi, 1990, (2): 12-13.
[10] Wang S M, Wan C G, Wang Y R, et al. The characteristics of Na⁺, K⁺ and free proline distribution in several drought-resistant plants of the Alxa Desert[J]. China, Journal of Arid Environment, 2004, 56: 525-539.
[11] 马清, 楼洁琼, 王锁民. Na⁺对渗透胁迫下霸王幼苗光合特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(3): 198-203.
[12] 周向睿, 王锁民. 增强多浆旱生植物霸王抗旱能力的钠复合肥研制[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2007.
[13] 常兆年, 李发江, 韩福贵, 等. 民勤荒漠草地主要植物群落生境条件的比较研究[J]. 草业科学, 2009, 26(7): 12-18.
[14] 吕慧颖, 李银新, 孔凡江, 等. 植物Na⁺/H⁺逆向转运蛋白研究进展[J]. 植物学通报, 2003, 20 (3): 363-369.
[15] 陈川, 张山泉. 水稻施用钾肥与钠肥对其生长和产量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2003, 31(5): 764-769.
[16] Brownell P F. Sodium as an essential micronutrient element for plants and its possible role in metabolism[J]. Advance in Botanical Research, 1979, 7: 117-224.
[17] 弋良朋, 马健, 李彦. 3种荒漠盐生植物根系及根毛形态特征的比较研究[J]. 植物研究, 2007, 27 (2): 205-211.
[18] Marschner H. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants[M]. London: Academic Press, 1995.
[19] 宫海军, 陈坤明, 王锁民, 等. 植物硅营养的研究进展[J]. 西北植物学报, 2004, 24(12): 2385-2392.
[20] 夏石头, 萧浪涛, 彭克勤. 高等植物中硅元素的生理效应及其在农业生产中的应用[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 2001, 37(4): 356-360.
[21] Epstein E. Silicon[J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 1999, 50: 641-664.
[22] 冯元琦. 硅肥应成为我国农业发展中的新肥料[J]. 化肥工业, 2000, 27(4): 9-11.
[23] 饶立华, 覃莲祥, 朱玉贤, 等. 硅对杂交水稻形态结构和生理结构的影响[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1986, 3: 20-24.
[24] 樊保宁, 游建华, 陈引芝. 中量元素肥料在甘蔗上的肥效研究[J]. 综述现代农业科学, 2008, (11): 173-174.
[25] 方敏彦, 章明, 丁品, 等. 疏勒河中游高盐生境长穗柽柳群落格局研究[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(3): 20-27.
[26] Chapin F S III, Autumn K, Pugnaire F, et al. Evolution of suites of traits in response to environmental stress[J]. American Naturalist, 1993, 142: 78-92.
[27] Gedroc J J, McConnaughay K D M, Coleman J S. Plasticity in root/shoot partitioning: Optimal, ontogenetic or both[J]. Functional Ecology, 1996, 10: 44-50.
[28] Malik R S, Dhankar J S, Turner N C. Influence of soil water deficits on root growth of cotton seedlings[J]. Plant and Soil, 1979, 53: 109-115.
[29] Smucker A J M, Nunez-Barrios A, Ritchie J T. Root dynamics in drying soil environments[J]. Below Ground Ecology, 1991, 2: 4-5.
[30] 刘来华, 李韵珠. 冬小麦水氮有效利用的研究[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 1996, 13(5): 67-73.
[31] 李景平, 杨鑫光, 傅华. 阿拉善荒漠区3 种旱生植物体内主要渗透调节物质的含量和分配特征[J]. 草业科学, 2005, 22(19): 35-38.
[32] 梁永超, 张永春, 马同生. 植物的硅素营养[J]. 土壤学进展, 1993, 21(3): 7-14.
[33] Kim S G, Kim K W, Park E W, et al. Silicon-induced cell wall fortification of rice leaves: A possible cellular mechanism of enhanced host resistance to blast[J]. Phytopathology, 2002, 92(10): 1095-1103.