地上生物量负向扰动对干旱荒漠区补植沙拐枣幼株光化学过程的影响

草业学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2): 281-289.

地上生物量负向扰动对干旱荒漠区补植沙拐枣幼株光化学过程的影响

朱成刚¹,李卫红^1*,马建新¹,马晓东²

1.中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所荒漠与绿洲生态国家重点实验室,新疆乌鲁木齐 830011;
2.新疆师范大学生命科学与化学学院,新疆乌鲁木齐 830054

收稿日期:2012-03-28 出版日期:2013-02-25 发布日期:2013-04-20
通讯作者: E-mail:liwh@ms.xjb.ac.cn
作者简介:朱成刚(1976-),男,江苏铜山人,博士。E-mail:zhuchg@ms.xjb.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(No.41101533, No. 91025025)资助。

Effects of defoliation disturbance of aboveground biomass on photochemical process of reforested Calligonum caput-medusae saplings in arid desert

ZHU Cheng-gang¹, LI Wei-hong¹, MA Jian-xin¹, MA Xiao-dong²

1.State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China;
2.Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China

Received:2012-03-28 Online:2013-02-25 Published:2013-04-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究通过试验模拟了不同强度的地上生物量刈割扰动(对照,30%,50%和70%),并监测了试验沙拐枣幼株的光化学特性,旨在研究补植灌木人工刈割作为饲草过程中,地上生物量负向扰动对沙拐枣幼株光系统Ⅱ(PSⅡ)光化学过程的影响。结果显示,扰动强度与幼株光化学过程的响应并非简单线性关系;扰动30%地上生物量的幼株表现出最高的PSⅡ光化学效率与光合能力;高强度地上生物量负向扰动下,虽然幼株能通过自身调节机制保证PSⅡ的正常功能与完整性,并能在光化学过程被抑制时通过热耗散消耗多数过剩激能,使过剩激能份额保持稳定,但是高强度的扰动(>50%)将降低幼株光合能力,电子传递速率及光化学效率与活性,并最终影响幼株的正常生长。

Abstract: The effect of artificial disturbance on aboveground biomass of two years old Calligonum caput-medusae saplings was studied using different disturbance intensity (CK, 30%, 50% and 70%) and assessiing photochemical processes in PSⅡ of reforested shrub saplings. Saplings in the 30% disturbed group had the highest photochemical efficiency of PSⅡ and photosynthetic capacity. Most of the surplus absorbed energy by PSⅡ of experimental saplings could be dissipated as heat when the fraction of absorbed light utilized in PSⅡ photochemistry was inhibited, thus the excess excitation energy maintained a stable status. The saplings under high intensity disturbance could maintain the normal function of PSⅡ by series regulation and photoprotection mechanisms. However, high intensity disturbance of aboveground biomass (more than 50%) reduced the photosynthetic capacity, electron transport rate and the efficiency and activity of PSⅡ thus inhibiting the growth of saplings.

中图分类号:

朱成刚,李卫红,马建新,马晓东. 地上生物量负向扰动对干旱荒漠区补植沙拐枣幼株光化学过程的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(2): 281-289.

ZHU Cheng-gang, LI Wei-hong, MA Jian-xin, MA Xiao-dong. Effects of defoliation disturbance of aboveground biomass on photochemical process of reforested Calligonum caput-medusae saplings in arid desert[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(2): 281-289.

参考文献

[1] Thevs N. Tugay vegetation in the middle reaches of the Tarim River: vegetation types and their ecology[J]. Archives of Nature Conserv and Landscape Research, 2005, 44: 64-84.
[2] Gries D, Foetzki A, Arndt S K, et al. Production of perennial vegetation in an oasis-desert transition zone in NW China-allometric estimation, and assessment of flooding and use effects[J]. Plant Ecology, 2005, 181: 23-43.
[3] Thomas F M, Foetzki A, Arndt S K, et al. Water use by perennial plants in the transition zone between river oasis and desert in NW China[J]. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2006, 7: 253-267.
[4] Chen Y N, Zilliacus H, Li W H, et al. Ground-water level affects plant species diversity along the lower reaches of the Tarim River, Western China[J]. Journal of Arid Environment, 2006, 66: 231-246.
[5] Hao X M, Li W H, Huang X, et al. Assessment of the groundwater threshold of desert riparian forest vegetation along the middle and lower reaches of the Tarim River, China[J]. Hydrological Process, 2010, 24: 178-186.
[6] Wang R Z. C₄ plants in the deserts of China: occurrence of C₄ photosynthesis and its morphological functional types[J]. Photosynthetica, 2007, 45: 167-171.
[7] Singh G. Influence of soil moisture and gradient on growth and biomass production of Calligonum polygonoides in Indian desert affected by surface vegetation[J]. Journal of Arid Environment, 2004, 56: 541-558.
[8] Dhief A, Gorai M, Aschi-Smiti S, et al. Comparative phonological and water potential patterns of three Calligonum species in the eastern Great Erg of Tunisia[J]. Flora, 2009, 204(8): 581-592.
[9] 邱真静, 李毅, 种培芳. PEG 胁迫对不同地理种源沙拐枣生理特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(3): 108-114.
[10] Lambers H, Chapin F S, Pons T L. Photosynthesis in Plant Physiological Ecology[M]. New York Inc: Springer-verlag, 1998: 8-50.
[11] 朱成刚, 李卫红, 马建新, 等. 塔里木河下游地下水位对柽柳叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(7): 1689-1696.
[12] 莫亿伟, 郭振飞, 谢江辉. 温度胁迫对柱花草叶绿素荧光参数和光合速率的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(1): 96-101.
[13] Hamerlynck E P, Huxman T E. Ecophysiology of two sonoran desert evergreen shrubs during extreme drought[J]. Journal of Arid Environment, 2009, 73: 582-585.
[14] Mathur S, Allakhverdiev S I, Jajoo A. Analysis of high temperature stress on the dynamics of antenna size and reducing side heterogeneity of photosystem II in wheat leaves (Triticum aestivum)[J]. Biochimicaet Biophysica Acta, 2011, 1807: 22-29.
[15] 霍成君, 韩建国, 洪绂曾, 等. 刈割期及留茬高度对混播草地产草量及品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2001, 9(4): 257-264.
[16] 丁成龙, 顾洪如, 许能祥, 等. 不同刈割期对多花黑麦草饲草产量及品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(6): 186-194.
[17] 章家恩, 刘文高, 陈景青, 等. 不同刈割强度对牧草地上部和地下部生长性状的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(9): 1740-1744.
[18] 郭正刚, 刘慧霞, 王彦荣. 刈割对紫花苜蓿根系生长影响的初步分析[J]. 西北植物学报, 2004, 24(2): 215-220.
[19] 张永亮, 胡自强, 赵海新, 等. 刈割对混播当年生物量及再生速率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2004, 4: 308-312.
[20] Liu J Z, Chen Y N, Chen Y J, et al. Degradation of Populus euphratica community in the lower reaches of the Tarim River, Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2005, 17(5): 740-747.
[21] Oxborough K, Baker N R. Resolving chlorophyll fluorescence images of photosynthetic efficiency into photochemical and non-photochemical components-calculation of qP and F_v /F_m without measuring F_o′[J]. Photosynthesis Research, 1997, 54: 135-142.
[22] Genty B, Briantais J M, Baker N R. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence[J]. Biochimicaet Biophysica Acta, 1989, 990: 87-92.
[23] Schreiber U, Schliwa U, Bilger W. Continuous recording of photochemical and non-photochemical fluorescence quenching with a new type of modulation fluorometer[J]. Photosynthesis Research, 1986, 10: 51-62
[24] Bilger W, Bjrkman O. Temperature dependence of violaxanthin deepoxidation and non-photochemical fluorescence quenching in intact leaves of Gossypium hirsutum L. and Malva parviflora L.[J]. Planta, 1991, 184: 226-234.
[25] Kramer D M, Johnson G, Kiirats O, et al. New fluorescence parameters for the determination of QA redox state and excitation energy fluxes[J]. Photosynthesis Research, 2004, 79: 209-218.
[26] Demmig-Adams B, Adams III W W, Barker D H, et al. Using chlorophyll fluorescence to assess the fraction of absorbed light allocated to thermal dissipation of excess excitation[J]. Plant Physiology, 1996, 98: 253-264.
[27] 张志良, 瞿伟菁. 植物生理学实验指导(第三版)[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2003.
[28] Kato M C, Hikosaka K, Hirotsu N, et al. The excess light energy that is neither utilized in photosynthesis nor dissipated by photoprotective mechanisms determines the rate of photoinactivaion in photosystem II[J]. Plant Cell Physiology, 2003, 44: 318-325.
[29] Gamon J A, Serrano L, Surfus J S. The photochemical reflectance index: an optical indicator of photosynthetic radiation use efficiency across species, functional types, and nutrient levels[J]. Oecologia, 1997, 112: 492-501.
[30] Guo J, Trotter C M. Estimating photosynthetic light-use efficiency using the photochemical reflectance index: variations among species[J]. Functional Plant Biology, 2004, 31: 255-265.
[31] Peltzer D, Dreyer E, Polle A. Differential temperature dependencies of antioxidative enzymes in two contrasting species: Fagus sylvatica and Coleus blumei[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2002, 40: 141-50.
[32] Zhuang L, Chen Y N. Physiological responses of three contrasting plant species to groundwater level changes in an arid environment[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2006, 48(5): 520-526.
[33] Bowler C, Van Montagu M, Inze D. Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 1992, 43: 83-116.
[34] Foyer C H, Lelandais M, Kunert K J. Photooxidative stress in plants[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 1994, 92: 696-717.