利用表型数据构建狗牙根初级核心种质

doi:10.11686/cyxb20140406

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究以831份狗牙根种质资源为试材,根据15个数量和质量性状,研究了狗牙根初级核心种质构建的方法。从总体取样规模(5%,10%,15%,20%,25%和30%)、组内取样比例(简单比例、对数比例、平方根比例和多样性比例)和取样方法(随机取样和聚类取样)3个层次探讨构建狗牙根初级核心种质的最佳取样策略,共形成48种取样策略。应用均值差异百分率、方差差异百分率、极差符合率和变异系数变化率4个参数来检验各取样策略的优劣。比较初始种质和初级核心种质两者基于主成分的样品分布图及性状间的相关系数,对构建的初级核心种质进行确认。结果表明,25%是最适宜的总体取样比例;4种组内取样比例中平方根比例优于简单比例、对数比例和多样性比例;2种取样方法中,聚类取样明显优于随机取样。最终确定25%的总体取样规模下,组内采用平方根比例和聚类抽样方法是构建狗牙根初级核心种质的最佳取样策略。根据获得的最佳取样策略最终在表型水平建立了包含208份种质的狗牙根初级核心种质,该种质可以作为整体资源的代表性样本,在狗牙根种质资源的充分开发和利用中发挥重要作用。

Abstract: In this study,the method of constructing Cynodon dactylon pre-core collection was studied based on 15 quantitative and qualitative traits from 831 accessions. An optimal sampling scheme was selected from 48 strategies which consisted of sampling proportions (5%,10%,15%,20%,25%,and 30%),sampling proportions within group (simple proportion,logarithmic proportion,square root proportion and genetic proportion) and individual selection methods within group (random selection and cluster selection) evaluating with four effective parameters including mean difference percentage,variance difference percentage,coincidence rate of range and changeable rate of variation coefficient. The optimal sampling scheme was also confirmed by comparing the accessions distribution plotted by first two principal components,correlation coefficients of traits between two collections. The result indicated that 25% was the optimum sampling proportions. The square root proportion was better than simple proportion,logarithmic proportion and genetic proportion. The cluster selection was more suitable than random selection. At 25% sampling proportion,using square root proportion within group and cluster selection method within group is the most suitable method for constructing C. dactylon pre-core collection. The result conducted by PCA analysis showed the genetic structure and variation of 831 accessions was well represented by the pre-core collection. The most important phenotypic correlations between traits which may be under the control of co-adapted gene complexes were also preserved by the pre-core collection. Based on the optimized sampling strategy,the pre-core collection consisting 208 accessions of C. dactylon were established and will play an important role in the utilization of C. dactylon genetic resources.

中图分类号:

S543⁺.901

郑轶琦，郭琰，房淑娟，徐亚楠，陈静波，刘建秀. 利用表型数据构建狗牙根初级核心种质[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(4): 49-60.

ZHENG Yi-qi,GUO Yan,FANG Shu-juan,XU Ya-nan,CHEN Jing-bo,LIU Jian-xiu. Constructing pre-core collection of Cynodon dactylon based on phenotypic data[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(4): 49-60.

参考文献

Reference：
[1]Frankel O H, Brown A H D. Current Plant Genetic Resources a Critical Appraisal[M]. New Delhi(India): Oxford and IBH Publishing, 1984.
[2]Brown A H D. Core collection: A practical approach to genetic resources management[J]. Genome, 1989, 31: 818-824.
[3]Han C Y, Dong Y C, Wang L F, et al. The construction of common wheat core collection and the analysis of genetic diversity in our country[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2008, 53(8): 908-915.
[4]Xu N, Cheng X Z, Wang S H, et al. Establishment of an adzuki bean (Vigna angularis) core collection based on geographical distribution and phenotypic data in China[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(8): 1366-1373.
[5]Li Z C, Zhang H L, Zeng Y W, et al. Studies on sampling schemes for the establishment of core collection of rice landraces in Yunnan[J]. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2002, 49: 67-74.
[6]Li G Q, Li X X, Shen D, et al. Studies on the methods of constructing Chinese cabbage core germplasm based on the morphological data[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2008, 35(12): 1759-1766.
[7]Hu J, Zhu J, Xu H M. Methods of constructing core collections by stepwise clustering with three sampling strategies based on the genotypic values of crops[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2000, 101: 264-268.
[8]Wang J C, Hu J, Zhang C F, et al. Evaluating parameters of rice core collections based on genotypic values and molecular marker information[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2007, 21(1): 51-58. 
[9]Liu Z C, Zhang C Y, Zhang Y M, et al. Study on method of constructing core collection of malus sieversii based on quantitative traits[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(2): 358-370. 
[10]Ortiz R, Ruia Tapia E N, Mijica Sanchez A. Sampling strategy for a core collection of Peruvian quinoa germplasm[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1998, 96: 475-483.
[11]Charmer G, Balfourier F. The use of geostatistics for sampling a core collection of perennial ryegrass populations[J]. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 1995, 42: 303-309.
[12]Basigalup D H, Barnes D K, Stucker R E. Development of a core collection for perennial Medicago plant introductions[J]. Crop Science, 1995, 35(4): 1163-1168.
[13]Diwan N, McIntosh M S, Bauchan G R. Methods of developing a core collection of annual Medicago species[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1995, 90: 755-761.
[14]Anderson W F. Development of a forage bermudagrass (Cynodon sp.) core collection[J]. Grassland Science, 2005, 51: 305-308.
[15]Harlan J R. Sources of variation in Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.[J]. Crop Science, 1969, 9: 774-778.
[16]Rochecouste E. Studies on the biotypes of Cynodon dactylon L. botanical investigation[J]. Weed Research, 1962, 2: 1-23.
[17]Harlan J R, de Wet J M J, Rawal K M. Origin and distribution of the seleucidus race of Cynodon dactylon L. Pers. var. dactylon (Gramineae)[J]. Euphytica, 1970, 19: 465-469.
[18]Wu R R, Lu X S. Chinese tropical and subtropical forage germplasm[M]. Beijing:China Science and Technology Publishing, 1992.
[19]Liu J X, He S A, Liu Y D, et al. Taxonomy of Cynodon dactylon types in east China and their turfgrass quality[J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 1996, 15(3): 18-22.
[20]Liu J X, Guo A G, Guo H L. Morphological variation and types of Cynodon dactylon[J]. Acta prataculturae Sinica, 2003, 12(6): 99-104.
[21]Zhang X A, Zhang X Q. Study on the morphological characteristics of native wild Cynodon dactylon in southwestern region of China[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2006, 3: 35-38.
[22]Huang C Q, Zhou S Y, Liu G D, et al. A study on morphological variations of Cynodon dactylon in south China[J]. Acta prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(5): 210-217.
[23]Zhang Y H, A B L T, Li P Y. Study on morphological diversity of Xinjiang wild bermudagrass[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2011, 34(1): 6-11.
[24]Huang C Q, Liu G D, Bai C H, et al. A study on the morphological diversity of 475 accessions of Cynodon dactylon[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(4): 33-42.
[25]Wu Y Q, Taliaferro C M, Bai G H, et al. AFLP analysis of Cynodon dactylon(L.) Pers. var. dactylon genetic variation[J]. Genome, 2004, 47: 689-696.
[26]Wu Y Q, Taliaferro C M, Bai G H, et al. Genetic analysis of Chinese Cynodon accessions by flow cytometry and AFLP markers[J]. Crop Science, 2006, 46(2): 917-926.
[27]Liu W, Zhang X Q, Li F, et al. Genetic diversity of bermudagrass accessions in south-west China by ISSRs molecular markers and geographic provenance[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2007, 16(3): 55-61.
[28]Yi Y J, Zhang X Q, Huang L K, et al. Genetic diversity of wild Cynodon dactylon germplasm detected by SRAP markers[J]．Hereditas, 2008, 30(1): 94-100.
[29]Wang Z Y, Yuan X J, Zheng Y Q, et al. Molecular identification and genetic analysis for 24 turf type Cynodon cultivars by sequence-related amplified polymorphism markers[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2009, 122: 461-467.
[30]Liang H M. Analysis on different populations of Cynodon dactylon by RAPD[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(1): 258-262.
[31]ling Y, Zhang X Q, Qi X F, et al. Genetic diversity of wild Cynodon dactylon germplasm from five province of Southwest China and Africa detected by SRAP markers[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(2): 196-203.
[32]Qi X F, Zhang X Q, Ling Y, et al. Genetic diversity of wild Cynodon dactylon germplasm detected by AFLP markers[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(3): 155-161.
[33]Huang C Q, Liu G D, Bai C J, et al. Estimation of genetic variation in Cynodon dactylon accessions using the ISSR technique[J]. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 2010, 38: 993-999.
[34]Li H Y, Liu L, Lou Y H, et al. Genetic diversity of Chinese natural bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) germplasm using ISSR markers[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2011, 127: 555-561.
[35]Liu J, Zhao Q, Yang Z M. ISSR molecular markers analysis of 9 Bermudagrass cultivation varieties[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(6): 159-165.
[36]Zhang Y H, Pa T G L, Li J H, et al. SSR Analyses of different bermudagrass populations[J]. Acta Agrectir Sinica, 2013, 21(3): 598-606.
[37]Xu H M, Qiu Y X, Hu J, et al. Methods of constructing core collection of crop germplasm by comparing different genetic distances,dluster methods and sampling strategies[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2004, 30(9): 932-936.
[38]Li Z C, Zhang H L, Zeng Y W, et al. Study on sampling schemes of core collection of local varieties of rice in Yunnan,China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2000, 33(5): 1-7.
[39]Yu P, Li Z C, Zhang H L, et al. Sampling strategy of primary core collection of common wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) in China[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2003, 8(5): 37 41.
[40]Qi Y W, Fan L N, Luo Q W, et al. Establishment of saccharum spontaneum L.core collections[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2013, 39(4): 649-656.
[41]Spagnoletti Z P L, Qualset C O. Evaluation of five strategies for obtaining a core subset from a large genetic resource collection of durum wheat[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1993, 87: 295-304.
[42]Brown A H D. The case for core collections[A]. In: Brown A H D, Frankel O H, Marshall R D, et al. The Use of Plant Genetic Resources[M]. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1989: 136-156.
[43]Spagnoletti Z P L, Qualset C O. Geographical diversity for quantitative spike characters in a world collection of durum wheat[J]. Crop Science, 1987, 27: 235-241.
[44]Liu C Y, Wang S H, Wang L X, et al. Establishment of candidate core collection in Chinese mungbean germplasm resources[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(4): 700-705.
[45]Ma H W, Yin Y B, Wang X, et al. Study on method of constructing core collection of japonica based on quantitative traits[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2013, 22(11): 7-14.
[46]Xu H M, Mei Y J, Hu J, et al. Sampling a core collection of Island cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) based on the genotypic values of fiber traits[J]. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2006, 53: 515-521.
[47]Xu H M, Hu J, Qiu Y X. Study on constructing core collection based on plant molecular markers and quantitative traits[J]. Journal of Biomathematics, 2005, 20(3): 351-355.

参考文献：
[1]Frankel O H, Brown A H D. Current Plant Genetic Resources a Critical Appraisal[M]. New Delhi(India): Oxford and IBH Publishing, 1984.
[2]Brown A H D. Core collection: A practical approach to genetic resources management[J]. Genome, 1989, 31: 818-824.
[3]郝晨阳, 董玉琛, 王兰芬, 等. 我国普通小麦核心种质的构建及遗传多样性分析[J]. 科学通报, 2008, 53(8): 908-915.
[4]徐宁, 程须珍, 王素华, 等. 以地理来源分组和利用表型数据构建中国小豆核心种质[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(8): 1366-1373.
[5]Li Z C, Zhang H L, Zeng Y W, et al. Studies on sampling schemes for the establishment of core collection of rice landraces in Yunnan[J]. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2002, 49: 67-74.
[6]李国强, 李锡香, 沈镝, 等. 基于形态数据的大白菜核心种质构建方法的研究[J].园艺学报, 2008, 35(12): 1759-1766.
[7]Hu J, Zhu J, Xu H M. Methods of constructing core collections by stepwise clustering with three sampling strategies based on the genotypic values of crops[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2000, 101: 264-268.
[8]王建成, 胡晋, 张彩芳, 等. 建立在基因型值和分子标记信息上的水稻核心种质评价参数[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21(1): 51-58. 
[9]刘遵春, 张春雨, 张艳敏, 等. 利用数量性状构建新疆野苹果核心种质的方法[J].中国农业科学, 2010, 43(2): 358-370. 
[10]Ortiz R, Ruia-Tapia E N, Mijica-Sanchez A. Sampling strategy for a core collection of Peruvian quinoa germplasm[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1998, 96: 475-483.
[11]Charmer G, Balfourier F. The use of geostatistics for sampling a core collection of perennial ryegrass populations[J]. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 1995, 42: 303-309.
[12]Basigalup D H, Barnes D K, Stucker R E. Development of a core collection for perennial Medicagoplant introductions[J]. Crop Science, 1995, 35(4): 1163-1168.
[13]Diwan N, McIntosh M S, Bauchan G R. Methods of developing a core collection of annual Medicagospecies[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1995, 90: 755-761.
[14]Anderson W F. Development of a forage bermudagrass (Cynodonsp.) core collection[J]. Grassland Science, 2005, 51: 305-308.
[15]Harlan J R. Sources of variation in Cynodon dactylon(L.) Pers. [J]. Crop Science, 1969, 9: 774-778.
[16]Rochecouste E. Studies on the biotypes of Cynodon dactylon L. botanical investigation[J]. Weed Research, 1962, 2: 1-23.
[17]Harlan J R, de Wet J M J, Rawal K M. Origin and distribution of the seleucidus race of Cynodon dactylon L. Pers. var. dactylon(Gramineae)[J]. Euphytica, 1970, 19: 465-469.
[18]吴仁润, 卢欣石. 中国热带亚热带牧草种质资源[M]. 北京: 中国科技出版社, 1992.
[19]刘建秀, 贺善安, 刘永东, 等. 华东地区狗牙根形态分类及其坪用价值[J]. 植物资源与环境, 1996, 15(3): 18-22.
[20]刘建秀, 郭爱桂, 郭海林. 我国狗牙根种质资源形态变异及形态类型划分[J]. 草业学报, 2003, 12(6): 99-104.
[21]张小艾, 张新全. 西南区野生狗牙根形态多样性研究[J]. 草原与草坪, 2006, 3: 35-38.
[22]黄春琼, 刘国道, 周少云, 等. 华南地区野生狗牙根植物学形态特征变异研究[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(5): 210-217.
[23]张延辉, 阿不来提, 李培英. 新疆野生狗牙根形态多样性研究[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2011, 34(1): 6-11.
[24]黄春琼, 刘国道, 白昌军, 等. 475份狗牙根种质资源形态多样性的研究[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(4): 33-42.
[25]Wu Y Q, Taliaferro C M, Bai G H, et al. AFLP analysis of Cynodon dactylon(L.) Pers. var. dactylongenetic variation[J]. Genome, 2004, 47: 689-696.
[26]Wu Y Q, Taliaferro C M, Bai G H, et al. Genetic analysis of Chinese Cynodonaccessions by flow cytometry and AFLP markers[J]. Crop Science, 2006, 46(2): 917-926.
[27]刘伟, 张新全, 李芳, 等. 西南区野生狗牙根遗传多样性的ISSR标记与地理来源分析[J]. 草业学报, 2007, 16(3): 55-61.
[28]易杨杰, 张新全, 黄琳凯, 等. 野生狗牙根种质遗传多样性的SRAP研究[J]．遗传, 2008, 30(1): 94-100.
[29]Wang Z Y, Yuan X J, Zheng Y Q, et al. Molecular identification and genetic analysis for 24 turf-type Cynodoncultivars by sequence-related amplified polymorphism markers[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2009, 122: 461-467.
[30]梁慧敏. 不同居群狗牙根RAPD分析[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(1): 258-262.
[31]凌瑶, 张新全, 齐晓芳, 等. 西南五省区及非洲野生狗牙根种质基于SRAP标记的遗传多样性分析[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(2): 196-203.
[32]齐晓芳, 张新全, 凌瑶, 等. 野生狗牙根种质资源的AFLP遗传多样性分析[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(3): 155-161.
[33]Huang C Q, Liu G D, Bai C J, et al. Estimation of genetic variation in Cynodon dactylonaccessions using the ISSR technique[J]. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 2010, 38: 993-999.
[34]Li H Y, Liu L, Lou Y H, et al. Genetic diversity of Chinese natural bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) germplasm using ISSR markers[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2011, 127: 555-561.
[35]刘君, 赵琴, 杨志民. ISSR分子标记对9种狗牙根的鉴定分析[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(6): 159-165.
[36]张延辉, 帕提古丽, 李江华, 等. 不同居群野生狗牙根材料的SSR分析[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 21(3): 598-606.
[37]徐海明, 邱英雄, 胡晋, 等. 不同遗传距离聚类和抽样方法构建作物核心种质的比较[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(9): 932-936.
[38]李自超, 张洪亮, 曾亚文, 等. 云南地方稻种资源核心种质取样方案研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2000, 33(5): 1-7.
[39]余萍, 李自超, 张洪亮, 等. 中国普通野生稻初级核心种质取样策略[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2003, 8(5): 37-41.
[40]齐永文, 樊丽娜, 罗青文, 等. 甘蔗细茎野生种核心种质构建[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(4): 649-656.
[41]Spagnoletti Z P L, Qualset C O. Evaluation of five strategies for obtaining a core subset from a large genetic resource collection of durum wheat[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1993, 87: 295-304.
[42]Brown A H D. The case for core collections[A]. In: Brown A H D, Frankel O H, Marshall R D, et al. The Use of Plant Genetic Resources[M]. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1989: 136-156.
[43]Spagnoletti Z P L, Qualset C O. Geographical diversity for quantitative spike characters in a world collection of durum wheat[J]. Crop Science, 1987, 27: 235-241.
[44]刘长友, 王素华, 王丽侠, 等. 中国绿豆种质资源初选核心种质构建[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(4): 700-705.
[45]马洪文, 殷延勃, 王昕, 等. 利用数量性状构建粳稻核心种质的方法比较[J]. 西北农业学报, 2013, 22(11): 7-14.
[46]Xu H M, Mei Y J, Hu J, et al. Sampling a core collection of Island cotton (Gossypium barbadenseL.) based on the genotypic values of fiber traits[J]. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2006, 53: 515-521.
[47]徐海明, 胡晋, 邱英雄. 利用分子标记和数量性状基因值构建作物核心种质库的研究[J]. 生物数学学报, 2005, 20(3): 351-355.