利用体外产气法和CNCPS法对不同生育期虉草营养价值的评价研究

doi:10.11686/cyxb2014399

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了评定不同生育期虉草的营养价值,分析体外产气法和CNCPS法两种营养评价方法的相关性。采用体外产气法测定抽穗期、开花期、灌浆期、乳熟期4个生育期虉草的体外发酵产气量、发酵参数(a、b、c)、DM消化率、NDF和ADF降解率,用康奈尔净碳水化合物和蛋白质体系(cornell net carbohydrate and protein system,CNCPS)分析方法测定相应组分,评价其营养价值,并比较研究两种方法评价结果的相关性。结果表明,体外发酵至72 h结束,累计总产气量和产气参数a以开花期最高(122.68 和4.46 mL),显著高于各组(P<0.05),且从抽穗期、灌浆期、乳熟期有降低的趋势;抽穗期和开花期的DM消化率、NDF和ADF降解率分别显著高于灌浆期和乳熟期(P<0.05)。随着虉草生育期的延长,CP和SOLP呈递减趋势,即抽穗期和开花期显著高于灌浆期和乳熟期(P<0.05);NDF、ADF和ADL呈递增趋势,但NDFIP、ADFIP呈递减趋势。灌浆期和乳熟期的CHO含量显著高于抽穗期和开花期(P<0.05),而CA和CNSC含量则相反,且CC含量同样以灌浆期与乳熟期较高;蛋白质组分中,PA与CA及CC与PC组分呈现同样的趋势。虉草CNSC、CA、CB₁、CB₂、PA、PB₃组分含量与不同时间点产气量呈显著或极显著的相关性(P<0.05或P<0.01)。因此,开花期虉草营养价值最高,其次为抽穗期、灌浆期和乳熟期,产气法和CNCPS评价牧草具有相关性,用体外产气量估测牧草CNCPS组分是可行的。

Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the nutritional value of reed canary grass at different growth stages using in vitro gas production and the Cornell net carbohydrate and protein system (CNCPS) methods, and to compare results from these two methods. The in vitro gas production method was used to determine gas production, fermentation parameters (a, b, c), dry matter (DM) digestibility, and the degradation rates of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) at heading, flowering, seed filling and milk ripe growth stages of reed canary grass. CNCPS components were also determined for comparison of the two methods. The cumulative total gas production and the a value (122.68 and 4.46 mL) at the flowering stage were significantly higher than those at other stages, and they tended to decrease from the heading to milk ripe stages. Similarly, DM digestibility and degradation rates of NDF and ADF at the heading and flowering stages were significantly higher than those at the seed filling and milk ripe stages. As reed canary grass matured, the crude protein (CP) and soluble protein (SOLP) contents tended to decrease, and were significantly lower at the seed filling and milk ripe stages than at the heading and flowering stages NDF, ADF and acid detergent lignin (ADL) components increased while the NDF insoluble protein (NDFIP) and ADF insoluble protein (ADFIP) generally decreased. The carbohydrate (CHO) content at the filling and milk ripe stages was significantly higher than that at the heading and flowering stages, while sugar content in CHO (CA) and non-structural carbohydrate (CNSC) contents were higher at the heading and flowering stages. The unavailable fiber (CC) content was also higher at the milk ripe stage. The protein component, the non-protein nitrogen (PA), and the bound protein (PC) showed similar trends to those of CA and CC. The levels of CNSC, CA, starch+non-starch polysaccharide fractions (CB₁), CB₂, PA, and low degradability protein (PB₃) levels of reed canary grass were significantly or very significantly correlated with the gas production at different time points. Therefore, the nutritional value of reed canary grass was the highest at the flowering stage, followed by the heading stage, filling stage and milk ripe stage in that order. The results from the two evaluation methods, in vitro gas production and the CNCPS method, were closely correlated, suggesting that it was feasible to estimate CNCPS components of forages using the in vitro gas production method.

陈光吉,宋善丹,郭春华,柏雪,张正帆,张艳,游明鸿,白史且. 利用体外产气法和CNCPS法对不同生育期虉草营养价值的评价研究[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(9): 63-72.

CHEN Guang-Ji, SONG Shan-Dan, GUO Chun-Hua, BAI Xue, ZHANG Zheng-Fan, ZHANG Yan, YOU Ming-Hong, BAI Shi-Qie. The nutritional value of reed canary grass at different growth stages, as determined by in vitro gas production and Cornell net carbohydrate and protein system methods[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(9): 63-72.

参考文献

[1] Sahramaa M. Evaluating Germplasm of Reed Canary Grass, Phalaris arundinacea L[M]. Southern Finland: University of Helsinki, 2004.
[2] Jia S X. Forage Floras of China[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 1991: 61-65.
[3] Zhang Y, Zhang C B, Li D X, et al . Regional trial of “Chuancao No. 3” of Phalarisarundinacea. Grassland and Animal Husbandry, 2007, (11): 9-14.
[4] Huhtanen P, Seppälä A, Ots M, et al . In vitro gas production profiles to estimate extent and effective first-order rate of neutral detergent fiber digestion in the rumen. Journal of Animal Science, 2008, 86(3): 651-659.
[5] Razligi S N, Doust-Nobar R S, Sis N M, et al . Estimation of net energy and degradability kinetics of treated whole safflower seed by in vitro gas production and nylon bag methods. Annals of Biological Research, 2011, 2: 295-300.
[6] Hetta M, Cone J W, Bernes G, et al . Voluntary intake of silages in dairy cows depending on chemical composition and in vitro gas production characteristics. Livestock Science, 2007, 106(1): 47-56.
[7] Hong J S, Liu S J, Chai S T, et al . Assessment of nutritional value of local oat green grass in Qinghai by In vitro gas production and nylon bag profiles. Chinese Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2009, 6(3): 36-38.
[8] Qu Y L, Wu J H, Li T. Use of Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System for evaluation of nutrient value of feeds to dairy cattle in the northeast agricultural region of China. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2010, 22(1): 201-206.
[9] Tao C W, Zhang A Z, Jiang N, et al . Study on the nutritive value of several common forage for the ruminant by CNCPS. China Herbivores, 2009, 144(3): 50-55.
[10] Menke K H, Steingass H. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research Dev, 1988, 28(1): 7-55.
[11] Ørskov E R, McDonald I. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 1979, 92(2): 499-503.
[12] Zhang L Y. Feed Analysis and Quality Inspection Technology, 2th edition[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2003.
[13] Van Soest P J, Sniffen C J, Mertens D R, et al . A net protein system for system for cattle: the rumen submodel for nitrogen. OWENS F N. Protein Requirements for Cattle: Proceedings of an International Symposium[C]. Stillwater: Oklahoma State University, 1981: 265.
[14] Krishnamoorthy U C, Sniffen C J, Stern M D, et al . Evaluation of mathematical of digestion and an in vitro silulation of rumen protelysis to estimate the rumen undergraded nitrogen content of feedstuffs. British Journal of Nutrition, 1983, 50(3): 555-565.
[15] American Association for Clinical Chemistry. Approved Methods of the AACC[M]. Saint Paul: American Association of Cereal Chemistry,1976.
[16] Sniffen C J, Oconnor J D, Van Soest P J, et al . A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: Ⅱ. Carbohydrate and protein availability. Journal of Animal Science, 1992, 70(11): 3562-3577.
[17] Li M L, Gao Z W. The forage yield and nutritive value of flixweed in different growth period of. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2004, 13(5): 66-69.
[18] Yang Y G, Cheng T L, Yang X J, et al . Effects of different growth stages of three Oat cultivars on the nutritive value of silage. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2013, 21(4): 683-688.
[19] Ma Z P, Li M F, Yang D L, et al . Relationship between grain filling and accumulation and remobilization of water soluble carbohydrates in leaf and stem of winter wheat during the grain filling in different water conditions. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(4): 68-78.
[20] Song Z Q, Gan Y M, Tian G, et al . Nutritional values of Italian ryegrass for growing rabbits. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(5): 352-38.
[21] Liu C Y, Sun X Y, Zhu T C, et al . Comparison of the production performance of ryegrass cultivars and screening of dominant varieties. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(4): 39-48.
[22] Wood C D, Manyuchi B. Use of an in vitro gas production method to investigate interactions between veld hay and Napier hay or groundnut hay supplements. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1997, 67(4): 265-278.
[23] Tang S S, Huang R L, Tan Z L, et al . Study on in vitro fermentation characteristics of different species of oat straw. Journal of Guangxi Agric Bio Science, 2007, 25(4): 330-335.
[24] Zhang J P, Li L R, Zou Q H, et al . Evaluation of some diary cattle feeds in Jiangxi Province with CNCPS,RFV and GI. Acta Agricultural University Jianxiensis, 2012, 34(5): 1003-1007.
[25] Aquino D L, Tedeschi L O, Lanzas C, et al . Evaluation of CNCPS predictions of milk production of dairy cows fed alfalfa silage[C]. Proceedings of the Cornell Nutritional Conference, 2003: 137-150.
[26] Huang F H, Dong K H. Study on nutrients of dominant spicies of forage and dynamics of the rumen degradability in old world Bluestem Shrub Rangeland. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2006,28: 18-22.
[27] Sui M X. Comparative Study on Nutritional Evaluation of Roughages by Gas Production Technique and CNCPS[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2009.
[2] 贾慎修. 中国饲用植物志[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1991: 61-65.
[3] 张玉, 张昌兵, 李达旭, 等. “川草 3 号” 虉草的区域试验研究. 草业与畜牧, 2007, (11): 9-14.
[7] 洪金锁, 刘书杰, 柴沙驼, 等. 产气法与尼龙袋法评定青海当地燕麦青千草营养价值. 中国畜牧兽医, 2009, 6(3): 36-38.
[8] 曲永利, 吴健豪, 李铁. 应用康奈尔净碳水化合物-蛋白质体系评定东北农区奶牛饲料营养价值. 动物营养学报, 2010, 22(1): 201-206.
[9] 陶春卫, 张爱忠, 姜宁, 等.用CNCPS评定反刍动物几种常用粗饲料营养价值的研究. 中国草食动物, 2009, 144(3): 50-55.
[12] 张丽英. 饲料分析及质量检测技术, 2版[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2003.
[17] 李孟良, 高志炜. 播娘蒿不同生育期鲜草产量与营养价值. 草业学报, 2004, 13(5): 66-69.
[18] 杨云贵, 程天亮, 杨雪娇, 等. 3个燕麦品种不同收获期对青贮饲草营养价值的影响. 草地学报, 2013, 21(4): 683-688.
[19] 马召朋, 栗孟飞, 杨德龙, 等. 不同水分条件下冬小麦灌浆期茎叶可溶性碳水化合物积累转运与籽粒灌浆的关系. 草业学报, 2014, 23(4): 68-78.
[20] 宋中齐, 干友民, 田刚, 等. 多花黑麦草在生长肉兔上的营养价值评定. 草业学报, 2014, 23(5): 352-38.
[21] 刘春英, 孙学映, 朱体超, 等. 不同黑麦草品种生产性能比较与优势品种筛选. 草业学报, 2014, 23(4): 39-48.
[23] 汤少勋, 黄瑞林, 谭支良, 等. 不同品种燕麦秸秆体外发酵产气特性的研究. 广西农业生物科学, 2007, 25(4): 330-335.
[24] 张吉鹍, 李龙瑞, 邹庆华. 江西几种奶牛常用饲料的多体系营养价值评定. 江西农业大学学报, 2012, 34(5): 1003-1007.
[26] 黄峰华, 董宽虎. 白羊草灌木丛草地优势种牧草营养物质及瘤胃降解动态研究. 中国草地学报, 2006, 28: 18-22.
[27] 隋美霞. 产气法和CNCPS法对粗饲料营养评价的比较研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2009.