围封沙质天然草地植物的构件和个体生物量比较研究

doi:10.11686/cyxb2015048

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 生物量是植物积累能量的主要体现,其在各器官中的分配是植物对环境适应的结果,反映了植物的生长策略。调查甘肃省景泰县绿洲边缘围封沙质草地常见的27种灌木和草本,采用全挖法研究了各植物盛花期时的个体和根、茎、花、叶等构件的生物量特征以及地下-地上生物量关系(根冠比,R/S)的变化趋势。结果表明:1)27种植物中,花、叶、茎干重小于1.0 g的分别占到89%,70%,56%,27种植物的根冠比均小于1;2)随着封育措施和人工抚育措施的实施,4种灌木的根冠比(R/S):沙蒿(均值为0.32)、猫头刺(均值为0.78)、荒漠锦鸡儿(均值为0.24)和白刺(均值为0.10)在各样地中表现出显著差异性;3)大部分植物构件对地上生物量的贡献率为:茎>叶>花>根,植物构件对个体生物量的贡献率为:叶>茎>花>根;一年生草本地上(花、叶、茎)生物量与个体生物量的比率显著高于多年生草本和灌木(P<0.05),不同构件对生物量贡献率的差异有利于不同生活型植物的种群扩散和繁衍。

Abstract: Plant biomass mainly reflects the energy accumulated by plants. Plant species have evolved specialized strategies to regulate biomass allocation among various organs or between above and below ground biomass. We investigated total biomass and biomass allocation characteristics of 27 shrub and herbaceous species in an exclosure on grassland in a marginal oasis area on sandy soil at Jingtai, Gansu Province. The flower, leaf and stem biomass comprised less than 1.0 g in 89%, 70% and 56% of the 27 species respectively and the root:shoot ratio (R:S) of all species was less than 1. The R:S of Artemisia desertorum, Oxytropis aciphylla, Caragana roborovskyi and Nitraria sibirica differed significantly between natural exclosure and artificially restored sites. The ratio of aboveground biomass:total biomass of annual herbaceous species was significantly higher than those of perennial herbaceous and shrub species. These characteristics are deemed advantageous for biodiversity in this environment.

王蕙,王辉,罗永忠,马维伟. 围封沙质天然草地植物的构件和个体生物量比较研究[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(9): 206-215.

WANG Hui, WANG Hui, LUO Yong-Zhong, MA Wei-Wei. A comparative study of plant biomass in a native grassland exclosure[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(9): 206-215.

参考文献

[1] Zhang Q, Zhao X, Zhao H L. Chinese Sandy Grassland[M]. Beijing: China Meteorological Press, 1998.
[2] Zuo W Q, Wang Y H, Wang F Y, et al . Effects of enclosure on the community characteristics of Leymus chinensisin degenerated steppe. Acta Prtaculturae Sinica, 2009, 18(3): 12-19.
[3] Li X R, Zhang Z S, Wang X P, et al . The ecohydrology of the soil vegetation system restoration in arid zones: a review. Journal of Desert Research, 2009, 29(5): 845-852.
[4] Yan Y C, Tang H P, Xin X P, et al . Advances in research on the effects of exclosure on grasslands. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(9): 5039-5046.
[5] Su Y Z, Zhao H L. Influences of grazing and exclosure on carbon sequestration in degraded sandy grassland, Inner Mongolia, North China. Environmental Science, 2003, 24(4): 23-28.
[6] Shan G L, Xu Z, Ning F. Influence of seasonal exclosure on plant and soil characteristics in typical steppe. Acta Prtaculturae Sinica, 2009, 18(2): 3-10.
[7] Meissner R A, Facelli J M. Effects of sheep exclusion on the soil seed bank and annual vegetation in chenopod shrublands of South Australia. Journal of Arid Environment, 1999, 42(2): 117-128.
[8] Wang Y R, Zeng Y J, Fu H, et al . Affects of over grazing and enclosure on desert vegetation succession of Reaumuria songarica . Journal of Desert Research, 2002, 22(4): 321-327.
[9] Zhang H S, Shao X Q, Liu G H, et al . Effects of enclosing and shallow ploughing as improvement technologies on the vegetation restoration of degraded Leymus chinensis (Thin.) Tzvel. Meadow grassland. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2010, 18(3): 339-345.
[10] Zou Y K, Zhang J N, Yang D L, et al . Phospholipid fatty acid analysis of microbial community structure under different land use patterns in soil ecosystems of Leymus chinensis steppes. Acta Prtaculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(4): 27-33.
[11] Wang W, Guo J Y. Contribution of CO 2 emission from soil respiration and from litter decomposition in Leymus chinensis community in northeast Songnen grassland. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2002, 22(5): 655-660.
[12] Hill M O, Evans D F, Bell S A. Long-term effects of excluding sheep from hill pastures in North Wales. Journal of Ecology, 1992, 80: 1-13.
[13] Bao Y T G T, Chen M. The studies of changes of plant diversity on degenerated steppe in enclosed process. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis NeMiongol, 1997,28(1): 87-91.
[14] Alice A, Martin O, Elsa L, et al . Effect of grazing on community structure and productivity of an Uruguayan grassland. Plant Ecology, 2005, 179: 83-91.
[15] Huseyin K, Steven S. The effects of long-term grazing exclosures on range plants in the central Anatolian region of Turkey. Environmental Management, 2007, 39: 326-337.
[16] Vickery P J. Grazing and net primary production of a temperate grassland.Journal of Applied Ecology, 1992, 9: 307-314.
[17] Yuan J Y, OuYang Z Y, Zheng H, et al . Species diversity and biomass of different grassland restoration approaches in southeastern Horqin sandy land. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2011, 25(10): 175-178.
[18] Cao Z L, Zheng C L, Zhao T N, et al . Influences of seed source effect of enclosed grassland on seed bank around sandy grassland. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 20(3): 197-200.
[19] Kinucan R J, Smeins F E. Soil seed bank of a semiarid Texas grassland under three long-term (36-Years) grazing regimes. American Midland Naturalist, 1992, 128(1): 11-21.
[20] Rachel A M, Jose M F. Effects of sheep exclusion on the soil seed bank and annual vegetation in chenopod shrub-lands of South Australia. Journal of Arid Environment, 1999, 42: 117-128.
[21] Zhao H L, Zhao X Y, Zhang T H, et al . Desertification Process and Recover Mechanism in Horqin Dune[M]. Beijing: Martitime Press, 2003.
[22] Hu Y K, Gao G G, Li K H. The succession of plant communities in Alpine grasslands in different ages of enclosing. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryolog, 2009, 31(6): 1186-1194.
[23] Wang C Y, Zhang J J, Lv Y L, et al . Effects of long-term grazing exclusion on soil organic carbon fractions in the grasslands of Inner Mongolia. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(5): 31-39.
[24] Cheng T R, Ma Q Y, Feng Z K, et al . Research on forest biomass in Xiaolong Mountains, Gansu Province. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2007, 29(1): 31-36.
[25] Liu J H, Xu X X, Yang G, et al . Study on biomass of secondary shrubbery community in small watershed of Loess Hill and Gully Region. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sinica, 2003, 23(8): 1362-1366.
[26] Wei W J, You W Z, Zhang H D, et al . Biomass carbon pool of larch forests in Liaoning province. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2011, 39(6): 26-29.
[27] Fang Y M. Botany Reproduction Ecology[M]. Jinan: Shandong University Press, 1996.
[28] Yu W T, Yu Y Q. Advances in the research of underground biomass. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2001, 12(6): 927-932.
[29] Wang H, Wang H,Huang R, et al . Effects of different exclosure management on soil and plant characteristics of sandy land. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(6): 15-22.
[30] Li X H, Li X L,Jiang D M, et al . A comparatives study of the individual biomass and modular biomass. Arid Zone Research, 2009, 26(2): 200-205.
[31] De Kroon H, Hutchings M J. Morphological plasticity in clonal plants: The foraging concept reconsidered. Journal of Ecology, 1995, 83: 143-152.
[32] Pan Y X, Wang X P, Jia R L, et al . Spatial variability of surface soil moisture content in a re-vegetated desert area in Shapotou, Northern China. Journal of Arid Environments, 2008, 72: 1675-1683.
[33] Wang X P, Li X R, Xiao H L, et al . Evolutionary characteristics of the artificially re-vegetated shrub ecosystem in the Tengger Desert, Northern China. Ecological Research, 2006, 21: 415-424.
[34] Yang H T, Li X R, Liu L C, et al . Biomass allocation patterns of four shrubs in desert grassland. Journal of Desert Research, 2013, 33(5): 1340-1348.
[35] Schenk H J, Jackson R B. Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below-ground/abover-ground allometries of plants in water-limited ecosystems. Journal of Ecology, 2002, 90(3): 480-494.
[36] Fank J H. The primary productivity of lawns in a temperate environment. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1980, 17: 109-114.
[37] Molyneux D E. Rooting pattern and water relations of three pasture grasses growing in drying soil. Oecologia, 1983, 58: 220-224.
[38] Geng H L, Wang Y H, Wang F Y, et al . The dynamics of root-shoot ratio and its environmental effective factors of recovering Leymus chinensis steppe vegetation in Inner Mongolia. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(10): 4629-4634.
[39] Poorter H, Nagel O. The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO 2 , nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2000, 6: 595-607.
[40] Su Z X, Zhong Z C. Studys on the biomass structure of Neosinocal Amus Affinif population in Jinyun Mountain. Acta Phytoecologica et Geobotanica Sinica, 1991, 15 (3): 240-251.
[41] Wang B S, Li M G, Peng S L. Botany Population Science[M]. Guangzhou: Guangdong Higher Education Press, 1995.
[1] 张强, 赵雪, 赵哈林.中国沙区草地[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 1998: 1-2.
[2] 左万庆, 王玉辉, 王风玉, 等. 围栏封育措施对退化羊草草原植物群落特征影响研究. 草业学报, 2009, 18(3): 12-19.
[3] 李新荣, 张志山, 王新平, 等. 干旱区土壤-植被系统恢复的生态水文学研究进展. 中国沙漠, 2009, 29(5): 845-852.
[4] 闫玉春, 唐海萍, 辛晓平, 等. 围封对草地的影响研究进展. 生态学报, 2009, 29(9): 5039-5046.
[5] 苏永中, 赵哈林. 持续放牧和围封对科尔沁退化沙地草地碳截存的影响. 环境科学, 2003, 24(4): 23-28.
[6] 单贵莲, 徐柱, 宁发, 等. 围封年限对典型草原植被与土壤特征的影响. 草业学报, 2009, 18(2): 3-10.
[8] 王彦荣, 曾彦军, 付华, 等. 过牧及封育对红砂荒漠植被演替的影响. 中国沙漠, 2002, 22(4): 321-327.
[9] 张洪生, 邵新庆, 刘贵河, 等. 围封、浅耕翻改良技术对退化羊草草地植被恢复的影响. 草地学报, 2010, 18(3): 339-345.
[10] 邹雨坤, 张静妮, 杨殿林, 等. 不同利用方式下羊草草原土壤生态系统微生物群落结构的PLFA分析. 草业学报, 2011, 20(4): 27-33.
[11] 王娓, 郭继勋. 东北松嫩平原羊草群落的土壤呼吸与枯枝落叶分解释放CO 2 贡献量. 生态学报, 2002, 22(5): 655-660.
[13] 宝音陶格涛, 陈敏. 退化草原封育改良过程中植物种的多样性变化的研究. 内蒙古大学学报, 1997, 28(1): 87-91.
[17] 袁吉有, 欧阳志云, 郑华, 等. 科尔沁沙地东南缘不同草地恢复方式下的物种多样性与生物量. 干旱区资源与环境, 2011, 25(10): 175-178.
[18] 曹子龙, 郑翠玲, 赵廷宁, 等. 围封草地"种子岛"效应对周围沙化草地土壤种子库的影响. 水土保持学报, 2006, 20(3): 197-200.
[21] 赵哈林, 赵学勇, 张铜会, 等. 科尔沁沙地沙漠化过程及其恢复机理[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2003.
[22] 胡玉昆, 高国刚, 李凯辉. 巴音布鲁克草原不同围封年限高寒草地植物群落演替分析. 冰川冻土, 2009, 31(6): 1186-1194.
[23] 王春燕, 张晋京, 吕瑜良, 等. 长期封育对内蒙古羊草草地土壤有机碳组分的影响. 草业学报, 2014, 23(5): 31-39.
[24] 程堂仁, 马钦彦, 冯仲科, 等. 甘肃小陇山森林生物量研究. 北京林业大学学报, 2007, 29(1): 31-36.
[25] 刘江华, 徐学选, 杨光, 等. 黄土丘陵区小流域次生灌丛群落生物量研究. 西北植物学报, 2003, 23(8): 1362-1366.
[26] 魏文俊, 尤文忠, 张慧东, 等. 辽宁省落叶松人工林生物量碳库特征. 东北林业大学学报, 2011, 39(6): 26-29.
[27] 方炎明. 植物生殖生态学[M]. 济南: 山东大学出版社, 1996: 1-109.
[28] 宇万太, 于永强. 植物地下生物量研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2001, 12(6): 927-932.
[29] 王蕙, 王辉, 黄蓉, 等. 不同封育管理对沙质草地土壤与植被特征的影响. 草业学报, 2012, 21(6): 15-22.
[30] 李雪华, 李晓兰, 蒋德明, 等. 科尔沁沙地70种草本植物个体和构件生物量比较研究. 干旱区研究, 2009, 26(2): 200-205.
[34] 杨昊天, 李新荣, 刘立超, 等. 荒漠草地4种灌木生物量分配特征. 中国沙漠, 2013, 33(5): 1340-1348.
[38] 耿浩林, 王玉辉, 王风玉, 等. 恢复状态下羊草草原( Leymus chinensis )植被根冠比动态及影响因子. 生态学报, 2008, 28(10): 4629-4634.
[40] 苏智先, 钟章成. 缙云山慈竹种群生物量结构研究. 植物生态学与地植物学学报, 1991, 15(3): 240-251.
[41] 王伯荪, 李鸣光, 彭少麟. 植物种群学[M]. 广州: 广东高等教育出版社, 1995: 8-27.