A comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance for germplasm and materials of Elytrigia at the seedling stage

Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2009, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4): 67-74.

Previous Articles Next Articles

A comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance for germplasm and materials of Elytrigia at the seedling stage

MENG Lin¹, SHANG Chun-yan^1,2, MAO Pei-chun¹, ZHANG Guo-fang¹, AN Sha-zhou²

1.Beijing Research and Development Center for Grasses and Environment, Beijing Academy of Agriculture
and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China; 2.College of Pratacultural and Environmental Science,
Xinjiang Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources
and Ecology of Xinjiang, Urumqi 830052, China

Received:2008-09-08 Online:2009-08-20 Published:2009-08-20

Abstract

Abstract: Simulating salinity stress in a green house was used to study the relative water content(RWC), relative electrical conductivity rate(EC),content of free proline(Pro), K⁺/Na⁺, changes of relative growth rate, the salt-tolerant coefficient, the livability and time of salinity injury to death of Elytrigia. Materials of 34 germplasms and 8 species of Elytrigia collected from 21 countries were measured and analyzed at the seedling stage, and the salt tolerances were comprehensively evaluated. Eight indexes were all effective for evaluation of salt tolerance of germ plasm and materials of Elytrigia at seedling stage. Cluster analysis of salt tolerant indexes showed the 34 germ plasms and materials could be divided into three salt tolerant levels, e.g. strong (ER030, ER035, ER041, EE011, EE014, EE017, EE023, EE026, EE047, EH001, EH002, EPU02), medium (ER008, ER014, ER027, ER032, ER037, ER038, ER044, ER045, EE007, EE027, EJ001, EPO02, EPO03, EPO04), and the weaker (ER028, ER033, ER036, ER039, EE022, EJ003, EL001, EI022).

CLC Number:

MENG Lin, SHANG Chun-yan, MAO Pei-chun, ZHANG Guo-fang, AN Sha-zhou. A comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance for germplasm and materials of Elytrigia at the seedling stage[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2009, 18(4): 67-74.

References

[1] 陈默君,贾慎修. 中国饲用植物[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
[2] 张国芳,王北洪,孟林,等. 四种偃麦草光合特性日变化分析[J].草地学报,2005,13(4):344-348.
[3] 孟林.优良饲用坪用水土保持兼用植物——偃麦草[J].草原与草坪,2003,(4):16-18.
[4] 谷安琳.耐盐碱栽培牧草——长穗薄冰草[J].中国草地,2004,26(2):9.
[5] 王洪刚,刘树兵,亓增军,等.中间偃麦草在小麦遗传改良中的应用研究[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2000,31(3):333-336.
[6] 马渐新,周荣华.来自长穗偃麦草的抗小麦条锈病基因的定位[J].科学通报,1999,44(1):65-69.
[7] 吕伟东,徐鹏彬,蒲训. 偃麦草属种质资源在普通小麦育种中的应用现状简介[J]. 草业学报,2007,16(6):136-140.
[8] 毛培春. 18种多年生禾草种子萌发期和幼苗期的耐盐性比较研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学硕士学位论文,2004.
[9] 白玉娥. 根茎类禾草耐盐性评价及生理基础的研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学硕士学位论文,2004.
[10] 张竞. 偃麦草属植物耐盐性评价及耐盐补偿生理学研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[11] 张耿,高洪文,王赞,等. 偃麦草属植物苗期耐盐性指标筛选及综合评价[J]. 草业学报,2007,16(4):55-61.
[12] 彭运翔,张力君,于颖杰,等. 偃麦草属植物种子和幼苗的耐盐性[J]. 内蒙古草业,2002,14(3):42-43.
[13] 邹琦. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
[14] 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2000.258-263.
[15] 中国土壤学会农业化学专业委员会. 土壤农业化学常规分析法[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1989.278.
[16] 费永俊,王燕,李秋杰,等. 几个草种的抗盐性评价[J]. 四川草原,2005,(5):19-21.
[17] 陈穗云,夏光敏,陈惠民,等. 小麦与高冰草(长穗偃麦草)体细胞杂种株系与其亲本幼苗抗盐性的比较[J]. 西北植物学报,2000,20(3):327-332.
[18] 赵可夫. 植物抗盐生理[M]. 北京:中国科技出版社,1993.
[19] 刘春华,苏加楷. 禾本科牧草耐盐性的研究[J]. 中国草地,1992,(6):12-17.
[20] 尚春艳,张国芳,毛培春,等. 中间偃麦草苗期NaCl胁迫的生理响应[J]. 华北农学报,2008,23(4):157-162.
[21] 王雪青,张俊文,魏建华,等. 盐胁迫下野大麦耐盐生理机制初探[J]. 华北农学报,2007,22(1):17-21.
[22] 李孔晨,卢欣石. 黑麦草属9个品种萌发及苗期耐盐性研究[J]. 草业科学,2008,25(3):111-115.
[23] 徐春波,米福贵,王勇. 转基因冰草植株耐盐性研究[J]. 草地学报,2006,14(1):20-23.
[24] 王锁民,朱兴运,赵银. 盐胁迫对拔节期碱茅游离脯氨酸成分和脯氨酸含量的影响[J]. 草业学报,1994,3(3):22-26.
[25] 吴欣明,王运琦,刘建宁,等. 羊茅属植物耐盐性评价及其对盐胁迫的生理反应[J]. 草业学报,2007,16(6):67-73.
[26] 翁森红,聂素梅,徐恒刚. 禾本科牧草K⁺/Na⁺与其耐盐性的关系[J]. 四川草原,1998,(2):22-23.
[27] 石德成,殷立绢. 盐(NaCl)与碱(Na₂CO₃)对星星草胁迫作用的差异[J]. 植物学报,1993, 35(2):144-149.
[28] 郑青松,华春,董鲜,等. 盐角草幼苗对盐离子胁迫生理响应的特性研究[J]. 草业学报,2008,17(6): 164-168

A comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance for germplasm and materials of Elytrigia at the seedling stage

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 1

Recommended Articles

Metrics