Welcome to Acta Prataculturae Sinica ! Today is Share:

Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2016, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5): 192-201.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2015238

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of virtual water flow associated with agricultural trade between China and Africa and implications for water saving between China and Africa

JIA Yan1, 2, ZHANG Ren-Zhi1, 3, *, ZHANG Jun1, 3   

  1. 1.College of Resources and Environmental Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
    2.Foreign Economic Cooperation Center, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100125, China;
    3.Research Center of Water-saving Agriculture of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730070, China
  • Received:2015-05-12 Online:2016-05-20 Published:2016-05-20

Abstract: Virtual water trade is a useful tool for international resource adjustment and has already become an important means for countries or regions facing a scarcity of water resources to trade surplus resources in order to alleviate serious water shortage, so as to guarantee food security and sufficient water supply for essential needs. Here we calculate the quantity of virtual water represented by agricultural trade between China and Africa from 2003 to 2012. The virtual water transfer features distinctive geographic and temporal pattern. From 2003 to 2012, the total amount of virtual water China imported from Africa was 769.71×108 m3, the average virtual water was 76.97×108 m3/year, while the quantity exported to Africa was 427.27×108 m3. Hence there is a net import of virtual water. The countries that are major suppliers of virtual water to China are Mozambique, South Africa, Burkina Faso, Benin and Mali. The major African importers of virtual water from China are South Africa, Morocco, and the Ivory Coast. The agricultural products contributing most to virtual water import by China from Africa are cotton, fruits and animal products; while products contributing significantly to visual water exports from China to Africa are tea, cereals and animal products. The overall balance of virtual water trade between China and Africa moves agricultural products from areas with low efficiency of water use to areas of higher efficiency of water use. This creates a negative impact on global water use efficiency, and a waste of 5.91×108 m3 of water. From a bilateral perspective, the virtual water transfer associated with agricultural trade between China and Africa has desirable water use efficiency benefits for both sides. However, from a global perspective, wasteful virtual water transfer such as this is not sustainable.

null