Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 144-156.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2021017
Tong JI(), Qi JIANG, Zhan-jun WANG, Bo JI()
Received:
2021-04-14
Revised:
2022-02-28
Online:
2022-07-20
Published:
2022-06-01
Contact:
Bo JI
Tong JI, Qi JIANG, Zhan-jun WANG, Bo JI. An evaluation of drought resistance of seven Poaceous forages[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(7): 144-156.
编号Number | 牧草品种 Forage species | 种质类型 Germplasm type | 来源 Source |
---|---|---|---|
A | 蒙古冰草-宁夏A. mongolicum-Ningxia | 野生驯化自繁种Wild domesticated self breeding seeds | 宁夏农林科学院荒漠化治理研究所 Institute of Deser Manage, Ningxia Agriculture and Forestry Science Academy |
B | 蒙古冰草-内蒙古A. mongolicum-Inner Mongolia | 育成种Breeding seeds | 内蒙古农牧业科学研究院草原研究所Institute of Grassland Science, Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences |
C | 沙生冰草A. desertorum | 商品种Commodity seeds | 克劳沃生态科技有限公司Beijing Clover Seed &TURF Co. |
D | 扁穗冰草A. cristatum | 育成种Breeding seeds | 内蒙古农牧业科学研究院草原研究所Institute of Grassland Science, Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences |
E | 细茎冰草A. trach | 商品种Commodity seeds | 宁夏远声绿阳林草生态工程有限公司Ningxia Yuansheng Lvyang Grass Industry Ecological Engineering Co., Ltd. |
F | 格兰马草B. gracilis | 自繁种Self breeding seeds | 宁夏农林科学院荒漠化治理研究所Institute of Deser Manage, Ningxia Agriculture and Forestry Science Academy |
G | 老芒麦E. sibiricus | 商品种Commodity seeds | 宁夏西贝农林牧生态科技公司Xibei Agriculture-Forest-Stockbreeding Biology and Technology Co., Ltd. |
Table 1 Test plants
编号Number | 牧草品种 Forage species | 种质类型 Germplasm type | 来源 Source |
---|---|---|---|
A | 蒙古冰草-宁夏A. mongolicum-Ningxia | 野生驯化自繁种Wild domesticated self breeding seeds | 宁夏农林科学院荒漠化治理研究所 Institute of Deser Manage, Ningxia Agriculture and Forestry Science Academy |
B | 蒙古冰草-内蒙古A. mongolicum-Inner Mongolia | 育成种Breeding seeds | 内蒙古农牧业科学研究院草原研究所Institute of Grassland Science, Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences |
C | 沙生冰草A. desertorum | 商品种Commodity seeds | 克劳沃生态科技有限公司Beijing Clover Seed &TURF Co. |
D | 扁穗冰草A. cristatum | 育成种Breeding seeds | 内蒙古农牧业科学研究院草原研究所Institute of Grassland Science, Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences |
E | 细茎冰草A. trach | 商品种Commodity seeds | 宁夏远声绿阳林草生态工程有限公司Ningxia Yuansheng Lvyang Grass Industry Ecological Engineering Co., Ltd. |
F | 格兰马草B. gracilis | 自繁种Self breeding seeds | 宁夏农林科学院荒漠化治理研究所Institute of Deser Manage, Ningxia Agriculture and Forestry Science Academy |
G | 老芒麦E. sibiricus | 商品种Commodity seeds | 宁夏西贝农林牧生态科技公司Xibei Agriculture-Forest-Stockbreeding Biology and Technology Co., Ltd. |
全氮 Total nitrogen (g·kg-1) | 全磷 Total phosphorus (g·kg-1) | 全钾 Total potassium (g·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available potassium (mg·kg-1) | 有效磷 Available phosphorus (mg·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Alkali hydrolysis nitrogen (g·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.45±0.045 | 0.44±0.009 | 18.78±0.560 | 208.95±3.510 | 2.70±1.080 | 14.14±2.930 |
有机质 Organic matter (g·kg-1) | pH | 全盐 Full salt (%) | 5-8月土壤平均含水量 Average soil moisture content from May to August (%) | 5-8月土壤最低含水量 Minimum soil moisture content from May to August (%) | |
6.17±0.990 | 8.21±0.060 | 2.27±0.139 | 12.35±3.420 | 8.000 |
Table 2 The physical and chemical properties of the tested field soil
全氮 Total nitrogen (g·kg-1) | 全磷 Total phosphorus (g·kg-1) | 全钾 Total potassium (g·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available potassium (mg·kg-1) | 有效磷 Available phosphorus (mg·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Alkali hydrolysis nitrogen (g·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.45±0.045 | 0.44±0.009 | 18.78±0.560 | 208.95±3.510 | 2.70±1.080 | 14.14±2.930 |
有机质 Organic matter (g·kg-1) | pH | 全盐 Full salt (%) | 5-8月土壤平均含水量 Average soil moisture content from May to August (%) | 5-8月土壤最低含水量 Minimum soil moisture content from May to August (%) | |
6.17±0.990 | 8.21±0.060 | 2.27±0.139 | 12.35±3.420 | 8.000 |
项目Item | 绿叶数-土壤含水量权衡分位数模型 Quantile model of the number of green leaves-soil water content trade-off | 株高-土壤含水量权衡分位数模型 Plant height-soil water content trade-off quantile model | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
编号Number | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | A | B | C | D | E | F | G |
建模样本数Modeling samples | 26 | 36 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 42 | 30 | 34 | 23 | 31 | 42 | 25 | 42 | 30 |
检验样本数Number of inspection samples | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
≥0权衡样本数Weigh the number of ≥0 samples | 8 | 13 | 17 | 19 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 10 | 6 | 20 | 29 | 7 | 16 | 15 |
分位点Tracking area update (TAU) | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.37 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.36 | 0.31 | 0.72 | 0.62 | 0.50 |
Table 3 The quantile with the weighted value of each forage ≥0
项目Item | 绿叶数-土壤含水量权衡分位数模型 Quantile model of the number of green leaves-soil water content trade-off | 株高-土壤含水量权衡分位数模型 Plant height-soil water content trade-off quantile model | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
编号Number | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | A | B | C | D | E | F | G |
建模样本数Modeling samples | 26 | 36 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 42 | 30 | 34 | 23 | 31 | 42 | 25 | 42 | 30 |
检验样本数Number of inspection samples | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
≥0权衡样本数Weigh the number of ≥0 samples | 8 | 13 | 17 | 19 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 10 | 6 | 20 | 29 | 7 | 16 | 15 |
分位点Tracking area update (TAU) | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.37 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.36 | 0.31 | 0.72 | 0.62 | 0.50 |
编号 Number | 干旱胁迫指数的隶属函数值Membership function value of DRI | D值 D value | 排序Sort | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
过氧化物酶POD | 脯氨酸Pro | 丙二醛MDA | 可溶性糖SS | 叶绿素Chl | 超氧化物歧化酶SOD | 过氧化氢酶CAT | |||
A | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.924 | 1 |
B | 0.16 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.67 | 0.05 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 0.261 | 4 |
C | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.28 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.34 | 0.18 | 0.256 | 5 |
D | 0.05 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.171 | 6 |
E | 0.26 | 0.51 | 0.97 | 0.34 | 0.42 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.390 | 3 |
F | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.85 | 0.26 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.391 | 2 |
G | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.020 | 7 |
权重 Weight | 0.30 | 0.51 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.05 |
Table 4 Physiological drought resistance evaluation D value
编号 Number | 干旱胁迫指数的隶属函数值Membership function value of DRI | D值 D value | 排序Sort | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
过氧化物酶POD | 脯氨酸Pro | 丙二醛MDA | 可溶性糖SS | 叶绿素Chl | 超氧化物歧化酶SOD | 过氧化氢酶CAT | |||
A | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.924 | 1 |
B | 0.16 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.67 | 0.05 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 0.261 | 4 |
C | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.28 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.34 | 0.18 | 0.256 | 5 |
D | 0.05 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.171 | 6 |
E | 0.26 | 0.51 | 0.97 | 0.34 | 0.42 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.390 | 3 |
F | 0.37 | 0.35 | 0.85 | 0.26 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.391 | 2 |
G | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.020 | 7 |
权重 Weight | 0.30 | 0.51 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.05 |
1 | Zhang J H, Wu B. Research progress of soil moisture of arid and semi-arid regions. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2012(2): 40-43, 68. |
张军红, 吴波. 干旱、半干旱地区土壤水分研究进展. 中国水土保持, 2012(2): 40-43, 68. | |
2 | Lu S. Effects of drought stress on plant growth and physiological traits. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science & Technology, 2012, 39(4): 51-54. |
鲁松. 干旱胁迫对植物生长及其生理的影响. 江苏林业科技, 2012, 39(4): 51-54. | |
3 | Zhu H, Zu Y G, Wang W J, et al. Effect of proline on plant growth under different stress conditions. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2009, 37(4): 86-89. |
朱虹, 祖元刚, 王文杰, 等. 逆境胁迫条件下脯氨酸对植物生长的影响. 东北林业大学学报, 2009, 37(4): 86-89. | |
4 | Xie X Y, Ma Z L, Bai P, et al. The morphological and physiological responses of hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) to drought stress with different intensity during blossom and fruit period. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(13): 3797-3805. |
谢小玉, 马仲炼, 白鹏, 等. 辣椒开花结果期对干旱胁迫的形态与生理响应. 生态学报, 2014, 34(13): 3797-3805. | |
5 | Du D, Liu F. Physiological response of two apple rootstocks to moderate drought stress. Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020(8): 64-67. |
杜典, 刘芬. 两种苹果砧木对中度干旱胁迫的生理响应. 甘肃农业科技, 2020(8): 64-67. | |
6 | Wang F, Peng Y L, Fang Y F, et al. Effect of different stay-green maize on leaves senescence after flowering under drought stress. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 38(4): 60-66. |
王芳, 彭云玲, 方永丰, 等. 花后干旱胁迫对不同持绿型玉米叶片衰老的影响. 水土保持通报, 2018, 38(4): 60-66. | |
7 | Ji B, Shi L, Xu J P, et al. Drought resistance evaluation of forage germplasm resources from 10 Gramineae species at germination stage. Seed, 2020, 39(7): 12-18. |
季波, 时龙, 徐金鹏, 等. 10种禾本科牧草种质资源萌发期抗旱性评价. 种子, 2020, 39(7): 12-18. | |
8 | Zhang Q D, Wei W, Chen L D, et al. Spatial variation of soil moisture and species diversity patterns along a precipitation gradient in the grasslands of the Loess Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(8): 1351-1362. |
张钦弟, 卫伟, 陈利顶, 等. 黄土高原草地土壤水分和物种多样性沿降水梯度的分布格局. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(8): 1351-1362. | |
9 | Zhao J D. Effective ways to improve plant drought resistance. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2009, 30(2): 50-51, 117. |
赵景娣. 提高植物抗旱性的有效途径. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2009, 30(2): 50-51, 117. | |
10 | Wang Y D. Effect of water stress simulated by PEG 6000 on physiological indices in Agropyron mongolioum Keng, Agropyron criatatum (L.) and Leymus mollis seedings. Yanbian: Yanbian University, 2008. |
王怡丹. 聚乙二醇6000模拟水分胁迫下蒙古冰草、扁穗冰草和滨麦抗旱性研究. 延边: 延边大学, 2008. | |
11 | Wang X K, Huang J L. Principles and techniques of plant physiological biochemical experiment. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2015. |
王学奎, 黄见良. 植物生理生化实验原理与技术. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2015. | |
12 | Wang P, Wang P, Sun W B, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of eight Elymus germlasms at seedling stage. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(2): 397-404. |
王平, 王沛, 孙万斌, 等. 8份披碱草属牧草苗期抗旱性综合评价. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2): 397-404. | |
13 | Du M Q, Wu R J, Yang M F, et al. Comparative study on drying weighing method and TDR method for observing soil moisture. Technology of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018(4): 7-9. |
杜敏晴, 伍仁军, 杨民烽, 等. 烘干称重法与TDR法观测土壤湿度的比较研究. 水土保持应用技术, 2018(4): 7-9. | |
14 | Hu L P. Quantile model regression analysis. Sichuan Mental Health, 2018, 31(4): 296-301. |
胡良平. 分位数模型回归分析. 四川精神卫生, 2018, 31(4): 296-301. | |
15 | Han D L, Wang Y R. Adaptability of Medicago sativa under water stress. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2005, 14(6): 7-13. |
韩德梁, 王彦荣. 紫花苜蓿对干旱胁迫适应性的研究进展. 草业学报, 2005, 14(6): 7-13. | |
16 | Yin F. Genotypic responses of maize (Zea mays L.) to water stress and its physiological mechanisms. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2004. |
尹飞. 玉米对水分胁迫响应的基因型差异及其生理机制研究. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2004. | |
17 | Wu J B. Regulation effects of plant growth regulators on the waterlogging stress of peanut. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2012. |
吴佳宝. 植物生长调节剂对花生渍涝胁迫的调控效应. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2012. | |
18 | Ouyang J Y, Wan Y, Xiang D B, et al. Effects of drought stress on agronomic traits and flavonoid compound contents of tartary buckwheat. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(16): 35-38. |
欧阳建勇, 万燕, 向达兵, 等. 干旱胁迫对苦荞农艺性状及黄酮类物质含量的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(16): 35-38. | |
19 | Pei B H, Zhou B S. A study on the drought resistance of three shrub species. Forest Research, 1993(6): 597-602. |
裴保华, 周宝顺. 三种灌木耐旱性研究. 林业科学研究, 1993(6): 597-602. | |
20 | Zhang A N, Wang F M, Yu X Q, et al. Screening marker varieties with drought resistance in cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) using identification method with soil moisture gradient. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(11): 2026-2032. |
张安宁, 王飞名, 余新桥, 等. 基于土壤水分梯度鉴定法的栽培稻抗旱标识品种筛选. 作物学报, 2008, 34(11): 2026-2032. | |
21 | Zhu J N, Peng W D, Li Y H, et al. Study on the effect of the shallow ploughing used to the desert steppe on soil water and the composition of herbage. Heilongjiang Animal Husbandry Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2014(23): 108-111. |
朱建宁, 彭文栋, 李永华, 等. 荒漠草原采用浅翻耕改良对土壤水分及牧草组成的影响研究. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2014(23): 108-111. | |
22 | Zhang G C, Liu X, He K N. Grading of Robinia pseudoacacia and Platycladus orientalis woodland soil’s water availability and productivity in semi-arid region of Loess Plateau. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003, 14(6): 858-862. |
张光灿, 刘霞, 贺康宁. 黄土半干旱区刺槐和侧柏林地土壤水分有效性及生产力分级研究. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14(6): 858-862. | |
23 | Shao H F, Chen Z, Xu J Y, et al. Physiological responses of two tobacco cultivar leaves to different drought stresses during seedling stage. Plant Physiology Journal, 2016, 52(12): 1861-1871. |
邵惠芳, 陈征, 许嘉阳, 等. 两种烟草幼苗叶片对不同强度干旱胁迫的生理响应比较. 植物生理学报, 2016, 52(12): 1861-1871. | |
24 | Wang W, Cui S X. Responses in suspension cultures of two ecotypes of reed (Phragmites communis) under osmotic stress Ⅱ. Changes of the reactivity of anti-oxidative enzymes. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2003, 23(2): 224-228. |
王蔚, 崔素霞. 两种生物型芦苇胚性悬浮培养物对渗透胁迫的生理响应 Ⅱ.抗氧化酶类活性的变化. 西北植物学报, 2003, 23(2): 224-228. | |
25 | Fu J M, Huang B R. Involvement of antioxidants and lipid peroxidation in the adaptation of two cool-season grasses to localized drought stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2001, 45: 105-114. |
26 | Dacosta M, Huang B R. Changes in antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation for bentgrass species in response to drought stress. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 2007, 132(3): 319-326. |
27 | Qi D H, Li X G, Wang L, et al. Effects of simulated low temperature stress on the activated oxygen metabolism protective enzymes of Podocarpus fleuryi seedlings. Journal of Southwest Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2003, 25(5): 385-388, 399. |
齐代华, 李旭光, 王力, 等. 模拟低温胁迫对活性氧代谢保护酶系统的影响-以长叶竹柏(Podocarpus fleuryi Hickel)幼苗为例. 西南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 25(5): 385-388, 399. | |
28 | Zhang Y P, Wang Z M, Huang Q, et al. Changes of chloroplast ultramicrostructure and function of different green organs in wheat under limited irrigation. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(7): 1213-1219. |
张永平, 王志敏, 黄琴, 等. 不同水分供给对小麦叶与非叶器官叶绿体结构和功能的影响. 作物学报, 2008, 34(7): 1213-1219. |
[1] | Rui WU, Wen-hui LIU, Yong-chao ZHANG, Min-jie LIU. Differences in morphological and physiological characteristics in the abscission zone of shattering-prone and shattering-resistant genotypes of Elymus sibiricus [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(4): 81-92. |
[2] | Zuo-tian YIN, Yu-hui WANG, Guang-sheng ZHOU, Quan-hui MA, Xiao-di LIU, Bing-rui JIA, Yan-ling JIANG. Response and sensitivity of photosynthesis of Stipa tianschanica in desert steppe to developing soil drought process [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(1): 81-94. |
[3] | Ru ZHANG, Jian-ping LI, Wen-dong PENG, Fang WANG, Zhi-gang LI. Effects of mulching with caragana (Caragana intermedia) branches on soil moisture content and temperature and reseeded forage biomass in desertified grassland in Ningxia Province, China [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(4): 58-67. |
[4] | ZHANG Yu-jun, SHANG Yi-shun, WANG Pu-chang, DING Lei-lei, ZHANG Wen, ZOU Chao. Effects of super absorbent polymers on growth and physiological characteristics of Sophora davidii vs. Panjiang seedlings under drought stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(7): 90-98. |
[5] | YANG Ning, MA Shao-ying, MA Lei, ZHANG Xu-hui, WANG Na, LI Sheng, CHAI Qiang. Physiological response of continuously cropped pea seedlings to inoculation with compound rhizobia preparations [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(6): 144-152. |
[6] | PU Xue-ke, WU Chun-hua, ZHOU Yong-jin, MIAN You-ming, MIAO Fang-fang, HOU Xian-qing, LI Rong. Effects of dual-mulching of furrow and ridge with plastic film and straw on temporal and spatial changes of soil moisture and potato yield in dry-farming areas of southern Ningxia [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(10): 149-160. |
[7] | MA Lei, MA Shao-ying, CHEN Gui-ping, CHAI Qiang, LI Sheng. Physiological responses of pea and nodule symbiosis to water stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(9): 96-109. |
[8] | ZHANG Chao-cheng, JIANG Qian, WU Zhi, HE Xin-jie, JIANG Kai, GAO Jing-ya, LI Xiang, WANG Ning. Studies of the shade-tolerance of four ornamental grass and sedge cultivars [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(7): 60-72. |
[9] | LIANG Kun-lun, JIA Cun-zhi, SUN Jin-hao, WANG Ming-yan, FU Hua, MAO Zhu-xin. Evaluation of physiological responses and tolerance to low-temperature stress of ten Elymus nutans varieties [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(3): 111-121. |
[10] | ZHANG Jian-jun, FAN Ting-lu, ZHAO Gang, DANG Yi, WANG Lei, WANG Yong, LI Shang-zhong, CHENG Wan-li. Effects of tillage system and long term fertilizer application on winter wheat yields [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(7): 175-186. |
[11] | JIANG La-mei, YANG Xiao-dong, YANG Jian-jun, HE Xue-min, LÜ Guang-hui. Effects of different management strategies on soil organic carbon and nitrogen pools in arid areas and their influencing factors [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(12): 22-33. |
[12] | PAN Hang, FENG Ying, WANG Xi-Yong, LI Yan. Examination and comparison of the physiological characteristics of ten Calligonum species in a desert environment [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(6): 68-75. |
[13] | XI Rui, LI Fa-Di, WANG Wei-Min, LI Chong, LA Yong-Fu, LIU Ting, PAN Xiang-Yu, TANG De-Fu, LI Bao-Sheng. The behavioral and physiological indices of Hu sheep in the arid and cold areas of northwest China [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(5): 184-191. |
[14] | LI Wen, CAO Wen-Xia, LIU Hao-Dong, LI Xiao-Long, XU Chang-Lin, SHI Shang-Li, FENG Jin, ZHOU Chuan-Meng. Analysis of soil respiration under different grazing management patterns in the alpine meadow-steppe of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(10): 22-32. |
[15] | LI Zhong-lin,GUO Kai-xiu,ZHOU Shou-biao,ZHENG He-quan,LIU Kun. Effects of light intensity on biological characteristics, physiological indexes and flavone content of Kalimeris indica [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(4): 162-170. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||