三江源草原生态系统生态服务价值的能值评价

doi:10.11686/cyxb2015387

草业学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 34-41.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2015387

三江源草原生态系统生态服务价值的能值评价

李琳, 林慧龙^*, 高雅

草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室,兰州大学草地农业科技学院,甘肃兰州 730020

收稿日期:2015-09-01 修回日期:2015-11-02 出版日期:2016-06-20 发布日期:2016-06-20
通讯作者: Email：Liuhuilong@lzu.edu.cn
作者简介:李琳（1991-）,女,甘肃白银人,在读硕士。Email：1179312063@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（31172250）资助

Emergy analysis of the value of grassland ecosystem services in the Three Rivers Source Region

LI Lin, LIN Hui-Long^*, GAO Ya

State Key Laboratory of Grassland Argo-ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China

Received:2015-09-01 Revised:2015-11-02 Online:2016-06-20 Published:2016-06-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 三江源地区处于青藏高原腹地,考虑三江源地区草地生态系统的特殊性、复杂性、敏感性,及其所蕴含的巨大的生态服务价值,全面的评价该地区的生态服务价值对于维护该地区生态环境健康和未来该地区经济社会的可持续发展具有重要意义。本研究以草地综合顺序分类法为理论基础,以能值分析法为主要计算方法,选择合适的6项评估指标,对2001-2010年三江源区草原生态系统生态服务价值进行逐项评估。研究结果表明,在过去的10年中,三江源区草原生态系统生态服务价值总量从1375亿元/年上升到1780亿元/年,年际变化较大;从趋势上,以2006年为分界点,2006年后的年份,其生态服务价值总量基本保持上升趋势,且普遍高于2006年前的年份。对不同草原类型进行生态服务价值评价可以看出,多雨冻原高山草甸类生态服务价值占全部草原类型生态服务价值的比例最大,10年中皆超过99.5%,这主要与该草地类型所占的面积比例有关;各类型草地生态服务价值占总价值的比例年际变化不大;在6项指标中,释放O₂与固定CO₂的价值所占总价值比例最大,两者之和约占全部价值量的90%,而直接的草产量价值仅占全部价值量的1%左右,远远低于其他生态服务项目的价值。

Abstract: The Three Rivers Source Region is located in the heart of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and, considering the complexity and sensitivity of the area’s ecological system, it is important to comprehensively evaluate this region’s ecological services in order to be able to maintain and sustainably develop the Plateau environment. Combining sequence classification with emergy analysis, six indexes were selected to measure the 2001-2010 grassland system and to determine the value of ecosystem services in the Three Rivers Source Region. The results show that over the ten-year period the value of ecosystem services varied from 137.5 billion yuan/year to 178 billion yuan/year. From a cut-off point in 2006, the total value of ecological services rose continually. The value of ecological services varies by different grassland types. Rain tundra alpine meadow made up more than 99.5% of ecological value over the ten-year period, a result that reflects the fact that these meadows account for the largest area of all grassland types. The proportional contribution of each grassland type to the overall value of ecosystem services does not significantly change on a year-by-year basis. Of the various indicators of ecological value, the release of O₂ and fixed CO₂ hold the largest share, with the two combined accounting for some 90% of all value. The value of hay provided directly by the grassland ecosystem accounted for about 1% of the total, much lower than the contribution of other ecological services.

李琳, 林慧龙, 高雅. 三江源草原生态系统生态服务价值的能值评价[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(6): 34-41.

LI Lin, LIN Hui-Long, GAO Ya. Emergy analysis of the value of grassland ecosystem services in the Three Rivers Source Region[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(6): 34-41.

参考文献

[1] Department of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary & General Station of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary of Ministry of Agriculture of China. Grassland Resources of China[M]. Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Science and Technology Press, 1996.
[2] Chen B M. Chinese Agricultural Comprehensive Production Capacity and Population Carrying Capacity[M]. Beijing: Meteorological Press, 2001.
[3] Sun Z G, Sun C M, Li J L, et al . Retrospect and prospect of carbon circle mechanism and carbon storage calculation of grassland ecosystem in China. Pratacultural Science, 2011, 9: 1611-1616.
[4] Odum H T. Environmental Accounting: EMERGY and Environmental Decision Making[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
[5] Lin H L, Wang X, Zhang Y, et al . Spatio-temporal dynamics on the distribution, extent, and net primary productivity of potential grassland in response to climate changes in China. The Rangeland Journal, 2013, 35(4): 409-425.
[6] Lin H L, Zhang Y. Evaluation of six methods to predict grassland net primary productivity along an altitudinal gradient in the Alxa Rangeland, Western Inner Mongolia, China. Grassland Science, 2013, 59(2): 100-110.
[7] Lin H L, Feng Q, Liang T, et al . Modelling global-scale potential grassland changes in spatio-temporal patterns to global climate change. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 2013, 20(1): 83-96.
[8] Lin H L, Zhao J, Liang T, et al . A classification indices-based model for Net Primary Productivity (NPP) and potential productivity of vegetation in China. International Journal of Biomathematics, 2012, 5(3): 1-23.
[9] Costanza R, d’Arge R, De Groot R, et al . The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics, 1998, 25(1): 3-15.
[10] Fan J W, Shao Q Q, Liu J Y, et al . Dynamic changes of grassland yield in Three River Headwater Region from 1988 to 2005. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2010, 18(1): 5-10.
[11] Dong X, Yang W, Ulgiati S, et al . The impact of human activities on natural capital and ecosystem services of natural pastures in North Xinjiang, China. Ecological Modelling, 2012, 225: 28-39.
[12] Yu Z B, Hong F Z, Han J G. Assessment of energy value of grassland ecological assets and functional value——Taking Leymus chinensis grassland in Xilinguole as an example. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2006, 28(2): 1-6.
[13] Zhao T Q, Ouyang Z Y, Jia L Q, et al . Ecosystem services and their valuation of China grassland. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24(6): 1101-1110.
[14] Zhao T Q, Ouyang Z Y, Zheng H, et al . Forest ecosystem services and their valuation in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2004, 19(4): 480-491.
[15] Liu M C, Li D Q, Wen Y M, et al . The spatial analysis of soil retention function in Sanjiangyuan region and its value evaluation. China Environmental Science, 2005, 25(5): 627-631.
[16] Renard K G, Foster G R, Weesies G A, et al . Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: a Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE)[M]. Washington: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 1997.
[17] Yang Z S, Xie Y Q. The calculation method and regional characteristics of direct economic loss of soils erosion in Yunnan Province. Journal of Yunnan University, 1994, (16): 99-106.
[18] Chen C Y, Dai J H, Wang H J. Changes of the value of ecosystem services in the Sanjiangyuan Region Based on land use data. Progress in Geography, 2012, (7): 970-977.
[19] Chen C Y, Tao Z X, Wang H J. Ecosystem service assessment of grasslands in the Sanjiangyuan Region. Progress in Geography, 2012, (7): 978-984.
[20] Ren J Z, Hu Z Z, Mou X D. Comprehensive and sequential classification system of rangeland and the significance of grass phylogeny. China Grassland, 1980, (1): 12-38.
[21] Liu M C, Li D Q, Nuan X F, et al . Ecosystem services and its value evaluation of Sanjiangyuan Region. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2013, (14): 654-660.
[22] Xin Y C, Du T Y, Xin Y J. Evaluation of the natural grassland ecosystem service function value in Qinghai Province. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2012, (5): 5-9.
[23] Lai M, Wu S H, Yin Y H. Changes in grassland ecosystem service values in the Three-River Headwaters Region. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2013, (14): 654-660.
[1] 中华人民共和国农业部畜牧兽医司, 全国畜牧兽医总站. 中国草地资源[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1996.
[2] 陈百明. 中国农业资源综合生产能力与人口承载能力[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2001.
[3] 孙政国, 孙成明, 李建龙, 等. 我国草地生态系统碳循环机制及碳蓄积核算研究回顾与展望. 草业科学, 2011, 9: 1611-1616.
[10] 樊江文, 邵全琴, 刘纪远, 等. 1988-2005年三江源草地产草量变化动态分析. 草地学报, 2010, 18(1): 5-10.
[12] 于遵波, 洪绂曾, 韩建国. 草地生态资产及功能价值的能值评估——以锡林郭勒羊草草地为例. 中国草地学报, 2006, (2): 1-6.
[13] 赵同谦, 欧阳志云, 贾良清, 等. 中国草地生态系统服务功能间接价值评价. 生态学报, 2004, 24(6): 1101 -1110.
[14] 赵同谦, 欧阳志云, 郑华, 等. 中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价. 自然资源学报, 2004, 19(4): 480-491.
[15] 刘敏超, 李迪强, 温琰茂, 等. 三江源地区土壤保持功能空间分析及其价值评估. 中国环境科学, 2005, 25(5): 627-631.
[17] 杨子生, 谢应齐. 云南省水土流失直接经济损失的计算方法和区域特征. 云南大学学报, 1994, (16): 99-106.
[18] 陈春阳, 戴君虎, 王焕炯. 基于土地利用数据集的三江源地区生态系统服务价值变化. 地理科学进展, 2012, (7): 970-977.
[19] 陈春阳, 陶泽兴, 王焕炯, 等. 三江源地区草地生态系统服务价值评估. 地理科学进展, 2012, (7): 978-984.
[20] 任继周, 胡自治, 牟新待. 草原的综合顺序分类法及其草原发生学意义. 中国草原, 1980, (1): 12-38.
[21] 刘敏超, 李迪强, 栾晓峰, 等. 三江源地区生态系统服务功能与价值评估. 植物资源与环境学报, 2005, (14): 40-43.
[22] 辛玉春, 杜铁英, 辛有俊. 青海天然草地生态系统服务功能价值评价. 中国草地学报, 2012, (5): 5-9.
[23] 赖敏, 吴绍洪, 尹云鹤, 等. 三江源区草地生态系统服务价值变化(英文). 农业科学与技术, 2013, (4): 654-660.

三江源草原生态系统生态服务价值的能值评价

Emergy analysis of the value of grassland ecosystem services in the Three Rivers Source Region

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics