黄土丘陵区草本群落生物量空间分布格局及其影响因素

doi:10.11686/cyxb2017152

草业学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 26-35.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2017152

黄土丘陵区草本群落生物量空间分布格局及其影响因素

方昭^{1, 2}, 张少康³, 刘海威^{1, 2}, 焦峰^{1, 3, *}, 张军⁴

1.中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所,陕西杨凌712100;
2.中国科学院大学,北京100049;
3.西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所,陕西杨凌712100;
4.华中农业大学公共管理学院,土地管理学院,湖北武汉 430070

收稿日期:2017-03-28 修回日期:2017-05-27 出版日期:2018-02-20 发布日期:2018-02-20
通讯作者: Jiaof@ms.iswc.ac.cn
作者简介:方昭(1992-),男,河南开封人,在读硕士。E-mail:shengtai1201@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFA0600801)和科技基础性工作专项(2014FY210130)资助

Distribution of herbaceous community biomass and its relationship with influencing factors in the Loess Hilly Region

FANG Zhao^{1, 2}, ZHANG Shao-kang³, LIU Hai-wei^{1, 2}, JIAO Feng^{1, 3, *}, ZHANG Jun⁴

1.Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, China;
2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3.Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, North-west A & F University, Yangling 712100, China;;
4.School of Public Administration, School of Land Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

Received:2017-03-28 Revised:2017-05-27 Online:2018-02-20 Published:2018-02-20
Supported by:

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 草地是干旱半干旱地区黄土高原植被组成的主体,而草本植物作为草地生态系统的优势群落,在黄土高原恢复植被和水土保持建设方面存在着不可替代的优势。因此本试验选取黄土丘陵区不同纬度下的草本群落为研究对象,分析草本群落地上、地下生物量的空间分布特征及其影响因素,同时并验证等速生长关系,以期为黄土丘陵区恢复植被、改善生态建设方面提供理论指导。结果表明:(1)在纬度梯度35.95°~38.36° N变化范围内,黄土丘陵区不同植被带草本群落地上生物量变化范围为54.60~204.32 g·m^-2,平均值156.968 g·m^-2,变异系数为27.83%;地下生物量变化范围为78.88~829.64 g·m^-2,平均值469.21 g·m^-2,变异系数为48.87%;草本群落地下/地上生物量变化范围为 0.93~4.49,平均值2.89,变异系数为39.18%。草本群落生物量(地下、地上)大小顺序均为:森林-草原带>草原带>森林带>草原-荒漠带,且地上、地下生物量随纬度梯度变化规律均呈现出“先增加后减少”的单峰型变化趋势。(2)草本群落地下与地上生物量呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),决定系数达到0.59,且符合等速生长关系。(3)草本群落地下生物量与年均降水、年均温、土壤有机碳、全氮、全磷含量之间均呈显著相关。气候因子和土壤理化性质对地下生物量都具有重要影响作用,其影响机理还需进一步结合植物生物学和生理生态方面的综合研究才能做出准确结论。

Abstract: Grassland is the main vegetation type in arid and semiarid areas of the Loess Plateau. Herbs, as the dominant community in the grassland ecosystem, have an irreplaceable advantage in the restoration of vegetation and in the conservation of soil and water on the Loess Plateau. In this study, we analyzed the spatial distribution characteristics of aboveground and belowground biomass and their influencing factors in herbaceous plant communities at different latitudes in the Loess Hilly Region. In addition, isokinetic growth was statistically analyzed to provide theoretical guidance for the restoration of vegetation and improvement of ecological management strategies for the Loess Hilly Region. The results showed that: (1) in the range of 35.95° to 38.36° N, the aboveground biomass of the herbaceous plant community in the Loess Hilly Region ranged from 54.60 to 204.32 g·m^-2 (average, 156.968 g·m^-2; coefficient of variation, 27.83%). Belowground biomass ranged from 78.88 to 829.64 g·m^-2 (average, 469.21 g·m^-2; coefficient of variation, 48.87%). The change in the belowground/aboveground biomass of the herbaceous plant community was 0.93-4.49 (average, 2.89; coefficient of variation, 39.18%). The communities were ranked, from highest biomass (belowground+aboveground) to lowest, as follows: forest-grassland belt>grassland belt>forest belt>grassland-desert belt. The aboveground and belowground biomass showed a “single peak” trend along the latitudinal gradient, first increasing and then decreasing with increasing latitude. (2) There was a significant positive correlation between belowground biomass and aboveground biomass (P<0.01; coefficient of determination, 0.59), and this relationship was consistent with isokinetic growth. (3) The belowground biomass of the herbaceous plant community was positively correlated with mean annual precipitation, mean annual temperature, soil organic carbon, soil total nitrogen, and soil total phosphorus. Both climatic factors and soil physico-chemical properties had important effects on belowground biomass. To draw accurate conclusions about the effects of climatic and soil physico-chemical properties on plant communities, further plant biology and eco-physiology research should be undertaken to explore the mechanisms underlying plants’ responses.

中图分类号:

方昭, 张少康, 刘海威, 焦峰, 张军. 黄土丘陵区草本群落生物量空间分布格局及其影响因素[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(2): 26-35.

FANG Zhao, ZHANG Shao-kang, LIU Hai-wei, JIAO Feng, ZHANG Jun. Distribution of herbaceous community biomass and its relationship with influencing factors in the Loess Hilly Region[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(2): 26-35.

参考文献

[1] Scurlock J M O, Johnson K, Olson R J. Estimating net primary productivity from grassland biomass dynamics measurements. Global Change Biology, 2002, 8(8): 736-753.
[2] Zhao W N.Community Carbon Sequestration of Grassland in the Loess Hill Region and Relationship with Environmental Factors. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2014.
赵婉伲. 黄土高原丘陵区典型草地群落碳储量及与环境因子的关系. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2014.
[3] Wang Y L, Ma Y S, Shi J J, et al. Investigation of biomass and soil nutrition of different vegetation type at alpine meadow in yellow river headwater area. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2011, 19(1): 1-6.
王彦龙, 马玉寿, 施建军, 等. 黄河源区高寒草甸不同植被生物量及土壤养分状况研究. 草地学报, 2011, 19(1): 1-6.
[4] Sun L A, Liang Y M, Liu G B.A review of underground biomass of grassland. Grassland and Turf, 1993, (1): 6-14.
孙力安, 梁一民, 刘国彬. 草地地下生物量研究综述. 草原与草坪, 1993, (1): 6-14.
[5] Hu Z M, Fan J W, Zhong H P, et al. Progress on grassland underground biomass researches in China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2005, 24(9): 1095-1101.
胡中民, 樊江文, 钟华平, 等. 中国草地地下生物量研究进展. 生态学杂志, 2005, 24(9): 1095-1101.
[6] Zheng X X, Zhao J M, Zhang Y G, et al. Variation of grassland biomass and its relationships with environmental factors in Hulunbeier, Inner Mongolia. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2007, 26(4): 533-538.
郑晓翾, 赵家明, 张玉刚, 等. 呼伦贝尔草原生物量变化及其与环境因子的关系. 生态学杂志, 2007, 26(4): 533-538.
[7] Enquist B J, Niklas K J.Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants. Science, 2002, 295(5559): 1517-1520.
[8] Cheng D L, Niklas K J.Above- and below-ground biomass relationships across 1534 forested communities. Annals of Botany, 2007, 99(1): 95-102.
[9] Niklas K J.Modelling below- and above-ground biomass for non-woody and woody plants. Annals of Botany, 2005, 95(2): 315-321.
[10] Mokany K, Raison R J, Prokushkin A S.Critical analysis of root∶shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes. Global Change Biology, 2006, 12(1): 84-96.
[11] Ni J.Carbon storage in grasslands of China. Journal of Arid Environments, 2002, 50(2): 205-218.
[12] Chen F H, Huang W, Jin L Y, et al. Characteristics and spatial variation of precipitation in arid regions of Central Asia under the background of global warming. Scientia Sinica, 2011, (11): 1647-1657.
陈发虎, 黄伟, 靳立亚, 等. 全球变暖背景下中亚干旱区降水变化特征及其空间差异. 中国科学(地球科学), 2011, (11): 1647-1657.
[13] Jiao F, Wen Z M, Li R.Analysis on environment effect of the returning farmland into forest and grassland on the loess plateau. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, 12(1): 26-29.
焦峰, 温仲明, 李锐. 黄土高原退耕还林(草)环境效应分析. 水土保持研究, 2005, 12(1): 26-29.
[14] Chen Y M, Liang Y M, Cheng J M.The zonal character of vegetation construction on loess plateau. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2002, 26(3): 339-345.
陈云明, 梁一民, 程积民. 黄土高原林草植被建设的地带性特征. 植物生态学报, 2002, 26(3): 339-345.
[15] Bao S D.Soil Agrochemical Analysis.3 edition. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000.
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[16] Wang Y N, Xie J M, Guo X.Application of geostatistical interpolation method in ArcGIS. Software Guide, 2008, (12): 36-38.
王艳妮, 谢金梅, 郭祥. ArcGIS中的地统计克里格插值法及其应用. 软件导刊, 2008, (12): 36-38.
[17] Warton D I, Wright I J, Falster D S, et al. Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2006, 81(2): 259.
[18] Niklas K J.A phyletic perspective on the allometry of plant biomass-partitioning patterns and functionally equivalent organ-categories. New Phytologist, 2006, 171(1): 27.
[19] Coupland R T.Grassland ecosystems of the world. London: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
[20] Ji W Y.The Study of Biomass, Belowground Productivity and Their Relationship with Environmental Factors in Inner Mongolia Grassland. Beijing: Beijing Normal University, 2013.
纪文瑶. 内蒙古草原生物量、地下生产力及其与环境因子关系研究. 北京: 北京师范大学, 2013.
[21] Ma W H, Yang Y H, He J S, et al. Inner Mongolia temperate grassland biomass and its relationships with environmental factors. Scientia Sinica (Vitae), 2008, 38(1): 84-92.
马文红, 杨元合, 贺金生, 等. 内蒙古温带草地生物量及其与环境因子的关系. 中国科学(生命科学), 2008, 38(1): 84-92.
[22] Han B, Fan J W, Zhong H P.Grassland biomass of communities along gradients of the Inner Mongolia grassland transect. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2006, 30(4): 553-562.
韩彬, 樊江文, 钟华平. 内蒙古草地样带植物群落生物量的梯度研究. 植物生态学报(英文版), 2006, 30(4): 553-562.
[23] Deng L, Shang G Z P. Distribution of natural grassland biomass and its relationship with influencing factors in Shaanxi. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2012, 20(5): 825-835.
邓蕾, 上官周平. 陕西省天然草地生物量空间分布格局及其影响因素. 草地学报, 2012, 20(5): 825-835.
[24] Cairns M A, Brown S, Helmer E H, et al. Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests. Oecologia, 1997, 111(1): 1-11.
[25] Cheng D L.Plant Allometric Study of Biomass Allocation Pattern and Biomass Production Rates. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2007.
程栋梁. 植物生物量分配模式与生长速率的相关规律研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2007.
[26] Wang M, Su Y Z, Yang R, et al. Allocation patterns of above- and belowground biomass in desert grassland in the middle reaches of Heihe River, Gansu Province, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2013, 37(3): 209-219.
王敏, 苏永中, 杨荣, 等. 黑河中游荒漠草地地上和地下生物量的分配格局. 植物生态学报(英文版), 2013, 37(3): 209-219.
[27] Yang H T, Li X R, Liu L C, et al. Biomass allocation patterns of four shrubs in desert grassland. Journal of Desert Research, 2013, 33(5): 1340-1348.
杨昊天, 李新荣, 刘立超, 等. 荒漠草地4种灌木生物量分配特征. 中国沙漠, 2013, 33(5): 1340-1348.
[28] Ma W H, Fang J Y.RBS ratios of temperate steppe and the environmental controls in Inner Mongolia. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2006, 42(6): 774-778.
马文红, 方精云. 内蒙古温带草原的根冠比及其影响因素. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 42(6): 774-778.
[29] Dai C, Kang M Y, Ji W Y, et al. Responses of belowground biomass and biomass allocation to environmental factors in central grassland of Inner Mongolia. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2012, 20(2): 268-274.
戴诚, 康慕谊, 纪文瑶, 等. 内蒙古中部草原地下生物量与生物量分配对环境因子的响应关系. 草地学报, 2012, 20(2): 268-274.
[30] Yang X J, Huang M, Wang J B, et al. Belowground biomass in Tibetan grasslands and its environmental control factors. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(7): 2032-2042.
杨秀静, 黄玫, 王军邦, 等. 青藏高原草地地下生物量与环境因子的关系. 生态学报, 2013, 33(7): 2032-2042.

黄土丘陵区草本群落生物量空间分布格局及其影响因素

Distribution of herbaceous community biomass and its relationship with influencing factors in the Loess Hilly Region

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	许翩翩, 王建柱. 三种常见边坡植物对模拟干旱环境抗旱性能的研究[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(2): 36-47.
[2]	李金波, 李诗刚, 宋桂龙, 濮阳雪华, 薛博晗. 两种黑麦草砷吸收特征及其与茎叶营养元素积累的关系研究[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(2): 79-87.
[3]	罗永清, 岳祥飞, 李玉强, 赵学勇, 丁杰萍, 闫志强. 降水格局对科尔沁沙地三种草本植物凋落物分解的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(2): 206-212.