欢迎访问《草业学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

草业学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (11): 12-21.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2018784

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

三江源区牧户生计资本对其生计策略的影响研究

吴廷美, 吴渊, 王多斌, 林慧龙*   

  1. 兰州大学草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室,兰州大学农业农村部草牧业创新重点实验室,兰州大学中国草业发展战略研究中心,兰州大学草地农业科技学院,甘肃 兰州 730020
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-19 出版日期:2019-11-20 发布日期:2019-11-20
  • 通讯作者: *. E-mail: linhuilong@lzu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:吴廷美(1994-),女,四川凉山人,在读硕士。E-mail: wutm17@lzu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(71773003,31772666),中国工程院重点咨询项目“面向2035年的我国草地农业现代化发展战略研究”(纵20180093),中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(lzujbky-2019-kb28)和国家林业和草原局2019年度软科学项目“草原生态保护补助奖励政策的效应评估与决策建议”资助

Influence of herders’ livelihood capital on livelihood strategies in the Three-River Headwaters region

WU Ting-mei, WU Yuan, WANG Duo-bin, LIN Hui-long*   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Key Laboratory of Forage and Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture, Chinese Center for Strategic Research of Grassland Agriculture Development, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China
  • Received:2018-11-19 Online:2019-11-20 Published:2019-11-20
  • Contact: *. E-mail: linhuilong@lzu.edu.cn

摘要: 牧户作为三江源区自然资源利用的决策主体,研究其生计策略对于当地的生态保护具有重要意义。根据分层随机抽样的第一手调查资料,将牧户生计策略划分为纯牧型和多样型,运用二元Logistic模型实证分析了影响牧户生计策略选择的关键生计资本指标。结果表明:1)不同生计策略牧户的生计资本状况呈现出明显的差异,多样型牧户的生计资本状况优于纯牧户;2)草地面积、住房质量、家庭年收入、亲友圈是否有人担任干部和居住地到最近集市的距离,是影响三江源区牧户生计策略选择关键生计资本指标;3)三江源区牧户的生计活动方式和收入结构总体单一,即使是多样型牧户也并未脱离放牧为主的生计活动。以上述关键生计资本指标作为突破口,积极合理引导牧户选择有利于生态保护的生计策略或是今后三江源区生态环境改善的新方向。

关键词: 三江源区, 生态保护, 生计策略, 二元Logistic模型

Abstract: Herdsmen are the decision-making body of natural resource utilization in the Three-River Headwaters region. Therefore, studying their livelihood strategies is important for local ecological protection. This study was based on first-hand survey data from stratified random sampling. Herders’ livelihood strategies were classified as pure pastoral or diverse, and key livelihood capital indicators that affect the choice of livelihood strategies by herdsmen were analyzed using a binary logistic model. The results indicated that: 1) The livelihood capital status of herdsmen with different livelihood strategies showed significant differences, and diverse herders had better livelihood capital than pure herdsmen. 2) The key livelihood capital indicators affecting the choice of livelihood strategies of the herdsmen in the Three-River Headwaters region were grassland area, housing quality, annual family income, whether there were cadres in the circle of friends and relatives, and the distance from the place of residence to the market. 3) The livelihood activities and income structure of the herdsmen in the Three-River Headwaters region were single, and even diverse herders were not separated from grazing-based livelihood activities. Considering these key livelihood capital indicators, herdsmen can be actively and rationally guided to choose a livelihood strategy that is conducive to ecological protection. This represents a new direction for the improvement of the ecological environment in the Three-River Headwaters region in the future.

Key words: Three-River Headwaters region, ecological protection, livelihood strategies, Binary Logistic model