不同时期毛苔草对不同水文情势的生长响应研究

草业学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1): 17-24.

不同时期毛苔草对不同水文情势的生长响应研究

王丽^1,2,宋长春¹,胡金明³,杨涛^1,2

1.中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所,吉林长春130012;
2.中国科学院研究生院,北京100039;
3.云南大学亚洲国际河流中心,云南昆明650091

收稿日期:2008-03-18 出版日期:2009-01-25 发布日期:2009-02-20
作者简介:王丽(1982-),女,山东临沂人,在读博士。E-mail:erc2009@126.com
基金资助:
中国科学院重要方向项目(KZCX2-YW-309)和中国科学院“东北振兴”项目(DBZX-2-024)资助。

Growth responses of Carex lasiocarpa to different water regimes at different growing stages

WANG Li1,2, SONG Changchun1, HU Jinming3, YANG Tao1,2

1.Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, CAS, Changchun 130012, China;
2.Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China;
3.Asian International River Centre of Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China

Received:2008-03-18 Online:2009-01-25 Published:2009-02-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过幼苗移植、水位控制试验,研究毛苔草对不同水文情势的生长响应,以及不同水文经历下的响应差别。结果表明,毛苔草对不同水文情势及水文经历存在显著生长响应。毛苔草地上、地下以及根茎生物量均在干湿交替条件下最大;鲜重根/茎随水分的增加而降低,干重根/茎则总体上随水分的增加而升高;根茎生物量比重在干旱处理下最大。不同水文经历的毛苔草,其生物量以有干湿交替经历的较大,根/茎及根茎占总生物量的比重则以经历干旱处理的较大;淹没水文情势下,毛苔草生长缓慢,但淹没抑制消除后,其生长过程可以通过根茎萌发得以延续。各生长指标极值的出现,要求在不同的生长阶段提供其所需的水文条件。在湿地恢复与管理过程中,针对生长季内优势植物水文需求的变化,采取不同的水文措施,有助于达到最佳的恢复及管理目标。

Abstract: Growth responses of Carex lasiocarpa to different water regimes and hydrologic experience were studied in seedling transplant and water control experiments. C. lasiocarpa had significant responses to different water conditions. Its above-ground、below-ground and rhizome biomass were biggest under dry-wet alternate conditions; fresh root/shoot ratio decreased with increasing water and increased with increasing dryness; the rhizome biomass percentage was greatest under -5 cm water level. For C. lasiocarpa with different hydrologic treatments, the biomass was bigger under dry-wet alternate conditions at some times in the season while root/shoot ratio and rhizome biomass percentage were higher if they had undergone the -5 cm water treatment through the growing season. C. lasiocarpa grew slowly when submerged, but continued by rhizome regeneration after submergence finished. To gain the maximal values of growth indicators, water requirements at different stages must be met. To achieve the optimum goals in wetland restoration and management, water regimes should be regulated according to the plants needs.

中图分类号:

Q945.17

王丽,宋长春,胡金明,杨涛. 不同时期毛苔草对不同水文情势的生长响应研究[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(1): 17-24.

WANG Li1,2, SONG Changchun1, HU Jinming3, YANG Tao1,2. Growth responses of Carex lasiocarpa to different water regimes at different growing stages[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2009, 18(1): 17-24.

参考文献

[1] 刘志民,蒋德明,高红瑛,等.植物生活史繁殖对策与干扰关系的研究[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(3):418-422.
[2] Baird A J, Wilby R L.生态水文学——陆生环境和水生环境植物与水分关系[M]. 赵文智,王根绪,译.北京:海洋出版社,2002.91-97.
[3] 武高林,杜国桢.植物形态生长对策研究进展[J].世界科技研究与发展,2007,29(4):47-51.
[4] Horsa′k M, Ha′jek M, Tichy′ L, et al. Plant indicator values as a tool for land mollusc autecology assessment[J]. Acta Oecologica, 2007, 32: 161-171.
[5] 彭艳,张全新,曾兵. 野生鸭茅植物学性特征变异研究[J]. 草业学报,2007,16(2):69-75.
[6] 周婵,杨允菲. 松嫩平原两个生态型羊草叶构件异速生长规律[J].草业学报,2006,15(5):76-81
[7] 杨允菲,邢福. 松嫩平原杂类草草甸宽叶蒿无性系种群构件年龄结构及其生产力[J].草业学报,2007,16(2):19-24.
[8] 孟婷婷,倪健,王国宏.植物功能性状与环境和生态系统功能[J].植物生态学报,2007,31(1):150-165.
[9] 赵魁义.中国沼泽志[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.55-56.
[10] 中国湿地植被编辑委员会.中国湿地植被[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.26-29,123-124.
[11] 何池全.毛果苔草湿地枯落物及地下生物量动态[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(3):363-366.
[12] 何池全,赵魁义.毛果苔草种群地上生物量与株高分形特征[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(4):640-642.
[13] 黄晓霞,江源,刘全儒,等. 小五台山亚高山草甸植物种分布的生境条件解释[J]. 草业学报,2007,16(6):7-13.
[14] 石红霄,周青平,颜红波,等. 3种根茎型禾草繁殖时空扩展初探[J]. 草业科学,2008,25(5):127-132.
[15] 朱志红,刘建秀,王孝安.克隆植物的表型可塑性与等级选择[J].植物生态学报,2007,31(4):588-598.
[16] 朱志玲,李德志,王绪平,等.克隆植物的水分生理整合及其生态效应[J].西北植物学报,2006, 26(12):2602-2614.
[17] 牛健忠,周禾,毛培胜,等. 在水分异质性供应下野牛草相连分株的反应[J]. 草业科学,2007,24(1):44-47.
[18] White S D, Ganf G G. A comparison of the morphology, gas space anatomy and potential for internal aeration in Phragmites australis under variable and static water regimes[J]. Aquatic Botany, 2002, 73: 115-127.
[19] Macek P, Rejma′nkova′E, Houdkova′K. The effect of long-term submergence on functional properties of Eleocharis cellulosa Torr[J]. Aquatic Botany, 2006, 84: 251-258.
[20] Mauchampa A, Blanch S, Grillas P. Effects of submergence on the growth of Phragmites australis seedlings[J]. Aquatic Botany,2001,69:147-164.
[21] Bakker C, van Bodegom P M, Nelissen H J M, et al. Preference of wet dune species for waterlogged conditions can be explained by adaptations and specific recruitment requirements[J]. Aquatic Botany, 2007, 86: 37-45.
[22] Ahna C, Mosera K F, Sparksb R E, et al. Developing a dynamic model to predict the recruitment and early survival of black willow (Salix nigra) in response to different hydrologic conditions[J]. Ecological Modeling, 2007, 204: 315-325.
[23] Boar R R. Responses of a fringing Cyperus papyrus L.swamp to changes in water level[J]. Aquatic Botany, 2006, 84: 85-92.