不同稻秸基质处理对高羊茅无土草皮成坪天数及坪用价值的影响

草业学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4): 87-93.

不同稻秸基质处理对高羊茅无土草皮成坪天数及坪用价值的影响

干友民^1*,蒙宇¹,张建波²,周玉峰²,吴佳海²,唐成斌²

1.四川农业大学动物科技学院草业科学系,四川雅安 625014;
2.贵州省草业研究所,贵州独山 558200

收稿日期:2008-11-04 出版日期:2009-08-20 发布日期:2009-08-20
作者简介:干友民(1954-),男,四川温江人,副教授。E-mail: ganyoumin1954@163.com
基金资助:
贵州省“十一五”重点攻关项目(黔科合重大专项字[2007]6005)资助。

Influence of different treatment with straw and straw’s thickness on forming-sod time and turf quality

GAN You-min¹, MENG Yu¹, ZHANG Jian-bo², ZHOU Yu-feng², WU Jia-hai², TANG Cheng-bin²

1.Department of Grassland Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agriculture
University, Ya’an 625014, China; 2.Guizhou Grassland Science Institute,
Dushan 558200, China

Received:2008-11-04 Online:2009-08-20 Published:2009-08-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 运用五因素二次正交旋转组合设计法,研究不同处理稻秸基质(处理Ⅰ:稻秸+猪粪便+秸秆腐熟剂;处理Ⅱ:稻秸+猪粪便;处理Ⅲ:稻秸+尿素+秸秆腐熟剂;处理Ⅳ:稻秸+尿素)和不同基质厚度(10,15,20,25和30 mm)对草皮成坪天数的影响。结果表明,对成坪天数影响最大的是处理Ⅰ基质,其次是基质厚度,再者是处理Ⅲ基质,其他2种基质对成坪天数的影响最小。在坪用价值为限定条件下,得出最优基质组合,其配比为处理Ⅰ为600 g,处理Ⅱ为600 g,处理Ⅲ为0 g,处理Ⅳ为600 g,基质厚度为20 mm,成坪时间为36.33 d,坪用价值权重值为108.61。

Abstract: Use square, regressive and rotation with 5 factors design, researched on the different straw and straw’s thickness that influence the days of forming-sod (TreatmentⅠ: straw+pig’s dejectas+accelerating-humus powder; TreatmentⅡ: straw+pig’s dejectas; Treatment Ⅲ: straw+urea+accelerating-humus powder; Treatment Ⅳ: straw+urea; and factor V: 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 mm thickness). As the result, the mostly influence on the days of forming-sod is treatmentⅠ (straw), the second is straw’s thickness, the third is treatment Ⅲ. Others have little influence on this. In the limit of the turf quality, the best medium is 600 g of treatment Ⅰ, 600 g of treatmentⅡ, 0 g of treatment Ⅲ, 600 g of treatment Ⅳ, 20 mm of the straw’s thickness. The days of forming-sod of the medium are 36.33 d. And the weight value of turf quality is 108.61.

中图分类号:

干友民,蒙宇,张建波,周玉峰,吴佳海,唐成斌. 不同稻秸基质处理对高羊茅无土草皮成坪天数及坪用价值的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(4): 87-93.

GAN You-min, MENG Yu, ZHANG Jian-bo, ZHOU Yu-feng, WU Jia-hai, TANG Cheng-bin. Influence of different treatment with straw and straw’s thickness on forming-sod time and turf quality[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2009, 18(4): 87-93.

参考文献

[1] 崔建宇,慕康国,胡林,等.北京地区草皮卷生产对土壤质量影响的研究[J].草业科学,2003,26(6):68-72.
[2] Patton A J, Hardebeck G A, Williams D W, et al.Establishment of bermudagrass and zoysiagrass by seed[J].Crop Science, 2004, (44): 2160-2167.
[3] 张巨明,任继周.暖季型草坪草营养体建坪方法的研究[J].草业学报,1997,6(1):38-43.
[4] 邢后银,张宁宁,古长标.地毯式草皮工厂化生产技术研究初探[J].南京农专学报,2002,18(2):32-36.
[5] 孙胜龙.玉米秸秆作为生态厕所基质处理人粪便的实验研究[J].环境科学学报,2006,26(1):50-56.
[6] Guerrero III R D. Vermicomposting improves farm economics[J].BioCycle,2008, 49(8):56-57.
[7] Pote D H, Daniel T C. Managing pine straw harvests to minimize soil and water losses[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,93(1):27.
[8] 张增强. 污泥堆肥对几种草坪草生长的响应[J].草业学报,1997,6(1):57-65.
[9] 王兴仁.现代肥料试验设计[M].北京:农业出版社,1996.164-190.
[10] 丁希泉.农业应用回归设计[M].长春:吉林科学技术出版社,1986.68-76.
[11] 陈振德,何金明,黄俊杰,等.蔬菜穴盘育苗基质的选配及其理化性质特性研究[J].农业工程学报,1998,14(2):192-197.
[12] 李开.土壤农业化学常规分析方法[M].北京:科学环境出版社,1983.
[13] 安渊,陈丽君,孟慧琳,等.封闭时间对模拟践踏的沟叶结缕草草坪质量的影响[J].草业学报,2005,14(6):81-86.
[14] 肖莉,张国权.地区农业耕作模式的综合评价优化法[J].生物数学学报,2006,21(1):40-46.
[15] 王钦,谢源芳.草皮质量评定方法[J].草业科学,1993,10(4):69-73.
[16] 张巨明,张小虎,刘照辉.暖季型草皮草的引种与评价[J].草业科学,1996,(6):35-38.
[17] 刘及东.草皮质量评定方法的研究[J].内蒙古农牧学院学报,1999,20(6):50-55.
[18] 高新吴,张志斌,郭世荣. 玉米与小麦秸秆无土栽培基质的理化性状分析[J].南京农业大学学报,2006,29(4):131-134.
[19] Antje H, Michael K, Alois K, et al. Performance of grassland under different cutting regimes as affected by sward composition, nitrogen input, soil conditions and weather-a simulation study[J].Europe Journal of Agronomy, 2005,22:141-158.
[20] 俞镇慌.秸秆材料用作草皮栽培基质的研究[J].产业用纺织品,2002,9:23-27.