三峡库区澎溪河消落区草本植物的分布与分解

草业学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2): 146-152.

三峡库区澎溪河消落区草本植物的分布与分解

张志永¹,彭建华¹,万成炎¹,郑志伟¹,仇登高²

1.水利部中国科学院水工程生态研究所,湖北武汉 430079;
2.中国水产科学研究院鲟鱼繁育技术工程中心,北京 102411

收稿日期:2009-04-20 出版日期:2010-02-25 发布日期:2010-04-20
作者简介:张志永(1979-),男,河南周口人,助理研究员,硕士。E-mail zhangzy@mail.ihe.ac.cn
基金资助:
国务院三峡办项目(KY01-02-01),国家自然科学基金项目(50979061)和国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2008ZX07104-003)资助。

Distribution and decomposition dynamics of herb plants in Pengxihewater-fluctuation-zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir

ZHANG Zhi-yong¹, PENG Jian-hua¹, WAN Cheng-yan¹, ZHENG Zhi-wei¹, QIU Deng-gao²

1.The Institute of Hydroecology, Ministry of Water Resources &
Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Wuhan 430079, China;
2.The Center for Sturgeon Breeding and Technological
Engineering, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Beijing 102411, China

Received:2009-04-20 Online:2010-02-25 Published:2010-04-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用随机多次小样方对三峡库区澎溪河消落区草本植物群落进行了调查,并应用分解网袋法对消落区草本植物分解速率进行了研究。结果表明,消落区草本植物覆盖度为50％～90％;在分解试验进行的94d中,草本植物分解速率为0.073～0.081g/d,平均0.070g/d,干物质流失率为78.35％～89.88％,平均为82.49％;试验期间共采集到底栖动物21种,分属于9目、10科,20属。第2,6,11,17,94天栖息密度均值依次为27,80,37,114,300个/m²,生物量平均值依次为0.2992,0.3078,0.0657,0.3154,0.2257g/m²。

Abstract: Repeated random sampling method was used to survey herb plants in the Pengxihe Water-fluctuation-zone of Three Gorges Reservoir. With the litterbag method, the decomposition rates of herb plants were studied for 94 consecutive days. The results showed that the cover indexes of herb plants ranged from 50％ to 90％. Within 94 days the decomposition rates of herb plants ranged from 0.073 to 0.081 g/d with an average of 0.070 g/d. The dry mass loss of herb plant ranged from 78.35％ to 89.88％, an average of 82.49％. Invertebrates were also collected and there were 21 species belonging to 20 genera, 10 families and 9 orders. After litterbags had been submerged for 2, 6, 11, 17, and 94 days, the average density of invertebrates were 27, 80, 37, 114 and 300 ind/m² respectively. At the same time, the average biomasses of invertebrates were 0.299 2, 0.307 8, 0.065 7, 0.315 4 and 0.225 7 g/m².

中图分类号:

Q948.15⁺5

张志永,彭建华,万成炎,郑志伟,仇登高. 三峡库区澎溪河消落区草本植物的分布与分解[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(2): 146-152.

ZHANG Zhi-yong, PENG Jian-hua, WAN Cheng-yan, ZHENG Zhi-wei, QIU Deng-gao. Distribution and decomposition dynamics of herb plants in Pengxihewater-fluctuation-zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(2): 146-152.

参考文献

[1] Norgrove L, Hauser S. Leaf properties, litterfall, and nutrient inputs of Terminalia ivorensisat different tree stand densities in a tropical timber-food crop multistratasystem[J].Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2000, 30(9): 1400-1409.
[2] Kavvadias V A, Alifragis D, Tsiontsis A, et al. Litterfall, litter accumulation and litter decomposition rates in four forest ecosystems in northern Greece[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2001, 144: 113-127.
[3] Ritter E. Litter decomposition and nitrogen mineralization in newly formed gaps in a Danish beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2005, 37(7): 1237-1247.
[4] 陈书秀, 江明喜. 三峡地区香溪河流域不同树种叶片凋落物的分解[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(9): 2905-2912.
[5] 郭继勋. 松嫩平原羊草草场中羊草枯枝落叶形成过程的初步研究[J]. 生态学杂志, 1990, 9(1): 11-14.
[6] 郭继勋, 祝廷成. 羊草草原枯枝落叶积累的研究[J]. 生态学报, 1994, 14(3): 255-261.
[7] 郭继勋, 祝廷成. 羊草草原枯枝落叶分解的研究-主要优势植物的分解速率和损失率[J]. 生态学报, 1992, 12(4): 295-299.
[8] 王娓, 郭继勋, 张保田. 东北松嫩草地羊草群落环境因素与凋落物分解季节动态[J]. 草业学报, 2003, 12(1): 47-52.
[9] 张建利, 张文, 毕玉芬. 山地草地凋落物分解与持水力的研究[J]. 草业科学, 2008, 25(3): 108-110.
[10] 李玉霖, 孟庆涛, 赵学勇, 等. 科尔沁沙地植物成熟叶片性状与叶凋落物分解的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(6): 2486-2494.
[11] Gholz H L,Wedin D A, Smitherman S M, et al. Long-term dynamics of pine and hardwood litter in contrasting environments: Toward a global model of decomposition[J]. Global Change Biology, 2000, 6: 751-765.
[12] Couteaux M M, McTiernan K B, Berg B, et al. Chemical composition and carbon mineralisation potential of scots pine needles at different stages of decomposition[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1998, 30(5): 583-595.
[13] Williams B L, Alexander C E. Interactions on mixing litters from beneath Sitka spruce and Scots pine and effects on microbial activity and N mineralization[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1991, 23: 71-75.
[14] Briones M J, Ineson P. Decomposition of eucalyptus leaves in litter mixtures[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1996, 28: 1381-1388.
[15] Robinson C H, Kirkham J B, Littlewood R. Decomposition of root mixture from high arctic plants: A microcosm study[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1999, 31: 1101-1108.
[16] 马雪华. 森林生态系统定位研究方法[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1994: 84-134.
[17] 谢志才, 马凯, 叶麟, 等.保安湖大型底栖动物结构与分布格局研究[J]. 水生生物学报, 2007, 31(2): 174-183.
[18] 梁象秋, 方纪祖, 杨和荃. 水生生物学(形态和分类)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1995: 200-252.
[19] Barbour M T, Gerritsen J, Snyder B D, et al. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish (Second Edition)[M]. Washington DC: EPA/841-B-99-002. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, 1999.
[20] 黄晓霞, 韩京萨, 刘全儒, 等, 小五台亚高山草甸植物地上生物量及其营养成分研究[J]. 草业科学, 2008, 25(11): 5-12.
[21] 国振杰, 易津, 张力君, 等. 海拔高度对羊草生物量和根茎形态可塑性的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2008, 22(4): 175-180.
[22] Millikin C S, Bledsoe C S. Biomass and distribution of fine and coarse roots from blue oak (Quercus douglasii) trees in the northern Sierra Nevada foothills of California[J]. Plant and Soil, 1999, 214: 27-38.
[23] 黄军, 王高峰, 安沙舟, 等. 施氮对退化草甸植被结构和生物量及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2009, 26(3): 75-78.
[24] 张铜会, 赵哈林, 李玉霖, 等. 科尔沁沙地灌溉与施肥对退化草地生产力的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2008, 17(1): 36-42.
[25] 周萍, 刘国彬, 侯喜禄. 黄土丘陵区铁杆蒿群落植被特性及土壤养分特征研究[J]. 草业学报, 2008, 17(2): 9-18.
[26] 王长庭, 王启兰, 景增春, 等. 不同放牧梯度下高寒小嵩草草甸植被根系和土壤理化特征的变化[J], 草业学报, 2008, 17(5): 9-15.
[27] Royer T V, Monaghan M T, Minshall G W. Processing of native and exotic leaf litter in two Idaho (USA) streams[J]. Hydrobiologia, 1999, 400: 123-128.
[28] Van Dokkum H R, Sljikemran D M E, Rossi L, et al. Variation in the decomposition of Phrgamites australis litter in a monomietic lake: The role of gammarids[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2002, 482: 69-77.
[29] Menéndez M, Hernández O, Comín F A. Seasonal comparisons of leaf processing rates in two Mediterranean rivers with different nutrient availability[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2003, 495: 159-165.
[30] Janssen M A, Walker K F. Processing of riparian and wetland plant litter in the River Murray, South Australia[J]. Hydrobiologia, 1999, 411: 53-64.
[31] Woodcock T S, Huryn A D. Leaf litter processing and invertebrate assemblages along a pollution gradient in a Maine (USA) headwater stream[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2005, 134(3): 363-375.
[32] Pascoal C, Pinho M, Cassio F, et al. Assessing structural and functional ecosystem condition using leaf breakdown: Studies on a polluted river[J]. Freshwater Biology, 2003, 48(11): 2033-2044.