几种高大禾草热值和灰分动态变化研究

草业学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2): 241-247.

几种高大禾草热值和灰分动态变化研究

宁祖林¹,陈慧娟^1,2,王珠娜³, 张卓文², 邱迎君⁴

1.中国科学院武汉植物园,湖北武汉 430074;
2.华中农业大学园艺林学学院, 湖北武汉 430070;

3.郑州市林业局, 河南郑州 450015;
4.宁波城市职业技术学院, 浙江宁波 315502

收稿日期:2009-04-02 出版日期:2010-02-25 发布日期:2010-04-20
作者简介:宁祖林(1977-),男,江西武宁人,助理研究员,硕士。E-mailningzulin@163.com
基金资助:
中国科学院重要方向性项目(KSCX2-G-027-4)和国家自然科学基金(30760024)资助。

A study on the dynamic change of gross caloric value and ash content of the several tall grasses

NING Zu-lin¹, CHEN Hui-juan^1,2, WANG Zhu-na³, ZHANG Zhuo-wen², QIU Ying-jun⁴

1.Wuhan Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China;
2.College of
Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;

3.Zhengzhou Forestry Administration, Zhengzhou 450015, China;
4.Ningbo
City College of Technology, Ningbo 315502, China

Received:2009-04-02 Online:2010-02-25 Published:2010-04-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对3种C₃类植物(芦竹、菅、芦苇)与5种C₄类植物(五节芒、芒、岗柴、斑茅、南荻)不同器官热值和灰分含量的月变化进行了研究,并探讨了其应用前景,为禾草类能源植物筛选评价提供科学依据。结果表明,1)8种高大禾草灰分含量存在差异,且具明显的季节性变化;C₃类植物平均灰分含量分别为:芦竹(7.17±1.09)%、菅(6.33±0.60)%、芦苇(7.89±1.09)%;C₄类植物平均灰分含量分别为:五节芒(4.92±1.38)%、芒(6.27±0.94)%、岗柴(6.99±1.13)%、斑茅(5.13±0.88)%、南荻(5.10±0.82)%。2)C₃类植物中芦竹干重热值较高,C₄类植物中五节芒、芒、斑茅、南荻的干重热值比较接近,无显著差异,岗柴干重热值最低。3)芦竹的干重热值与灰分含量有显著线性相关(P＜0.05),五节芒、芦苇的干重热值与灰分含量有极显著线性相关(P＜0.01),而菅、芒、岗柴、斑茅、南荻的干重热值与灰分含量无相关性(P＞0.05)。4)C₃类植物平均去灰分热值分别为:芦竹(19.01±0.27)kJ/g、菅(18.58±0.31)kJ/g、芦苇(18.72±0.23)kJ/g;C₄类植物平均去灰分热值分别为:五节芒(18.52±0.32)kJ/g、芒(18.69±0.47)kJ/g、岗柴(18.54±0.33)kJ/g、斑茅(18.48±0.41)kJ/g、南荻(18.49±0.37)kJ/g,灰分含量不同,导致去灰分热值与干重热值的月变化趋势不同。

Abstract: Monthly changes in the calorific values and ash contents of 8 tall grasses (three C₃ photosynthetic species (Arundo donax, Themeda villosa, Phragmites communis), five C₄ photosynthetic species (Miscanthus floridulus, M. sinensis, M. sacchariflorus, Saccharum arundinaceum, M. lutarioripara) are discussed in this paper to explore the prospects for applying a scientific basis to develop a screening evaluation for energy plants of these tall grasses. 1) The ash contents of the 8 tall grasses differed and varied with season; the annual average ash contents of the three C₃ photosynthesis species were 7.17±1.09% for A. donax, 6.33±0.60% for T. villosa, and 7.89±1.09% for P. communis; while those of the five C₄ photosynthesis species were 4.92±1.38% for M. floridulus, 6.27±0.94% for M. sinensis, 6.99±1.13% for M. sacchariflorus, 5.13±0.88% for S. arundinaceum, and 5.10±0.82% for T. lutarioripara. 2) Among the three C₃ photosynthesis species A. donax had the highest calorific values, while among the five C₄ photosynthesis species the calorific values of M. floridulus, M. sinensis, S. arundinaceum ,M. lutarioripara were closer to each other with no significant difference. M. sacchariflorus had the lowest calorific values. 3) Gross calorific values were correlated with ash contents for A. donax(P＜0.05), they were strongly correlated for M. floridulus and P. communis(P＜0.01), whereas there was no significant correlation between gross calorific values and ash contents for the other species. 4) The average ash free caloric values of the C₃ photosynthetic species were (19.01±0.27) kJ/g for A. donax, (18.58±0.31) kJ/g for T. villosa, (18.72±0.23) kJ/g for P. communis; and those of the C₄ photosynthesis species were (18.52±0.32) kJ/g for M. floridulus, (18.69±0.47) kJ/g for M. sinensis,(18.54±0.33) kJ/g for M. sacchariflorus, (18.48±0.41) kJ/g for S. arundinaceum, (18.49±0.37) kJ/g for M. lutarioripara. The seasonal changes in ash free caloric values were different from those of the gross caloric values due to differing ash contents in the 8 tall grasses.

中图分类号:

Q949.9

宁祖林,陈慧娟,王珠娜, 张卓文, 邱迎君. 几种高大禾草热值和灰分动态变化研究[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(2): 241-247.

NING Zu-lin, CHEN Hui-juan, WANG Zhu-na, ZHANG Zhuo-wen, QIU Ying-jun. A study on the dynamic change of gross caloric value and ash content of the several tall grasses[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(2): 241-247.

参考文献

[1] 杨成源, 张加研, 李文政, 等. 滇中高原及干热河谷薪材树种热值研究[J]. 西南林学院院报, 1996, 16(4): 294-302.
[2] 鲍雅静, 李政海, 韩兴国, 等. 植物热值及其生物生态学属性[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 25(9): 1095-1103.
[3] 李高扬, 李建龙, 王艳, 等. 优良能源植物筛选及评价指标探讨[J]. 可再生能源, 2007, 25(6): 84-89.
[4] 席庆国, 刘玉新. 高大禾草加工技术概况[J]. 草业科学, 2005, 22(1): 32-33.
[5] 解新明, 周峰, 赵燕慧, 等. 多年生能源禾草的产能和生态效益[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(5): 2329-2342.
[6] 林益明, 杨志伟, 李振基. 武夷山常绿林研究[M]. 厦门: 厦门大学出版社, 2001.
[7] 郭水良, 黄华, 朱亦均, 等. 金华市郊10种杂草的热值和灰分含量及其适应意义[J]. 植物研究, 2005, 25(4): 460-464.
[8] Mani S, Tabil L G, Sokhansanj S. Grinding performane and physical properties of wheat and barley straws, corn stover and switchgrass[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2004, 27: 339-352.
[9] 徐永荣, 张万均, 冯宗炜. 天津滨海盐渍土上几种植物的热值和元素含量极其相关性[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(3): 450-455.
[10] Cassida K A, Muir J P, Hussey M A, et al. Biofuel component concentrations and yields of switchgrass in South central US environments[J]. Crop Science, 2005, 45: 682-692.
[11] Misra M K, Ragland K W, Baker A J. Wood ash composition as afunction of furnace temperature[J]. Biomass & Bioenergy,1993, 4: 103-116.
[12] 肖军, 段菁春, 王华. 生物质利用现状[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2003, 10(1): 11-13.
[13] Lewandowski I, Scurlck J, Lindvall E, et al. The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2003, 25: 335-361.
[14] 官丽莉, 周小勇, 罗艳. 我国植物热值研究综述[J]. 生物学杂志, 2005, 24(4): 452-457.
[15] 祖元刚. 能量生态学引论[M]. 长春: 吉林科学技术出版社, 1990.
[16] 林鹏, 邵成, 郑文教. 福建和溪亚热带雨林优势植物叶的热值研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 1996, 20(4): 303-309.
[17] 彭辅松. 植物燃值与发展速生、丰产薪炭林的关系[J]. 武汉植物研究, 1990, 8(5): 194-198.
[18] Turhollow A F. Screening herbaceous lignocellulosic energy crops in temperate region of the United States[J]. Bioresource and Technology, 1991, 36: 247-252.
[19] 李军, 吴平治, 李美茹, 等. 能源植物的研究进展及发展趋势[J]. 自然杂志, 2006,29(1): 21-25.
[20] 向平, 林益明, 彭在清, 等. 厦门园林植物园10种榕属植物叶热值与灰分含量的研究[J]. 林业科学, 2003, 39: 68-73.
[21] 林益明, 王湛昌, 柯莉娜, 等. 四种灌木状与四种乔木状棕榈植物热值的月变化[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(6): 1117-1124.
[22] 程序. 能源牧草堪当未来生物能源之大任[J]. 草业学报, 2008, 17(3): 1-5.
[23] 刘吉利, 朱万斌, 谢光辉, 等. 能源作物柳枝稷研究进展[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(3): 232-240.