草地早熟禾对干旱及旱后复水的生理响应研究

草业学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2): 31-38.

草地早熟禾对干旱及旱后复水的生理响应研究

杜建雄^1,4,侯向阳³,刘金荣^2*

1.甘肃农业大学草业学院,甘肃兰州730070;
2.兰州大学草地农业科技学院,农业部草地农业生态系统学
重点开放实验室,甘肃兰州730020;
3.中国农业科学院草原研究所,内蒙古呼和浩特 010010;

4.贵州财经学院资源与环境管理学院,贵州贵阳 550004

收稿日期:2009-07-20 出版日期:2010-02-25 发布日期:2010-04-20
作者简介:杜建雄(1974-),男,甘肃临洮人,在读博士。
基金资助:
甘肃省自然科学基金(0803RJZG033),甘肃省教育厅科研项目(080903)和农业部草地农业生态系统学重点开放实验室项目资助。

A study on physiological response to drought and re-watering treatments in Kentucky bluegrass

DU Jian-xiong^1,4, HOU Xiang-yang³, LIU Jin-rong²

1.College of Grassland, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
2.Key Laboratory of
Grassland Agro-Ecosystem Ministry of Agriculture College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and
Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China;
3.Grassland Research Institute
of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Huhehaote 010010, China;
4.School of
Resources and Environmental Management, Guizhou College of
Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550004, China

Received:2009-07-20 Online:2010-02-25 Published:2010-04-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了进一步明确冷季型草坪草形态、水分生理和碳分配模式对干旱及复水处理的反应,本试验以草地早熟禾草的3个栽培种:新歌来德、午夜和奖金为材料,进行人工模拟干旱处理21d,然后再恢复浇水21d。期间测定了草坪质量、叶片相对含水量(RWC)、总的非结构性碳水化合物(TNC)含量及¹⁴C同化物在根、茎、叶的分配率。试验结果表明,干旱胁迫造成3个品种的草坪质量和RWC明显下降,变化幅度因品种和处理时间不同而存在差异;复水后,草坪质量和RWC不同程度地得到恢复,其中奖金表现出较强的恢复能力。干旱胁迫初期,3个品种根部¹⁴C分配率明显增加,干旱14d时,3个品种¹⁴C分配模式为:根＞茎＞叶。随着干旱胁迫的进行,¹⁴C由根部向茎和叶片转移,其茎和叶片中¹⁴C分配率明显升高。复水21d后,3个品种中¹⁴C分配率模式为:茎＞叶＞根;干旱胁迫期间,3个品种的叶片、茎和根之间TNC积累量一直发生变化,干旱胁迫21d时,3个品种TNC含量在根、茎、叶中的积累模式为:叶＞茎＞根。复水后,3个品种根、茎、叶中TNC积累量较干旱胁迫21d时各自对应器官中TNC积累量有不同程度下降,但TNC在根、茎、叶中的积累模式与干旱胁迫期间保持一样。试验结果表明,在干旱和复水处理中碳同化物在植物体内不同器官不同分配率及碳水化合物在植物体内不同器官中积累是草坪草对干旱胁迫及复水处理的一种生理调节反应,将为今后研究草坪草在其他逆境胁迫下的抗性提供了一定的科学参考。

Abstract: The morphology, water physiology, and carbon allocation responses of cool-season turfgrass to drought stress and re-watering treatments were studied. Three cultivars (Prize, Nuglade, and Midnight) of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), were tested under drought and re-watering treatments to determine the changes in turf quality, leaf relative water content (RWC), total nonstructural carbohydrate (TNC) content and ¹⁴C allocation in different organs. Drought stress caused a significant decline in turf quality and leaf RWC, which varied with cultivar and treatment time. After re-watering, turf quality and leaf RWC recovered to different degrees, especially in Prize. At the early stages during drought stress, ¹⁴C allocation to the roots increased significantly for all cultivars. After 14 d drought stress, ¹⁴C allocation to different organs in the three cultivars was roots＞shoots＞leaves. With prolonged drought stress, some ¹⁴C in the roots moved into the shoots and leaves, resulting in a marked increase of ¹⁴C allocation to the shoots and leaves. After 21 d re-watering, ¹⁴C allocation in the three cultivars was shoots＞leaves＞roots. During the drought stress, TNC accumulation in the roots, shoots, and leaves of the three cultivars continually changed and was in the sequence leaves＞shoots＞roots. After re-watering, the TNC content in the leaves, shoots, and roots of all three cultivars was lower than that under drought stress, but still in the same order. This suggests that the allocation of carbon assimilates and their accumulation in different organs of turfgrasses were a physiological adaptation response to drought and re-watering treatments and provides a scientific basis for further investigating the resistance of turfgrasses to other adverse environments.

中图分类号:

杜建雄,侯向阳,刘金荣. 草地早熟禾对干旱及旱后复水的生理响应研究[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(2): 31-38.

DU Jian-xiong, HOU Xiang-yang, LIU Jin-rong. A study on physiological response to drought and re-watering treatments in Kentucky bluegrass[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(2): 31-38.

参考文献

[1] 孙吉雄. 草坪学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1995.
[2] 冉飞, 包苏科, 石丽娜, 等. 干旱胁迫和复水对锡金微孔草抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2008, 17(5): 156-160.
[3] 王齐, 孙吉雄, 安渊. 水分胁迫对结缕草种群特征和生理特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(2): 33-38.
[4] 万里强, 石永红, 李向林, 等. 高温干旱胁迫下三个多年生黑麦草品种叶绿体和线粒体超微结构的变化[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(1): 25-31.
[5] 吕金印, 山仑, 高俊凤. 土壤干湿交替对小麦花前碳同化物分配的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2004, 24(9): 1565-1569.
[6] 隋方功, 葛体达, 刘鹏起. 干旱对夏玉米碳素同化、运转与分配的影响研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2006, 14(3): 234-237.
[7] Beneragama C K, Yamamoto S. Growth, carbon allocation and nonstructural carbohydrates of turf-type Bermudagrass and Bahiagrass as affected by simulated terminal drought[J]. Annual Research of Sri Lanka Student Association in Japan, 2006, 6: 1-6.
[8] Chaves M M. Effects of water deficits on carbon assimilation[J]. Experimental Botany, 1991, 42: 1-16.
[9] Huang B, Fu J. Photosynthesis, respiration, and carbon allocation of two cool-season perennial grasses in response to surface soil drying[J]. Plant and Soil, 2000, 227: 17-26.
[10] Onillon B, Durand J L, Gastal F, et al. Drought effects on growth and carbon partitioning in a tall fescue sward grown at different rates of nitrogen fertilization[J]. European Agronomy, 1995, 4: 91-99.
[11] DaCosta M, Huang B R. Changes in carbon partitioning and accumulation patterns during drought and recovery for colonial bentgrass, creeping bentgrass, and velvet bentgrass[J]. HortScience, 2006, 131: 484-490.
[12] Huang B, Gao H. Root physiological characteristics associated with drought resistance in tall fescue cultivars[J]. Crop Science, 2000, 40: 196-203.
[13] Oosthuizen L B, Snyman H A. The influence of water stress on non-structural carbohydrate concentration in Themeda triandra[J]. South African Botany, 2001, 67: 53-57.
[14] Turner L B. The extent and pattern of osmotic adjustment in white clover (Trifolium repens L. ) during the development of water stress[J]. Annals Botany, 1990, 66: 721-777.
[15] 刘金荣, 杜建雄, 谢晓蓉. 干热胁迫和复水对草坪草光合生理生态特性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(5): 2694-2700.
[16] 谢晓蓉, 刘金荣, 李唯, 等. 干热对草地早熟禾生理反应与坪用质量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2007, 15(6): 572-576.
[17] 刘金荣, 谢晓蓉. 冷季型草坪草在河西走廊生态适应性的综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2003, 3(1): 79-82.
[18] Richardson M D, Karcher D E, Purcell L C. Quantifying turfgrass cover using digital image analysis[J]. Crop Science, 2001, 41: 1884-1888.
[19] 邹琦. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 11-12.
[20] Ting S V. Rapid colorimetric methods for simultaneous determination of total reducing sugars and fructose in citrus juices[J]. Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1959, 4: 263-266.
[21] 李艳秋, 尹伟伦, 夏新莉. 干旱胁迫下四种冷季型草坪草的生理反应[J]. 草地学报, 2007, 15(2): 164-167.
[22] 余晓华, 张巨明, 王明祖, 等. 四种结缕草属草坪草对土壤干旱胁迫的响应及抗旱性研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2008, (5): 121-124.
[23] Wang Z L, Huang B R. Physiological recovery of Kentucky bluegrass from simultaneous drought and heat stress[J]. Crop Science, 2004, 44: 1729-1736.
[24] Volaire F. Effects of summer drought and spring defoliation on carbohydrate reserves, persistence and recovery of two populations of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata) in a Mediterranean environment[J]. Agricultural Science, 1994, 122: 207-215.
[25] Volaire, F. Growth, carbohydrate reserves and drought survival strategies of contrasting Dactylis glomerata populations in a Mediterranean environment[J]. Applied Ecology, 1995, 32: 56-66.
[26] Qian Y, Fry J D. Water relations and drought tolerance of four turfgrasses[J]. HortScience, 1997, 122: 129-133