苜蓿+玉米间作系统产量表现及其种间竞争力的评定

草业学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1): 22-30.

苜蓿+玉米间作系统产量表现及其种间竞争力的评定

张桂国^1,2,董树亭^2*,杨在宾¹

1.山东农业大学动物科技学院,山东泰安 271018;
2.作物生物学国家重点实验室山东农业大学农学院,山东泰安 271018

出版日期:2011-02-22 发布日期:2011-02-22
通讯作者: E-mail:stdong@sdau.edu.cn
作者简介:张桂国(1977-),男,山东泗水人,讲师,博士。
基金资助:
“十一五”国家科技攻关项目(2006BAD15B07-03),国家科技支撑计划项目(2007BAD31B04)和国家自然科学基金项目(30571098, 30771282)资助。

Production performance of alfalfa+maize intercropping systems and evaluation of interspecies competition

ZHANG Gui-guo^1,2, DONG Shu-ting², YANG Zai-bin¹

1.College of Animal Science and Technology, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China;

2.Key Laboratory of Crop Biology of China; Department of Agronomy,
Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China

Online:2011-02-22 Published:2011-02-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本试验目的在于探讨不同苜蓿+玉米间作模式下种间竞争力变化,及其对间作系统产量建成的影响。试验设苜蓿、玉米行数比分别为2∶2,3∶2,4∶2,5∶2四个间作处理,每处理3个重复,其所占间作面积比分别为33％∶67％,43％∶57％,50%∶50%,55%∶45%,玉米、苜蓿单作为对照组。测定各处理干物质产量,采用土地当量比(LER)、侵占力(Aam)、相对拥挤系数(RCC)等指标来评定不同间作处理系统内的作物竞争力。结果表明,在苜蓿+玉米间作系统第1年生产中,苜蓿竞争力大于玉米,所有间作处理总产量和经济产出均低于单作玉米,高于单作苜蓿,各间作处理相比以5∶2间作模式生产性能最佳。在第2年生产中,苜蓿进入高产期,始终占据间作系统的优势生态位,所有间作处理生物总产量都不低于单作玉米和单作苜蓿,经济产出均大于单作苜蓿和单作玉米,5∶2间作模式表现出最佳的生产优势。

Abstract: The variation of interspecies competitiveness, and its effects on the production performance of four intercropping treatments alternating alfalfa (Medicago) and maize (Zea mays) were investigated in a 2∶2,3∶2,4∶2,5∶2 design with three replications, and intercropping area rates of 33%∶67%, 43%∶57%, 50%∶50%, 55%∶45%, respectively. Maize and alfalfa as the monocultures were the control groups. Dry matter yields of different treatments were measured, and land equivalent ratio (LER), aggressiveness (A), and relative crowding coefficient (RRC) were introduced as indexes to evaluate the interspecies competition in each treatment. In the first year of establishment, yields of all the intercropping treatments were lower than that of the maize monoculture, but higher than that of the alfalfa. The 5∶2 treatment had a better production performance and economic returns than the other intercropping treatments. In the second year, alfalfa had a high-yielding period, and occupied the dominant niche for the whole growing stage in the intercropping systems. Total biomass of all the intercropping systems were not less than the maize or alfalfa monocultures. The 5∶2 intercropping treatment had the best productivity and economic returns.

中图分类号:

S344.2

张桂国,董树亭,杨在宾. 苜蓿+玉米间作系统产量表现及其种间竞争力的评定[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(1): 22-30.

ZHANG Gui-guo, DONG Shu-ting, YANG Zai-bin. Production performance of alfalfa+maize intercropping systems and evaluation of interspecies competition[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(1): 22-30.

参考文献

侯扶江, 南志标, 任继周. 作物-家畜综合生产系统. 草业学报, 2009, 18(5): 211-234.
陈明, 周昭旭, 罗进仓. 间作苜蓿棉田节肢动物群落生态位及时间格局. 草业学报, 2008, 17(4): 132-140.
Sullivan P. Intercropping principles and production practices. http: //attra. ncat. org/attra-pub/PDF/intercrop. pdf, 2003-08-16.
刘闯, 胡庭兴, 李强, 等. 巨桉林草间作模式中牧草光合生理生态适应性研究. 草业学报, 2008, 17(1): 58-65.
吕玉华, 郑大玮. 内蒙古农牧交错带农牧系统耦合及相悖的机理及效应. 草业学报, 2009, 18(4): 217-223.
冯丽肖, 杜雄, 张立峰. 华北农牧交错带畜牧业外部经济效应解析. 草业学报, 2009, 18(2): 155-162.
李治强. 紫花苜蓿与垂穗披碱草混播防治褐斑病试验. 草业科学, 2009, 26(10): 177-180.
Li L, Sun J H, Zhang F S, et al. Root distribution and interactions between intercropped species. Oecologia, 2005, 147: 280-290.
Crowley M J. Plant Ecology. Cambridge: Blackwell Science, 1997.
赵林, 李保平, 孟玲, 等. 不同氮、磷营养水平下紫茎泽兰和多年黑麦草苗期的相对竞争力. 草业学报, 2008, 17(1): 145-149.
Ghaffarzadeh M. Strip Intercropping. The United States of American: Iowa State University Agronomy Department (extension textbook), 1999.
Li L, Li S M, Sun J H, et al. Diversity enhances agricultural productivity via rhizosphere phosphorus facilitation on phosphorus-deficient soils. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science of the United States of American, 2007, 104(27): 11192-11196.
Skelton L E, Gary W. A Comparison of Conventional and Alternative Cropping Systems Using Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L) and Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L): An Agroecosystem Analysis. The United States of American: The University of Georgia, 2002.
De Wit C T. On Competition. Netherlands: Verslagen van Landbouwkundige Onderzoekingen, 1960: 1-82.
De Wit C T, Van Den Bergh J P. Competition between herbage plants. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 1965, 13: 212-221.
Newman E I, Eason W R, Eissenstat D M. Interactions between plants: The role of mycorrhizae. Mycorrhiza, 1992, 1: 47-53.
Firbank L G, Watkinson A R. On the analysis of competition within two species mixtures of plants. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1985, 22: 503-517.
Bi H, Turvey N D. Inter-species competetion between seedlings of Pinus radiata, Eucalyptus regnans and Acacia melanoxylon. Australian Journal of Botany, 1994, 42(1): 61-70.
Li L, Yang S C, Li X L, et al. Interspecific complementary and competitive interactions between intercropped maize and faba bean. Plant and Soil, 1999, 212: 105-114.
Jolliffe P A. The replacement series. Journal of Ecology, 2000, 88: 371-385.
Ghosheh H Z, Bsoul E Y. Utilization of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L) as a smoother crop in field maize (Zea mays L). Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 2005, 25(1): 5-17.
Putnam D H, Summers C G, Orloff S B. Alfalfa Production Systems in California. http: //alfalfa. ucdavis. edu, 2009-02-15.
Hassanali A, Herren H, Khan Z R, et al. Integrated pest management: The push-pull approach for controlling insect pests and weeds of cereals, and its potential for other agricultural systems including animal husbandry. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biogical Sciences, 2008, 363: 611-621.
Smith M A, Carter P R. Strip intercropping maize and alfalfa. Journal of Production Agriculture, 1998, 11(3): 345-353.
Willey R W. Intercropping-its importance and research needs. Part 1. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts, 1979, 32: 1-10.
Vandermeer J. The Ecology of Intercropping. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Fetene M. Intra-and inter-specific competition between seedlings of Acacia etbaica and a perennial grass (Hyparrenia hirta). Journal of Arid Environments, 2003, 55: 441-451.
Willey R W, Rao M R. A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Experimental Agriculture, 1980, 16: 117-125.
Zhang F S, Li L. Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency. Plant and Soil, 2003, 248: 305-312.
樊江文, 钟华平, 梁飚, 等. 不同压力和干扰条件下黑麦草与其他6种植物的竞争研究. 植物生态学报, 2003, 27(4): 522-530.
孙小龙, 周禾, 李平, 等. 苜蓿与玉米秸秆混贮研究. 草业学报, 2009, 18(5): 86-92.
Xu B C, Li F M, Shan L. Switchgrass and milkvetch intercropping under 2∶1 row-replacement in semiarid region, northwest China: Aboveground biomass and water use efficiency. European Journal of Agronomy, 2008, 28(3): 485-492.
Li L, Sun J H, Zhang F S, et al. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping. I. Yield advantage and interspecific interaction on nutrients. Field Crops Research, 2001, 71: 123-137.
陈玉香, 周道玮. 东北农牧交错带玉米生产与利用及农业生态系统优化生产模式. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2002.

[1]	赵财,周海燕,柴强,黄高宝,刘辉娟,朱静. 不同供水水平下丁香酚和间作蚕豆对小麦根系生长的互作效应[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(2): 133-139.
[2]	王田涛,王琦,王惠珍,张恩和. 连作条件下间作模式对当归生长特性和产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(2): 54-61.