晋北盐碱化草地群落斑块的多样性

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过对晋北盐碱化草地8个不同的草地群落斑块的优势度、多样性、群落相似系数及土壤性质等特征进行研究,揭示草地群落斑块在演替过程中的结构特征与变化规律,为进一步对草地植被恢复与盐碱化草地治理奠定理论基础。结果表明,8个群落斑块的物种组成和优势度差异比较明显,Margalef物种丰富度指数和Shannon-Wiener多样性指数在斑块Ⅱ、Ⅲ和Ⅰ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ、Ⅵ、Ⅶ、Ⅷ组之间差异极显著(P<0.01);Pielou均匀性系数和Simpson优势度指数在斑块Ⅱ、Ⅲ和Ⅵ、Ⅶ、Ⅷ之间差异极显著(P<0.01);斑块Ⅶ和Ⅷ、Ⅵ和Ⅶ、Ⅳ和Ⅴ群落相似系数最大,分别为0.956 7,0.929 7,0.903 4。8个群落斑块分为2类,其中斑块Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ为一类,主要表现为土壤含水量、容重、pH值和碱化度比较小,植被特征主要是以较高大的赖草为优势物种,随着土壤的旱化,一些不耐旱的种群在群落中消退,比较耐旱的赖草在此类斑块中占据优势,形成以赖草为优势种的斑块;其他斑块为另一类,植被特征主要是以比较低矮的委陵菜和麻黄为主。

Abstract: 8 communities patches on salinization grassland were studied by the dominance, diversity and community characteristics.The purpose of this paper was reveal to the structure and variation of grassland community patches in the succession process, further provide the theoretical basis to grassland restoration and salinization grassland restoration. The results showed that the species composition and dominance of 8 community patches were more obvious different, the Margalef species richness index and Shannon-Wiener diversity index were significant different between the patchⅡ,Ⅲ and Ⅰ,Ⅳ,Ⅴ,Ⅵ,Ⅶ,Ⅷ (P＜0.01), the Simpson dominance index and Pielou uniformity coefficient were significant different between the patches Ⅱ,Ⅲ and Ⅵ,Ⅶ,Ⅷ(P＜0.01), the community similarity coefficients of the patch Ⅶ and Ⅷ, Ⅵ and Ⅶ, ⅣandⅤ were largest, respectively 0.956 7, 0.929 7, 0.903 4. There were two groups of community patches. Patch Ⅰ,Ⅱand Ⅲ were a groups, which soil moisture, bulk density, pH value and salinity were lower, the dominant plant is Leymus secalinus. With the drying of soil, some weak drought-resistant species disappeared from the community, while drought-resistant L. secalinus occupied dominant status in the group patches, there becomed community patches which dominant plant was L. secalinus. Others were in another group, the dominant plants were Potentilla anserina and Casuarina cunninghamiana.

中图分类号:

赵祥,谢开云,王妍君,董宽虎,朱慧森. 晋北盐碱化草地群落斑块的多样性[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(4): 51-60.

ZHAO Xiang, XIE Kai-yun, WANG Yan-jun, DONG Kuan-hu, ZHU Hui-sen. Study of patches community diversity on salinization grassland in north of Shanxi province[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(4): 51-60.

参考文献

[1] Taliaferro C M. Diversity and vulnerability of bermuda turfgrass species[J]. Crop Science, 1995, 35: 327-331.
[2] 辛晓平, 高琼. 放牧和水淹干扰对松嫩平原碱化草地空间格局影响的分形分析[J]. 植物学报, 1999, 41: 307-313.
[3] 辛晓平, 杨正宇, 田新智. 松嫩平原羊草草地斑块动态研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24: 656-661.
[4] 王国宏, 任继周, 张自和. 河西山地绿洲荒漠植物群落种群多样性研究Ⅰ生态地理及植物群落的基本特征[J]. 草业学报, 2001, 10(1): 1-12.
[5] 刘红玉, 吕宪国, 张世奎, 等. 三江平原流域湿地景观多样性及其50年变化研究[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(7): 1472-1479.
[6] 尚文艳, 吴钢, 付晓, 等. 陆地植物群落物种多样性维持机制[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(3): 573-578.
[7] Hernandez-Stefanoni J L, Dupuy J M. Effects of land-scape patterns on species density and abundance of trees in a tropical subdeciduous forest of the Yucatan Peninsula[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 255: 3797-3805.
[8] Chen J, Huang D M, Shiyomi M, et al. Spatial heterogeneity and diversity of vegetation at the landscape level in Inner Mongolia, China, with special reference to water resources[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 82: 222-232.
[9] 邓文洪, 高玮, 宋晓东. 破碎化次生林斑块面积及斑块隔离对大山雀繁殖成功的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2001, 12(4): 527-531.
[10] 郑家文, 丁平, 徐肖江, 等. 白鹇种群分布与栖息地斑块特征的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(5): 951-953.
[11] 孙贤斌, 刘红玉, 张晓红, 等. 斑块尺度湿地植物群落多样性的维持能力[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(3): 579-585.
[12] 蒙旭辉, 李向林, 辛晓平, 等. 不同放牧强度下羊草草甸草原群落特征及多样性分析[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(3): 239-243.
[13] 赵玉晶, 白云鹏, 韩大勇, 等. 松嫩平原环境破碎化后羊草斑块植物组成多样性的空间变化[J]. 草地学报, 2008, 16(2): 158-163.
[14] 林大仪. 土壤学实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2008: 66, 88, 162, 165.
[15] 任继周. 草业科学研究方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998: 16-28.
[16] 周国英, 陈桂琛, 赵以莲, 等. 施肥和围栏封育对青海湖地区高寒草原影响的比较研究Ⅰ群落结构及其物种多样性[J]. 草业学报, 2004, 13(1): 26-31.
[17] 李永宏. The change of plant diversity in Stipa grandis and Leymus chinensis grassland under influence of grazing[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica(植物学报), 1993, 35(11): 875-884.
[18] 杨利民, 韩梅, 李建东. 中国东北样带草地群落放牧干扰植物多样性的变化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2001, 25(1): 110-114.
[19] 侯继华, 周道玮, 姜世成. 蚂蚁筑丘活动对松嫩草地植物群落多样性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2002, 26(3): 323-329.
[20] Silvertown J W. Introduction to Plant Population Ecology (2nd. ed)[M]. London: Longman, 1987.
[21] 李以康, 林丽, 张法伟, 等. 嵩草草甸退化和恢复过程中主要牧草演替和地表特征变化[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(5): 179-185.
[22] 青秀玲. 典型草原主要植物繁殖特性的研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2002.
[23] 李文华, 王如松. 生态安全与生态建设[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2002: 98-103.
[24] Odum E P. Fundamentals of Ecology (3 edition)[M]. Philadeplphia: W. B. Sauders Company, 1971.
[25] Tilman D, Wedin D, Knops J. Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems[J]. Nature, 1997, 379: 718-720.
[26] 罗天相, 刘莎. 中度放牧干扰对草地生物多样性影响的思考[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007, 35(21): 6567-6568.
[27] 韩龙, 郭彦军, 韩建国, 等. 不同刈割强度下羊草草甸草原生物量与植物群落多样性研究[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(3): 70-75.
[28] 刘学录. 盐化草地景观中的斑块形状指数及其生态学意义[J]. 草业科学, 2000, 17(2): 50-52.
[29] Breemen N V, Finzi A C. Plant-soil interactions ecological aspects and evolutionary implications[J]. Biogeochemistry, 1998, 42: 1-19.
[30] Vinton M A A, Burke I C. Plant effects on soil nutrient dynamics along a precipitation gradient in Great Plains grasslands[J]. Oecologia,1997, 110: 393-402.
[31] 赵登亮, 刘钟龄, 杨桂霞,等. 放牧对克氏针茅草原植物群落与种群格局的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(3): 6-13.
[32] Wedin D A, Tilman D. Influence of nitrogen loading and species composition on the carbon balance of grasslands[J]. Science, 1996, 274: 1720-1723.
[33] Burke I C, Lauenroth W K, Vinton M A, et al. Plant-soil interactions in temperate grasslands[J]. Boigeochemistry, 1998, 42: 121-143.
[34] Angers D A, Caron J. Plant-induced changes in soil structure: processes and feedbacks[J]. Boigeochemistry, 1998, 42: 55-72.
[35] 王根绪, 沈永平, 钱鞠, 等. 高寒草地植被覆盖变化对土壤水分循环影响研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2003, 25: 653-659.
[36] 宋会兴, 苏智先, 彭远英. 渝东山地黄壤肥力变化与植物群落演替的关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2005, 16: 223-226.
[37] 苏永中, 常学向, 何志斌, 等. 祁连山典型流域谷地植被斑块演变与土壤性状[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(1): 212-219.