菊芋粕对泌乳奶牛的营养价值评定

草业学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (6): 264-269.

菊芋粕对泌乳奶牛的营养价值评定

赵芳芳¹,郑琛¹,李发弟^1,2,韩向敏^1*,郝正里¹

1.甘肃农业大学动物科学技术学院,甘肃兰州 730070;
2.甘肃省饲料工程技术研究中心,甘肃兰州 730000

收稿日期:2010-05-27 出版日期:2011-06-25 发布日期:2011-12-20
通讯作者: E-mail:min65@sina.com
作者简介:赵芳芳(1984-),女,山东济南人,硕士。E-mail:lainongdongke0344@126.com
基金资助:
“十一五”奶业国家科技支撑计划(2006BAD04A03)专项经费资助。

Nutritional evaluation of Helianthus tuberosus meal on lactating dairy cows

ZHAO Fang-fang¹, ZHENG Chen¹, LI Fa-di^1,2, HAN Xiang-min¹, HAO Zheng-li¹

1.Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
2.Gansu Feed Engineering Technology Research Center, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received:2010-05-27 Online:2011-06-25 Published:2011-12-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选用6头2～3胎泌乳中期健康荷斯坦奶牛,采用3×3有重复拉丁方试验设计,通过消化试验就菊芋粕对泌乳奶牛的营养价值进行评定。试验设3个日粮处理,处理1为基础日粮,处理2为菊芋粕替代15%基础日粮(干物质基础),处理3为菊芋粕替代30%基础日粮(干物质基础)。结果表明,菊芋粕风干样品中干物质、粗蛋白、粗脂肪、粗纤维、中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维、粗灰分、钙、磷和产奶净能分别为92.43%,12.98%,0.81%,12.67%,25.93%,21.44%,3.92%,0.27%,0.20%和 5.18 MJ/kg;菊芋粕对泌乳奶牛干物质消化率、粗蛋白消化率、中性洗涤纤维消化率、酸性洗涤纤维消化率分别为61.78%,73.21%,51.65%,61.14%,消化能和产奶净能分别为10.13和5.18 MJ/kg;3个处理组试牛产奶量和乳成分无显著差异(P>0.05),表明菊芋粕是一种营养价值略低但养分消化率较高的能量饲料。

Abstract: A 3×3 latin square design was used to determine the nutritive value of Helianthus tuberosus meal with six lactating Holstein dairy cows. 1) On an air dry basis, dry matter, crude protein, ether extract, crude fiber, nitrogen-free extract, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, calcium, phosphorus, and milking energy of H. tuberosus meal were 92.43%, 2.98%, 0.81%, 12.67%, 25.93%, 21.44%, 3.92%, 0.27%, 0.20% and 5.18 MJ/kg respectively. H. tuberosus meal was a poor energy feed for dairy cows. 2) The digestibility of dry matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber of H. tuberosus meal (on an air dry basis), were 61.78%, 73.21%, 51.65% and 61.14% respectively. The digestible energy and net energy were 10.13 and 5.18 MJ/kg. In three treatments the digestibility of compendium nutritive matters tended to decrease. H. tuberosus meal was higher in feed digestibility than the common meal and had no influence on dairy cows. 3) The addition of H. tuberosus meal to the dairy ration did not affect the production performance.

中图分类号:

S823.9⁺15

赵芳芳,郑琛,李发弟,韩向敏,郝正里. 菊芋粕对泌乳奶牛的营养价值评定[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(6): 264-269.

ZHAO Fang-fang, ZHENG Chen, LI Fa-di, HAN Xiang-min, HAO Zheng-li. Nutritional evaluation of Helianthus tuberosus meal on lactating dairy cows[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(6): 264-269.

参考文献

[1] 中国饲用植物志编辑委员会. 中国饲用植物志[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1989.
[2] 黄相国, 葛菊梅, 沈裕虎, 等. 青海高原菊芋开发研究述评[J]. 西北农业学报, 2004, 13(2): 35-38.
[3] 王凤, 高华援, 刘峰, 等. 功能性植物菊芋开发利用前景[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2008, (9): 8-9.
[4] 林晨, 顾宪红, 张名涛, 等. 新型绿色食品和饲料添加剂——菊粉[J]. 兽药与饲料添加剂, 2005, 10(1): 12-14.
[5] 王聪, 刘强, 董群, 等. 日粮补充苹果酸对牛瘤胃发酵和养分消化代谢的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(3): 224-231.
[6] 王磊, 刘志强, 杨菊清, 等. 日粮中添加丙烯酸对绵羊消化代谢的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(3): 148-154.
[7] 王加启.现代奶牛养殖科学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
[8] 杨胜. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 1999.
[9] 韩友文. Van Soest 饲草分析方案[J]. 饲料博览, 2004, (2): 48.
[10] 杨诗兴. 饲料营养价值评定方法[M]. 兰州: 甘肃人民出版社, 1982.
[11] 杨凤. 动物营养学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[12] 熊本海, 庞之洪, 罗清尧, 等. 中国饲料成分及营养价值表[J]. 中国饲料, 2009, (21): 30-33.
[13] 薛红枫, 孟庆祥. 奶牛中性洗涤纤维营养研究进展[J]. 动物营养学报, 2007, 19(增刊): 454-458.
[14] Nordfeldt S, Iwanaga I, Morita K, et al. Influence of crude fiber in the ration on efficiency of feed utilization by dairy cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1950, (33): 473-485.
[15] 王桂瑛, 毛华明, 文际坤, 等. 玉米的加工处理对饲料营养物质消化率的影响[J]. 饲料与畜牧, 2009, (8): 32-35.
[16] 张宏福. 动物营养参数与饲养标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998.
[17] 吴秋珏, 徐廷生. 饲粮中中性洗涤纤维的研究进展[J]. 饲料工业, 2006, 27(7): 14-16.
[18] Wang Z, Eastridge M L, Qiu X. Effects of forage neutral detergent fiber and yeast culture on performance of cows during early lactation[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2001, (1): 204-212.
[19] 刘强. 反刍动物营养调控研究[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2008.
[20] 李胜利. 饲料营养与牛奶品质[J]. 中国乳业, 2005, (5): 28-32.