3种鼠尾草属植物光合作用-光响应特性研究

草业学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 70-76.

3种鼠尾草属植物光合作用-光响应特性研究

张力文^1,2,钟国成¹,张利^1,2*,杨瑞武^1,2,丁春邦^1,2,周永红²

1.四川农业大学生命科学与理学院,四川雅安 625014;
2.四川农业大学作物基因资源与遗传改良教育部重点实验室,四川雅安 625014

收稿日期:2010-12-30 出版日期:2012-02-25 发布日期:2012-04-20
通讯作者: E-mail:zhangli@sicau.edu.cn
作者简介:张力文(1985-),男,湖北黄冈人,硕士。E-mail:zlw2008@yahoo.cn
基金资助:
四川省青年科技基金项目(08ZQ026-034)和四川省科技厅科技支撑项目(2008FZ0148,2008SZ0074)资助。

A study on photosynthesis and photo-response characteristics of three Salvia species

ZHANG Li-wen^1,2, ZHONG Guo-cheng¹, ZHANG Li^1,2, YANG Rui-wu^1,2, DING Chun-bang^1,2, ZHOU Yong-hong²

1.College of Biology and Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625014, China;
2.Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Resources and Improvement of Ministry of Education, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625014, China

Received:2010-12-30 Online:2012-02-25 Published:2012-04-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究丹参、宝兴鼠尾草和短唇鼠尾草光合作用-光响应特性,阐明其对环境光合特性的适应和生理响应,为丹参田间高产栽培技术、鼠尾草属野生植物资源的引种和保护提供理论依据。测定丹参、宝兴鼠尾草和短唇鼠尾草叶绿素含量,并利用LI-6400便携式光合仪研究其光合特性,同时运用直角双曲线模型、非直角双曲线模型和C₃植物光响应新模型对光响应曲线进行拟合比较研究。结果显示,3种鼠尾草属植物的叶绿素含量存在明显差异。其光响应曲线均符合C₃植物光响应新模型。丹参表观量子效率(AQY)、最大净光合速率(Pn_max)、光补偿点(LCP)均最低,分别为0.040 3,13.32 μmol/(m²·s),24.37 μmol/(m²·s);宝兴鼠尾草为最高;短唇鼠尾草居中。3种植物的净光合速率(Pn)、胞间CO₂浓度(Ci)、气孔导度(Gs)及蒸腾速率(Tr)对不同光合有效辐射(PAR)的响应均有一定程度的差异。C₃植物光响应新模型拟合的结果最好。丹参和宝兴鼠尾草不属于典型的阳性植物,短唇鼠尾草则更为耐荫。可以采取与玉米等高竿作物间作或套作,缓和蒸腾作用,以达到提高丹参净光合速率的目的。

Abstract: To provide basic data for wild plant resources protection and cultivation of three Salvia species, the photosynthetic characteristics of adaptation and physiological response are reported in this paper. Plant chlorophyll concentrations were determined by colorimetry. Photosynthesis characteristics were evaluated using a LI-6400 portable photosynthetic system and data were fitted with different models to investigate the photosynthesis-light response curves using SPSS 18.0. Chlorophyll contents of the three Salvia species were significantly different. Photosynthesis-light response curves of all 3 plants fitted the new photosynthetic light-response model. The apparent quantum efficiency (AQY), Pn_max and LCP of S. miltiorrhiza were 0.040 3, 13.32 μmol/(m²·s) and 24.37 μmol/(m²·s), respectively, and were the lowest of the three plants while those of S. paohsingensis were the highest. The light radiation net photosynthetic rate (Pn), intercellular CO₂ concentration (Ci), stomatal conductance (Gs) and transpiration rate (Tr) of the three species of Salvia showed different responses to the photosynthetically available radiation flux density (PAR). The new photosynthetic light-response model gave accurate values for the physiological parameters of S. miltiorrhiza, S. paohsingensis and S. brevilabra. Neither S. miltiorrhiza nor S. paohsingensis were typical positive plants, and the shadow resistance of S. brevilabra was good. Intercropping with tall crops such as corn was good for increasing the net photosynthesis rate of S. miltiorrhiza and for retarding transpiration.

中图分类号:

Q945.11

张力文,钟国成,张利,杨瑞武,丁春邦,周永红. 3种鼠尾草属植物光合作用-光响应特性研究[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(2): 70-76.

ZHANG Li-wen, ZHONG Guo-cheng, ZHANG Li, YANG Rui-wu, DING Chun-bang, ZHOU Yong-hong. A study on photosynthesis and photo-response characteristics of three Salvia species[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(2): 70-76.

参考文献

[1] 国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典一部[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2005: 52.
[2] Ji X Y, Tan B K, Zhu Y Z. Salvia miltiorrhiza and ischemic diseases[J]. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, 2000, 21: 1089-1094.
[3] 四川省医药卫生志编撰委员会. 四川省医药卫生志[M]. 成都: 四川科学技术出版社, 1991: 541.
[4] 杨在君, 缪金城, 张利, 等. 四川和重庆鼠尾草属植物的种类及药用资源[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2008, 19(4): 904-908.
[5] 叶子飘, 于强. 冬小麦旗叶光合速率对光强度和CO₂浓度的响应[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2008, 29(3): 33-37.
[6] 王秀伟, 毛子军. 7个光响应曲线模型对不同植物种的实用性[J]. 植物研究, 2009, 29(1): 43-48.
[7] 高鹤, 宗俊勤, 陈静波, 等. 7种优良观赏草光合生理日变化及光响应特征研究[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(4): 87-93.
[8] 韦兰英,曾丹娟, 张建亮, 等. 岩溶石漠化区四种牧草植物光合生理适应性特征[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(3): 212-219.
[9] Ueda Y S, Nishihara H, Tomita Y O. Photosynthetic response of Japanese rose species Rosa bracteata and Rose rugosa to temperature and light[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2000, 84: 365-371.
[10] 张宪政. 植物叶绿素含量测定——丙酮乙醇混合液法[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 1986, 3: 26-27.
[11] Thornley J H M. Mathematical Models in Plant Physiology[M]. London: Academic Press, 1976: 86-110.
[12] Ye Z P, Yu Q. A coupled model of stomatal conductance and photosynthesis for winter wheat[J]. Photosynthetica, 2008, 46(4): 637-640.
[13] 黄俊, 郭世荣, 吴震, 等. 弱光对不结球白菜光合特性与叶绿体超微结构的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(2): 352-358.
[14] 肖亚雯, 王康才, 杨磊, 等. 不同居群半夏光合及荧光动力学研究[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2009, 34(11): 1339-1342.
[15] 钱莲文, 张新时, 杨智杰, 等. 几种光合作用光响应典型模型的比较研究[J]. 武汉植物学研究, 2009, 27(2): 197-203.
[16] 李合生. 现代植物生理学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2002: 130-131.
[17] 董志新, 韩清芳, 贾志宽, 等. 不同苜蓿品种光合速率对光和CO₂浓度的响应特征[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(6): 2272-2278.
[18] 孙旭生, 林琪, 赵长星, 等. 施氮量对超高产冬小麦灌浆期旗叶光响应曲线的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(3): 1428-1436.
[19] 蒋高明. 植物生理生态学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2004: 65-66.
[20] 林保花, 刘金祥, 肖生鸿, 等. 粤西乡土香根草光合生理生态特征日动态分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(11): 2041-2045.
[21] 刘金祥, 陈伟云, 肖生鸿. 黑籽雀稗的光合生理特性研究[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(6): 254-258.