不同建植期人工草地优势种植物根系活力、群落特征及其土壤环境的关系

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以三江源区重度退化草地(“黑土滩”)作为对照试验,研究了6 年人工草地和10 年人工草地优势种植物－垂穗披碱草根系活力、植物群落数量特征、土壤理化特征、6 种土壤酶活性,分析人工草地优势种植物根系活力、群落数量结构与土壤微环境的关系。研究结果表明,6 年人工草地的禾本科植物生物量最大、豆科植物开始入侵;10 年人工草地的禾本科植物较6 年人工草地生物量降低,杂类草生物量最大,豆科植物大量入侵,开始出现莎草科植物;人工草地根层土壤理化性质明显发生变化,土壤含水量、有机质、全氮、速效氮、全磷和速效磷的含量提高,土壤容重、温度、pH值降低;6 年和10 年人工草地的蔗糖酶、碱性磷酸酶、蛋白酶、脲酶的活性提高,多酚氧化酶活性降低,过氧化氢酶活性变化规律不明显。植物群落特征与土壤含水量、有机质、速效氮、全磷和水解酶类正相关,与土壤容重、pH值、多酚氧化酶负相关;垂穗披碱草根系活力与土壤含水量、pH值、蛋白酶、碱性磷酸酶和多酚氧化酶活性负相关;垂穗披碱草根系活力变化的趋势是6 年人工草地高于10 年人工草地,土壤微环境的改变使得植物间对于土壤资源利用竞争增大,植物根系活力随群落物种组成、生物量的分配而改变。

Abstract: Three river source regions were contrasted with heavily degraded grassland (black soil patch) by studying, the root activity of Elymus nutans (the dominant species), plant community quantity characteristics, soil physicochemical properties and activities of six soil enzymes over six and ten years of artificial grassland. The relationship of root activity of the dominant species, community quantity structure and soil micro-environment of artificial grassland were analysed. The biomass of grass became the largest part of the plant community and legumes began to invade in six year old artificial grassland. The biomass of grass in ten year old artificial grassland was lower than that of the six year artificial grassland, in which the biomass of forbs became the largest component of the plant community. There was an immense invasion of legumes, and sedges also began to emerge. Soil physicochemical properties had marked changes in artificial grassland. Soil moisture, organic matter, total nitrogen, available nitrogen, total phosphorus and available phosphorus increased while soil bulk density, temperature and pH value decreased. The activities of invertase, alkali phosphatase, protease and urease of six year and of ten year artificial grassland increased but the polyphenol oxidase activity was reduced. The catalase activity was not obviously changed. Plant community characteristics were positively related to soil moisture, organic matter, available nitrogen, total phosphorus and hydrolysis enzymes whereas plant community characteristics were negatively related to soil bulk density, pH value and polyphenol oxidase. The root activity of E. nutans was negatively related to soil compaction, soil moisture, pH value, protease, alkali phosphatase, polyphenol oxidase. Analysis showed that the variation trend of root activity of E. nutans in 6 year artificial grassland was more than that in 10 year artificial grassland. The changes in soil micro-environment led to increasing plant competition for soil resource utilization. The root activity of plants changed with the different species composition and biomass distribution of the plant community.

中图分类号:

张莉,王长庭,刘伟,王启兰,李里,向泽宇. 不同建植期人工草地优势种植物根系活力、群落特征及其土壤环境的关系[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(5): 185-194.

ZHANG Li, WANG Chang-ting, LIU Wei, WANG Qi-lan, LI li, XIANG Ze-yu. Relationships of dominant species root activity, plant community characteristics and soil micro-environment in artificial grassland over different cultivation periods[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(5): 185-194.

参考文献

[1] 许中旗, 李文华, 鲍维楷, 等. 植被原生演替研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(12): 3383-3389.
[2] 刘兴元, 龙瑞军, 尚占环. 草地生态系统服务功能及其价值评估方法研究[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(1): 167-174.
[3] 黎与. 江河源区高寒草甸退化草地恢复与重建技术研究[J]. 草业与畜牧, 2007, 4: 30-32.
[4] 三江源自然保护区生态保护与建设编辑委员会.三江源自然保护区生态保护与建设[M]. 西宁: 青海人民出版社, 2007: 77-78.
[5] 刘纪远, 徐新良, 邵全琴. 近30年来青海三江源地区草地退化的时空特征[J]. 地理学报, 2008, 63(4): 364-376.
[6] 武高林, 任国华, 刘振恒, 等.黄河首曲湿地功能区“黑土型”退化草甸恢复改良[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 45(4): 48-52.
[7] 马玉寿, 尚占环, 施建军, 等. 黄河源区”黑土型”退化草地人工群落组分配置技术研究[J]. 西北农业学报, 2007, 16(5): 1-6.
[8] 马玉寿, 郎百宁, 李青云, 等. 江河源区高寒草甸退化草地恢复与重建技术研究[J]. 草业科学, 2002, 19(9): 1-5.
[9] 王炜, 刘钟龄, 郝敦元, 等. 内蒙古草原退化群落恢复演替的研究Ⅰ.退化草原的基本特征与恢复演替动力[J]. 植物生态学报, 1996, 20(5): 449-459.
[10] 欧阳克蕙, 王堃. 人工草地植被重建对退化红壤化学性质和酶活性的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2007, 29(3): 474-478.
[11] Fu B J, Chen L D, Ma K M. The effect of land use change on the regional environmental in the Yangjuangou Catchment in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1999, 54(3): 241-246.
[12] 魏学红, 孙磊, 武高林. 青藏高原东缘“黑土型”退化草甸人工草地改良的土壤养分响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(5): 153-168.
[13] 王长庭, 龙瑞军, 王启兰, 等. 三江源区高寒草甸不同退化演替阶段土壤有机碳和微生物量碳的变化[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2008, 14(2): 225-230.
[14] 关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1986.
[15] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所. 土壤理化分析[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1983: 62-107.
[16] 马克平, 刘玉明. 生物群落多样性的测度方法. I α多样性的测度方法(下)[J]. 生物多样性, 1994, 2(4): 231-239.
[17] 周本智, 张守攻, 傅懋毅. 植物根系研究新技术Minirhizotron的起源、发展和应用[J]. 生态学杂志, 2007, 26(2): 253-260.
[18] Aon M A, Colaneri A C II. Temporal and spatial evolution of enzymatic activities and physical-chemical properties in an agricultural soil[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2001, 18: 255-270.
[19] 岳中辉, 王博文, 王洪峰, 等. 松嫩平原西部盐碱草地土壤多酚氧化酶活性及其与主要肥力因子的关系[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(4): 251-255.
[20] 王庆仁, 李继云, 李振声. 植物高效利用土壤难容态磷研究动态及展望[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1998, 4(2): 107-116.
[21] Larson W E, Pierce F J. Conservation and enhancement of soil quality[A]. In Proc. of the Int. Workshop on Evaluation for Sustainable Land Management in the Developing World[C]. Bangkok, Thailand: Int. Board for Soil Res. and Management, 1991: 12.
[22] Cooperrider A. Conservation of biodiversity on western rangelands[A]. Van Wieren S E. Grazing and Conservation Management Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands[C]. South Texas: Development and Impl-ementation, 1991.
[23] 张庆费, 宋水昌, 由文辉. 浙江天童植物群落次生演替与土壤肥力的关系[J].生态学报, 1999, 19(2): 174-178.
[24] 邹厚远, 刘国彬, 王晗生. 子午岭林区北部近50年植被的变化发展[J]. 西北植物学报, 2002, 22(1): l-8.
[25] 侯扶江, 常生华, 于应文, 等. 放牧家畜的践踏作用研究评述[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(4): 784-789.
[26] 黄德青, 于兰, 张耀生, 等. 祁连山北坡天然草地地上生物量及其与土壤水分关系的比较研究[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 20(3): 20-27.
[27] Crist P J, Thomas W K, John O. Assessing land use impacts on bio-diversity using an expert system tool[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2000, 15: 47-62.
[28] 侯琼, 王英舜, 师桂花, 等. 内蒙古典型草原作物系数的试验研究[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 20(4): 34-41.
[29] 马玉寿, 郎百宁, 李青云, 等. 江河源区高寒草甸退化草地恢复与重建技术研究[J]. 草业科学, 2002, 19(9): 1-4.
[30] 文金花, 马玉寿, 施建军, 等. 利用草地早熟禾改建江河源区“黑土型”退化草地的研究[J]. 草原与草坪, 2006, (2): 41-45.
[31] 王长庭, 曹广民, 王启兰, 等. 三江源地区不同建植期人工草地植被特征及其与土壤特征的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(11): 2426-2431.
[32] 张庆费, 曲文辉, 宋永昌. 浙江天童植物群落演替对土壤化学性质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 1999, 10(1): 19-22.
[33] Acosta-Martinez V, Tabatabai M A. Enzyme activities in a limed agricultural soil[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2000, 31: 85-91.
[34] Frankenberger W T, Dick W A. Relationships between enzyme activities and microbial growth and activity indices in soil[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1983, 47: 945-961.
[35] Acosta-martinez V, Cruz L, Sotomayor-ramirez D, et al. Enzyme activities as affected by soil properties and land use in a tropical watershed[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2007, 35: 35-45.
[36] An S S, Huang Y M, Zheng F L. Evaluation of soil microbial indices along a revegetation chronosequence in grassland soils on the Loess Plateau, Northwest China[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2009, 41: 286-292.
[37] 王启兰, 王长庭, 刘伟, 等. 江河源区人工草地植物群落和土壤酶活性变化[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2010, 16(5): 662-666.