内蒙古不同草原类型土壤呼吸对放牧强度及水热因子的响应

草业学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 8-14.

内蒙古不同草原类型土壤呼吸对放牧强度及水热因子的响应

杨阳,韩国栋^*,李元恒,陈志芳,王成杰

内蒙古农业大学生态环境学院,内蒙古呼和浩特 010018

收稿日期:2011-11-25 出版日期:2012-06-25 发布日期:2012-12-20
通讯作者: E-mail:hanguodong@imau.edu.cn
作者简介:杨阳(1986-),女,内蒙古呼和浩特人,在读硕士。E-mail:Yangy_4342260@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(30860060)和国家公益性行业(农业)专项(200903060,201003019)资助。

Response of soil respiration to grazing intensity, water contents, and temperature of soil in different grasslands of Inner Mongolia

YANG Yang, HAN Guo-dong, LI Yuan-heng, CHEN Zhi-fang, WANG Cheng-jie

College of Ecology and Environmental Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China

Received:2011-11-25 Online:2012-06-25 Published:2012-12-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 土壤呼吸的测定对于预测不同生态系统碳收支起着关键性作用。本研究利用Li-8100开路式碳通量测定系统,对内蒙古荒漠草原、典型草原和草甸草原生态系统在不同放牧强度(零放牧的对照、轻度放牧、中度放牧和重度放牧)下土壤呼吸速率进行测定,并分析了土壤呼吸与土壤温度(10 cm处)和空气相对湿度的相关性。结果表明,草地类型、放牧强度及它们的交互作用都对土壤呼吸有显著影响(P<0.05),放牧强度对土壤呼吸的影响主要表现在荒漠草原和典型草原生态系统,对草甸草原没有显著影响。在不同草地生态系统中,随着放牧强度的增加,土壤呼吸速率呈先升高后降低的变化规律。方差结果显示,不同草原类型的土壤10 cm温度和空气相对湿度有极显著性的差异(P<0.001),不同放牧强度对土壤10 cm温度和空气相对湿度无显著性影响。

Abstract: Determination of soil respiration plays a key role in the assessment of carbon budgets in different ecosystems. Soil respiration rates under four different grazing intensities (no grazing, light grazing, moderate grazing and heavy grazing) were measured in desert steppe, typical steppe and meadow steppe in Inner Mongolia using a Li-8100 open circuit soil C Flux measuring system. Regression analyses were done between soil respiration and soil temperature (at 10 cm depth of soil), as well as soil respiration and air relative humidity. The grassland type, grazing intensity and their interaction had significant effects on soil respiration. The effect of grazing intensity on soil respiration was significant in desert steppe and typical steppe, but not significant in meadow steppe. In different grasslands, as grazing intensity increased, the soil respiration initially increased but then decreased. Variance analysis showed that there were significant differences in soil temperature at 10 cm depth of soil and in air relative humidity among different grassland types, but no differences were found between different grazing intensities.

中图分类号:

S812.29

杨阳,韩国栋,李元恒,陈志芳,王成杰. 内蒙古不同草原类型土壤呼吸对放牧强度及水热因子的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(6): 8-14.

YANG Yang, HAN Guo-dong, LI Yuan-heng, CHEN Zhi-fang, WANG Cheng-jie. Response of soil respiration to grazing intensity, water contents, and temperature of soil in different grasslands of Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(6): 8-14.

参考文献

[1] 李凌浩, 王其兵, 白永飞, 等. 锡林河流域羊草草原群落土壤呼吸及其影响因子的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24: 680-686.
[2] 陈四清, 崔骁勇, 周广胜, 等. 内蒙古锡林河流域大针茅草原土壤呼吸和凋落物分解的CO₂排放速率研究[J]. 植物学报, 1999, 41(6): 645-650.
[3] 崔骁勇, 王艳芬, 杜占池. 内蒙古典型草原主要植物群落土壤呼吸的初步研究[J]. 草地学报, 1999, 7(3): 245-250.
[4] Fang J Y, Wang W. Soil respiration as a key belowground process: issues and perspectives[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 2007, 31: 345-347.
[5] 陈海军, 王明玖, 韩国栋, 等. 不同强度放牧对贝加尔针茅草原土壤微生物和土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2008, 22: 165-169.
[6] 白哈斯. 不同放牧率对羊草+苔草低地草甸草地再生和净初级生产力的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2007, 24(6): 826-829.
[7] 鲍芳, 周广胜. 中国草原土壤呼吸作用研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(6): 713-726.
[8] 徐海红, 侯向阳, 那日苏. 不同放牧制度下短花针茅荒漠草原土壤呼吸动态研究[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(2): 219-226.
[9] 周萍, 刘国彬, 薛萐. 草地生态系统土壤呼吸及其影响因素研究进展[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(2): 184-193.
[10] 郭明英, 卫智军, 运向军, 等. 放牧对草原土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2011, 28(5): 729-736.
[11] 陈全胜, 韩兴国, 阎志丹, 等. 典型温带草原群落土壤呼吸温度敏感性与土壤水分的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(4): 831-836.
[12] 陈全胜, 李凌浩, 韩兴国, 等. 温带草原11个植物群落夏秋土壤呼吸对气温变化的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2003, 27: 441-447.
[13] 李博. 中国北方草地退化及其防治对策[J]. 中国农业科学, 1997, 30(6): 1-9.
[14] Xu M, Qi Y. Soil-surface CO₂ efflux and its spatial and temporal variations in a young ponderosa pine plantation in northern California[J]. Global Change Biology, 2001, 7: 667-677.
[15] 刘伟, 王继明, 王智平. 内蒙古典型草原植物功能型对土壤甲烷吸收的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(3): 275-283.
[16] Li L H, Han X G, Wang Q B, et al. Correlations between plant biomass and soil respiration in a Leymus chinensis community in the Xilin River Basin of Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 2002, 44(5): 593-597.
[17] Janssens I A, Lankreijer H. Productivity overshadows temperature in determining soil and ecosystem respiration across European forests[J]. Global Change Biology, 2001, 7(3): 269-278.
[18] Verburg P J, Arnone III J A, Obrist D, et al. Net ecosystem carbon exchange in two experimental grassland ecosystems[J]. Global Change Biology, 2004, 10: 498-508.
[19] Nadelhoffer K J. The potential effects of nitrogen deposition on fine-root production in forest ecosystems[J]. New Phytologist, 2000, 147: 131-139.
[20] Burton A J, Pregitzer K S, Hendrick R L. Relationships between fine-root dynamics and nitrogen availability in Michigan northern hardwood forests[J]. Oecologia, 2000, 125(3): 389-399.
[21] Wan S, Luo Y. Substrate regulation of soil respiration in a tallgrass prairie: Results of a clipping and shading experiment[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2003, 17: 1054, doi: 10.1029/2002GB001971.
[22] Bremer J D, Ham J M, Owensby C E, et al. Responses of soil respiration to clipping and grazing in a tallgrass prairie[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1998, 27: 1539-1548.
[23] 陶冶, 张元明. 3种荒漠植物群落物种组成与丰富度的季节变化及地上生物量特征[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(6): 1-11.
[24] 彭祺, 王宁, 张锦俊. 放牧与草地植物之间的相互关系[J]. 宁夏农学院学报, 2004, 25(4): 76-79.
[25] Atkin O K, Tjoelker M G. Thermal acclimation and the dynamic response of plant respiration to temperature[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2003, 8: 343-351.
[26] Fu S, Cheng W X, Susfalk R. Rhizosphere respiration varies with plant species and phenology a greenhouse pot experiment[J]. Plant and Soil, 2002, 239: 133-140.
[27] Xu L, Baldocchi D D, Tang J. How soil moisture rain pulses and growth alter the response of ecosystem respiration to temperature[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2004, 18, doi: 10.1029/2004GB002281.
[28] 周广胜. 土壤呼吸作用普适性评估模型构件的设想[J].中国科学, 2008, 38(3): 293-302.