不同添加剂和青贮密度对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响

doi:10.11686/cyxb2017161

草业学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 156-162.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2017161

不同添加剂和青贮密度对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响

王木川¹, 杨玉玺¹, 于奕东², 玉柱^{1, *}

1.中国农业大学动物科技学院,北京 100093;
2.鄂尔多斯市农牧业局,内蒙古鄂尔多斯 017000

收稿日期:2017-03-31 修回日期:2017-07-04 出版日期:2018-02-20 发布日期:2018-02-20
通讯作者: yuzhu3@sohu.com
作者简介:王木川(1992-),男,黑龙江牡丹江人,在读硕士。E-mail: muchuanwang@163.com
基金资助:
国家牧草产业技术体系(CARS-35),公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201303061),天津市农业科技成果转化与推广项目(201404040)和内蒙古自治区科技计划项目(苜蓿混合青贮调制技术研究与示范)资助

Interactions between additives and ensiling density on quality of Medicago sativa silage

WANG Mu-chuan¹, YANG Yu-xi¹, YU Yi-dong², YU Zhu^{1, *}

1.College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100093, China;
2.Erdos Office of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry, Erdos 017000, China

Received:2017-03-31 Revised:2017-07-04 Online:2018-02-20 Published:2018-02-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究以第二茬初花期刈割的紫花苜蓿为原料,晾晒至干物质含量在60%左右,针对影响苜蓿青贮品质的添加剂和青贮密度两个因素,设计两因素试验,分别在600和650 kg·m^-3青贮密度条件下添加植物乳杆菌(LP, Lactobacillus. plantarum)、乳酪乳杆菌(LC, Lactobacillus. casei)、蔗糖(S, sucrose)、纤维素酶(CE, acremonium cellulose)、LP+S、LC+S、LP+CE和LC+CE,以不添加作为对照。发酵45 d后进行开罐分析。结果表明,处理组S、S+LP和S+LC对于苜蓿青贮品质有一定的改善,这3个处理组的pH值、丁酸含量、NDF含量和ADF含量均低于对照组;添加CE、LP+CE和LC+CE对苜蓿青贮品质没有明显的改善;添加剂对苜蓿青贮品质有显著影响(P<0.05),青贮密度对苜蓿青贮品质没有明显改善,但对干物质含量和氨态氮占总氮含量有显著影响(P<0.05);两因素对苜蓿青贮品质的影响没有明显的交互作用(P>0.05)。

Abstract: Medicago sativa (alfalfa) was used to make silage, with and without addition of additives. Alfalfa plants were freshly harvested at the initial blooming stage, when their dry matter content was about 400 g·kg^-1 (fresh matter basis). The effects of additives and ensiling density on the quality of alfalfa silage were investigated in an experiment with eighteen treatment levels. The quality of silages was analyzed after 45 days of fermentation. The results showed that silage treated with S (sucrose), S+LP (sucrose+Lactobacillus. plantarum) and S+LC (sucrose+Lactobacillus. casei) had lower pH, butyric acid content, NDF neutral detergent fiber content, and acid detergent fiber content than silages without these additives. Treatments with CE (acremonium cellulose), LP+CE, and LC+CE did not significantly improve the quality of silage. Treatments with additives resulted in higher quality alfalfa silage than treatments without additives (P<0.05). Preparing silage with higher density did not significantly improve its quality but significantly increased its DM (dry matter) content and ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen ratio (P<0.05). The additive×density interaction was not a significant factor for silage quality (P>0.05).

王木川, 杨玉玺, 于奕东, 玉柱. 不同添加剂和青贮密度对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(2): 156-162.

WANG Mu-chuan, YANG Yu-xi, YU Yi-dong, YU Zhu. Interactions between additives and ensiling density on quality of Medicago sativa silage[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(2): 156-162.

参考文献

[1] Wang Y, Yu Z.Effects of different additives on fermentation quality of alfalfa silage. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2010, 32(5): 80-84.
王莹, 玉柱. 不同添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮发酵品质的影响. 中国草地学报, 2010, 32(5): 80-84.
[2] Li G Y, Fu T, Gao T Y.Influence of molasses and agro-byproducts additives on the quality of alfalfa silage. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2009, (2): 135-139.
李改英, 傅彤, 高腾云. 添加糖蜜和农副产品对苜蓿青贮品质的影响. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2009, (2): 135-139.
[3] Tian R X, An Y, Liang J F.Effects on additives on the quality of alfalfa silage. Grassland of China, 2005, 27(4): 10-14.
田瑞霞, 安渊, 梁金凤. 添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响. 中国草地, 2005, 27(4): 10-14.
[4] Zhang J G, Cai Y, Kobayashi R, et al. Charactrristics of lactic bacteria isolated from forage crops and their effects on silage fermentation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2000, 80(10): 1455-1460.
[5] Broderick G A, Derosa R, Reynal S.Value of treating alfalfa silage with fibrolytic enzymes proor to feeding the silage to lactating dairy cows. US Dairy Forage Research Center, 1997, 12: 81-85.
[6] Shao T, Ohba N, Shimojo M, et al. Dynamics of earlt fermentation of Italian Lyegrass silage. Asian Australisian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2002, 15(11): 1606-1610.
[7] Bolsen K K, Lin C, Brent A M F, et al. Effect of silage additives on the microbial succession and fermentation process of alfalfa corn silages. Journal of Dairy Science, 1992, 75(11): 3066-3083.
[8] Broderick G A, Kang J H.Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and amino acids in ruminal fluids and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Science, 1980, 63(1): 64-75.
[9] Zhang L Y.Feed Analysis and Forage Quality Detection Technology. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007: 53-56, 67-78.
张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术 . 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2007: 53-56, 67-78.
[10] McDonald P, Henderson A R. Determination of water-soluble carbohydrates in grass. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1964, 15(6): 395-398.
[11] Yu Z, Sun Q Z. Forage Silage Technology.Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2011: 8-10, 62-65, 121-122.
玉柱, 孙启忠.饲草青贮技术. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2011: 8-10, 62-65, 121-122.
[12] Xue Y L, Bai C S, Yu Z.Effects of different additives on the silage quality of alfalfa fibrous residues. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2007, 15(4): 339-343.
薛艳林, 白春生, 玉柱. 添加剂对苜蓿草渣青贮饲料品质的影响. 草地学报, 2007, 15(4): 339-343.
[13] Zeng Y, Xun S Q.Research progress of promoting silage additives. The Chinese Livestock and Poultry Breeding, 2011, (5): 73-76.
曾影, 郇树乾. 发酵促进型牧草青贮添加剂研究进展. 中国畜禽种业, 2011, (5): 73-76.
[14] Zhu H S, Dong K H.Effects of different additives on Medicago sativa silage quality. Grassland and Turf, 2009, (4): 40-44.
朱慧森, 董宽虎. 不同添加剂对苜蓿青贮品质动态变化的影响. 草原与草坪, 2009, (4): 40-44.
[15] Li X L, Wan L Q.Research progress on Medicago sativa silage technology. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2005, 14(2): 9-15.
李向林, 万里强. 苜蓿青贮技术研究进展. 草业学报, 2005, 14(2): 9-15.
[16] Yu G H, Xu Q F, Yu Z, et al. Effects of formic acid, sucrose and wilting on smooth brome silage. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2011, 33(1): 100-104.
于国辉, 许庆方, 玉柱, 等. 甲酸、蔗糖及晾晒对无芒雀麦青贮效果的影响. 中国草地学报, 2011, 33(1): 100-104.
[17] Liu H, Bu D P, Lü Z W, et al. Effects of wilting and additives on fermentation quality of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(5): 126-133.
刘辉, 卜登攀, 吕中旺, 等. 凋萎和不同添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响. 草业学报, 2015, 24(5): 126-133.
[18] Li J L, Zhang X Q, Yu Z, et al. Effects of moisture content and lactic acid bacteria additive on the quality of Italian ryefrass silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(6): 342-348.
李君临, 张新全, 玉柱, 等. 含水量和乳酸菌添加剂对多花黑麦草青贮品质的影响. 草业学报, 2014, 23(6): 342-348.
[19] Zhao M M, Yu Z.Effects of lactic acid bacteria and cellulase on Napier grass silage. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(1): 205-210.
赵苗苗, 玉柱. 添加乳酸菌及纤维素酶对象草青贮品质的改善效果. 草地学报, 2015, 23(1): 205-210.
[20] Fllya I, Muck R E, Contreras Govea F E. Inoculant effects on alfalfa silage;Fermentation products and nutritive value. Journal of Dairy Science, 2007, 90(11): 5108-5114.
[21] Lü J M, Chen M L, Hu W L.Effect of enzyme preparation on fermentation quality and nutrient value of corn silage. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2015, 41(7): 18.
吕建敏, 陈民利, 胡伟莲. 添加酶制剂对青贮玉米秸发酵品质和营养价值的影响. 中国畜牧杂志, 2005, 41(7): 18.
[22] Hristov A N.Effect of a commercial enzyme preparation on alfalfa silage fermentation and protein degradability. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1993, 42(3/4): 273-282.
[23] Jaster E H, Moore K J.Quality and fermentation of enzyme treated alfalfa silages at three moisture concentrations. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1991, 31: 261.

不同添加剂和青贮密度对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响

Interactions between additives and ensiling density on quality of Medicago sativa silage

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics