欢迎访问《草业学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

草业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 40-53.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2020236

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

社会资本对牧户参与草原生态治理意愿的影响——以甘南州黄河水源补给区为例

陈强强1,2(), 陈文娟3, 马亚飞1, 杨婕妤1, 杨清1   

  1. 1.甘肃农业大学财经学院,甘肃 兰州 730070
    2.甘肃省生态建设与环境保护研究中心,甘肃 兰州 730070
    3.甘肃农业大学理学院,甘肃 兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-26 修回日期:2020-07-29 出版日期:2021-05-21 发布日期:2021-05-21
  • 作者简介:陈强强(1979-),男,甘肃陇西人,教授,硕士。E-mail: jjglxy666@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省人文社会科学项目(20ZZ02);甘肃省社科项目(20YB058);甘肃省社科项目(19YB127);甘肃农业大学青年研究生指导教师扶持基金项目(GAU-QNDS-201705);甘肃农业大学学科建设专项基金(GAU-XKJS-2018-235)

Effect of social capital on herders’ willingness to participate in grassland ecological governance——A case study of the Yellow River catchment area in Gannan autonomous prefecture

Qiang-qiang CHEN1,2(), Wen-juan CHEN3, Ya-fei MA1, Jie-yu YANG1, Qing YANG1   

  1. 1.College of Finance and Economics,Gansu Agricultural University,Lanzhou 730070,China
    2.Gansu Research Center for Ecological Construction and Environmental Protection,Lanzhou 730070,China
    3.College of Science,Gansu Agricultural University,Lanzhou 730070,China
  • Received:2020-05-26 Revised:2020-07-29 Online:2021-05-21 Published:2021-05-21

摘要:

甘南黄河水源补给区是典型的生态系统脆弱区,其生态安全对黄河流域乃至全国生态安全具有重要的战略意义。牧户的主动参与和有力监督是草原生态保护的基础,基于188户牧户调研数据,运用双栏模型分析了社会资本对牧户参与草原生态治理意愿的影响,结果表明:1)牧户具有较高的草原生态治理参与意愿,但因“搭便车”心理,内在意愿转变为外在行为的动力不足,户均支付意愿金额为233.25~272.36元·年-1。2)干群交往对牧户草原生态治理参与意愿产生抑制作用,牧户信任正向影响草原生态治理参与意愿,平均边际效应为0.039,同时有利于集体治理行为的形成。非正式社会规范对牧户参与意愿具有显著的引导作用,边际效应为0.069,而社会参与对牧户参与意愿和支付意愿均产生抑制作用。另外,受限于资源依赖型生计,年长牧户和家庭决策者参与草原生态治理的意愿更高,其平均边际效应分别为0.036和0.084。牧民交往正向影响牧户支付意愿。3)党员身份对牧户草原生态治理参与意愿和支付意愿均具有显著的正向作用。家庭人口规模和年收入正向影响牧户草原生态治理支付意愿,同时家庭年收入负向影响参与意愿。因此,从草原生态文明价值体系培育,牧户信息网络共享平台建设,牧区党员培养与其模范作用发挥,牧户生计与增收渠道拓宽等方面提出增强牧户意愿的政策建议。

关键词: 社会资本, 草原生态治理, 参与意愿, 支付意愿, 双栏模型, 甘南州

Abstract:

The Yellow River catchment in Gannan Autonomous Prefecture is a typical ecologically fragile area, and its ecological security has important strategic significance for the Yellow River Basin and even the whole of China. Active participation and effective supervision are fundamental factors for rangeland ecological protection. In this study, the double-hurdle model and 188 survey datasets derived from herders were used to analyze the effect of social capital on herders’ participation in rangeland ecological governance of the Yellow River catchment in Gannan Autonomous Prefecture. The main findings were that: 1) Herders showed high willingness to participate in rangeland ecological governance, with a ratio of 88.3%. However, due to the ‘free riding’ mentality, there was little motivation to convert this willingness into actual behavior, and the amount that herders were willing to pay for rangeland ecological governance was only 233.25-272.36 CNY·yr-1·household-1. 2) The communication between cadres and the masses had a negative effect (P<0.10) on the willingness of herders to participate in rangeland ecological governance. Trust among herders not only positively affected their willingness to participate (average marginal effect of 0.039) but also benefited the formation of uniform collective governance behavior. Informal social standards actively guided herders’ willingness to participate (average marginal effect of 0.069). In addition, limited by their resource-dependent livelihood, older herders and family decision makers were more willing to participate than were other categories of herders (average marginal effect of 0.036 and 0.084, respectively). The communication among herdsmen positively affected their willingness to pay. 3) Party membership had significant positive effects on herders’ willingness to participate in, and pay for rangeland ecological governance. Annual family income had a significant positive impact on willingness to pay for, but not on willingness to participate. Finally, some policy recommendations are proposed to enhance herders’ willingness to participate in grassland ecological governance, including the development of a grassland ecological civilization value system, the construction of an information network sharing platform for herders, encouraging pastoral party membership and strengthening its role, and broadening the channels of herders’ livelihood and income.

Key words: social capital, grassland ecological governance, participation willingness, payment willingness, double-hurdle model, Gannan Prefecture