三江源区牧户生计资本对其生计策略的影响研究

doi:10.11686/cyxb2018784

草业学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (11): 12-21.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2018784

三江源区牧户生计资本对其生计策略的影响研究

吴廷美, 吴渊, 王多斌, 林慧龙^*

兰州大学草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室,兰州大学农业农村部草牧业创新重点实验室,兰州大学中国草业发展战略研究中心,兰州大学草地农业科技学院,甘肃兰州 730020

收稿日期:2018-11-19 出版日期:2019-11-20 发布日期:2019-11-20
通讯作者: *. E-mail: linhuilong@lzu.edu.cn
作者简介:吴廷美(1994-),女,四川凉山人,在读硕士。E-mail: wutm17@lzu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(71773003,31772666),中国工程院重点咨询项目“面向2035年的我国草地农业现代化发展战略研究”(纵20180093),中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(lzujbky-2019-kb28)和国家林业和草原局2019年度软科学项目“草原生态保护补助奖励政策的效应评估与决策建议”资助

Influence of herders’ livelihood capital on livelihood strategies in the Three-River Headwaters region

WU Ting-mei, WU Yuan, WANG Duo-bin, LIN Hui-long^*

State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Key Laboratory of Forage and Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture, Chinese Center for Strategic Research of Grassland Agriculture Development, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China

Received:2018-11-19 Online:2019-11-20 Published:2019-11-20
Contact: *. E-mail: linhuilong@lzu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 牧户作为三江源区自然资源利用的决策主体,研究其生计策略对于当地的生态保护具有重要意义。根据分层随机抽样的第一手调查资料,将牧户生计策略划分为纯牧型和多样型,运用二元Logistic模型实证分析了影响牧户生计策略选择的关键生计资本指标。结果表明:1)不同生计策略牧户的生计资本状况呈现出明显的差异,多样型牧户的生计资本状况优于纯牧户;2)草地面积、住房质量、家庭年收入、亲友圈是否有人担任干部和居住地到最近集市的距离,是影响三江源区牧户生计策略选择关键生计资本指标;3)三江源区牧户的生计活动方式和收入结构总体单一,即使是多样型牧户也并未脱离放牧为主的生计活动。以上述关键生计资本指标作为突破口,积极合理引导牧户选择有利于生态保护的生计策略或是今后三江源区生态环境改善的新方向。

关键词: 三江源区, 生态保护, 生计策略, 二元Logistic模型

Abstract: Herdsmen are the decision-making body of natural resource utilization in the Three-River Headwaters region. Therefore, studying their livelihood strategies is important for local ecological protection. This study was based on first-hand survey data from stratified random sampling. Herders’ livelihood strategies were classified as pure pastoral or diverse, and key livelihood capital indicators that affect the choice of livelihood strategies by herdsmen were analyzed using a binary logistic model. The results indicated that: 1) The livelihood capital status of herdsmen with different livelihood strategies showed significant differences, and diverse herders had better livelihood capital than pure herdsmen. 2) The key livelihood capital indicators affecting the choice of livelihood strategies of the herdsmen in the Three-River Headwaters region were grassland area, housing quality, annual family income, whether there were cadres in the circle of friends and relatives, and the distance from the place of residence to the market. 3) The livelihood activities and income structure of the herdsmen in the Three-River Headwaters region were single, and even diverse herders were not separated from grazing-based livelihood activities. Considering these key livelihood capital indicators, herdsmen can be actively and rationally guided to choose a livelihood strategy that is conducive to ecological protection. This represents a new direction for the improvement of the ecological environment in the Three-River Headwaters region in the future.

Key words: Three-River Headwaters region, ecological protection, livelihood strategies, Binary Logistic model

吴廷美, 吴渊, 王多斌, 林慧龙. 三江源区牧户生计资本对其生计策略的影响研究[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(11): 12-21.

WU Ting-mei, WU Yuan, WANG Duo-bin, LIN Hui-long. Influence of herders’ livelihood capital on livelihood strategies in the Three-River Headwaters region[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(11): 12-21.

参考文献

[1] Liu J X, Wang Q.Accounting methods esearch for ecological compensation standard in the Three-River Headwaters Region based on supply cost. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2017, 30(1): 82-90.
刘俊鑫,王奇. 基于生态服务供给成本的三江源区生态补偿标准核算方法研究. 环境科学研究, 2017, 30(1): 82-90.
[2] Yang H Z, Li H M, Zhang A L.Herdsmen’s perception about ecological degeneration of grasslands in the Three River Source Region, China. Arid Zone Research, 2016, 33(4): 822-829.
杨海镇, 李惠梅, 张安录. 牧户对三江源草地生态退化的感知. 干旱区研究, 2016, 33(4): 822-829.
[3] Li Z W, Wu R J, Ma Y P.Impact of climate change and human activities on vegetation productivity in the Three River Headwaters. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2016, 38(3): 804-810.
李作伟, 吴荣军, 马玉平. 气候变化和人类活动对三江源地区植被生产力的影响. 冰川冻土, 2016, 38(3): 804-810.
[4] Zhang Y, Zhang C B, Wang Z Q, et al. Quantitative assessment of relative roles of climate change and human activities on grassland net primary productivity in the Three-River Source Region, China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(5): 1-14.
张颖, 章超斌, 王钊齐, 等. 气候变化与人为活动对三江源草地生产力影响的定量研究. 草业学报, 2017, 26(5): 1-14.
[5] Xu X L, Wang L, Li J, et al. Analysis of the grassland restoration trend and degradation situation in the “Three-River headwaters” region since the implementation of the ecological project. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2017, 19(1): 50-58.
徐新良, 王靓, 李静, 等. 三江源生态工程实施以来草地恢复态势及现状分析. 地球信息科学学报, 2017, 19(1): 50-58.
[6] Zhang F F, Zhao X Y.A review of ecological effect of peasant’s livelihood transformation in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(10): 3157-3164.
张芳芳, 赵雪雁. 我国农户生计转型的生态效应研究综述. 生态学报, 2015, 35(10): 3157-3164.
[7] Koczberski G, Curry G N.Making a living: Land pressures and changing livelihood strategies among oil palm settlers in Papua New Guinea. Agricultural Systems, 2005, 85(3): 324-339.
[8] Cao G M, Long R J.The Bottleneck and its resolutions to the natural recovery of black soil type degraded grassland in the Three River Source Region. Acta Agrectir Sinica, 2009, 17(1): 4-9.
曹广民, 龙瑞军. 三江源区“黑土滩”型退化草地自然恢复的瓶颈及解决途径. 草地学报, 2009, 17(1): 4-9.
[9] Zhou L Z, Li D Q, Wang X L, et al. Sanjiangyuan Reserve’s rodent pests, their damage to frigid meadows and the control strategies. Journal of Anhui University (Natural Science Edition), 2002, 26(2): 87-96.
周立志, 李迪强, 王秀磊, 等. 三江源自然保护区鼠害类型、现状和防治策略. 安徽大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 26(2): 87-96.
[10] Li F, Zhu F J, Zhai Y H, et al. Estimating ecological compensation payments in the Three-River Headwaters Region based on environmental protection cost. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2017, 30(1): 91-100.
李芬, 朱夫静, 翟永洪, 等. 基于生态保护成本的三江源区生态补偿资金估算. 环境科学研究, 2017, 30(1): 91-100.
[11] Su F, Xu Z M, Shang H Y.An overview of sustainable livelihoods approach. Advances in Earth Science, 2009, 24(1): 61-69.
苏芳, 徐中民, 尚海洋. 可持续生计分析研究综述.地球科学进展, 2009, 24(1): 61-69.
[12] Meng J J, Amrulla, Liu Y, et al. Study on relationship between livelihood capital and livelihood strategy of farming and grazing households: A case of Uxin Banner in Erdos. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 49(2): 321-328.
蒙吉军, 艾木入拉, 刘洋, 等. 农牧户可持续生计资产与生计策略的关系研究——以鄂尔多斯市乌审旗为例. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 49(2): 321-328.
[13] Wei H L, Qi Y J.Empirical analysis of relationship between farmers’ livelihood capital and livelihood strategies: A case of Hexi Corridor closing area for protection of desertified land perimeter. Journal of Desert Research, 2016, 36(2): 540-548.
韦惠兰, 祁应军. 农户生计资本与生计策略关系的实证分析——以河西走廊沙化土地封禁保护区外围为例. 中国沙漠, 2016, 36(2): 540-548.
[14] Wang Q, Zong X, Wei H L.Selection of livelihood strategy of herdsman: A case study in Yellow River Source Region from Shaqu estuary to Maqu segment. Grassland and Turf, 2017, 37(3): 53-59.
王茜, 宗鑫, 韦惠兰. 牧户生计策略选择研究——以黄河源区沙曲河口玛曲段为例. 草原与草坪, 2017, 37(3): 53-59.
[15] Song L J, Sun Z B, Sun Q L, et al. Analysis of sustainable livelihoods of grassland herdsman: A case of Baingoin County in Northern Tibet. Acta Agrectir Sinica, 2015, 23(6): 1287-1294.
宋连久, 孙自保, 孙前路, 等. 藏北草原牧民可持续生计分析-以班戈县为例. 草地学报, 2015, 23(6): 1287-1294.
[16] Tang Q, Xu Y, Li Y.Assessment of farmers’ sustainable livelihoods and future strategies on the Loess Plateau: Based on a survey of 1076 farmers in Yan’an City in Shaanxi Province and Guyuan City in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. Progress in Geography, 2013, 32(2): 161-169.
汤青, 徐勇, 李扬. 黄土高原农户可持续生计评估及未来生计策略——基于陕西延安市和宁夏固原市1076户农户调查. 地理科学进展, 2013, 32(2): 161-169.
[17] Li F, Zhang L B, Xu Y D, et al. The contribution of ophiocordyceps sinensis excavations to farmers and herder’s income in Sanjiangyuan Region, China. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013, 23(11): 439-443.
李芬, 张林波, 徐延达, 等. 冬虫夏草采集对三江源区农牧民收入的贡献研究. 中国人口, 资源与环境, 2013, 23(11): 439-443.
[18] Wang C C, Yang Y S.An overview of farmers’ livelihood strategy change and its effect on land use/cover change in Developing Countries. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(6): 792-798.
王成超, 杨玉盛. 基于农户生计策略的土地利用/覆被变化效应综述. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(6): 792-798.
[19] Ellis F.Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. Journal of Development Studies, 1998, 35(1): 1-38.
[20] Glavovic B C, Boonzaier S.Confronting coastal poverty: Uilding sustainable coastal livelihoods in South Africa. Ocean and Coastal Management, 2007, 50(1/2): 1-23.

三江源区牧户生计资本对其生计策略的影响研究

Influence of herders’ livelihood capital on livelihood strategies in the Three-River Headwaters region

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	曹巍, 刘璐璐, 吴丹. 三江源区土壤侵蚀变化及驱动因素分析[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(6): 10-22.
[2]	林慧龙, 郑舒婷, 王雪璐. 基于RUSLE模型的三江源高寒草地土壤侵蚀评价[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(7): 11-22.
[3]	芦光新, 李宗仁, 李希来, 王军邦, 吴楚, 李欣, 张更兄, 孙乾, 李峰科, 郑慧美. 三江源区高寒草地不同生境土壤可培养纤维素分解真菌群落结构特征研究[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(1): 76-87.
[4]	杜加强, 贾尔恒·阿哈提, 赵晨曦, 房世峰, 刘伟玲, 阴俊齐, 袁新杰, 徐延达, 舒俭民, 何萍. 三江源区近30年植被生长动态变化特征分析[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(1): 1-12.
[5]	卢慧, 丛静, 刘晓, 王秀磊, 唐军, 李迪强, 张于光. 三江源区高寒草甸植物多样性的海拔分布格局[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(7): 197-204.
[6]	孙鹏飞，崔占鸿，刘书杰，柴沙驼，郝力壮，王迅. 三江源区不同季节放牧草场天然牧草营养价值评定及载畜量研究[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(12): 92-101.
[7]	张良侠,樊江文,邵全琴,唐风沛,张海燕,李愈哲. 生态工程前后三江源草地产草量与载畜压力的变化分析[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(5): 116-123.