Forage quality of maize (Zea mays) stover among different varieties

Abstract

Abstract: Maize stover is the important resource as forage. With technique of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy, forage quality traits such as in vitro dry matter digestibility(IVDMD), acid detergent fiber(ADF), neutral detergent fiber(NDF)and water soluble carbohydrate(WSC) of maize stover about 44 varieties were evaluated. The Results showed that there were significant differences in IVDMD, ADF, NDF and WSC among varieties. The four forage quality traits were almost accorded with normal distribution respectively. IVDMD ranged from 38.60% to 51.74%, ADF ranged from 27.01% to 35.67%, NDF ranged from 51.55% to 65.81% and WSC ranged from 4.69% to 12.21%. The coefficient of variation(CV)of WSC was the highest which was 23.59%. IVDMD was significantly and negatively associated with ADF and NDF, and positively associated with WSC. There was a significantly positive correlation between ADF and NDF. WSC was significantly and negatively associated with ADF and NDF. There were five elite varieties with high IVDMD and WSC and low ADF and NDF.

CLC Number:

TAI Shu-jing, ZHANG Ren-he, SHI Jun-tong, XUE Ji-quan. Forage quality of maize (Zea mays) stover among different varieties[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2009, 18(5): 80-85.

References

[1]王鹏文, 潘万博. 我国玉米发展现状和趋势分析. 天津农学院学报, 2005, 12(3): 53-57.
[2] 程序. 能源牧草堪当未来生物能源之大任. 草业学报, 2008, 17(3): 1-5.
[3] 李浩波. 秸秆饲料学. 西安: 西安地图出版社, 2002. 1-10.
[4] 张建国, 刘向东, 曹致中, 等. 饲料稻研究现状及发展前景. 草业学报, 2008, 17(5): 151-155.
[5] 杨伟光. 玉米高产育种研究. 玉米科学, 2006, 14(2): 10-12, 15.
[6] 白永新, 陈保国, 张润生, 等. 普通玉米品质育种的现状分析与综合评价. 玉米科学, 2003, 11(2): 50-53.
[7] 田清震, 张世煌, 李新海, 等. 玉米育种发展动态. 玉米科学, 2007, 15(1): 24-28.
[8] 白琪林. 青贮玉米秸秆品质性状遗传及其近红外测定方法的研究. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2005.
[9] 白琪林, 陈绍江, 戴景瑞. 我国常用玉米自交系秸秆品质性状及其相关分析. 作物学报, 2007, 33(11): 1777-1781.
[10] Adugna T, Trygve B, Frik S. The effect of variety on maize grain and crop residue yield and nutritive value of the stover. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1999, 79: 165-177.
[11] Tomas E, Mandebvu P, Ballard C, et al. Comparison of corn silage hybrids for yield, nutrient composition, in vitro digestibility, and milk yield by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 2001, 84: 2217-2226.
[12] Lauer J G, Coors J G, Flannery P J. Forage yield and quality of corn cultivars developed in different eras. Crop Science, 2001, 41: 1449-1455.
[13] Luis M, Burak R, Torrecillas M. Identifying inbred lines capable of improving ear and stover yield and quality of superior silage maize hybrids. Crop Science, 2002, 42: 365-372.
[14] Reddya B, Sanjana P, Bidinger F, et al. Crop management factors influencing yield and quality of crop residues. Field Crops Research, 2003, 84(1): 57-77.
[15] Ruiz O, Beltran R, Salvador F, et al. Nutritive value and forage yield of corn hybrids for silage. Agricultural Science, 2006, 40(1): 87-92.
[16] 邢廷铣. 农作物秸秆营养价值及其利用. 长沙: 湖南科学技术出版社, 1993.20-25.
[17] 闫贵龙, 陈绍江, 孟庆翔. 高油 647 玉米秸秆营养价值随籽粒成熟期的变化规律. 中国农业大学学报, 2005, 10(4): 102-108.
[18] 闫贵龙, 孟庆翔, 陈绍江. 高油298玉米秸秆的适宜收获期及其营养价值与其他品种玉米秸秆的比较优势. 畜牧兽医学报, 2006, 37(3): 250-256.
[19] 赵丽华, 莫放, 余汝华, 等. 收刈时间对不同品种玉米秸秆营养成分和干物质降解率的影响. 中国牛业科学, 2007, 33(4): 33-35.
[20] 唐启义, 冯明光. 实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统. 北京: 北京科学出版社, 2002.
[21] 刘淑云, 董树亭, 胡昌浩, 等. 玉米产量和品质与生态环境的关系. 作物学报, 2005, 31(5): 571-576.
[22] 陈世勇, 谭庆军, 赵荣芳, 等. 应用土壤无机氮测试优化青贮玉米氮素管理. 草业学报, 2008, 17(3): 156-161.
[23] Bediye S, Sileshi Z, Mengiste T. Tef (Eragrostis tef) Straw Quality as Influenced by Varietal Differences and Locations. Proc. 4th Annual Conference of Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP), ESAP, Addis Ababa, 1996. 145-152.