[1] Zhou X R, Guo Z G, Guo X H. The role of plateau pika and plateau zokor in alpine meadow. Pratacultural Science, 2010, 27(5): 38-44. [2] Li W F, Tang Z M. Environment and safety of Qinghai-Tibet railway. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2003, 3(3): 65-67. [3] Fan N C, Shi Y Z. A revision of the zokors of subgenus Eospalax . Acta Theriologica Sinica, 1982, 2(1): 183-200. [4] Melladoa M, Olverab A, Querob A. Dietary overlap between prairie dog ( Cynomys mexicanus ) and beef cattle in a desert rangeland of northern Mexico. Journal of Arid Environments, 2005, 62(3): 449-458. [5] Rosiere R E. An evaluation of grazing intensity influence on california annual range. Range Manage, 1987, 40(2): 160-165. [6] Zhang Y W, Han J G, Li Z Q. A study of the effects of different grazing intensities on soil physical properties. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2002, 1(4): 74-78. [7] Du Y G, Cao G M, Wang Q L, et al . Effect of grazing on surface character and soil physical property in alpine meadow. Journal of Moutain Science, 2007, 25(3): 338-343. [8] Harald S, Atle M, Gunnar A. Sleep grazing and rodent populations: Evidence of negative interaction from a landscape scale experiment.Oecologa, 2005, 143(3): 357-364. [9] Cui Q H, Jiang Z G, Lian X M, et al . Factors influencing habitat selection of root voles ( Microtus oeconomus ). Acta Theriologica Sinica, 2005, 25(1): 45-51. [10] Fan N C, Wang Q Y, Zhou W Y, et al . The relationship between the plateau zokor population and vegetation damage. Proceedings of Alpine Meadow Ecosystem Congress[C]. Beijing: Science Press, 1988: 109-115. [11] Zhang Y M, Liu J K. The biological characteristics of subterranean rodents and their roles in ecosystem. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 2002, 22(5): 144-153. [12] Wu R N, Su B D, Bai M L. The influencing of subterranean rodents in agricultural ecosystem. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2004, (6): 105-106. [13] Han T H, Zhang W G, Ding L S. Features of vegetation in Myospalax baileyi habitat. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 1999, 8(2): 43-49. [14] Zhang J, Ge Q Z, Zhang W G, et al . Correlations between vegetation properties and fitness of plateau zokor habitat. Pratacultural Science, 2011, 28(5): 836-840. [15] Li F X, Zhang D G. Indicators and recovery approaches of degenerated grassland in China. Grassland and Turf, 2005, (1): 24-28. [16] He J L, Zhang J S, Yang Y B, et al . The study patterns and characteristics of plateau zokor mound. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2006, 15(1): 107-112. [17] Wu J, Wang J C. Principle and advantages of RTK. China Investigation Design, 2009, (9): 52-53. [18] Mannetje L T. The dry-weight-rank method for the botanical analysis of pasture. Grass and Forage Science, 1963, 18(4): 268-275. [19] Jones R M, Hargreaves J N G. Improvements to the dry-weight-rank method for measuring botanical composition. Grass and Forage Science, 1979, 34(3): 181-189. [20] Gillen R L, Smith E L. Evaluation of the dry-weight-rank method for determining species composition in tall grass prairie. Journal of Range Management, 1986, 5(7): 283-285. [21] Barnes D L, Odendaal J J, Beukes B H. Use of the dry-weight-rank method of botanical analysis in the eastern Transvaal Highveld. Proceedings of the Annual Congresses of the Grassland Society of Southern Africa, 1982, 17(1): 79-83. [22] Friedel M H, Chewings V H, Bastin G N. The use of comparative yield and dry-weight-rank techniques for monitoring arid rangeland. Journal of Range Management, 1988, 41(5): 430-435. [23] Dowhower S L, Teague W R, Ansley R J, et al . Dry-weight-rank method assessment in heterogenous communities. Journal of Range Management, 2001, 16(6): 71-76. [24] Dekker B, Kirkman K P, Du Plessis S I. Use of the dry-weight-rank method of botanical analysis in semi-arid savanna communities. African Journal of Range and Forage Science, 2001, 18(1): 63-66. [25] Hughes L E. Grazing systems:more thoughts and observations. Rangelands, 2011, 33(1): 35-40. [26] Rajput B S, Bhadauria U P S, Rajput R L. Study on specific leaf area and its relation with leaf area, leaf dry weight and seed yield in Mung bean. Journal of Life Sciences, 2014, 11(1): 247-250. [27] Haydock K P, Shaw N H. The comparative yield method for estimating dry matter yield of pasture. Animal Production Science, 1975, 15(76): 663-670. [28] Lv Y Z, Li B G. Edaphology[M]. Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Press, 2006. [29] Zhou J W, Hua L M, Zuo S T, et al . Research progress in habitat selection of plateau zokor. Pratacul Tural Science, 2013, 30(4): 647-653. [30] Liu W, Zhou L, Wang X. Responses of plant and rodents to different grazing intensity. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 19(3): 376-382. [31] Wen L Y, Li Z F. The effects of disturbance on maintaining mechanism of species diversity. Journal of Northwest Normal University (Natural Science), 2006, 42(4): 87-91. [32] Huang B. The Relationship between Plateau Zokor and Vegetation, Soil Factors[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2014. [33] Wang Q Y, Zhou W Y, Wei W H, et al . The burrowing behaviour myospalax bailey and its relation to soil hardness. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 2000, 20(4): 277-283. [34] Liu W G, Li L X, Xie H R, et al . Effect of soil bulk density on root morphology and biomass of vetiver grass seedlings. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(4): 214-220. [35] Dai Q, Gu H J, Wang Y Z. Theories and models for habitat selection. Zoological Research, 2007, 28(6): 681-688. [36] Zhao Q S, Lou Y Q, Sun Y H. A review of statistical methods for evaluating animal habitat selection. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 2013, 48(5): 732-741. [37] Jin L R, Sun K P, He H S, et al . Research advances in habitat suitability index model. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2008, 27(5): 841-846. [38] Bellis L M, Navarro J L, Vignolo P E, et al . Habitat preferences of lesser rheas in Argentine Patagonia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2006, 15(9): 3065-3075. [1] 周雪荣, 郭正刚, 郭兴华. 高原鼠兔和高原鼢鼠在高寒草甸中的作用. 草业科学, 2010, 27(5): 38-44. [2] 李午峰, 唐祯敏. 青藏铁路的环境与安全. 安全与环境学报, 2003, 3(3): 65-67. [3] 樊乃昌, 施银柱. 中国鼢鼠( Eospalax )亚属分类研究. 兽类学报, 1982, 2(1): 183-200. [6] 张蕴薇, 韩建国, 李志强. 放牧强度对土壤物理性质的影响. 草地学报, 2002, 1(4): 74-78. [7] 杜岩功, 曹广民, 王启兰, 等. 放牧对高寒草甸地表特征和土壤物理性状的影响. 山地学报, 2007, 25(3): 338-343. [9] 崔庆虎, 蒋志刚, 连新明, 等. 田鼠栖息地选择的影响因素. 兽类学报, 2005, 25(1): 45-51. [10] 樊乃昌, 王权业, 周文扬, 等. 高原鼢鼠种群数量与植被破坏程度的关系-高寒草甸生态系统国际学术讨论会文集[C]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1988: 109-115. [11] 张堰铭, 刘季科. 地下鼠生物学特征及其在生态系统中的作用. 兽类学报, 2002, 22(5): 144-153. [12] 乌日娜, 苏布道, 白梦兰. 地下鼠对农业生态系统的影响. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2004, (6): 105-106. [13] 韩天虎, 张卫国, 丁连生. 高原鼢鼠栖息地植被特征. 草业学报, 1999, 8(2): 43-49. [14] 张军, 葛庆征, 张卫国, 等. 植被性状与高原鼢鼠栖息地适合度的关系. 草业科学, 2011, 28(5): 836-840. [15] 李凤霞, 张德罡. 草地退化指标及恢复措施. 草原与草坪, 2005, (1): 24-28. [16] 何俊龄, 张金沙, 杨莹博, 等. 高原鼢鼠土丘空间格局及主要特征研究. 草业学报, 2006, 15(1): 107-112. [17] 吴娇, 王军成. RTK工作原理及优缺点. 中国勘察设计, 2009, (9): 52-53. [28] 吕贻忠, 李保国. 土壤学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社出版, 2006. [29] 周建伟, 花立民, 左松涛, 等. 高原鼢鼠栖息地选择研究进展. 草业科学, 2013, 30(4): 647-653. [30] 刘伟, 周立, 王溪. 不同放牧强度对植物及啮齿动物作用的研究. 生态学报, 1999, 19(3): 376-382. [31] 文陇英, 李仲芳. 干扰对物种多样性维持机制的影响. 西北师范大学学报, 2006, 42(4): 87-91. [32] 黄彬. 高原鼢鼠种群密度与植被土壤因素的关系[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2014. [34] 刘晚苟, 李良贤, 谢海蓉, 等. 土壤容重对野生香根草幼苗根系形态及其生物量的影响. 草业学报, 2015, 24(4): 214-220. [35] 戴强, 顾海军, 王跃招. 栖息地选择的理论与模型. 动物学研究, 2007, 28(6): 681-688. [36] 赵青山, 楼瑛强, 孙悦华. 动物栖息地选择评估的常用统计方法. 动物学杂志, 2013, 48(5): 732-741. [37] 金龙如, 孙克萍, 贺红士, 等. 生境适宜都指数模型研究进展. 生态学杂志, 2008, 27(5): 841-846. |