A comprehensive evaluation of nutritional value of nine shrubs in the karst area of northwest Guizhou

doi:10.11686/cyxb20140511

Abstract

Abstract:

Shrubs are one kind of diet for goats and can provide energy, protein, minerals and multivitamins for grazing animals. Information about the feeding value off wild shrubs is useful to graziers. The mineral element content and nutritional value of nine shrubs in the karst region of northwest Guizhou were quantitatively analyzed and further evaluated using fuzzy membership function, grey correlation degree and cluster analysis methods. The mineral content of the nine shrubs was 0.56%-1.10% for Ca, 0.08%-0.21% for P, 0.26%-0.36% for Na, 0.7%-1.8% for K, 0.25%-1.00% for Mg, 0.03%-0.06% for Fe, 15.2-24.1 mg/kg for Cu, 76.5-114.0 mg/kg for Mn, 33.2-113.1 mg/kg for Zn, respectively. The nutritional value was 7.5%-17.1% for CP (crude protein), 7.8%-13.6% for WSC (water-soluble sugars, excluding of Elaeagnus pungens), 11.2%-26.5% for ADF (acid detergent fiber), 16.2%-45.1% for NDF (neutral detergent fiber), 5.9-7.9 MJ/kg for ME (metabolic energy) and 37.1%-49.4% for OMD (digestibility of organic matter), respectively. The results for mineral elements, for nutritional value and for comprehensive feeding value of nine shrubs were similar for fuzzy membership function value, grey correlation degree and cluster analysis. The ranking for mineral element content of the shrubs was Rubus corchorifolius and Cotoneaster horizontalis>Dendrobenthamia capitata and Salix cathayana>Elaeagnus pungens and Rosa mairei>Hypericum patulum, Buddleja officinalis and Pyracantha fortuneana, while the nutritional values was P. fortuneana>E. pungens>D. capitata>H. patulum, B. officinalis, S. cathayana, R. mairei, R. corchorifolius and C. horizontalis. The results of comprehensive nutritional value and cluster analysis showed that the feeding value of R. corchorifolius and C. horizontalis was excellent, D. capitata, S.cathayana, E. pungen, R. mairei and P. fortuneana was good, and H. patulum and B. officinalis was medium. When evaluating the feeding value of shrubs, their mineral elements, nutritional values, biologically active substances and the preferential feeding behavior of livestock should be considered.

CLC Number:

S816.15

SUN Hong,YU Ying-wen,MA Xiang-li,MU Xiao-ming,LIAO Jia-fa. A comprehensive evaluation of nutritional value of nine shrubs in the karst area of northwest Guizhou[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(5): 99-106.

References

Reference: 

[1] Wan L Q. Study on grazing and utilization of goats on a shrubland in the three Gorges region of Yangtz river[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2001.

[2] Huang F, Cao J H, Ding J F, et al. Analysis on the nutrients of fodder shrubs in Karst Area of Southwest Guizhou Province[J]. Tropical Geography, 2010, 30(3): 237-241.

[3] Yang Y X, Cai W X. Study on changing low of nutritive compositon of some major herbages in grassheath in Guizhou[J]. Grassland of China, 1994, (4): 54-58.

[4] People's Republic of China Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Department. China grassland resources[M]. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, 1996.

[5] He R, He L P, Wang Y X, et al. Nutrients and value in use of nineteen protein storage Leguminosae shrubs in Yunnan[J]. Yunnan Forestry Science and Technology, 2001, 97(4): 60-64.

[6] Xu Z G, Yuan G J, Du F L. Research progress on chemistry component of Rosa L. plant[J]. Hunan Guiding Journal of TCM, 2003, 9(5): 62-63.

[7] Meng X J, Liu B, Rezeng C D, et al. Progress of chemical constituents and pharmacology of Genus Rubus[J]. Natural Product Research and Development, 2011, 23: 767-775, 788.

[8] Zhang H Y, Pan J X. Advances in chemical composition and biological activity of plant Buddleja[J]. Foreign medicine (herbal Volume), 1995, 10(5): 195-200.

[9] Chen X. Medical elaeagnus genus in Sichuan and Chongqing[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2001, 24(2): 40-42.

[10] Xiao Z Y, Mu Q. Advances on chemical investigation of Hypericum[J]. Natural Product Research and Development, 2007, 19: 344-355.

[11] Chen Q, Li Z, Sun M. Research advance in pyracantha and rosa I. of rosaceae[J]. Food Engineering, 2011, (3): 11-13, 51.

[12] Jing D B, Li P J, Kou Z W, et al. The exploration, manufacture and application of feeding xylophyta resources[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2003, 12(2): 7-13.

[13] Wang C H, Song L T. Fuzzy theory methodology[M]. Beijing: China Architectural Press, 1988.

[14] Deng J L. The basic method of gray system[M]. Wuhan: Huazhong University Press, 1987

[15] Zheng W, Zhu J Z, Jia N E G L. A comprehensive evaluation of the productive performance of legume-grass mixtures under different mixed sowing patterns[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(6): 242-251.

[16] Yang S. Feed Analysis and feed quality detection technology[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 1999.

[17] Gansu Agricultural University. Grassland ecological chemistry experiment guide book[M]. Beijing: Agricultural Press, 1987.

[18] Rohweder D A, Barnes R F, Jorgensen N. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 1978, 47(3): 747-759. 

[19] Maike T N P, Aide H Z P A, Gelin H F J F D. Animal nutrition[M]. Zhao Y B, Hu L H, Translate. Lanzhou: Gansu Ethnic Publishing House, 1992. 

[20] Yang F. Animal nutrition[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1993.

[21] Grace N D. The Mineral Requirements of Grazing Ruminants[M]. Hamilton: New Zealand Society of Animal Production, Occasional Publication No 9, 1983. 

[22] Zhao Y G, Hong Q H, Xie P, et al. The nutritional value evaluation of artificial grassland in karst region in Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(1): 1-9.

[23] Yu Y W, Fraser M D, Evans J G. Long-term effects on sward composition and animal performance of reducing fertiliser inputs to upland permanent pasture[J]. Grass and Forage Science, 2011, 66: 138-151.

[24] Jia J, Zhang J, Yang L. Analysis of volatile components and fatty acids in seeds of cotoneaster multiflorus by GC-MS[J]. Helongjiang Medicine Journal, 2010, 23(2): 167-169.

参考文献：

[1] 万里强. 长江三峡地区灌丛草地山羊放牧利用研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2001.

[2] 黄芬, 曹建华, 丁俊峰, 等. 黔西南岩溶区饲料灌木营养元素分析[J]. 热带地理, 2010, 30（3）: 237-241.

[3] 杨泽新, 蔡维湘. 贵州灌丛草地几种常见灌木和草本类牧草营养成分含量变化规律研究[J]. 中国草地, 1994, （4）: 54-58.

[4] 中华人民共和国农业部畜牧兽医司. 中国草地资源[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1996.

[5] 何蓉, 和丽萍, 王懿祥, 等. 云南19 种豆科蛋白饲料灌木的营养成分及利用价值[J]. 云南林业科技, 2001, 97（4）: 60-64.

[6] 徐治国, 袁干军, 杜方麓. 蔷薇属植物的化学成分研究概况[J]. 湖南中医药导报, 2003, 9（5）: 62-63.

[7] 孟祥娟, 刘斌, 热增才旦, 等. 悬钩子属植物化学成分及药理活性研究进展[J]. 天然产物研究与开发, 2011, 23: 767-775, 788.

[8] 张虎翼, 潘竞先. 醉鱼草属植物化学成分及生物活性研究进展[J]. 国外医药·植物药分册, 1995, 10（5）: 195-200.

[9] 陈新. 川渝地区胡颓子属药用植物资源研究[J]. 成都中医药大学学报, 2001, 24（2）: 40-42.

[10] 肖志勇, 穆青. 金丝桃属植物化学成分研究进展[J]. 天然产物研究与开发, 2007, 19: 344-355.

[11] 陈青, 李祝, 孙媚. 蔷薇科火棘属和蔷薇属植物研究进展[J]. 食品工程, 2011, （3）: 11-13, 51.

[12] 靖德兵, 李培军, 寇振武, 等. 木本饲用植物资源的开发及生产应用研究[J]. 草业学报, 2003, 12（2）: 7-13.

[13] 王彩华, 宋连天. 模糊论方法学[M]. 北京: 中国建筑出版社, 1988.

[14] 邓聚龙. 灰色系统基本方法[M]. 武汉: 华中理工大学出版社, 1987

[15] 郑伟, 朱进忠, 加娜尔古丽. 不同混播方式豆禾混播草地生产性能的综合评价[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21（6）: 242-251.

[16] 杨胜. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 1999.

[17] 甘肃农业大学. 草原生态化学实验指导书[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1987.

[18] Rohweder D A, Barnes R F, Jorgensen N. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 1978, 47(3): 747-759. 

[19] 麦克唐纳 P, 爱德华兹 P A, 格林霍夫 J F D. 动物营养学[M]. 赵义斌, 胡令浩, 译. 兰州: 甘肃民族出版社, 1992. 

[20] 杨凤. 动物营养学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1993.

[21] Grace N D. The Mineral Requirements of Grazing Ruminants[M]. Hamilton: New Zealand Society of Animal Production, Occasional Publication No 9, 1983. 

[22] 赵彦光, 洪琼花, 谢萍, 等. 云贵高原石漠化地区人工草场营养价值评价研究[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21（1）: 1-9.

[23] Yu Y W, Fraser M D, Evans J G. Long-term effects on sward composition and animal performance of reducing fertiliser inputs to upland permanent pasture[J]. Grass and Forage Science, 2011, 66: 138-151.

[24] 贾佳, 张晶, 杨磊. 水栒子种仁挥发性成分和脂肪酸的GC-MS分析[J]. 黑龙江医药, 2010, 23（2）: 167-169.