Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12): 27-37.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2020034
Previous Articles Next Articles
Jiao-jiao QIANG(), Zhe-hao YAN, Yun CHEN(), Bing-hui HE, Han TANG, Xiao-hong LIU
Received:
2020-01-20
Revised:
2020-04-20
Online:
2020-12-28
Published:
2020-12-28
Contact:
Yun CHEN
Jiao-jiao QIANG, Zhe-hao YAN, Yun CHEN, Bing-hui HE, Han TANG, Xiao-hong LIU. Factors affecting the shear strength of root-soil complexes from three types of grass hedgerows in a karst area[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(12): 27-37.
草类 Types of grass | 种植方式 Method of placement | 篱带规格 Hedgerow specification | 播种(移栽)密度 Seeding (transplanting) density | 移栽时情况 Status of transplanting | 出苗/成活率 Emergence (survival) rate (%) | 播种(移栽)时间Seeding (transplanting) time | 采样时间Sampling time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
长Length (m) | 宽Width (cm) | |||||||
二月兰 O. violaceus | 撒播Broadcast sowing | 200 | 20 | 0.003 kg·m-2 | - | ≈66 | 2018-10 | 2019-01 |
光叶苕子 V. rothvar | 撒播Broadcast sowing | 200 | 20 | 0.004 kg·m-2 | - | ≈75 | 2018-10 | 2019-01 |
沿阶草 O. bodinieri | 移栽Transplant | 200 | 30 | 4行,每株间距约10 cm。 Four rows, about 10 cm each. | 株高约为5 cm,地径约0.8 cm,冠幅约为7 cm。 The plant height is about 5 cm, the ground diameter is about 0.8 cm, the crown width about 7 cm. | ≈90 | 2018-07 | 2019-01 |
Table 1 Basic information on hedgerow placement
草类 Types of grass | 种植方式 Method of placement | 篱带规格 Hedgerow specification | 播种(移栽)密度 Seeding (transplanting) density | 移栽时情况 Status of transplanting | 出苗/成活率 Emergence (survival) rate (%) | 播种(移栽)时间Seeding (transplanting) time | 采样时间Sampling time | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
长Length (m) | 宽Width (cm) | |||||||
二月兰 O. violaceus | 撒播Broadcast sowing | 200 | 20 | 0.003 kg·m-2 | - | ≈66 | 2018-10 | 2019-01 |
光叶苕子 V. rothvar | 撒播Broadcast sowing | 200 | 20 | 0.004 kg·m-2 | - | ≈75 | 2018-10 | 2019-01 |
沿阶草 O. bodinieri | 移栽Transplant | 200 | 30 | 4行,每株间距约10 cm。 Four rows, about 10 cm each. | 株高约为5 cm,地径约0.8 cm,冠幅约为7 cm。 The plant height is about 5 cm, the ground diameter is about 0.8 cm, the crown width about 7 cm. | ≈90 | 2018-07 | 2019-01 |
草类 Types of grass | 坡位 Slope position | 根长 Root length (cm) | 根表面积 Root surface area(cm2) | 根体积 Root volume(cm3) | 纤维素 Cellulose (%) | 半纤维素 Hemicellulose (%) | 木质素 Lignin (%) | 木纤比 Wood fiber ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
二月兰 O.violaceus | 上坡Up | 208.59±83.62Aa | 28.67±4.98Ab | 0.46±0.10Ab | 0.27±0.03Bc | 0.55±0.07Aa | 0.17±0.01Aa | 0.65±0.07Aa |
中坡Mid | 304.95±81.32Ab | 40.84±12.09Ab | 0.49±0.44Ab | 0.37±0.02Aa | 0.34±0.06Ba | 0.15±0.01Ab | 0.40±0.02Ba | |
下坡Down | 297.86±82.54Aa | 42.05±12.73Ab | 0.32±0.04Ab | 0.37±0.04Aab | 0.28±0.01Ba | 0.16±0.01Aa | 0.39±0.09Ba | |
光叶苕子 V. rothvar | 上坡Up | 274.84±87.67Ba | 38.76±14.43Ab | 0.32±0.05Bb | 0.34±0.04Ab | 0.45±0.03Ab | 0.16±0.01Ba | 0.47±0.04Ab |
中坡Mid | 680.99±79.51Aa | 55.91±15.61Ab | 0.46±0.03Ab | 0.44±0.06Aa | 0.38±0.04Ba | 0.21±0.01Aa | 0.48±0.08Aa | |
下坡Down | 369.79±63.91Ba | 42.06±6.00Ab | 0.40±0.04Ab | 0.42±0.05Aa | 0.42±0.03ABa | 0.18±0.01Ba | 0.42±0.03Aa | |
沿阶草 O.bodinieri | 上坡Up | 276.47±75.01Aa | 65.95±3.36Ba | 1.25±0.67Ba | 0.43±0.02Aa | 0.41±0.03Ab | 0.18±0.03Aa | 0.41±0.08Ab |
中坡Mid | 439.23±120.49Ab | 94.97±5.69Aa | 2.33±0.40Aa | 0.44±0.21Aa | 0.36±0.13Aa | 0.18±0.04Aab | 0.46±0.18Aa | |
下坡Down | 261.22±114.52Aa | 74.19±9.15Ba | 1.49±0.21ABa | 0.23±0.11Ab | 0.28±0.18Aa | 0.18±0.04Aa | 0.93±0.51Aa |
Table 2 Root morphology and chemical composition characteristics of three grasses hedgerow root-soil complex
草类 Types of grass | 坡位 Slope position | 根长 Root length (cm) | 根表面积 Root surface area(cm2) | 根体积 Root volume(cm3) | 纤维素 Cellulose (%) | 半纤维素 Hemicellulose (%) | 木质素 Lignin (%) | 木纤比 Wood fiber ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
二月兰 O.violaceus | 上坡Up | 208.59±83.62Aa | 28.67±4.98Ab | 0.46±0.10Ab | 0.27±0.03Bc | 0.55±0.07Aa | 0.17±0.01Aa | 0.65±0.07Aa |
中坡Mid | 304.95±81.32Ab | 40.84±12.09Ab | 0.49±0.44Ab | 0.37±0.02Aa | 0.34±0.06Ba | 0.15±0.01Ab | 0.40±0.02Ba | |
下坡Down | 297.86±82.54Aa | 42.05±12.73Ab | 0.32±0.04Ab | 0.37±0.04Aab | 0.28±0.01Ba | 0.16±0.01Aa | 0.39±0.09Ba | |
光叶苕子 V. rothvar | 上坡Up | 274.84±87.67Ba | 38.76±14.43Ab | 0.32±0.05Bb | 0.34±0.04Ab | 0.45±0.03Ab | 0.16±0.01Ba | 0.47±0.04Ab |
中坡Mid | 680.99±79.51Aa | 55.91±15.61Ab | 0.46±0.03Ab | 0.44±0.06Aa | 0.38±0.04Ba | 0.21±0.01Aa | 0.48±0.08Aa | |
下坡Down | 369.79±63.91Ba | 42.06±6.00Ab | 0.40±0.04Ab | 0.42±0.05Aa | 0.42±0.03ABa | 0.18±0.01Ba | 0.42±0.03Aa | |
沿阶草 O.bodinieri | 上坡Up | 276.47±75.01Aa | 65.95±3.36Ba | 1.25±0.67Ba | 0.43±0.02Aa | 0.41±0.03Ab | 0.18±0.03Aa | 0.41±0.08Ab |
中坡Mid | 439.23±120.49Ab | 94.97±5.69Aa | 2.33±0.40Aa | 0.44±0.21Aa | 0.36±0.13Aa | 0.18±0.04Aab | 0.46±0.18Aa | |
下坡Down | 261.22±114.52Aa | 74.19±9.15Ba | 1.49±0.21ABa | 0.23±0.11Ab | 0.28±0.18Aa | 0.18±0.04Aa | 0.93±0.51Aa |
抗剪指标 Shear index | 草类 Types of grass | 自然含水率 Natural moisture content | 土壤容重 Soil bulk density | 毛管孔隙度 Capillary porosity | 有机质 Organic matter | 根长 Root length | 根表面积 Root surface area | 根体积 Root volume | 纤维素 Cellulose | 半纤维素 Hemicellulose | 木质素 Lignin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
黏聚力 Cohesive strength | 二月兰O.violaceus | 0.07 | -0.52 | -0.31 | 0.32 | 0.92** | 0.82** | 0.18 | 0.47 | -0.52 | -0.36 |
光叶苕子V. rothvar | -0.19 | 0.09 | -0.54 | 0.91** | 0.99** | 0.80* | 0.66 | 0.72* | -0.56 | 0.86** | |
沿阶草O.bodinieri | -0.05 | -0.07 | 0.02 | 0.83** | 0.85** | 0.94** | 0.85** | 0.11 | -0.24 | 0.11 | |
内摩擦角 Internal friction angle | 二月兰O.violaceus | -0.18 | 0.20 | -0.22 | 0.46 | 0.39 | 0.16 | 0.30 | 0.13 | -0.46 | -0.44 |
光叶苕子V. rothvar | 0.48 | -0.23 | 0.57 | -0.34 | -0.57 | -0.79* | -0.05 | -0.44 | 0.20 | -0.25 | |
沿阶草O.bodinieri | -0.60 | -0.03 | -0.56 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.31 | 0.38 | 0.77* | 0.36 | 0.04 | |
平均抗剪强度 Average shear strength | 二月兰O.violaceus | -0.23 | 0.48 | -0.08 | 0.52 | 0.06 | -0.07 | 0.38 | 0.04 | -0.23 | -0.33 |
光叶苕子V. rothvar | 0.46 | -0.20 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.06 | -0.40 | 0.45 | -0.02 | -0.22 | 0.36 | |
沿阶草O.bodinieri | -0.63 | 0.09 | -0.57 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.47 | 0.61 | 0.69* | 0.27 | 0.13 |
Table 3 Correlation between shear strength indexes and influencing factors of three kinds of hedgerow root-soil complex
抗剪指标 Shear index | 草类 Types of grass | 自然含水率 Natural moisture content | 土壤容重 Soil bulk density | 毛管孔隙度 Capillary porosity | 有机质 Organic matter | 根长 Root length | 根表面积 Root surface area | 根体积 Root volume | 纤维素 Cellulose | 半纤维素 Hemicellulose | 木质素 Lignin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
黏聚力 Cohesive strength | 二月兰O.violaceus | 0.07 | -0.52 | -0.31 | 0.32 | 0.92** | 0.82** | 0.18 | 0.47 | -0.52 | -0.36 |
光叶苕子V. rothvar | -0.19 | 0.09 | -0.54 | 0.91** | 0.99** | 0.80* | 0.66 | 0.72* | -0.56 | 0.86** | |
沿阶草O.bodinieri | -0.05 | -0.07 | 0.02 | 0.83** | 0.85** | 0.94** | 0.85** | 0.11 | -0.24 | 0.11 | |
内摩擦角 Internal friction angle | 二月兰O.violaceus | -0.18 | 0.20 | -0.22 | 0.46 | 0.39 | 0.16 | 0.30 | 0.13 | -0.46 | -0.44 |
光叶苕子V. rothvar | 0.48 | -0.23 | 0.57 | -0.34 | -0.57 | -0.79* | -0.05 | -0.44 | 0.20 | -0.25 | |
沿阶草O.bodinieri | -0.60 | -0.03 | -0.56 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.31 | 0.38 | 0.77* | 0.36 | 0.04 | |
平均抗剪强度 Average shear strength | 二月兰O.violaceus | -0.23 | 0.48 | -0.08 | 0.52 | 0.06 | -0.07 | 0.38 | 0.04 | -0.23 | -0.33 |
光叶苕子V. rothvar | 0.46 | -0.20 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.06 | -0.40 | 0.45 | -0.02 | -0.22 | 0.36 | |
沿阶草O.bodinieri | -0.63 | 0.09 | -0.57 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.47 | 0.61 | 0.69* | 0.27 | 0.13 |
1 | Fabio C N, Romain D, Fritz S, et al. Bedrock bedding, 1andsliding and erosional budgets in the Central European Alps. Terra Nova, 2015, 27(5): 370-378. |
2 | Li X K, He C X, Jiang Z C. Method and principles of ecological rehabilitation and reconstruction in fragile karst ecosystem. Carsologica Sinica, 2003, 22(1): 12-17. |
李先琨, 何成新, 蒋忠诚. 岩溶脆弱生态区生态恢复、重建的原理与方法. 中国岩溶, 2003, 22(1): 12-17. | |
3 | Aerts R, Maes W, November E, et al. Surface runoff and seed trapping efficiency of shrubs in a regenerating semiarid woodland in northern Ethiopia. Catena, 2006, 65: 61-70. |
4 | Endo T, Tsuruta T. The effect of tree roots upon the shearing strength of soil //Forestry and forest products research institute. annual report of the hokkaido branch, forest place experimental station. Sapporo, Japan: Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, 1969. |
5 | Bischetti G B, Chiaradia E A, Simonato T, et al. Root strength and root area ratio of forest species in Lombardy (Northern Italy). Plant and Soil, 2005, 278(1/2): 11-22. |
6 | Mao Z, Yang M, Bourrier F, et al. Evaluation of root reinforcement models using numerical modelling approaches. Plant and Soil, 2014, 381(1/2): 249-270. |
7 | Bourrier F, Kneib F, Chareyre B, et al. Discretemodeling of granular soils reinforcement by plant roots. Ecological Engineering, 2013, 61(Part C): 646-657. |
8 | Liu C Y, Hu X S, Dou Z N, et al. Shear strength tests of the root soil composite system of alpine grassland vegetation at different stages of degradation and the determination of thresholds in the Yellow River source region. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(9): 14-26. |
刘昌义, 胡夏嵩, 窦增宁, 等. 黄河源区高寒草地植被根-土复合体抗剪强度试验及退化程度阈值确定. 草业学报, 2017, 26(9): 14-26. | |
9 | Qi Z X, Yu D M, Liu Y B, et al. Experimental research on factors affecting shear strength of halophyte root-soil composite systems in cold and arid environments. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2017, 25(6): 1438-1448. |
祁兆鑫, 余冬梅, 刘亚斌, 等. 寒旱环境盐生植物根-土复合体抗剪强度影响因素试验研究. 工程地质学报, 2017, 25(6): 1438-1448. | |
10 | Li J, Wang X, Jia H X, et al. Ecological restoration with shrub roots for slope reinforcement in a shallow landslide-prone region. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(14): 5117-5126. |
李佳, 汪霞, 贾海霞, 等. 浅层滑坡多发区典型灌木根系对边坡土体抗剪强度的影响. 生态学报, 2019, 39(14): 5117-5126. | |
11 | Wang Y, Du F, Zhou M, et al. Research on shear strength of root soil composite in a forest and grass standing site in northern shaanxi. Research of soil ang Water Conservation, 2018, 25(2): 213-219. |
王月, 杜峰, 周敏, 等. 陕北林草混交根土复合体抗剪强度研究. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(2): 213-219. | |
12 | Zhou T, Chen Y, Wang R Z, et al. Root characteristics of Cynodon dactylis and Trifolium repens and their effect on shear performance of purple soilin barren hillside. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(3): 63-73. |
周涛, 谌芸, 王润泽, 等. 种草和施用聚丙烯酰胺对荒坡紫色土抗剪和抗蚀性能的影响研究. 草业学报, 2019, 28(3): 62-73. | |
13 | Li T, Wang R Z, Chen Y, et al. Effects of polyacrylamide and grass root system on shear strength and physical properties of purple soil on barren slopes. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(2): 69-78. |
李铁, 王润泽, 谌芸, 等. PAM和草类根系对荒坡紫色土物理性质与抗剪性能的影响. 草业学报, 2018, 27(2): 69-78. | |
14 | Tang H, Chen Y, Liu X H, et al. Study on the mechanic features of root and root-soil matrix of Dolichos lablab L.hedgerows on the slopes of the karst area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(16): 6114-6125. |
唐菡, 谌芸, 刘枭宏, 等. 喀斯特坡地拉巴豆地埂篱根及根-土复合体力学特性. 生态学报, 2019, 39(16): 6114-6125. | |
15 | Zhang Q Y, Tang L X, Pan L, et al. Study on the tensile and shear properties of shrubs and the applicability of model WU in karst area. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, . |
张乔艳, 唐丽霞, 潘露, 等. 喀斯特区灌木抗拉抗剪特性及WU模型适用性研究. 长江科学院院报, . | |
16 | Wang R Z, Chen Y, Li T, et al. Root distribution characteristics of Vetiveria zizanioides and Digitaria sanguinalis and their effects on the anti erodibility of purple soil in slopelands. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(7): 45-54. |
王润泽, 谌芸, 李铁, 等. 香根草和马唐的根系特征及对坡地紫色土抗侵蚀性的影响. 草业学报, 2017, 26(7): 45-54. | |
17 | Institute of Soil Physics, Nanjing Soil Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Physical properties of Soil. Beijing: Beijing Science Press, 1978. |
中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤物理研究室. 土壤物理性质测定法. 北京: 北京科学出版社, 1978. | |
18 | Li H S. Experimental principle and techniques for plant physiology and biochemistry. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000. |
李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000. | |
19 | Liu Y B, Hu X S, Yu D M, et al. Root distribution characteristics of combination of herbs and shrubs in loess area of Xining basin and its effect on enhancing soil shear strength. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2020, 28(3): 471-481. |
刘亚斌, 胡夏嵩, 余冬梅, 等. 西宁盆地黄土区草本和灌木组合根系分布特征及其增强土体抗剪强度效应. 工程地质学报, 2020, 28(3): 471-481. | |
20 | Wang G, Zhou T Y, Wei J. Experimental study on shear resistance of herb root soil complex in purple soil and yellow soil. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2019(4): 34-37, 69. |
王耕, 周腾禹, 韦杰. 紫色土和黄壤草本根土复合体抗剪性能试验研究. 中国水土保持, 2019(4): 34-37, 69. | |
21 | Cheng H, Zhao J M, Cai G T, et al. Experimental study of increment in shear strength of soil with roots of tall fescue plants. Journal of Nanchang Institute of Technology, 2018, 37(1): 1-8. |
程洪, 赵建民, 蔡高堂, 等. 高羊茅根系增强土壤黏聚力的试验研究. 南昌工程学院学报, 2018, 37(1): 1-8. | |
22 | Andreoli A, Bischetti G B, Chiaradia E, et al. The roots of river restoration: Role of vegetation recover in bed stabilization. Iahr World Congress, 2017. |
23 | Wu Y R, Liu J, Zhang X, et al. Relationship between anti-shear characteristics of root and its responses to their chemical components for three shrubs. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2019, 33(4): 129-133. |
武艺儒, 刘静, 张欣, 等. 3种灌木直根抗剪特性及其与化学组分的关系. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019, 33(4): 129-133. |
[1] | Hai-xia HUANG, Qi-qi YANG, Peng CUI, Gang LU, Guo-jun HAN. Changes in morphological and physiological characteristics of Gymnocarposprzewalskii roots in response to water stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(1): 197-207. |
[2] | LIU Fang, CHEN Zhen, XU Wen, CHU Zhi-ying, GUAN Yong-xiang, WU Gui-cheng, HUAN Jing, SUN Zheng-guo. Impacts of different paddy soils on nodule growth characteristics of Chinese milk vetch [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(6): 153-161. |
[3] | JIAO Ting, WU Tie-cheng, WU Jian-ping, ZHAO Sheng-guo, LEI Zhao-min, LIANG Jian-yong, RAN Fu, JIU MAI Zha-xi, LIU Zhen-heng. A comparative study on digestibility and feed intake of Tibetan sheep of different types [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(5): 100-108. |
[4] | XU Sheng-rong, ZHANG En-he, MA Rui-li, WANG Qi, LIU Qing-lin, HUANG Yu-fang. Effects of mulching on soil environment and water utilization by roots of Lycium barbarum [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(2): 12-22. |
[5] | LI Tie, WANG Run-ze, CHEN Yun, HE Bing-hui, ZHOU Tao, WU Chen, LIU Xiao-hong. Effects of polyacrylamide and grass root system on shear strength and physical properties of purple soil on barren slopes [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(2): 69-78. |
[6] | ZHANG Yao-yao, LENG Ruo-lin, CUI Xia, SONG Qing-jie, XU Gang. Spatial distribution characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus in soil on the Gannan Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(12): 12-21. |
[7] | WANG Chun-yan, YAN Xia, GU Meng-he. The interaction effects of vegetation and soil nutrients on vegetation succession in abandoned farmland on the Loess Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(11): 26-35. |
[8] | CHANG Jing-jing, XU Li, XUE Jing-yue, YANG Hao, HE Nian-peng, ZHANG Jin-jing. Effects of grazing intensity on soil organic matter and microorganisms in the Zoige alpine meadow [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(1): 22-31. |
[9] | LUO Han-Fu, SONG Hua-Wei, LIU Tian-Zeng, ZHANG Ju-Ming. Effect of lanthanum on root growth of Paspalum notatum seedlings under aluminum stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(9): 208-213. |
[10] | WANG Run-Ze, CHEN Yun, LI Tie, PENG Shi-Lei, LIU Zhi-Peng, SHAN Zhi-Jie. Root distribution characteristics of Vetiveria zizanioides and Digitaria sanguinalis and their effects on the anti-erodibility of purple soil in slopelands [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(7): 45-54. |
[11] | BAI Na, WANG Li, KONG Dong-Sheng. Spatial distribution and chemical properties of marsh wetland soil in the Heihe Nature Reserve [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(5): 15-28. |
[12] | WANG Yu-Yang, CHEN Ya-Peng. Research progress in water uptake models by plant roots [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(3): 214-225. |
[13] | LUO Yong-Qing, ZHAO Xue-Yong, WANG Tao, LI Yu-Qiang, ZUO Xiao-An, DING Jie-Ping. Plant root decomposition and its responses to biotic and abiotic factors [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(2): 197-207. |
[14] | WANG Run-Ze, CHEN Yun, LI Tie, ZHOU Tao, HE Bing-Hui, LIU Xiao-Hong, LIU Zhi-Peng, SHAN Zhi-Jie. Impacts of polyacrylamide and grass root systems on micro-aggregates of purple soil in barren hillside badlands [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(12): 13-23. |
[15] | NIU Xue-Li, NAN Zhi-Biao. Review of minirhizotron applications for study of fine roots in grassland [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(11): 205-215. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||