打捆密度和堆垛方式对天然草地青干草化学成分和真菌毒素的影响

doi:10.11686/cyxb2018334

草业学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (7): 143-150.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2018334

打捆密度和堆垛方式对天然草地青干草化学成分和真菌毒素的影响

都帅¹, 刘昊², 尤思涵¹, 格根图¹, 贾玉山^{1, *}

1.饲草栽培、加工与高效利用农业部重点实验室,草地资源教育部重点实验室,内蒙古农业大学草原与资源环境学院,内蒙古呼和浩特 010019;
2.呼伦贝尔市草原工作站,内蒙古呼伦贝尔 021000

收稿日期:2018-05-22 修回日期:2018-07-11 出版日期:2019-07-20 发布日期:2019-07-20
通讯作者: jys_nm@sina.com
作者简介:都帅(1990-),男,内蒙古阿尔山人,在读博士。E-mail: dushuai@emails.imau.edu.cn
基金资助:
十三五国家重点研发计划(2017YFD052013)和草产品加工利用关键技术研发与产业化示范创新人才团队资助

Effects of baling density and stacking method on chemical composition and mycotoxin levels of native hay

DU Shuai¹, LIU Hao², YOU Si-han¹, Gegentu¹, JIA Yu-shan^{1, *}

1.Key Laboratory of Forage Cultivation, Processing and High Efficient Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources, Ministry of Education, College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China;
2.Hulun Buir Grassland Station,Hulun Buir 021000, China

Received:2018-05-22 Revised:2018-07-11 Online:2019-07-20 Published:2019-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究打捆密度和堆垛方式对干草化学成分和真菌毒素的影响,采用2×3因子裂区设计,打捆密度作为主处理因子(A),A₁为160 kg·m^-3和A₂为120 kg·m^-3,堆垛方式作为副处理因子(B),B₁交叉堆垛、B₂纵向堆垛和B₃横向堆垛,进行天然草地青干草贮藏试验。结果表明,打捆密度对粗灰分(Ash)、干物质(DM)、中性洗涤纤维(NDF)、黄曲霉毒素B₁(AFB₁)、T-2毒素(T-2)和赭曲霉毒素A(OTA)含量均没有显著影响(P>0.05),对酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)、粗蛋白质(CP)、脱氧雪腐镰刀菌烯醇(DON)和玉米赤霉烯酮(ZEN)含量影响显著(P<0.05),高密度草捆中ADF、DON和ZEN含量显著低于(P<0.05)低密度草捆,CP含量显著高于 (P<0.05) 低密度草捆。堆垛方式对Ash、DM、ADF、NDF、CP、DON、AFB₁、T-2和OTA含量均无显著影响(P>0.05),对ZEN含量影响显著(P<0.05),高密度草捆中ZEN含量显著低于(P<0.05)低密度草捆。且打捆密度和堆垛方式交互作用对干草化学成分和真菌毒素存在正效应。打捆密度可以显著改善天然青干草的化学成分和真菌毒素含量;堆垛方式对干草的化学成分和真菌毒素有一定的改善;打捆密度和堆垛方式交互作用对干草品质和真菌毒素均有显著影响。综合比较干草化学成分和真菌毒素含量,在内蒙古锡林浩特地区,天然草地青干草打捆密度160 kg·m^-3,采用交叉堆垛贮藏干草效果最佳。

关键词: 天然草地, 青干草, 打捆密度, 堆垛方式, 化学成分, 真菌毒素

Abstract: The major constraint for forage storage is chemical composition and mycotoxin. To study the effects of baling density and stacking method on chemical composition and mycotoxin levels of native hay, a randomized split-plot experiment (2×3 factors) was carried out. Baling density as the primary factor and stacking method as the secondary factor was used. The primary factor was 160 and 120 kg·m^-3, the secondary factor was cross-stacking, vertical-stacking and transverse-stacking. Baling density was the main plot factor and sacking method was the subplot factor. For baling density, no significant differences were found for hay dry matter (DM), ash (Ash), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), aflatoxin B₁ (AFB₁), T-2 toxin (T-2) or ochratoxin A (OTA) (P>0.05). However, acid detergent fiber (ADF), crude protein (CP), deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZEN) did differ significantly with baling density (P<0.05). For stacking method, there were no significant differences in Ash, DM, ADF, NDF, CP, DON, AFB₁, T-2 and OTA (P>0.05). However, there was a significant difference between stacking methods for ZEN levels in the hay (P<0.05). In summary, baling density, and stacking method did significantly change hay chemical composition and mycotoxin levels. The optimal combination from this experiment in Xilinhot, was a baling density of 160 kg·m^-3 with cross-stacking of bales.

Key words: native grassland, hay, baling density, stacking ways, chemical composition, mycotoxin

都帅, 刘昊, 尤思涵, 格根图, 贾玉山. 打捆密度和堆垛方式对天然草地青干草化学成分和真菌毒素的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(7): 143-150.

DU Shuai, LIU Hao, YOU Si-han, Gegentu, JIA Yu-shan. Effects of baling density and stacking method on chemical composition and mycotoxin levels of native hay[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(7): 143-150.

参考文献

[1] Pingali P.Westernization of Asian diet and the transformation of food systems: I, implications for research and policy. Food Policy, 2007, 32(3): 281-298.
[2] Yu C Q, Rong H, Sun W, et al. Research progress on technologies for hay making and storage. Pratacultural Science, 2010, 27(8): 143-150.
余成群, 荣辉, 孙维, 等. 干草调制与贮存技术的研究进展. 草业科学, 2010, 27(8): 143-150.
[3] Cochrane M J, Wickes R B.Nutrient losses in cereal and pasture hays stored in three types of hay packages in the open in two environments. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 1987, 25(2): 326-330.
[4] McDonald P, Edwards R A. Animal Nutrition. 4th Edition. New York: Proc. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1988.
[5] Yu J, Cleveland T E, Nierman W C, et al. Aspergillus flavus genomics: gateway to human and animal health, food safety, and crop resistance to diseases. Revista Iberoamericana de Micología, 2005, 22(4): 192-202.
[6] Georgianna D R, Fedorova N D, Burroughs J L, et al. Beyond aflatoxin: four distinct expression patterns and functional roles associated with Aspergillus flavus secondary metabolism gene clusters. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2010, 11(2): 213-226.
[7] Wang R J, Miao Z H, Zhang Z X, et al. Recent trends of mycotoxin contamination in animal feeds and raw materials in China. Feed Industry, 2003, 24(7): 53-54.
王若军, 苗朝华, 张振雄, 等. 中国饲料及饲料原料受霉菌毒素污染的调查报告. 饲料工业, 2003, 24(7): 53-54.
[8] Glenn A E.Mycotoxigenic Fusarium species in animal feed. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2007, 137(3/4): 213-240.
[9] Ao Z G, Chen D W.Recent trends of mycotoxin contamination in animal feeds and raw materials in China. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2008, 35(1): 152-156.
敖志刚, 陈代文. 2006-2007年中国饲料及饲料原料霉菌毒素污染调查报告. 中国畜牧兽医, 2008, 35(1): 152-156.
[10] Khlangwiset P, Shephard G S, Wu F.Aflatoxins and growth impairment: a review. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 2011, 41(9): 740-755.
[11] Van Soest P J, Robertson J B, Lewis B A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 1991, 74(10): 3583-3597.
[12] General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. Determination of aflatoxin B1 in animal feeding stuffs Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, GB/T 17480-2008. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2008.
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 饲料中黄曲霉毒素B1的测定, GB/T 17480-2008. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.
[13] General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. Determination of ochratoxin A in feeds-High performance liquid chromatography with immunosorbent column clean-up, GB/T 30957-2014. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2014.
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 饲料中赭曲霉毒素A的测定, GB/T 30957-2014. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014.
[14] General Administration of Quality Supervision=, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. Determination of deoxynivalenol in feed-High performance liquid chromatography with immunosorbent column clean-up, GB/T 30956-2014. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2014.
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 饲料中脱氧雪腐镰刀菌烯醇的测定, GB/T 30956-2014. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014.
[15] General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. Determination of zearalenone in feed-High performance liquid chromatographic method with immunoaffinity column clean-up, GB/T 28716-2012. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2012.
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 饲料中玉米赤霉烯酮的测定, GB/T 28716-2012. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2012.
[16] General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. Method of determination of T-2 toxin in formula feed-Thin layer chromatography, GB/T 8381.4-2005. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2005.
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 配合饲料中T-2毒素的测定, GB/T 8381.4-2005. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2005.
[17] Rowley E D.A comparison of hay conservation systems. Journal of Agriculture, West Australia,1976, 17: 107-112.
[18] Collins M, Paulson W H, Finner M F, et al. Moisture and storage effects on dry matter and quality losses of alfalfa in round bales. American Society of Agricultural Engineers Microfiche Collection, 1986, 30(4): 913-917.
[19] Rotz C A, Abrams S M.Losses and quality changes during alfalfa hay harvest and storage. Transactions of the Asae American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 1988, 31(2): 350-355.

打捆密度和堆垛方式对天然草地青干草化学成分和真菌毒素的影响

Effects of baling density and stacking method on chemical composition and mycotoxin levels of native hay

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	高金龙, 刘洁, 殷建鹏, 葛静, 侯蒙京, 冯琦胜, 梁天刚. 天然草地牧草营养品质的高光谱遥感研究进展[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(2): 172-185.
[2]	孙林, 刘广华, 张欣昕, 薛艳林, 吴晓光, 肖燕子, 殷国梅, 刘思博, 张福金. 蒙药黄芩与制粒对紫花苜蓿维生素和化学成分的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(10): 99-108.
[3]	倪璐, 吴静, 李纯斌, 秦格霞, 李政, 孔婕. 近30年中国天然草地物候时空变化特征分析[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(1): 1-12.
[4]	李明雨, 黄文广, 杨君珑, 李小伟. 宁夏草原植物叶片氮磷化学计量特征及其驱动因素[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(2): 23-32.
[5]	苗福泓, 李永臻, 杨国锋, 刘洪庆, 孙娟, 林英庭. 天然草原青干草对农区洼地绵羊肉品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(7): 98-105.
[6]	朱晓艳, 赵诚, 史莹华, 王成章, 姚国磊, 吕先召, 韩康康, 李栋栋. 苜蓿青贮料替代苜蓿青干草对奶牛生产性能及乳品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(5): 156-164.
[7]	李永臻, 苗福泓, 沈志强, 林英庭, 李国才, 孙娟. 天然草原青干草对农区洼地绵羊生长、屠宰性能和经济效益的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(11): 178-184.
[8]	覃凤飞, 沈益新, 李兰海, 胡增运, 程亮, 马旭龙, 陈青青, 王凌越. 干旱胁迫对新疆三个优势牧草种的光合特性与水分利用效率的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(10): 86-94.
[9]	张志南,武高林,王冬,邓蕾,郝红敏,杨政,上官周平. 黄土高原半干旱区天然草地群落结构与土壤水分关系[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(6): 313-319.
[10]	张喜峰,张立新,高梅,韦成才,马英明,王平平,耿伟. 不同氮肥形态和腐殖酸对陕西典型生态区烤烟化学成分和产质量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(6): 60-67.
[11]	刘艳娜,史莹华,严学兵,王成章,梁明根,周路. 苜蓿青干草替代部分精料对奶牛生产性能及经济效益的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(6): 190-197.
[12]	欧阳克蕙，熊小文，王文君 ，胡耀，周萍芳，刘党生. 苜蓿黄酮对崇仁麻鸡生长性能及[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(4): 340-345.
[13]	周伟,王倩,章超斌,李建龙. 黑河中上游草地NDVI时空变化规律及其对气候因子的响应分析[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(1): 138-147.
[14]	鲁黎明,朱靓,雷强,叶利华,杜卫民. 四川烤烟主产区烟叶感官质量及主要化学成分分析[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(4): 88-97.
[15]	崔占鸿,郝力壮,刘书杰,柴沙驼,赵月平,张晓卫. 体外产气法评价青海高原燕麦青干草与天然牧草组合效应[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(3): 250-257.