开垦对放牧温性草原生态系统水分利用效率的影响

doi:10.11686/cyxb2019259

草业学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (10): 110-121.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2019259

开垦对放牧温性草原生态系统水分利用效率的影响

李愈哲^1,*, 邵全琴¹, 樊江文¹, 陈一¹, 陈智², 官惠玲¹, 张馨元³

1.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所陆地表层格局与模拟重点实验室, 北京100101;
2.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室, 北京100101;
3.中国地质大学, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2019-05-07 修回日期:2019-07-02 出版日期:2019-10-20 发布日期:2019-10-20
通讯作者: E-mail: liyuzhe@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介:李愈哲(1989-),男,江西兴国人,助理研究员,博士。E-mail: liyuzhe@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFA0604801,2017YEC0506500)和国家自然科学基金项目(41601615)资助

Effects of grassland cultivation on ecosystem water use efficiency in a grazed temperate grassland area

LI Yu-zhe^1,*, SHAO Quan-qin¹, FAN Jiang-wen¹, CHEN Yi¹, CHEN Zhi², GUAN Hui-lin¹, ZHANG Xin-yuan³

1.Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
2.Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling,Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
3.China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2019-05-07 Revised:2019-07-02 Online:2019-10-20 Published:2019-10-20
Contact: E-mail: liyuzhe@igsnrr.ac.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 作为生态系统碳水循环的耦合指标,水分利用效率(WUE)是衡量区域资源转化效率的重要参考。为了解开垦利用对放牧草地生态系统水分利用效率的影响,以放牧区域和开垦利用区域毗邻的两套涡度相关系统监测数据为基础,结合群落调查和采样测定,对比分析了两种管理利用方式下生态系统水分利用效率(WUE_GPP)的动态差异和影响因素。结果显示:1)WUE_GPP在夏季达到全年峰值,6月开垦站点日均WUE_GPP 3.61 g C·kg^-1 H₂O,较放牧站点高58%,全年WUE_GPP 3.07 g C·kg^-1 H₂O, 较放牧站点2.11 g C·kg^-1 H₂O提升约50%;2)开垦站点较高的WUE_GPP归咎于生长季较高的总初级生产力(GPP)和非生长季更低的蒸散耗水(ET);3)ET变化对放牧站点WUE_GPP变异解释程度较高(26%, P<0.001),而GPP对开垦站点WUE_GPP变化的解释程度(45%, P<0.001)高于ET;4)环境因子中,土壤含水量对WUE_GPP变化的调控作用最强,两者负相关关系在开垦站点、放牧站点均达到极显著水平(P<0.001)。研究结果能为合理规划区域土地利用,促进干旱区关键资源高效利用提供有益参考。

关键词: 草地开垦, 放牧生态系统, 草地利用方式转变, 温性草原, 水分利用效率

Abstract: Water use efficiency (WUE) is an indicator of coupling between ecosystem carbon and water cycles, so it is an important reference for the measurement of regional resource transformation efficiency. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of cultivation on the WUE of a grazed grassland ecosystem. On the basis of the vorticity-related system monitoring data in adjacent grazed and cultivated areas and combined community investigations and sampling measurements, this study analyzed the dynamic difference and effects of two different management patterns on the WUE of the ecosystem (gross primary productivity; GPP) (WUE_GPP). The results indicated that: 1) WUE_GPP reached its peak each year in summer; in June, the daily average WUE_GPP of the cultivated sites (3.61 g C·kg^-1 H₂O) was 58% higher than that of the grazed sites, and the annual WUE_GPP of the former (3.07 g C·kg^-1 H₂O) was 50% higher than that of the latter. 2) The higher WUE_GPP of the cultivated sites was due to the higher GPP during the growing season and lower evapotranspiration (ET) during the non-growing season. 3) The ET explained the change in the WUE_GPP of the grazed sites (26%, P<0.001), while GPP explained the change in WUE_GPP of the cultivated sites (45%, P<0.001) better than did ET. 4) Among the environmental factors, soil moisture had the strongest effect on the change in WUE_GPP and the negative correlation between them was extremely significant both for the cultivated and grazed sites (P<0.001). These results show that different land management practices and utilization types can significantly affect ecosystem WUE on the temperate steppe. Among the various environmental factors, soil water content explained the changes in WUE_GPP at both the grazed and cultivated sites, and so soil water supply may be the most important factor regulating WUE in regional ecosystems. These results provide a useful reference for scientific planning of regional land use and for the reinforcement of more efficient use of key resources in arid areas.

Key words: grassland cultivation, grazing ecosystem, steppe management/use change, temperate steppe, water use efficiency

李愈哲, 邵全琴, 樊江文, 陈一, 陈智, 官惠玲, 张馨元. 开垦对放牧温性草原生态系统水分利用效率的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(10): 110-121.

LI Yu-zhe, SHAO Quan-qin, FAN Jiang-wen, CHEN Yi, CHEN Zhi, GUAN Hui-lin, ZHANG Xin-yuan. Effects of grassland cultivation on ecosystem water use efficiency in a grazed temperate grassland area[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(10): 110-121.

参考文献

[1] Pielke Sr R A, Marland G, Betts R A, et al. The influence of land-use change and landscape dynamics on the climate system: Relevance to climate-change policy beyond the radiative effect of greenhouse gases. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical,Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2002, 360: 1705-1719.
[2] Paeth H, Born K, Girmes R, et al. Regional climate change in tropical and northern Africa due to greenhouse forcing and land use changes. Journal of Climate, 2009, 22(1): 114-132.
[3] Tao F, Zhang Z, Zhang S, et al. Historical data provide new insights into response and adaptation of maize production systems to climate change/variability in China. Field Crops Research, 2016, 185: 1-11.
[4] Li D, Wang D, Chen J Q, et al. Effect of sowing density of Bromus inermis on soil microbial characteristics and enzyme activitises. Acta Pratacultureae Sinica, 2018, 27(1): 53-61.
李达, 王笛, 陈金强, 等. 呼伦贝尔人工栽培草地土壤微生物对无芒雀麦不同播种密度的响应. 草业学报, 2018, 27(1): 53-61.
[5] Fang J Y, Jing H C, Zhang W H, et al. The concept of “Grass-based livestock husbangdry” and its practice in Hulun Buir, Inner Mongolia. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2018, 63(17): 1619-1631.
方精云, 景海春, 张文浩, 等. 论草牧业的理论体系及其实践. 科学通报, 2018, 63(17): 1619-1631.
[6] Li Y Z, Fan J W, Zhang L X, et al. The impact of different land use and management on community composition, species diversity and productivity in a typical temperate grassland. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(1): 1-9.
李愈哲, 樊江文, 张良侠, 等. 不同土地利用方式对典型温性草原群落物种组成和多样性以及生产力的影响. 草业学报, 2013, 22(1): 1-9.
[7] Li Y Z, Fan J W, Yu H L.The varied impacts of different restoration practices on the restoration process of temperate grassland ecosystem in the Beijing-Tianjin Sand Source Control Project. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(5): 1-14.
李愈哲, 樊江文, 于海玲. 京津风沙源治理工程不同恢复措施对草地恢复过程的差异性影响. 草业学报, 2018, 27(5): 1-14.
[8] Liu J Y, Ning J, Kuang W H, et al. Spatiotemporal patterns and characteristics of land-use change in China during 2010-2015. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018, 73(5): 789-802.
刘纪远, 宁佳, 匡文慧, 等. 2010-2015年中国土地利用变化的时空格局与新特征. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 789-802.
[9] Yu G R, Wang Q F, Zhuang J.Modeling the water use efficiency of soybean and maize plants under environmental stresses: Application of a synthetic model of photosynthesis-transpiration based on stomatal behavior. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2004, 161(3): 303-318.
[10] Hu Z M, Yu G R, Wang Q F, et al. Ecosystem level water use efficiency: A review. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(3): 1498-1507.
胡中民, 于贵瑞, 王秋凤, 等. 生态系统水分利用效率研究进展. 生态学报, 2009, 29(3): 1498-1507.
[11] Niu S, Wu M, Han Y, et al. Water-mediated responses of ecosystem carbon fluxes to climatic change in a temperate steppe. New Phytologist, 2008, 177(1): 209-219.
[12] Li Y Z, Fan J W, Hu Z M, et al. Comparison of evapotranspiration components and water-use efficiency among different land use patterns of temperate steppe in the Northern China pastoral-farming ecotone. International Journal of Biometeorology, 2016, 60(6): 827-841.
[13] Jürgen K, Sönke Z, Medlyn B, et al. Towards physiologically meaningful water-use efficiency estimates from eddy covariance data. Global Change Biology, 2018, 24(2): 694-710.
[14] Keenan T F, Hollinger D Y, Bohrer G, et al. Increase in forest water-use efficiency as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise. Nature, 2013, 499(7458): 324.
[15] Niu S, Xing X, Zhang Z, et al. Water-use efficiency in response to climate change: From leaf to ecosystem in a temperate steppe. Global Change Biology, 2011, 17(2): 1073-1082.
[16] Yi K, Maxwell J T, Wenzel M K, et al. Linking variation in intrinsic water-use efficiency to isohydricity: A comparison at multiple spatiotemporal scales. New Phytologist, 2019, 221(1): 195-208.
[17] Hu Z, Yu G, Zhou Y, et al. Partitioning of evapotranspiration and its controls in four grassland ecosystems: Application of a two-source model. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2009, 149(9): 1410-1420.
[18] Miao H, Chen S, Chen J, et al. Cultivation and grazing altered evapotranspiration and dynamics in Inner Mongolia steppes. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2009, 149(11): 1810-1819.
[19] Chen S, Chen J, Lin G, et al. Energy balance and partition in Inner Mongolia steppe ecosystems with different land use types. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2009, 149(11): 1800-1809.
[20] Baldocchi D.A comparative study of mass and energy exchange rates over a closed crop: II. CO₂ exchange and water use efficiency. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1994, 67(3): 291-321.
[21] Scanlon T M, Albertson J D.Canopy scale measurements of CO₂ and water vapor exchange along a precipitation gradient in southern Africa. Global Change Biology, 2003, 10(3): 329-341.
[22] Ponton S, Flanagan L B, Alstad K P, et al. Comparison of ecosystem water-use efficiency among Douglas-fir forest, aspen forest and grassland using eddy covariance and carbon isotope techniques. Global Change Biology, 2006, 12(2): 294-310.
[23] Hu Z M, Shi H, Cheng K, et al. Joint structural and physiological control on the inter-annual variation in productivity in a temperate grassland: A data-model comparison. Global Change Biology, 2018, 24(7): 2965-2979.
[24] Wei Y, Hu Z M, Zhao Y P, et al. Modeling net ecosystem carbon exchange of alpine grasslands with a satellite-driven model. PLoS One, 2015, 10(4): e0122486. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122486
[25] Zhang L X, Hu Z M, Fan J W, et al. Advances in the spatiotemporal dynamics in ecosystem water use efficiency at regional scale. Advances in Earth Science, 2014, 29(6): 691-699.
张良侠, 胡中民, 樊江文, 等. 区域尺度生态系统水分利用效率的时空变异特征研究进展. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(6): 691-699.
[26] Zhou S, Yu B, Zhang Y, et al. Water use efficiency and evapotranspiration partitioning for three typical ecosystems in the Heihe River Basin, northwestern China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2018, 253(254): 261-272.
[27] Kool D, Agam N, Lazarovitch N, et al. A review of approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2014, 184(15): 56-70.
[28] Yang F, Shao Q Q, Li Y Z, et al. Impacts of grassland reclamation on land surface radiation and water-heat fluxes in the farming-pastoral ecotone of northern China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(17): 5440-5451.
杨帆, 邵全琴, 李愈哲, 等. 北方典型农牧交错带草地开垦对地表辐射收支与水热平衡的影响. 生态学报, 2016, 36(17): 5440-5451.
[29] Li Y Z, Fan J W, Hu Z M, et al.Influence of land use patterns on evapotranspiration and its components in a temperate grassland ecosystem. Advances in Meteorology, 2015, 2015: 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/452603.
[30] Xin Y F, Chen F, Zhao P, et al. Surface energy balance closure at ten sites over the Tibetan Plateau. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2018, 259: 317-328.
[31] Cui W, Chui T F M. Temporal and spatial variations of energy balance closure across FLUXNET research sites. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2019, 271: 12-21.
[32] Li H D, Guan D X, Yuan F H, et al. Water use efficiency and its influential factors over Horqin Meadow. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(2): 478-488.
李辉东, 关德新, 袁凤辉, 等. 科尔沁草甸生态系统水分利用效率及影响因素. 生态学报, 2015, 35(2): 478-488.
[33] Hu Z Z, Yu G R, Fu Y L, et al. Effects of vegetation control on ecosystem water use efficiency within and among four grassland ecosystems in China. Global Change Biology, 2010, 14(7): 1609-1619.
[34] Kang H J, Tao Y L, Quan W, et al. Study on the light saturated point of winter wheat flag leaf in north China. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2013, 33(6): 1252-1257.
康华靖, 陶月良, 权伟, 等. 北方冬小麦旗叶光饱和点探讨. 麦类作物学报, 2013, 33(6): 1252-1257.
[35] Hu Z M, Yu G, Fan J W, et al. Precipitation-use efficiency along a 4500-km grassland transect. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2010, 19(6): 842-851.
[36] Niu S, Yang H, Zhang Z, et al. Non-additive effects of water and nitrogen addition on ecosystem carbon exchange in a temperate steppe. Ecosystems, 2009, 12(6): 915-926.
[37] Li Y Z, Fan J W, Hu Z M.Comparison of carbon-use efficiency among different land-use patterns of the temperate steppe in the Northern China pastoral farming ecotone. Sustainability, 2018, 10(2): 487.

开垦对放牧温性草原生态系统水分利用效率的影响

Effects of grassland cultivation on ecosystem water use efficiency in a grazed temperate grassland area

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	才璐, 王林林, 罗珠珠, 李玲玲, 牛伊宁, 蔡立群, 谢军红. 中国苜蓿产量及水分利用效率对种植年限响应的Meta分析[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 27-38.
[2]	方彦杰, 张绪成, 于显枫, 侯慧芝, 王红丽, 马一凡, 张国平, 雷康宁. 地膜覆盖和施肥对半干旱区苦荞土壤水分利用及产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(11): 46-56.
[3]	方彦杰, 张绪成, 于显枫, 侯慧芝, 王红丽, 马一凡, 张国平, 雷康宁. 立式深旋松耕对半干旱区饲草玉米水分利用和产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(10): 161-171.
[4]	李尚中, 樊廷录, 赵晖, 李城德, 赵贵宾, 赵刚, 党翼, 王磊, 张建军, 唐小明, 王淑英, 程万莉. 不同地膜覆盖栽培模式对玉米产量、水分利用效率和品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(10): 182-191.
[5]	官惠玲, 樊江文, 李愈哲. 不同人工草地对青藏高原温性草原群落生物量组成及物种多样性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(9): 192-201.
[6]	周旭姣, 王琦, 张登奎, 尹鑫卫, 李晓玲, 刘青林, 贾生海. 垄沟集雨种植对土壤水热效应及紫花苜蓿产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(11): 60-74.
[7]	刘家鹤, 牛伊宁, 罗珠珠, 蔡立群, 张仁陟, 谢军红. 黄土高原坡耕地植物篱-作物间作系统水分利用特征研究[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(6): 111-119.
[8]	文雅, 张静, 冯萌, 郭正刚. 水氮互作对河西走廊紫花苜蓿品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(10): 76-83.
[9]	冯福学, 慕平, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽, 刘欢, 陈国栋. 西北绿洲灌区饲用燕麦耗水特性及产量变化对水氮耦合的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(8): 74-84.
[10]	邓建强, 梁志婷, 刘渊博, 王自奎, 沈禹颖. 陇东旱塬冬小麦复种饲草轮作系统产量和水分利用特征[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(2): 161-170.
[11]	李尚中, 樊廷录, 赵刚, 王磊, 党翼, 张建军, 唐小明, 王淑英. 品种、密度与覆膜方式对旱地春玉米产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(12): 35-47.
[12]	张静, 王倩, 肖玉, 庞晓攀, 贾婷婷, 宋锐, 刘慧霞. 交替灌溉对紫花苜蓿生物量分配与水分利用效率的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(3): 164-171.
[13]	覃凤飞, 沈益新, 李兰海, 胡增运, 程亮, 马旭龙, 陈青青, 王凌越. 干旱胁迫对新疆三个优势牧草种的光合特性与水分利用效率的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(10): 86-94.
[14]	赵哈林, 李瑾, 周瑞莲, 云建英, 曲浩, 潘成臣. 风沙流频繁吹袭对樟子松幼苗光合水分代谢的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(10): 149-156.
[15]	任志国, 陈亚鹏,李卫红,刘树宝. 地下水埋深对塔里木河下游建群种植物叶片δ¹³C值的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(2): 76-82.