欢迎访问《草业学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

草业学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 56-70.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2019424

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

应用13C同位素标记法区分羊草草原生态系统呼吸

李茹霞1,2, 耿元波1,*   

  1. 1.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101;
    2.中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-29 修回日期:2019-11-25 出版日期:2020-06-20 发布日期:2020-06-20
  • 通讯作者: * E-mail: gengyb@igsnrr.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:李茹霞(1996-),女,山西闻喜人,在读硕士。E-mail: lirx.18s@igsnrr.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41071138)和国家重点研发项目(2016YFD0201208)资助

Application of 13C stable isotope labeling in the partitioning of ecosystem respiration in a Leymus chinensis steppe in Inner Mongolia, China

LI Ru-xia1,2, GENG Yuan-bo1,*   

  1. 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2019-09-29 Revised:2019-11-25 Online:2020-06-20 Published:2020-06-20

摘要: 草原生态系统呼吸在碳循环和气候变化过程中发挥重要作用,它包括土壤呼吸和地上部植物体呼吸,且不同的生态系统呼吸组分对于环境变化有不同的响应机制。为区分生态系统呼吸,探讨草原呼吸对温室气体排放的贡献,研究利用稳定同位素13C自然标记法和13C脉冲标记法,并结合静态箱-Keeling plot方法对内蒙古锡林河流域羊草草原生态系统呼吸进行了区分, 并分析比较 2 种方法的区分结果。结果表明:1)实验中13C自然标记样方和13C脉冲标记样方生境一致,两者土壤温度和土壤含水量无显著差异,13C自然标记法和13C脉冲标记法的区分结果具有可比性。2)对比自然标记法,脉冲标记法显著提高了生态系统呼吸、土壤呼吸和地上部植物呼吸的δ13C值(P<0.05)。3)13C自然标记法和13C脉冲标记法区分结果Fs/Feco(土壤呼吸通量/生态系统呼吸通量)在2011年分别是(75.2±4.3)%和(73.8±2.9)%,在2012年分别是(89.2±2.0)%和(89.1±1.4%)。统计分析结果表明,2种方法获得的区分结果无显著差异(2011: P=0.567; 2012: P=0.674),表明自然状态下,羊草草原生态系统呼吸、地上部植物体呼吸和土壤呼吸之间的δ13C值差异足够用来区分生态系统呼吸,这一发现能够提高同位素标记法区分生态系统呼吸的效率,进而为生态系统碳循环过程的精细研究提供参考。

关键词: 13C自然标记法, 13C脉冲标记法, Keeling plot, 生态系统呼吸区分, 羊草草原

Abstract: Grassland ecosystem respiration, of which the main components are soil respiration and aboveground plant respiration, plays an important role in the global carbon cycle and climate change. Also, different ecosystem respiratory components have different response mechanisms to environmental changes. In order to explore the contribution of grassland respiration to greenhouse gas emissions, we used a 13C natural stable isotope labeling method and a 13C pulse labeling method, combined with the static chamber-Keeling plot method, to distinguish the components of grassland ecosystem respiration in Leymus chinensis steppe. The research was conducted in the Xilin River Basin of Inner Mongolia and we then evaluated the two stable isotope methods according to partitioning results. It was found that: 1) 13C natural labeling and 13C pulse labeling methods gave significantly similar results when samples were from the same habitat, as defined by soil temperature and soil water content. Thus, the partitioning results obtained by the two methods are comparable. 2) Compared with the 13C natural labeling method, the pulse labeling method significantly improved the δ13C value of ecosystem respiration, soil respiration and above-ground plant respiration (P<0.05). 3) The partitioning results of the 13C natural labeling method and the 13C pulse labeling method expressed by Fs/Feco (ratio of soil respiration flux to ecosystem respiratory flux), were (75.2±4.3)% and (73.8±2.9)%, respectively, in 2011, and (89.2±2.0)% and (89.1±1.4)% in 2012. The statistical analysis indicated that there was no significant difference between partitioning results of the 13C natural labeling method and the 13C pulse labeling method in different years (2011: P=0.567; 2012: P=0.674). These results imply that under natural conditions, the potential differences among δ13C in ecosystem respiration components were enough to differentiate ecosystem respiration. This discovery can improve the efficiency of ecosystem respiration partitioning research using the isotope labeling method. Further, this information will facilitate more insightful study of the ecosystem carbon cycle process.

Key words: 13C natural labeling method, 13C pulse labeling method, Keeling plot, partitioning of ecosystem respiration, Leymus chinensis steppe