欢迎访问《草业学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

草业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 183-193.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2023423

• 综合评述 • 上一篇    

农业伦理视域下“藏粮于地”与“藏粮于草”的辩证关系——兼论《粮食安全保障法》第二章“耕地保护”

赵安1(), 柏瑛2()   

  1. 1.兰州大学草地农业科技学院,甘肃 兰州 730020
    2.兰州文理学院经管学院,甘肃 兰州 730010
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-14 修回日期:2024-01-12 出版日期:2024-10-20 发布日期:2024-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 柏瑛
  • 作者简介:Corresponding author. E-mail: gsby717@163.com
    赵安(1987-),男,甘肃镇原人,讲师,博士。E-mail: zhaoa@lzu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    黄河流域草牧业高质量发展技术集成与示范项目效益评价(071100442)

The dialectical relationship between “sourcing food from croplandstoring grain in the land” and “sourcing food from grasslandstoring grain in the grass” from the perspective of agricultural ethics——On the “Farmland Protection” in chapter Chapter 2 of the Food Security Law

An ZHAO1(), Ying BAI2()   

  1. 1.College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730020,China
    2.Faculty of Economics and Management,Lanzhou University of Arts and Science,Lanzhou 730010,China
  • Received:2023-11-14 Revised:2024-01-12 Online:2024-10-20 Published:2024-07-15
  • Contact: Ying BAI

摘要:

从农业伦理视角看“藏粮于地”与“藏粮于草”之间的互补共赢关系。聚焦2023年新颁布的《粮食安全保障法》第二章“耕地保护”,认为耕地保护不光是保面积,还要保水、保土、保肥、保多元种植模式、保农业系统多样性等。本研究采用了文献综述、实地调研、案例分析等方法,梳理了耕地面积和耕地质量等资源的刚性约束,种植业的结构性问题和粮食连增的不可持续性,粮草多元种植实现耕地改良和增加后备土地的科研成果、政策共识,并从黄河流域的6个调研县筛选了粮草轮作复种、套作间作、混播混贮等3个典型案例作为佐证。本研究认为种植业结构调整处于农业结构调整的首要位置,尤其是在粮食产量达到人年均400 kg口粮安全点之后,就不应该再制定过高的粮食生产目标,而应适时启动“藏粮于草”计划来保护耕地、增草增粮。“藏粮于草”更符合农业伦理学模式,是伦理学在植物生产层中的创新性应用。建议将口粮、饲粮、饲草种植分别统计,因地制宜开展粮草多元种植模式。

关键词: 藏粮于地, 藏粮于草, 耕地保护, 粮食安全, 农业伦理

Abstract:

From the perspective of agricultural ethics, there is a complementary and win-win relationship between sourcing food from cropland and sourcing food from grassland through forage for animal production. Focusing on Chapter 2, “Farmland Protection,” of the Food Security Law promulgated in 2023, it is believed that farmland protection is not about preserving area only, but also about preserving water, soil, fertilizer, diverse planting practices, and the diversity of agricultural systems. In this study, a combination of several research methods including a literature review, field research, and case studies, was used to understand the interaction between the rigid constraints of resources such as cultivated land area and quality, structural problems relating to the unsuitability of particular land areas for crop planting, and the unsustainable expectation of continuous incremental increase in crop yields over time. Achievements have been made in scientific research, and in policies to improve cultivated land and increase the amount of reserve land, through diversified planting of food crops of various kinds and forages. Six counties in the Yellow River Basin were selected for surveys of food and forage crop rotation and replanting. Various categories of farm system were studied, including: systems with two crops per year, intercropping of different species, and mixed food crop and silage production. Three commonly practiced farming systems were taken as case studies: alternate-row mixed cropping of food and forage plants, broadcast-sown mixed food and forage species crops, and monoculture forage crops. Our results indicate that changes in the patterns and technology of crop and forage planting are the key to changes in future organization of the agricultural sector. Especially after the annual grain yield reaches the food safety threshold of 400 kg per person, higher grain production targets should not be pursued, but instead the “forage for animal production” strategy should be implemented in a timely manner to protect farmland. A focus on forage production for animal husbandry is more conducive to enhanced agricultural ethics outcomes and represents an innovative application of ethics in plant production. It is recommended to separately calculate the planting of human food and animal forage crops, and to develop a diversified planting model for these two categories of crops, according to local conditions.

Key words: sourcing food from cropland, sourcing food from grassland, protection of farmland, food security, agricultural ethics