不同坪床配比百慕大T-419的生物量和根系分布特征研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本试验采用9种不同的坪床配比,对热带亚热带运动场常用品种百慕大T-419的生物量和根系分布特征进行了研究。结果表明,各处理的地上与地下生物量变化基本一致,中等含沙量的处理Ⅲ和Ⅶ的地上与地下生物量最高。不同处理的根系分布随土壤深度的增加而减少,集中分布于0~10 cm土层,方差分析表明,0~10 cm土层各处理间根系生物量差异显著,其中处理Ⅲ、Ⅵ和Ⅶ显著高于处理Ⅰ和对照CK,10~20和20 cm以下的生物量均无显著差异。地下总生物量与总根长相关系数为0.541(P＜0.05),与根系表面积、根系体积相关系数分别为0.651和0.615(P＜0.01);根尖数与总根长、平均直径相关系数分别为0.500和0.695(P＜0.01)。

Abstract: This research used nine turf-bed compositions to analyze the biomass and root distribution characteristics of Bermuda T-419, a commonly used sports turf in the tropics and subtropics. Above and belowground biomasses of treatments showed similar changes, middle sediment treatments Ⅲ and Ⅶ were highest in above and belowground biomass. Root biomasses of the different treatments were significantly reduced with soil depth, and distribution of roots was concentrated in the 0-10 cm layer. Variance analysis indicated significant differences in the 0-10 cm belowground biomass between treatments and that treatments Ⅲ, Ⅵ and Ⅶ were significantly higher than Ⅰand the CK. There were no significant differences in biomass in the10-20 cm and below 20 cm soil layers. The correlation coefficient between belowground biomass and total root length was 0.541 (P<0.05), between belowground biomass and root surface-area with root volume it was 0.651 and 0.615 respectively (P<0.01), and between root number and total root length, with average diameters it was 0.500 and 0.695 respectively (P<0.01).

中图分类号:

黄晓露,刘君,杨志民. 不同坪床配比百慕大T-419的生物量和根系分布特征研究[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(5): 98-106.

HUANG Xiao-lu, LIU Jun, YANG Zhi-min. Study on biomass and root system distribution characteristics of sport turf in different substrate compositions[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2009, 18(5): 98-106.

参考文献

[1]李鹏,李占斌,澹台湛. 黄土高原退耕草地植被根系动态分布特征.应用生态学报,2005,16(5):849-853.
[2] 李勇,徐晓琴,朱显谟. 黄土高原植物根系提高土壤抗冲性机制初步研究.中国科学,1992,3:254-259.
[3] 罗俊强,韩烈保,陈宝书. 草坪地下生物量与坪用性状的关系.北京林业大学学报,2000,22(2):77-80.
[4] Baddeley J A, Watson C A. Seasonal patterns of fine root production and mortality in Prunus avium in Scotland. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 2004, 34(7):1534-1537.
[5] 孙强,韩建国,刘帅,等. 草地早熟禾草坪土壤水分动态与根系生长分布.生态学报,2005,25(6):1306-1311.
[6] 任云宇,何军,刘艺杉. 水分处理对草坪草地下植物量的影响.草业科学,2005,22(8):79-83.
[7] 史晓霞,师尚礼,刘自学,等. 灌溉量对草坪草地上、地下植物量分配的影响.草业科学,2007,24(2):85-91.
[8] 陈蕴,罗富成. 昆明地区几种主要草坪草根系特征特性的初步研究.云南畜牧兽医,2008,16(3):267-271.
[9] 陈静波,阎君,张婷婷,等. 四种暖季型草坪草对长期盐胁迫的生长反应.草业学报,2008,17(5):30-36.
[10] Kunze R J, Ferguson M H, Page J B. The effects of compaction on golf green. USGA Journal and Turf Management, 1957, 11(11):24-27.
[11] Taylor D H, Blake G R. Sand content of sand-soil-peat mixtures for turf grass. Soil Science Society American Journal, 1979, 43:394-398.
[12] 任继周. 草业科学研究方法.北京:中国农业出版社,1998.376-378.
[13] 周梦华,程积民,万惠娥,等. 云雾山本氏针茅群落根系分布特征.草地学报,2008,16(3):267-271.
[14] 李会科,郑秋玲,赵政阳,等. 黄土高原果园种植牧草根系特征的研究.草业学报,2008,17(2):92-96.
[15] 李昕,张新全. 高速公路绿化以及铁路护坡中的作用.四川草原,2003,(5):5-6.
[16] 张秀娟,梅莉,王政权. 细根分解研究及其存在的问题.植物学通报,2005,22(2):246-254.
[17] Passioura J B, Stirzaker R J. Feed forward responses of plants to physically inhospitable soil. In: Buxton D R. International Crop Science I. W I, USA: Crop Science Society of America, Madison,1994. 715-719.
[18] Murphy J A, Honig J A, Samarnayake H, et al.Creeping bentgrass establishment on root zones varying in sand sizes.International Turf Grass Society Research Journal,2001,(9):573-579.
[19] Murphy J A, Samarnayak H, Honig J A, et al. Creeping bentgrass establishment on sand-based root zones varying in amendment.USGA Turf grass and Environmental Research Online,2004,3(10):1-15.
[20] 王长庭,王启兰,景增春,等. 不同放牧梯度下高寒小嵩草草甸植被根系和土壤理化特征的变化.草业学报,2008,17(5):9-15.
[21] Jackson R B, Canadell J R, Mooney H A, et al. A global analysis of root distribution for terrestrial biomass. Oecologia, 1996, 108(3):389-411.
[22] 黄文娟,于海多,赵兰坡. 松嫩羊草草原植被与土壤的耦合关系.草地学报,2006,14(1):64-65.
[23] Benoit C, Nicolass B, Francois C. A cyclical but asynchronous pattern of fine root and woody biomass production in a hard-wood forest of southern Quebec and its relationships with annual variation of temperature and nutrient availability. Plant and Soil, 2003, 250(1):49-57.
[24] 林慧龙,侯扶江,李飞. 家畜践踏对环县草原地下生物量的影响.草地学报,2008,16(2):186-190.
[25] 程云环,韩有志,王庆成,等. 落叶松人工林细根动态与土壤资源有效性关系研究.植物生态学报,2005,29(3):403-410.
[26] 梅莉,王政权,韩有志,等. 水曲柳根系生物量、比根长和根长密度的分布格局.应用生态学报,2006,17(1):1-4.
[27] 康绍忠,刘晓明,熊运章. 土壤-植物-大气连续体水分传输理论及其应用.北京:水利电力出版社,1994.
[28] 安文芝,祝玲敏,谢建军,等. 栽培甘草根系分布规律及生物量的研究.草业科学,2007,24(7):51-54.
[29] Bengough A G, Young I M. Root elongation of seedling peas through layered soil of different penetration resistances.Plant Soil, 1993, 149:129-139.
[30] Rosolem C A, Schiochet M A, Souza L S, et al. Root growth and cotton nutrition as affected by liming and soil compaction. Commun Soil Science Plant Anal, 1998, 29(1&2):169-177.
[31] Bengough A G, Mullins C E. The resistance experienced by root growing in a pressurized cell-areappraisal. Plant and Soil, 1990, 123:73-82.
[32] Bengough A G, Croser C, Pritchard J. A biophysical analysis of root growth under mechanical stress. Plant and Soil, 1997, 189: 155-164.
[33] De Freitas P L, Zobel R W, Snyder V A. Corn root growth in soil columns with artificially constructed aggregates. Crop Science, 1999,39:725-730.
[34] Yu L, Ray J D, O’Toole J C, et al. Use of wax petrolatum layer for screening rice root penetration. Crop Science, 1995, 35:684-687.
[35] Keisling T C, Batchelor J T, Porter O A. Soy bean root morphology in soils with and without tillage pans in the lower Mississippi River Valley. Journal of Plant Nutrtion, 1995, 18:373-384.
[36] Bushamuka V N, Zobel R W. Differential genotypic and root type penetration of compacted soil layers. Crop Science, 1998, 38:776-781.
[37] 刘晚苟,山仑,邓西平. 植物对土壤紧实度的反应.植物生理学通报,2001,37(3):254-258.
[38] Bengough A G, Kirby J M. Tribology of the cap in maize (Zea mays) and peas (Pisum sativum). New Phytologlist, 1999, 142:421-425.
[39] 韦兰英,上官周平. 黄土高原子午岭天然柴松林细根垂直分布特征.西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2007,35(7):71-72.
[40] 杨丽韫,罗天祥,吴松涛. 长白山原始阔叶红松(Pinus koraiensis) 林及其次生林细根生物量与垂直分布特征.生态学报,2007, 27(9):3609-3617.