放牧对克氏针茅草原植物群落与种群格局的影响

草业学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 6-13.

放牧对克氏针茅草原植物群落与种群格局的影响

赵登亮¹,刘钟龄¹,杨桂霞²,辛小平²,梁存柱^1,4*,王炜¹,王立新^3,4

1.内蒙古大学生命科学学院,内蒙古呼和浩特010021;
2.中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所,北京100081;

3.内蒙古大学环境与资源学院,内蒙古呼和浩特010021;
4.内蒙古大学中美生态、
能源与可持续性科学研究中心,内蒙古呼和浩特,010021

收稿日期:2010-02-17 出版日期:2010-03-25 发布日期:2010-06-20
作者简介:赵登亮(1979-),男,内蒙古锡林郭勒人,硕士。E-mail:zdl7993@163.com
基金资助:
现代农业产业技术体系建设专项及公益性行业(农业)科研专项(No.200903060)和国家自然科学基金项目(No.30360016,No.40861002)资助。

Grazing impact on distribution pattern of the plant communities and populations in Stipa krylovii steppe

ZHAO Deng-liang¹, LIU Zhong-ling¹, YANG Gui-xia², XIN Xiao-ping², LIANG Cun-zhu^{1, 4}, WANG Wei¹, WANG Li-xin^{3, 4}

1.College of Life Sciences of Inner Mongolia University, Hhhhot 010021, China;
2.Institute of
Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,
Beijing 100081, China;
3.College of Environment &
Resources of Inner Mongolia University,
Hhhhot 010021, China;
4.Sino-US Centerfor Conservation, Energy and Sustainability
Science of Inner Mongolia University, Hhhhot 010021, China

Received:2010-02-17 Online:2010-03-25 Published:2010-06-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在内蒙古草原区中部的克氏针茅草原,连续4年(2006-2009年)进行了夏秋季划区轮牧实验;利用摄影和地理信息系统相结合方法,研究了不同放牧强度对植物群落和种群格局的生态作用效应。摄影图像和测定数据的分析结果表明,在不同放牧实验小区形成了大小不一、结构不同的群落斑块,并显示出不同放牧强度与放牧周期的植物群落及种群斑块结构的生态梯度格局。在不放牧的围封对照小区内(G5)保持原有的克氏针茅群落斑块和羊草群落斑块,二者的斑块数量、斑块面积之比、斑块的植物组成与生物量都比较稳定;在不同放牧强度的实验小区(G1、G2、G3),群落斑块的数量、面积、种群结构、植物多度、株丛冠幅、生物量等都形成了相对应的梯度差异。不同放牧强度导致克氏针茅群落与种群斑块的不同破碎化程度和植物个体(株丛)小型化。适度放牧使得斑块结构与生物量表现出中度干扰下植物补偿性生长的效应。结果表明植物群落斑块结构与种群格局的变化是草原植物群落演替过程中种群拓殖与衰退的基本形式,也是生态演替的机制。

Abstract: A continuous period of four years (2006-2009 years) rotational grazing experiment was carried out on Stipa krylovii steppe in the central part of Inner Mongolia in the summer and autumn. With combination of photography and geographic information systems, we had studied ecological effects of grazing on the distribution pattern of plant populations and communities in different grazing intensities experimental plots. The photographic images and experimental data showed that there had formed patches with different sizes and structures in different grazing areas, also the gradient sequence of communities and population and plant production were caused by a different cycle and intensity of grazing. However, the patches in no-grazing enclosed control area(G5) were still original Ass.S. krylovii and Ass. Leymus chinensis. The percentage of the number and area of patches、the plants composition and above-ground biomass were all relatively stable in G5. In different grazing intensity experiments plots(G1、G2、G3),there formed different gradient on the number, area, population structure, plant abundance, circumference and above-ground biomas. Ass.S. krylovii and population patch become fragmentation and individual plant become miniaturization due to different grazing intensity. Moderate grazing makes the patch structure and above-ground biomass emerge in the effects of compensatory growth of plants. This study showed that the changes of plant patch structure in community and population pattern were the basic for population colonization and recession during grassland succession, and also the mechanism for the succession of grassland plant communities.

中图分类号:

赵登亮,刘钟龄,杨桂霞,辛小平,梁存柱,王炜,王立新. 放牧对克氏针茅草原植物群落与种群格局的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(3): 6-13.

ZHAO Deng-liang, LIU Zhong-ling, YANG Gui-xia, XIN Xiao-ping, LIANG Cun-zhu, WANG Wei, WANG Li-xin. Grazing impact on distribution pattern of the plant communities and populations in Stipa krylovii steppe[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(3): 6-13.

参考文献

[1] 李永宏, 汪诗平. 放牧对草原植物的影响[J]. 中国草地, 1999, (3): 11-19.
[2] Mclntyre S, Landsberg J. Disturbance response in vegetation-towards a global perspective on functional reait[J]. Jourual of Vegetation Science, 1999, 10: 621-630.
[3] Zhao L, Yang G, Liu Z, et al. Phenological complementarity does not enhance ecosystem production in undisturbed steppe community[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2007, 49(5): 582-587.
[4] Yang Y, Fang J, Ma W, et al. Soil carbon stock and its changes in northern China’s grasslands from 1980s to 2000s[J]. Global Change Biology, 2010, DOI: 10.1111/j. 1365-2486. 2009. 02123. X.
[5] 陈敏, 刘钟龄, 王炜, 等. 改良退化草地与建立人工草地的研究[M]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古人民出版社, 1998: 1-2, 11-15.
[6] 刘钟龄, 王炜, 梁存柱, 等. 内蒙古草原植被在持续牧压下退化演替的模式与诊断[J]. 草地学报, 1998, 6(4): 244-252.
[7] Niu K C, Luo Y J, Du G Z, et al. The role of biomass allocation strategy in diversify Loss due to fertilizalion[J]. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2008, 9(5): 485-493.
[8] 任海, 彭少麟, 陆宏芳. 退化生态系统恢复与恢复生态学[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(8): 1756-1764.
[9] 侯扶江,徐磊. 生态系统健康的研究历史与现状[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(6): 210-225.
[10] 任海, 邬建国, 彭少麟, 等. 生态系统健康监测与评估[J]. 热带地理, 2000, 21(3): 171-175.
[11] 王立新, 刘钟龄, 刘华民, 等. 内蒙古典型草原生态系统健康评价[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(2): 544-550.
[12] 李博. 中国北方草地退化及其防治对策[J]. 中国农业学报, 1997, 30(6): 1-9.
[13] 张自学. 二十世纪末内蒙古生态环境遥感调查研究[M]. 呼和浩特, 内蒙古人民出版社, 2001.
[14] 宝音陶格涛, 李艳梅, 杨持. 不同牧压梯度下植物群落特性的比较[J]. 草业科学, 2002, 19(2): 13-15.
[15] Liu Z, Hao D. The ecosystem conservation and sustainable development of the north steppe of China[A]. Dust-storm Formation and Comprehensive Control Measures[M]. Huhhot:Inner Mongolia People’s Publishing House, 2004: 322-345.
[16] John R, Chen J, Lu N, et al. Land cover/land use change in semi-arid Inner Mongolia: 1992-2004[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2009, 4: 501-509.
[17] Fan L, Gao Y, Bruck H, et al. Investigating the relationship between NDVI and LAI in semiarid grassland in Inner Mongolia using in-situ measurements[J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2009, 95: 151-156.
[18] Ma W, He J, Yang Y, et al. Environmental factors covary with plant diversity-productivity relationships among Chinese grassland sites[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2010, 17: 233-243.
[19] 马文红, 杨元合, 贺金生, 等. 内蒙古温带草地生物量及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 中国科学C辑(生命科学), 2008, 38(1): 84-92.
[20] 银山, 包玉海, 潘洪杰, 等. 基于遥感与GIS的内蒙古自治区土地荒漠化研究[A]. 内蒙古草原荒漠化问题及其防治对策研究[M]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古大学出版社, 2002: 78-88.
[21] 董建军, 张庆, 牛建明. 呼和浩特市土地利用变化及其景观格局和生态环境效应分析[J]. 内蒙古大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 39(4): 418-423.
[22] Ma W, Liu Z, Wang Z, et al. Climate change alters interannual variation of grassland aboveground productivity: Evidence from a 22-year measurement series in the Inner Mongolian grassland[J]. Journal of Plant Research, 2010, DOI: 10. 1007/s10265-009-0302-0.
[23] 王炜, 刘钟龄, 郝敦元. 内蒙古草原退化群落恢复演替的研究Ⅰ.退化草原的基本特征与恢复演替动力[J]. 植物生态学报, 1996, 20(5): 449-459.
[24] 王炜, 刘钟龄, 郝敦元, 内蒙古退化草原植被对禁牧的动态响应[J]. 气候与环境研究, 1997, 2(3): 237-240.
[25] Mark R T. Spatial pattern analysis in plant ecology[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999: 1-30.
[26] 许清涛, 黄宁, 巴雷, 等. 不同放牧强度下草地植物格局特征的变化[J]. 中国草地学报, 2007, 29(2): 7-12.
[27] Parsons A J, Leafe Collett B, Stiles W. The physiology of grass roduction under grazing 1. Characteristics of leaf and canopy photosynthesis of continuously grazed swards[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1983, 20: 117-126.
[28] 王仁忠. 放牧影响下羊草草地主要植物种群生态位宽度与生态位重叠的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 1997, 21(4): 304-311.
[29] 汪诗平, 王艳芬, 陈佐忠, 等. 气候变化和放牧活动对糙隐子草种群的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2003, 27(3): 337-343.
[30] 闫玉春, 唐海平. 围栏禁牧对内蒙古典型草原群落特征的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2007, 27(6): 1225-1232.
[31] 王炜, 刘钟龄, 郝敦元, 等. 内蒙古草原退化群落恢复演替的研究Ⅱ. 恢复演替时间进程的分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 1996, 20(5): 460-471.
[32] 王炜, 梁存柱, 刘钟龄, 等. 内蒙古草原退化群落恢复演替的研究Ⅳ. 演替过程中植物种群动态的分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 1999, 13(4): 44-55.