乳酸菌制剂对不同比例苜蓿和披碱草混贮发酵品质的影响

草业学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4): 94-100.

乳酸菌制剂对不同比例苜蓿和披碱草混贮发酵品质的影响

王昆昆¹,玉柱^2*,邵涛¹,刘平督¹

1.南京农业大学动物科技学院,江苏南京 210095;
2.中国农业大学草地研究所,北京 100094

收稿日期:2009-06-25 出版日期:2010-08-20 发布日期:2010-08-20
作者简介:王昆昆(1984-),男,河南济源人,硕士
基金资助:
国家牧草产业技术体系,公益性行业科研专项(nyhyzx07-022),农业部“引进国际先进农业科学技术” 项目(2010-C15),国家“十一五”支撑项目(2006BAD16B03-04)和国家“十一五”支撑项目(2006BAD04A04-06-06)资助

Effects of lactobacillus on fermentation quality of mixed silage of Medicago sativa and Elymus dahuricus

WANG Kun-kun¹, YU Zhu², SHAO Tao¹, LIU Ping-du¹

1.College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China;

2.Institute of Grassland Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China

Received:2009-06-25 Online:2010-08-20 Published:2010-08-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 试验旨在研究不同乳酸菌制剂添加量(lactobacillus)对不同比例苜蓿和披碱草45d混贮发酵品质的影响。结果表明,添加剂对苜蓿和披碱草青贮的发酵品质有显著影响(P<0.05);除了70∶30混贮比例外,其他混贮比例都改善了青贮的发酵品质,其中以30∶70混贮比例效果最好;添加剂和混贮比例对青贮的发酵品质有交互作用;综合各项指标,在各个混贮比例中,都以添加0.0250%的乳酸菌制剂效果最好,pH值降得最低,氨态氮含量生成最少,青贮V-Score得分最高。

Abstract: Fresh Medicago sativa and Elymus dahuricus in different ratios were made into silages to study the effects of lactobacillus on fermentation quality of mixed silages after 45 days. The fermentation quality of M. sativa and E. dahuricus silages were significantly (P<0.05) affected by additives. All bi-crop ratios except the 70∶30 ratio improved the fermentation quality of silages with a 30∶70 ratio the best treatment. There were interactions between the additives and bi-crop rations. For the lowest pH and ammonia-N contents and the highest V-score, the treatment with 0.025% lactobacillus was the best in all crop ratios.

中图分类号:

S816.6

王昆昆,玉柱,邵涛,刘平督. 乳酸菌制剂对不同比例苜蓿和披碱草混贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(4): 94-100.

WANG Kun-kun, YU Zhu, SHAO Tao, LIU Ping-du. Effects of lactobacillus on fermentation quality of mixed silage of Medicago sativa and Elymus dahuricus[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(4): 94-100.

参考文献

[1] Mcdonald P, Henderson A R, Herson S J. The Biochemistry of Silage[M]. Marlow, Berkshire, Great Britain: Chalcombe Publications, 1991.
[2] 戚志强, 玉永雄, 胡跃高, 等. 当前我国苜蓿产业发展的形势与任务[J]. 草业学报, 2008, 17(1): 107-113.
[3] 薛艳林, 孙杰, 聂明达, 等. 苜蓿草渣与小麦秸混贮发酵品质的研究[J]. 中国饲料, 2008, (2): 42-44.
[4] 张英俊, 玉柱, 罗海岭, 等. 葛藤玉米混合青贮品质研究[J]. 动物生产, 2006, (23): 57-58.
[5] 韩立英, 玉柱. 3种乳酸菌制剂对苜蓿和羊草的青贮效果[J]. 草业科学, 2009, 26(2): 66-71.
[6] 张磊, 邵涛. 添加乙醇对象草青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(2): 52-59.
[7] 刘秦华, 范传广, 张建国, 等. 切短与添加物对臂形草青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(1): 51-56.
[8] Kizilsimsek M, Schmidt R J, Kung L J. Effects of a mixture of lactic acid bacteria applied as a freeze-dried or fresh culture on the fermentation of alfalfa silage[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2007, 90: 5698-5705.
[9] Hristov A N, McAllister T A. Effect of inoculants on whole-crop barley silage fermentation and dry matter disappearance in situ[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2002, 80: 510-516.
[10] 杨胜. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 1999: 16-27.
[11] Koehler L H. Differentiation of carbohydrate by anthrone reaction rate and colour intensity[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 1952, 24: 1576-1579.
[12] Krishnamoorthy U, Muscato T V, Sniffen C J, et al. Nitrogen fractions in selected feedstuffs[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1982, 65: 217-225.
[13] Playne M J, McDonald P. The buffering constituents of herbage and silage[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1966, 17: 264-268.
[14] Han K J, Collins M, Vanzant E S, et al. Bale density and moisture effects on alfalfa round bale silage[J]. Crop Science, 2004, 44(3): 914-919.
[15] Cussen R F, Merry R J, Williams A P, et al. The effect of additives on the ensilage of forage of differing perennial ryegrass and white clover content[J]. Grass and Forage Science, 1995, 50: 249-258.
[16] Broderica G A, Kang J H. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1980, 33: 64-75.
[17] 孙娟娟, 玉柱, 薛艳林, 等. 添加剂对羊草青贮发酵品质和体外消化率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2007, 15(3): 238-242.
[18] Torriani S, Paummeri M, Coscial, et al. Detection and characterization of epithetic lactic acid bacteria on growing plants of maize and Lucerne[J]. Annals of Microbiological Enzimol, 1992, 42: 49-59.
[19] Lin C, Bolsen K K, Brent B E, et al. Epiphytic lactic acid bacteria succession during the pre-ensiling and ensiling periods of alfalfa and maize[J]. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 1992, 75: 375-387.
[20] Cai Y, Kumai S. The proportion of enterococcus species isolated from forage crops and their influence on silage fermentation[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1994, 82: 2466-2471.
[21] 熊井清雄, 廖芷, 福见良平. 乳酸菌制剂对青贮饲料发酵品质的改善效果[J]. 中国农业科学, 1995, (2): 58-63.
[22] Jaster E H. Complex interactions from inoculants, enzymes explored[J]. Feedstuffs, 1994, 66: 13-27.
[23] 侯俊财, 刘飞, 杨丽杰, 等. 添加乳酸菌对全株玉米青贮饲料品质的影响[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2006, (2): 50-52.