不同覆盖物对无芒隐子草建植的影响

草业学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3): 287-291.

不同覆盖物对无芒隐子草建植的影响

邰建辉^1,3,王彦荣^1*,李晓霞²,魏学¹,陈谷³

1.兰州大学草地农业科技学院,甘肃兰州 730020;
2.中国科学院植物研究所,北京 100093;
3.百绿集团,北京 100025

收稿日期:2010-04-26 出版日期:2011-03-25 发布日期:2011-06-20
通讯作者: E-mail:yrwang@lzu.edu.cn
作者简介:邰建辉(1981-),男,陕西凤翔人,硕士。E-mail:timothy@barenbrug.com.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2007CB108904)资助。

Effects of different mulching on the establishment of Cleistogenes songorica

TAI Jian-hui^1,3, WANG Yan-rong¹, LI Xiao-xia², WEI Xue¹, CHEN Gu³

1.College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China;
2.Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China;
3.Barenbrug Group, Beijing 100025, China

Received:2010-04-26 Online:2011-03-25 Published:2011-06-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 覆盖物处理对无芒隐子草建植的影响因土壤干旱条件不同而异,在非干旱条件下(隔5 d灌溉),各处理对建植率的影响差异不显著。但在干旱条件下(隔15 d灌溉),沙覆盖的建植率(40.7%)显著高于其他处理;地膜覆盖(23.6%)与对照(22.2%)无显著差异,但显著高于稻草覆盖(15.9%)。2种灌溉条件下,沙覆盖处理的株高、叶片数、分蘖数、叶面积和地上生物量等都显著高于其他处理和对照。

Abstract: Effects of different mulching on the seedling establishment of Cleistogenes songorica varied with soil water conditions. The mulches showed no effects on seedling establishment when the plants were irrigated every 5 days, but it significantly affected seedling survival rate when the plants were irrigated every 15 days. At 15-day interval irrigation, the seedling establishment rate was the highest (40.7%) under sand mulching and was the lowest (15.9%) under straw mulching. The seedling establishment rate under film mulching (23.6%) was not significantly different from that of the control (22.2%), but was significantly greater than that under straw mulching (15.9%). The plant heights, leaf numbers, tiller numbers, leaf areas and aboveground biomasses under sand mulching were significantly greater than those under other treatments.

中图分类号:

S688.4

邰建辉,王彦荣,李晓霞,魏学,陈谷. 不同覆盖物对无芒隐子草建植的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(3): 287-291.

TAI Jian-hui, WANG Yan-rong, LI Xiao-xia, WEI Xue, CHEN Gu. Effects of different mulching on the establishment of Cleistogenes songorica[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(3): 287-291.

参考文献

[1] Yang Y M, Liu X J, Li W Q, et al. Effect of different mulch materials on winter wheat production in desalinized soil in Heilonggang region of North China[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2006, 7(11): 858-867.
[2] 田娜, 张蕾, 江海东. 保水剂对垂盆草建植和生理代谢的影响[J].草业科学, 2009, 26(2): 120-123.
[3] Li X Y, Gong J D, Gao Q Z, et al. Incorporation of ridge and furrow method of rainfall harvesting with mulching for crop production under semiarid region of China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2000, 228(3-4): 165-173.
[4] Li X J, Zhang Z G, Li Y C. Effects of straw mulch on water status in saline soil[J]. Journal of Soil Science, 2000, 30(4): 176-177.
[5] Unger P W, Role of mulches in dryland agriculture[A]. In: Gupta U S. Crop Physiology[M]. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, 1975: 237-260.
[6] Wicks G A, Crutchfield D A, Burnside O C. Influence of wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw mulch and metolachlor on corn (Zea mays) growth and yield[J]. Weed Science, 1994, 42: 141-147.
[7] Chen S Y, Zhang X Y, Liu M Y. Soil temperature and soil water dynamics in wheat field mulched with maize straw[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2002, 23(4): 34-37.
[8] 郇庚年. 甘肃张掖主要野生草坪植物[J]. 草业科学, 1989, 6(5): 60-64.
[9] 邰建辉, 王彦荣, 陈谷. 无芒隐子草种子萌发、出苗和幼苗生长对土壤水分的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2008, 17(3): 105-110.
[10] 鱼小军, 王彦荣, 曾彦军, 等. 温度和水分对无芒隐子草和条叶车前种子萌发的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(5): 883-887.
[11] 魏学, 王彦荣, 胡小文, 等. 无芒隐子草不同节间部位的种子休眠对高温处理的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(6): 169-173.
[12] 黄文达, 王彦荣, 胡小文. 三种荒漠植物种子萌发的水热响应[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(3): 171-177.
[13] 蒋小军, 周政华. 不同覆盖物对种子直播建植草坪的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2003, 20(8): 60-61.
[14] Dong Z Y, Qian B F. Field investigation on effects of wheat-straw/corn-stalk mulch on ecological environment of upland crop farmland[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2002, 3(2): 209-215.
[15] Tolk J A, Howell T A, Evett S R. Effect of mulch, irrigation, and soil type on water use and yield of maize[J]. Soil Tillage Research, 1999, 50(2): 137-147.