物种多样性和生物量分布规律对冻土活动层埋深变化的响应

草业学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (1): 10-17.

物种多样性和生物量分布规律对冻土活动层埋深变化的响应

王增如^1,2,杨国靖³,何晓波³,叶柏生^1*

1.中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所冰冻圈科学国家重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730000;
2.中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所沙坡头沙漠试验研究站,甘肃兰州730000;
3.中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所寒旱区水文与水土资源研究室,甘肃兰州 730000

出版日期:2012-02-20 发布日期:2012-02-20
通讯作者: E-mail: yebs@lzb.ac.cn
作者简介:王增如(1981-),男,河北邯郸人,博士。
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2007CB411502),中国科学院知识创新项目(KZCX2-YW-QN310),中国科学院战略性先导科技专项－应对气候变化的碳收支认证及相关问题(XDA05050306)和国家自然科学基金(40741001,11005052)资助。

Response of distribution patterns of plant species diversity and biomass to permafrost changes

WANG Zeng-ru^1,2, YANG Guo-jing³, HE Xiao-bo³, YE Bai-sheng¹

1.State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Sciences, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2. Shapotou Desert Research and Experiment Station, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;
3..Division of Hydrology Water-Land Resources in Cold and Arid Regions, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China

Online:2012-02-20 Published:2012-02-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 全球变化背景下,冻土环境变化对地上植被的影响是近年来倍受关注的重大科学问题。鉴于此,在长江源区冬克玛底流域分析了植物物种多样性和生物量空间分布规律及其对冻土活动层埋深变化的响应。结果表明, 1)地上植被的物种多样性指数随着冻土活动层埋深的增加表现出非单调性递减;在冻土活动层埋深约2 m时,物种多样性指数较高(Patrick指数、Shannon-Wiener指数和Simpson指数分别为:26.43±3.31,2.06±0.38和0.83±0.08)。2)生物量的垂直分布规律整体表现出地下生物量明显高于地上生物量,地下生物量占总生物量的63%~96%。3)地上生物量和地下生物量与活动层埋深均具有显著的相关性(R²=0.65,P<0.01; R²=0.79, P<0.01),随着活动层埋深的增加呈现出明显下降趋势。4)活动层埋深对0~40 cm深度的地下生物量的垂直分布具有显著影响。活动层埋深约1 m时,地下生物量垂直变化很小;活动层埋深大于1.5 m时,呈倒金字塔形分布;活动层埋深大于3 m时,10~40 cm深度的地下生物量占总地下生物量的比例随着活动层埋深(3.11~4.81 m)的增加而增加。

Abstract: With a background of global climate warming, the effects of permafrost changes on aboveground vegetation have attracted much attention. The effects of permafrost changes on distribution patterns of plant species diversities and biomass in the Dongkemadi River Basin (head water of Yangtze River) were investigated. 1) Species diversity indexes non-monotonically decreased as the depth of the permafrost active layer increased, and the maximal values of species diversity indexes occurred at about 2 m depth of the permafrost active layer (the Partrick index, Shannon-Wiener index and Simpson index are respectively 26.43±3.31, 2.06±0.38 and 0.83±0.08). 2) In terms of the vertical distribution of biomass, underground biomass was considerably larger than aboveground biomass, underground biomass occupied 63%-96% of the total biomass. 3) There was a significant correlation between biomass and depth of the permafrost active layer (R²=0.65, P<0.01 for aboveground biomass and R²=0.79, P<0.01 for underground biomass), and both aboveground and underground biomasses decreased as the depth of the permafrost active layer increased. 4) The depth of the permafrost active layer had a considerable influence on the vertical distribution of underground biomass at soil depths of 0-40 cm: when the depth of the permafrost active layer was about 1 m, there was little vertical variation of underground biomass; but there was an obpyramidal pattern when the depth of permafrost active layer was larger than 1.5 m. When the depth of this layer was larger than 3 m, the ratio of underground biomass with soil depths of 10-40 cm to total underground biomass increased as the depth of the permafrost active layer increased.

中图分类号:

Q948.1
S314

王增如,杨国靖,何晓波,叶柏生. 物种多样性和生物量分布规律对冻土活动层埋深变化的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(1): 10-17.

WANG Zeng-ru, YANG Guo-jing, HE Xiao-bo, YE Bai-sheng . Response of distribution patterns of plant species diversity and biomass to permafrost changes[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(1): 10-17.

参考文献

Wang G X, Li S N, Hu H C, et al. Water regime shifts in the active soil layer of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau permafrost region, under different levels of vegetation. Geoderma, 2009, 149(3-4): 280-289.
Jorgenson M T, Racine C H, Walters J C, et al. Permafrost degradation and ecological changes associated with a warming climate in central Alaska. Climatic Change, 2001, 48(4): 551-579.
Boer G J, Flato G, Reader M C, et al. A transient climate change simulation with greenhouse gas and aerosol forcing: experimental design and comparison with the instrumental record for the twentieth century. Climate Dynamics, 2000, 16(6): 405-425.
Johns T C, Carnell R E, Crossley J F, et al. The second Hadley Centre coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM: Model description, spinup and validation. Climate Dynamics, 1997, 13(2): 103-134.
Osterkamp T E, Jorgenson M T, Schuur E, et al. Physical and ecological changes associated with warming permafrost and thermokarst in interior Alaska. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 2009, 20(3): 235-256.
Osterkamp T E. Establishing long-term permafrost observatories for active-layer and permafrost investigations in Alaska: 1977-2002. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 2003, 14(4): 331-342.
Christensen T R, Johansson T R, Akerman H J, et al. Thawing sub-arctic permafrost: Effects on vegetation and methane emissions. Geophysical Research Letters, 2004, 31(4): 501-504.
Hinzman L D, Goering D J, Kane D L. A distributed thermal model for calculating soil temperature profiles and depth of thaw in permafrost regions. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1998, 103(D22): 28975-28991.
Camill P. Peat accumulation and succession following permafrost thaw in the boreal peatlands of Manitoba, Canada. Ecoscience, 1999, 6(4): 592-602.
Kokelj S V, Zajdlik B, Thompson M S. The impacts of thawing permafrost on the chemistry of lakes across the subarctic boreal-Tundra Transition, Mackenzie Delta Region, Canada. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 2009, 20(2): 185-199.
Kokfelt U, Rosen P, Schoning K, et al. Ecosystem responses to increased precipitation and permafrost decay in subarctic Sweden inferred from peat and lake sediments. Global Change Biology, 2009, 15(7): 1652-1663.
Schuur E, Crummer K G, Vogel J G, et al. Plant species composition and productivity following permafrost thaw and thermokarst in alaskan tundra. Ecosystems, 2007, 10(2): 280-292.
Bhiry N, Payette S, Robert E C. Peatland development at the arctic tree line (Quebec, Canada) influenced by flooding and permafrost. Quaternary Research, 2007, 67(3): 426-437.
Kemper J T, Macdonald S E. Effects of contemporary winter seismic exploration on low arctic plant communities and permafrost. Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research, 2009, 41(2): 228-237.
Lloyd A H, Yoshikawa K, Fastie C L, et al. Effects of permafrost degradation on woody vegetation at arctic treeline on the Seward Peninsula, Alaska. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 2003, 14(2): 93-101.
Wania R, Ross I, Prentice I C. Integrating peatlands and permafrost into a dynamic global vegetation model: 1. Evaluation and sensitivity of physical land surface processes. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2009, 23(3): 1-19.
Bakalin V A, Vetrova V P. Vegetation-permafrost relationships in the zone of sporadic permafrost distribution in the Kamchatka Peninsula. Russian Journal of Ecology, 2008, 39(5): 318-326.
Nguyen T N, Burn C R, King D J, et al. Estimating the extent of near-surface permafrost using remote sensing, mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 2009, 20(2): 141-153.
Sannel A, Kuhry P. Long-term stability of permafrost in subarctic peat plateaus, west-central Canada. Holocene, 2008, 18(4): 589-601.
Wu Q B, Li X, Li W J. The prediction of permafrost change along the Qinghai-Tibet Highway, China. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 2000, 11(4): 371-376.
周幼吾,郭东信,邱国庆,等. 中国冻土. 北京:科学出版社, 2000.
马克平,黄建辉. 北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性的研究:Ⅱ丰富度,均匀度和物种多样性. 生态学报, 1995, 15(3): 268-277.
Trakhtenbrot A, Kadmon R. Effectiveness of environmental cluster analysis in representing regional species diversity. Conservation Biology, 2006, 20(4): 1087-1098.
Araujo M B, Humphries C J, Densham P J, et al. Would environmental diversity be a good surrogate for species diversity. Ecography, 2001, 24(1): 103-110.
Davies R G, Orme C, Webster A J, et al. Environmental predictors of global parrot (Aves: Psittaciformes) species richness and phylogenetic diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2007, 16(2): 220-233.
Keller A, Rodel M O, Linsenmair K E, et al. The importance of environmental heterogeneity for species diversity and assemblage structure in Bornean stream frogs. Journal of Animal Ecology, 2009, 78(2): 305-314.
韩龙, 郭彦军, 韩建国, 等. 不同刈割强度下羊草草甸草原生物量与植物群落多样性研究. 草业学报, 2010, 19(3): 70-75.
呼格吉勒图, 杨劼, 宝音陶格涛, 等. 不同干扰对典型草原群落物种多样性和生物量的影响. 草业学报, 2009, 18(3): 6-11.
Levin L A, Etter R J, Rex M A, et al. Environmental influences on regional deep-sea species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2001, 32: 51-93.
Dai Y C, Yang Z L, Cui B K, et al. Species diversity and utilization of medicinal mushrooms and fungi in China. International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms, 2009, 11(3): 287-302.
Nagaike T. A review of ecological studies on the effects of forest management on plant species diversity. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 2002, 52(1): 35-54.
Orlov N L, Sang N N, Cuc H T. Description of a new species and new records of Rhacophorus genus (Amphibia: Anura: Rhacophoridae) with a review of amphibians and reptiles diversity of Ghu Yang Sin National Park (Dac Lac Province, Vietnam). Russian Journal of Herpetology, 2008, 15(1): 67-84.
Li L, Zeng D. Relationships between species diversity and ecosystem functioning: A review. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2008, 27(11): 2010-2017.
汪殿蓓, 暨淑仪, 陈飞鹏. 植物群落物种多样性研究综述. 生态学杂志, 2001, 20(4): 55-60.
江小雷, 岳静, 张卫国, 等. 生物多样性, 生态系统功能与时空尺度. 草业学报, 2010, 19(1): 219-225.
李英年, 关定国, 赵亮, 等. 海北高寒草甸的季节冻土及在植被生产力形成过程中的作用. 冰川冻土, 2005, (3): 311-318.
王长庭, 曹广民, 王启兰, 等. 青藏高原高寒草甸植物群落物种组成和生物量沿环境梯度的变化. 中国科学(C辑:生命科学), 2007, (5): 585-592.

[1]	王大为,赵军,韩涛,李丽丽. 基于CSCS的黑河上游潜在植被NPP及其水热关系研究[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(6): 11-19.
[2]	胡澍,焦菊英,杜华栋,苗芳. 黄土丘陵沟壑区不同立地环境下植物的抗氧化特性[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(5): 1-12.
[3]	杨菁,谢应忠,吴旭东,徐坤. 不同种植年限人工苜蓿草地植物和土壤化学计量特征[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(2): 340-345.
[4]	王喜勇,高蕊,周晓青,魏岩. 角果藜的结实格局及地下散布单位的入土机制[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(2): 352-357.
[5]	张志达，于应文，花立民，蒲训，王虎成，梁天刚. 甘肃省野生维管植物多样性分布格局分析[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(1): 22-30.
[6]	刘庆超,刘庆华,马宗骧,王奎玲. 三桠乌药耐阴性研究[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(6): 93-99.
[7]	肖绪培,宋乃平,谢腾腾,方楷. 荒漠草原区围封草地群落特征及其形成机制[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(6): 321-327.
[8]	李玉洁,李刚,宋晓龙,赵建宁,修伟明,杨殿林. 休牧对贝加尔针茅草原土壤微生物群落功能多样性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(6): 21-30.
[9]	高凯,朱铁霞,韩国栋. 围封年限对内蒙古羊草-针茅典型草原植物功能群及其多样性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(6): 39-45.
[10]	秦川,何丙辉,刘永鑫,李天阳,严丽,马希武. 生物埂护坡上黄花根系分布特征及其对土壤养分的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(5): 256-264.
[11]	王志伟,史健宗,岳广阳,赵林,南卓铜,吴晓东,乔永平,吴通华,邹德福. 玉树地区融合决策树方法的面向对象植被分类[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(5): 62-71.
[12]	郝婧,张婕,张沛沛,郭东罡,王丽媛,上官铁梁,黄汉富,宋向阳. 煤矸石场植被自然恢复初期草本植物生物量研究[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(4): 51-60.
[13]	高晓星,满百膺,陈秀蓉,杨成德. 东祁连山线叶嵩草内生细菌X4的产吲哚乙酸、解磷、抗菌和耐盐特性研究及分子鉴定[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(4): 137-146.
[14]	肖亮,蒋建雄,易自力,艾辛,覃静萍,刘树玲,陈智勇,林聪. 广西省芒野生居群表型多样性研究[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(4): 43-50.
[15]	张存厚,王明玖,张立,杨丽萍. 呼伦贝尔草甸草原地上净初级生产力对气候变化响应的模拟[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(3): 41-.