高寒草甸恢复演替过程中生产力与植物功能特征关系的研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究选择甘肃省玛曲县阿孜牧场高寒草甸,利用空间序列代替时间序列的方法,分别于同质高寒草甸内选择弃耕后恢复1,3,7,10,15年的5个演替梯度的草地各0.5 hm²,于每梯度样地内选5个0.5 m×0.5 m的样方,分别于2010年5月(牧草萌发期)和8月底(生物量高峰期)分种测定植物高度、盖度、密度和生物量。同时按照生物量比率理论,测定样方中生物量之和达80%的优势物种的株高、相对生长率、叶面积、叶鲜重等,就高寒草甸恢复演替过程中生态系统初级生产力与4种涉及养分获取及养分利用且简单易测的植物功能特征(植株高度、相对生长率、比叶面积和叶干物质含量)的关系进行了研究。结果表明, 植株高度(y=-12.299x+410.3, R²=0.678 2, P<0.001)、相对生长率 (y=-0.022 9x+0.624 7, R²=0.699 2, P<0.001)、以及比叶面积(y=-61.171x+2 756.5, R²=0.595 6, P<0.001)等功能特征均与演替时间呈显著负相关关系,叶干物质含量与演替时间呈显著的正相关关系(y=0.170 5x+0.106 3, R²=0.506 5, P<0.001)。地上净初级生产力也与演替时间呈显著负相关关系(y=-0.228x+7.386 7, R²=0.495 4, P<0.01)。同时, 地上净初级生产力与株高(y=0.014 7x+0.942 6, R²=0.457 5, P<0.01)、相对生长率(y=8.695 4x+1.869 9, R²=0.519 1, P<0.001)和比叶面积(y=0.002 4x+0.942 6, R²=0.361 7, P<0.01)间呈显著正相关关系,与叶干物质含量的相关性不显著(y=-0.435 5x+6.797, R²=0.101 5, P>0.05)。此结果证明,植株高度、相对生长率、比叶面积等功能特征对高寒草甸生态系统生产力响应演替变化具有一定的指示意义。在高寒草地生态系统管理和利用中, 可将此特征作为预测草地系统功能响应环境变化的参考依据。

Abstract: Using a spatial sequence approach instead of a temporal one, plant functional traits and aboveground primary productivity were investigated along successive recovery stages in an alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. The functional traits, including plant height, relative growth rate, special leaf area, leaf dry mass content, and total biomass of dominant plant species at the individual and community levels were measured at recovery succession stages of 1, 3, 7, 10, and 15 years. The recovery succession significantly reduced the value of plant functional traits such as plant height, relative growth rate and special leaf area, but increased the value of leaf dry mass content (y=0.170 5x+0.106 3, R²=0.506 5, P<0.001). There were negative relationships between plant height (y=-12.299x+410.3, R²=0.678 2, P<0.001), relative growth rate (y=-0.022 9x+0.624 7, R²=0.699 2, P<0.001), special leaf area (y=-61.171x+2 756.5, R²=0.595 6, P<0.001) and succession stage, but a positive relationship between leaf dry mass content (y=0.170 5x+0.106 3, R²=0.506 5, P<0.001) and succession stage. A negative relationship also emerged between above-ground net primary productivity (ANPP) and succession stage (y=-0.228x+7.386 7, R²=0.495 4, P<0.01). Plant height (y=0.014 7x+0.942 6, R²=0.457 5, P<0.01), relative growth rate (y=8.695 4x+1.869 9, R²=0.519 1, P<0.001) and special leaf area (y=0.002 4x+0.942 6, R²=0.361 7, P<0.01) all had significantly positive effects on ANPP, while leaf dry mass content had no significant effect on ANPP (y=-0.435 5x+6.797, R²=0.101 5, P>0.05). The plant height, relative growth rate and special leaf area could be used as predicting traits for ecosystem productivity response to succession in the alpine meadow. In the management and utilization of alpine meadow ecosystems, these three functional traits could be used to describe and predict ecosystem function response to environmental changes.

中图分类号:

S812

张灵菲,魏斌,葛庆征,郝敏,傅华,张卫国,江小雷. 高寒草甸恢复演替过程中生产力与植物功能特征关系的研究[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(6): 235-241.

ZHANG Ling-fei, WEI Bin, GE Qing-zheng, HAO Ming, FU Hua, ZHANG Wei-guo, JIANG Xiao-lei. Relationship between productivity and plant functional traits along successive recovery stages in an alpine meadow[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(6): 235-241.

参考文献

[1] Chapin F S III. Effects of plant traits on ecosystem and regional processes: a conceptural framework for prediction the consequences of global change[J]. Annals of Botany, 2003, 91(4): 455-463.
[2] Diaz S, Hodgson J G, Thompson K, et al. The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2004, 15(3): 295-304.
[3] Hooper D U, Chapin F S III, Ewel J J, et al. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge[J]. Ecological Monographs, 2005, 75(1): 3-35.
[4] Craine J M, Tilman D, Weding D, et al. Functional traits, productivity and effects on nitrogen cycling of 33 grassland species[J]. Functional Ecology, 2002, 16(5): 563-574.
[5] Díaz S, Cabido M. Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2001, 16(11): 646-655.
[6] Garnier E, Cortez J, Billès G, et al. Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession[J]. Ecology, 2004, 85(9): 2630-2637.
[7] Jiang X L, Zhang W G, Wang G. Effects of different components of diversity on productivity in artificial plant communities[J]. Ecological Research, 2007, 22(4): 629-634.
[8] Díaz S, Lavorel S, McIntyre S, et al. Plant trait responses to grazing - A global synthesis[J]. Global Change Biology, 2006, (13): 12, 1-29.
[9] Lavorel S, Garnier E. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail[J]. Functional Ecology, 2002, 16: 545-556.
[10] Grime J P. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects[J]. Journal of Ecology, 1998, 86(6): 902-906.
[11] Chapin F S III, Matson P A, Mooney H A. Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology[M]. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag, 2002.
[12] Grime J P. Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties[M]. UK: John Wiley and Sons Chichester, 2001.
[13] Westoby M, Falster D S, Moles A T, et al. Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species[J]. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2002, 33(1): 125-159.
[14] Garnier E, Shipley B, Roumet C, et al. A standardized protocol for the determination of specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content[J]. Functional Ecology, 2001, 15(5): 688-695.
[15] Hunt R. Plant Growth Analysis[M]. London, UK: Arnold, 1978.
[16] Eviner V T III, Chapin F S. Functional matrix: a conceptual framework for predicting multiple plant effects on ecosystem processes[J]. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2003, 34(3): 455-485.
[17] Vile D, Shipley B, Garnier E. Ecosystem productivity can be predicted from potential relative growth rate and species abundance[J]. Ecology Letters, 2006, 9(9): 1061-1067.
[18] 宋晓谕, 张仁懿, 李新娥, 等. 甘南亚高山草甸弃耕演替过程中的物种多样性与生产力变化模式及相互关系研究[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(6): 1-8.
[19] 韩立辉, 尚占环, 任国华, 等. 青藏高原“黑土滩"退化草地植物和土壤对秃斑面积变化的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(1): 1-6.
[20] Gleeson S K, Tilman D. Plant allocation, growth rate and successional status[J]. Functional Ecology, 1994, 8(4): 543-550.
[21] Reich P B, Ellsworth D S. Leaf carbon and nutrient assimilation and conservation in species of differing successional status in an oligotrophic Amazonian forest[J]. Functional Ecology, 1995, 9(1): 65-76.
[22] Garnier E, Bellmann G L A, Debain S, et al. Consistency of species ranking based on functional leaf traits[J]. New Phytologist, 2001, 152: 69-83.
[23] McNaughton S J, Oesterheld M, Frank D A, et al. Ecosystem-level patterns of primary productivity and herbivory in terrestrial habitats[J]. Nature, 1989, 341: 142-144.
[24] Garnier E, Lavorel S, Ansquer P, et al. Assessing the effects of land-use change on plant traits, communities and ecosystem functioning in grasslands: A standardized methodology and lessons from an application to 11 European sites[J]. Annals of Botany, 2007, 99(5): 967-985.
[25] 王长庭, 龙瑞军, 王根绪, 等. 高寒草甸群落地表植被特征与土壤理化性状、土壤微生物之间的相关性研究[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(6): 25-34.
[26] Westoby M. A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme[J]. Plant and Soil, 1998, 199(2): 213-227.
[27] Westoby M, Falster D S, Moles A T, et al. Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species[J]. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2002, 33(1): 125-159.
[28] Chapin F S III, Autumn K, Pugnaire F. Evolution of suites of traits in response to environmental stress[J]. The American Naturalist, 1993, 142(suppl.): 78-92.
[29] Reich P B, Walters M B, Ellsworth D S. Leaf life-span in relation to leaf, plant, and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems[J]. Ecological Monographs, 1992, 62(3): 365-392.
[30] Vendramini F, Díaz S, Gurvich D E, et al. Leaf traits as indicators of resource-use strategy in floras with succulent species[J]. New Phytologist, 2002, 154(1): 147-157.
[31] Pontes L D, Soussana J F, Louault F, et al. Leaf traits affect the above-ground productivity and quality of pasture grasses[J]. Functional Ecology, 2007, 21(5): 844-853.