新疆三种主要草地植被类型的高光谱反射特征研究

草业学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 258-266.

新疆三种主要草地植被类型的高光谱反射特征研究

杨红飞¹,李建龙^1*,穆少杰¹,杨齐²,胡潇潇¹,金国平³,赵万羽⁴

1.南京大学生命科学学院,江苏南京 210093;
2. 中国环境监测总站,北京 100012;
3.新疆阜康市畜牧局草地站,新疆阜康 831500;
4.中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所,新疆乌鲁木齐 830011

收稿日期:2011-11-09 出版日期:2012-06-25 发布日期:2012-12-20
通讯作者: E-mail:jlli2008@nju.edu.cn
作者简介:杨红飞(1981-),男,安徽宣城人,博士。E-mail:yhfmails@gmail.com
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2010CB950702), 国家自然科学基金项目(编号:41271361) 和国家863计划专题项目(2007AA10Z231)资助。

Analysis of hyperspectral reflectance characteristics of three main grassland types in Xinjiang

YANG Hong-fei¹, LI Jian-long¹, MU Shao-jie¹, YANG Qi², HU Xiao-xiao¹, JIN Guo-ping³, ZHAO Wan-yu⁴

1.School of Life Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China;
2.Environment Monitoring of China, Beijing 100012, China;
3.Prairie Station of Animal Husbandry Bureau of Fukang City, Fukang 831500, China;
4.Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China

Received:2011-11-09 Online:2012-06-25 Published:2012-12-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究利用便携式地物光谱仪,对新疆部分天然草地类型及植物进行了实地光谱测量,分析和比较了3种草地类型的光谱反射特征。结果表明,在可见光波段,干荒漠类草甸植被,除角果黎外,其冠层反射率要低于低地山地草甸和蒿属荒漠草地。而在近红外波段,角果黎、骆驼蓬、梭梭冠层光谱反射率明显高于低地山地草甸植被和部分蒿属荒漠草甸植被。同一类型草地中,由于植被类别间的差异以及叶片内部结构的不同,冠层光谱反射率差异较大。3类草地类型不同植被的红边特征参数表现为干荒漠类草甸的梭梭红边位置最高,低地山地草甸的博洛塔绢蒿红边位置最低;蒿属荒漠类草甸的骆驼蓬的红边斜率和红边面积最大,低地山地草甸的苔草红边斜率和红边面积最小。对6种代表性的植被指数分析得出,PRI、OSAVI、MCARI指数均表现为蒿属荒漠类草甸<低地山地草甸<干荒漠类草甸。NDVI植被指数则表现为低地山地草甸最大,而干荒漠类草甸最小。GNDVI指数表现为低地山地草甸最大,蒿属荒漠类草甸最小。总之,高光谱遥感对于草地植被的分类监测和遥感反演等具有重要的意义。

Abstract: The arid desert meadow, Artemisia desert meadow, and lowland mountain meadow are three main grassland types of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China. To assist the extraction of remote sensing data and dynamic monitoring of grassland, hyperspectral reflectance spectra were measured with a portable ground object spectrometer. The reflectance spectral characteristics were analyzed for the three main grassland types that are located on the northern side of the Tianshan Mountains in Fukang city. The canopy spectral reflectance of arid desert meadow was smaller than those of Artemisia desert meadow and lowland mountain meadow in the visible wavelengths (except for Ceratocarpus arenarius) while in the near infrared wavelengths, the spectral reflectance of C. arenarius, Peganum harmala and Haloxylon ammodendron was considerably greater than those of Artemisia desert meadow and lowland mountain meadow. Because of the difference between vegetation type and internal structure of leaves, the differences of spectral reflectance between different vegetations that belong to the same type were significant in the visible and the near infrared wavelengths. The value of the red edge position of H. ammodendron of arid desert meadow was greater than those of Artemisia desert meadow and lowland mountain meadow. The value of Dλ_red and S_red of P. harmala in the Artemisia desert meadow was greater than those of arid desert meadow and lowland mountain meadow, while those of Carex liparocarpos was the smallest. PRI, OSAVI and MCARI were the greatest for arid desert meadow vegetation and the smallest for Artemisia desert meadow vegetation. NDVI was the greatest for lowland mountain meadow and the lowest for arid desert meadow. In addition, GNDVI was the greatest for lowland mountain meadow and the lowest for Artemisia desert meadow. In conclusion, hyperspectral remote sensing played a vital and significant role in monitoring grassland vegetation classification and remote sensing inversion.

中图分类号:

S812

杨红飞,李建龙,穆少杰,杨齐,胡潇潇,金国平,赵万羽. 新疆三种主要草地植被类型的高光谱反射特征研究[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(6): 258-266.

YANG Hong-fei, LI Jian-long, MU Shao-jie, YANG Qi, HU Xiao-xiao, JIN Guo-ping, ZHAO Wan-yu. Analysis of hyperspectral reflectance characteristics of three main grassland types in Xinjiang[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(6): 258-266.

参考文献

[1] 于贵瑞. 全球变化与陆地生态系统碳循环和碳蓄积[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2003: 180-210.
[2] 张凯, 郭铌, 王润元, 等. 甘肃省两种主要草地类型的光谱反射特征比较[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25: 142-148.
[3] 胡新博. 草地光谱与牧草产量的相关分析[J]. 草食家畜, 1996, (4): 43-47.
[4] 娜日苏, 苏和, 格根图, 等. 内蒙古退化草甸草原近地面光谱特征的研究[J]. 中国草地学报, 2010, 32(2): 66-70.
[5] 陈功, 王建伟. 封育条件下草地光谱反射特征及地上生物量估测[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2008, 23(4): 462-467.
[6] 刘睿, 孙九林, 张金区, 等. 中国北方草地覆被的HJ星NDVI校正研究[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(1): 189-198.
[7] 任继周, 梁天刚, 林慧龙, 等. 草地对全球气候变化的响应及其碳汇潜势研究[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(2): 1-22.
[8] 李飞, 赵军, 赵传燕, 等. 中国西北干旱区潜在植被模拟与动态变化分析[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(4): 42-50.
[9] 张娟娟, 田永超, 朱艳, 等. 不同类型土壤的光谱特征及其有机质含量预测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(9): 3154-3163.
[10] 童庆禧, 张兵, 郑兰芬. 高光谱遥感-原理、技术与应用[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.
[11] 范文义, 杜华强, 刘哲. 科尔沁沙地地物光谱数据分析[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2004, 32(2): 45-48.
[12] 邹红玉, 郑红平. 浅述植被“红边”效应及其定量分析方法[J]. 遥感信息, 2010, (4): 112-116.
[13] Huete A, Didan K, Miura T. Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 83(1-2): 195-213.
[14] Gitelson A, Merzlyak M N. Spectral reflectance changes associate with autumn senescence of Aesculus hippocastanum L. and Acer platanoides L. leaves. spectral features and relation to chlorophyll estimation[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 1994, 143(3): 286-292.
[15] Penuelas J, Filella I, Gamon J A. Assessment of photosynthetic radiation-use efficiency with spectral reflectance[J]. New Phytologist, 1995, 131(3): 291-296.
[16] Rondeaux G, Steven M, Baret F. Optimization of soil-adjusted vegetation indices[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1996, 55(2): 95-107.
[17] Gitelson A A, Kaufman Y J, Stark R, et al. Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 80(1): 76-87.
[18] Daughtry C S T, Walthall C L, Kim M S, et al. Estimating corn leaf chlorophyll concentration from leaf and canopy reflectance[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2000, 74(2): 229-239.